Dynamic Cone Penetrometer Testing on Airport Subgrade Soils - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Dynamic Cone Penetrometer Testing on Airport Subgrade Soils

Description:

Dynamic Cone Penetrometer Testing on Airport Subgrade Soils Researcher: Michael Watts REU Sponsor: Dr. Mike Mooney What is a Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP)? – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:321
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: jwa90
Learn more at: