Title: Recursive Definitions and Structural Induction
1Recursive Definitions and Structural Induction
- CS/APMA 202
- Rosen section 3.4
- Aaron Bloomfield
2Recursion
- Recursion means defining something, such as a
function, in terms of itself - For example, let f(x) x!
- We can define f(x) as f(x) x f(x-1)
3Recursion example
- Rosen, section 3.4, question 1
- Find f(1), f(2), f(3), and f(4), where f(0) 1
- Let f(n1) f(n) 2
- f(1) f(0) 2 1 2 3
- f(2) f(1) 2 3 2 5
- f(3) f(2) 2 5 2 7
- f(4) f(3) 2 7 2 9
- Let f(n1) 3f(n)
- f(1) 3 f(0) 31 3
- f(2) 3 f(1) 33 9
- f(3) 3 f(2) 39 27
- f(4) 3 f(3) 327 81
4Recursion example
- Rosen, section 3.4, question 1
- Find f(1), f(2), f(3), and f(4), where f(0) 1
- Let f(n1) 2f(n)
- f(1) 2f(0) 21 2
- f(2) 2f(1) 22 4
- f(3) 2f(2) 24 16
- f(4) 2f(3) 216 65536
- Let f(n1) f(n)2 f(n) 1
- f(1) f(0)2 f(0) 1 12 1 1 3
- f(2) f(1)2 f(0) 1 32 3 1 13
- f(3) f(2)2 f(0) 1 132 13 1 183
- f(4) f(3)2 f(0) 1 1832 183 1 33673
5Fractals
- A fractal is a pattern that uses recursion
- The pattern itself repeats indefinitely
6Fractals
7Fibonacci sequence
- Definition of the Fibonacci sequence
- Non-recursive
- Recursive F(n) F(n-1) F(n-2)
- or F(n1) F(n) F(n-1)
- Must always specify base case(s)!
- F(1) 1, F(2) 1
- Note that some will use F(0) 1, F(1) 1
8Fibonacci sequence in Java
- long Fibonacci (int n)
- if ( (n 1) (n 2) )
- return 1
- else
- return Fibonacci (n-1) Fibonacci (n-2)
-
- long Fibonacci2 (int n)
- return (long) ((Math.pow((1.0Math.sqrt(5.0)),n)
- - Math.pow((1.0-Math.sqrt(5.0)),n)) /
- (Math.sqrt(5) Math.pow(2,n)))
-
9Recursion definition
- From The Hackers Dictionary
- recursion n. See recursion. See also tail
recursion.
10Bad recursive definitions
- Consider
- f(0) 1
- f(n) 1 f(n-2)
- What is f(1)?
- Consider
- f(0) 1
- f(n) 1f(-n)
- What is f(1)?
11Defining sets via recursion
- Same two parts
- Base case (or basis step)
- Recursive step
- Example the set of positive integers
- Basis step 1 ? S
- Recursive step if x ? S, then x1 ? S
12Defining sets via recursion
- Rosen, section 3.4, question 24 give recursive
definitions for - The set of odd positive integers
- 1 ? S
- If x ? S, then x2 ? S
- The set of positive integer powers of 3
- 3 ? S
- If x ? S, then 3x ? S
- The set of polynomials with integer coefficients
- 0 ? S
- If p(x) ? S, then p(x) cxn ? S
- c ? Z, n ? Z and n 0
13Defining strings via recursion
- Terminology
- ? is the empty string
- ? is the set of all letters a, b, c, , z
- The set of letters can change depending on the
problem - We can define a set of strings ? as follows
- Base step ? ? ?
- If w ? ? and x ? ?, then wx ? ?
- Thus, ? s the set of all the possible strings
that can be generated with the alphabet - Is this countably infinite or uncountably
infinite?
14Defining strings via recursion
- Let ? 0, 1
- Thus, ? is the set of all binary numbers
- Or all binary strings
- Or all possible computer files
15String length via recursion
- How to define string length recursively?
- Basis step l(?) 0
- Recursive step l(wx) l(w) 1 if w ? ? and x
? ? - Example l(aaa)
- l(aaa) l(aa) 1
- l(aa) l(a) 1
- l(a) l() 1
- l() 0
- Result 3
16Todays demotivators
17Strings via recursion example
- Rosen, section 3.4, question 38 Give a recursive
definition for the set of string that are
palindromes - We will define set P, which is the set of all
palindromes - Basis step ? ? P
- Second basis step x ? P when x ? ?
- Recursive step xpx ? P if x ? ? and p ? P
18Strings and induction example
- This requires structural induction, which will be
covered later in this slide set
19Recursion pros
- Easy to program
- Easy to understand
20Recursion cons
- Consider the recursive Fibonacci generator
- How many recursive calls does it make?
- F(1) 1
- F(2) 1
- F(3) 3
- F(4) 5
- F(5) 9
- F(10) 109
- F(20) 13,529
- F(30) 1,664,079
- F(40) 204,668,309
- F(50) 25,172,538,049
- F(100) 708,449,696,358,523,830,149 ? 7 1020
- At 1 billion recursive calls per second
(generous), this would take over 22,000 years - But that would also take well over 1012 Gb of
memory!
21Trees
- Rooted trees
- A graph containing nodes and edges
- Cannot contain a cycle!
Cycle not allowed in a tree
22Rooted trees
- Recursive definition
- Basis step A single vertex r is a rooted tree
- Recursive step
- Let T1, T2, , Tn be rooted trees
- Form a new tree with a new root r that contains
an edge to the root of each of the trees T1, T2,
, Tn
23(Extended) Binary trees
- Recursive definition
- Basis step The empty set is an extended binary
tree - Recursive step
- Let T1, and T2 be extended binary trees
- Form a new tree with a new root r
- Form a new tree such that T1 is the left
subtree, and T2 is the right subtree
24Full binary trees
- Recursive definition
- Basis step A full binary tree consisting only of
the vertex r - Recursive step
- Let T1, and T2 be extended binary trees
- Form a new tree with a new root r
- Form a new tree T such that T1 is the left
subtree, and T2 is the right subtree - This is denoted by T T1T2
- Note the only difference between a regular binary
tree and a full one is the basis step
25Binary tree height
- h(T) denotes the height of tree T
- Recursive definition
- Basis step The height of a tree with only one
node r is 0 - Recursive step
- Let T1 and T2 be binary trees
- The binary tree T T1T2 has heighth(T) 1
max ( h(T1), h(T2) ) - This definition can be generalized to non-binary
trees
26Binary tree size
- n(T) denotes the number of vertices in tree T
- Recursive definition
- Basis step The number of vertices of an empty
tree is 0 - Basis step The number of vertices of a tree
with only one node r is 1 - Recursive step
- Let T1 and T2 be binary trees
- The number of vertices in binary tree T T1T2
isn(T) 1 n(T1) n(T2) - This definition can be generalized to non-binary
trees
27A bit of humor Computer terminology
28Recursion vs. induction
- Consider the recursive definition for factorial
- f(0) 1
- f(n) n f(n-1)
- Sort of like induction
Base case
The step
29Recursion vs. induction
- Rosen, section 3.4, example 7 (page 262)
- Consider the set of all integers that are
multiples of 3 - 3, 6, 9, 12, 15,
- x x 3k and k ? Z
- Recursive definition
- Basis step 3 ? S
- Recursive step If x ? S and y ? S, then xy ? S
30Recursion vs. induction
- Proof via induction prove that S contains all
the integers that are divisible by 3 - Let A be the set of all ints divisible by 3
- Show that S A
- Two parts
- Show that S ? A
- Let P(n) 3n ? S
- Base case P(1) 31 ? S
- By the basis step of the recursive definition
- Inductive hypothesis assume P(k) 3k ? S is
true - Inductive step show that P(k1) 3(k1) is
true - 3(k1) 3k3
- 3k ? S by the inductive hypothesis
- 3 ? S by the base case
- Thus, 3k3 ? S by the recursive definition
- Show that A ? S
- Done in the text, page 267 (not reproduced here)
31What did we just do?
- Notice what we did
- Showed the base case
- Assumed the inductive hypothesis
- For the inductive step, we
- Showed that each of the parts were in S
- The parts being 3k and 3
- Showed that since both parts were in S, by the
recursive definition, the combination of those
parts is in S - i.e., 3k3 ? S
- This is called structural induction
32Structural induction
- A more convenient form of induction for
recursively defined things - Used in conjunction with the recursive definition
- Three parts
- Basis step Show the result holds for the
elements in the basis step of the recursive
definition - Inductive hypothesis Assume that the statement
is true for some existing elements - Usually, this just means assuming the statement
is true - Recursive step Show that the recursive
definition allows the creation of a new element
using the existing elements
33End of lecture on 24 March 2005
- Although I want to start two slides back
34Tree structural induction example
- Rosen, section 3.4, question 43
- Show that n(T) 2h(T) 1
- Basis step Let T be the full binary tree of
just one node r - h(T) 0
- n(T) 1
- n(T) 2h(T) 1
- 1 20 1
- 1 1
35Tree structural induction example
- Show that n(T) 2h(T) 1
- Inductive hypothesis
- Let T1 and T2 be full binary trees
- Assume that n(T1) 2h(T1) 1 for some tree T1
- Assume that n(T2) 2h(T2) 1 for some tree T2
- Recursive step
- Let T T1 T2
- Here the operator means creating a new tree
with a root note r and subtrees T1 and T2 - New element is T
- By the definition of height and size, we know
- n(T) 1 n(T1) n(T2)
- h(T) 1 max ( h(T1), h(T2) )
- Therefore
- n(T) 1 n(T1) n(T2)
- 1 2h(T1) 1 2h(T2) 1
- 1 2max ( h(T1), h(T2) ) the sum of two
non-neg s is at least - as large as the larger of the two
- 1 2h(T)
- Thus, n(T) 2h(T) 1
36String structural induction example
- Rosen, section 3.4, question 32
- Part (a) Give the definition for ones(s), which
counts the number of ones in a bit string s - Let ? 0, 1
- Basis step ones(?) 0
- Recursive step ones(wx) ones(w) x
- Where x ? ? and w ? ?
- Note that x is a bit either 0 or 1
37String structural induction example
- Part (b) Use structural induction to prove that
ones(st) ones(s) ones(t) - Basis step t ?
- ones (s?) ones(s) ones(s)0 ones(s)
ones(?) - Inductive hypothesis Assume ones(st) ones(s)
ones(t) - Recursive step Want to show that ones(stx)
ones(s) ones(tx) - Where s, t ? ? and x ? ?
- New element is ones(stx)
- ones (stx) ones ((st)x)) by associativity
of concatenation - xones(st) by recursive definition
- x ones(s) ones(t) by inductive hypothesis
- ones(s) (x ones(t)) by commutativity and
assoc. of - ones(s) ones(tx) by recursive definition
- Proven!
38Quick survey
- I feel I understand structural induction
- Very well
- With some review, Ill be good
- Not really
- Not at all
39Human stupidity
40Induction methods compared
Weak mathematical Strong Mathematical Structural
Used for Usually formulae Usually formulae not provable via mathematical induction Only things defined via recursion
Assumption Assume P(k) Assume P(1), P(2), , P(k) Assume statement is true for some "old" elements
What to prove True for P(k1) True for P(k1) Statement is true for some "new" elements created with "old" elements
Step 1 called Base case Base case Basis step
Step 3 called Inductive step Inductive step Recursive step
41Induction types compared
- Show that F(n) lt 2n
- Where F(n) is the nth Fibonacci number
- Actually F(n) lt 20.7n, but we wont prove that
here - Fibonacci definition
- Basis step F(1) 1 and F(2) 1
- Recursive step F(n) F(n-1) F(n-2)
- Base case (or basis step) Show true for F(1) and
F(2) - F(1) 1 lt 21 2
- F(2) 1 lt 22 4
42Via weak mathematical induction
- Inductive hypothesis Assume F(k) lt 2k
- Inductive step Prove F(k1) lt 2k1
- F(k1) F(k) F(k-1)
- We know F(k) lt 2k by the inductive hypothesis
- Each term is less than the next, therefore F(k)
gt F(k-1) - Thus, F(k-1) lt F(k) lt 2k
- Therefore, F(k1) F(k) F(k-1) lt 2k 2k
2k1 - Proven!
43Via strong mathematical induction
- Inductive hypothesis Assume F(1) lt 21, F(2) lt
22, , F(k-1) lt 2k-1, F(k) lt 2k - Inductive step Prove F(k1) lt 2k1
- F(k1) F(k) F(k-1)
- We know F(k) lt 2k by the inductive hypothesis
- We know F(k-1) lt 2k-1 by the inductive hypothesis
- Therefore, F(k) F(k-1) lt 2k 2k-1 lt 2k1
- Proven!
44Via structural induction
- Inductive hypothesis Assume F(n) lt 2n
- Recursive step
- Show true for new element F(n1)
- We know F(n) lt 2n by the inductive hypothesis
- Each term is less than the next, therefore F(n)
gt F(n-1) - Thus, F(n-1) lt F(n) lt 2n
- Therefore, F(n) F(n-1) lt 2n 2n 2n1
- Proven!
45Another way via structural induction
- Inductive hypothesis Assume F(n) lt 2n and
F(n-1) lt 2n-1 - The difference here is we are using two old
elements versus one, as in the last slide - Recursive step
- Show true for new element F(n1)
- F(n1) F(n) F(n-1)
- We know F(n) lt 2n by the inductive hypothesis
- We know F(n-1) lt 2n-1 by the inductive hypothesis
- Therefore, F(n) F(n-1) lt 2k 2k-1 lt 2k1
- Proven!
46But wait!
- In this example, the structural induction proof
was essentially the same as the weak or strong
mathematical induction proof - Its hard to find an example that works well for
all of the induction types - Structural induction will work on some recursive
problems which weak or strong mathematical
induction will not - Trees, strings, etc.
47A bit of humor
48Section 3.4, question 8
- Give the recursive definition of the following
sequences - Note that many answers are possible!
- an 4n 2
- Terms 2, 6, 10, 14, 16, etc.
- a1 2
- an an-1 4
- an 1 (-1)n
- Terms 0, 2, 0, 2, 0, 2, etc.
- a1 0, a2 2
- an an-2
- an n(n1)
- Terms 2, 6, 12, 20, 30, 42, etc.
- a1 2
- an an-1 2n
- an n2
- Terms 1, 4, 9, 16, 25, 36, 49, etc.
- a1 1
- an an-1 2n - 1
49Section 3.4, question 12
- Show that f12 f22 f32 fn2 fnfn1
- Base case n 1
- f12 f1f2
- 12 11
- Inductive hypothesis Assume
- f12 f22 f32 fk2 fkfk1
- Inductive step Prove
- f12 f22 f32 fk2 fk12 fk1fk2
50Section 3.4, question 12
- Inductive hypothesis Assume
- f12 f22 f32 fk2 fkfk1
- Inductive step Prove
- f12 f22 f32 fk2 fk12 fk1fk2
- fkfk1 fk12 fk1fk2
- fkfk1 fk12 fk1 (fk fk1)
- fkfk1 fk12 fkfk1 fk12
51Section 3.4, question 13
- Show that f1 f2 f3 f2n-1 f2n
- Base case n 1
- f1 f21
- 1 1
- Inductive hypothesis Assume
- f1 f2 f3 f2k-1 f2k
- Inductive step Prove
- f1 f2 f3 f2k-1 f2(k1)-1 f2(k1)
- f1 f2 f3 f2k-1 f2k1 f2k2
52Section 3.4, question 13
- Inductive hypothesis Assume
- f1 f2 f3 f2k-1 f2k
- Inductive step Prove
- f1 f2 f3 f2k-1 f2k1 f2k2
- f2k f2k1 f2k2
- True by definition of f2k2
53Section 3.4, question 22
- Show that the set S defined by
- Basis step 1 ? S
- Recursive step s t ? S when s ? S and t ? S
- is the set of positive integers
- Z 1, 2, 3,
- Note the (somewhat recursive) definition of the
positive integers - 1 is a positive integer
- For any arbitrary n that is a positive integer,
n1 is also a positive integer - Proof by structural induction
- Basis step 1 ? S and 1 ? Z
- Inductive hypothesis Assume k ? S
- Recursive step Show k1 ? S
- k ? S by the inductive hypothesis
- 1 ? S by the base case
- k1 ? S by the recursive step of the recursive
definition above
54Section 3.4, question 35
- Give a recursive definition of the reversal of a
string - Basis step ?R ?
- Note that the superscripted R means reversal of a
string - Recursive step Consider a string w ? ?
- Rewrite w as vy where v ? ? and y ? ?
- v is the first n-1 characters in w
- y is the last character in w
- wR y(vR)
- Parentheses are for our benefit
55Quick survey
- I felt I understood the material in this slide
set - Very well
- With some review, Ill be good
- Not really
- Not at all
56Quick survey
- The pace of the lecture for this slide set was
- Fast
- About right
- A little slow
- Too slow
57Quick survey
- How interesting was the material in this slide
set? Be honest! - Wow! That was SOOOOOO cool!
- Somewhat interesting
- Rather borting
- Zzzzzzzzzzz
58Todays demotivators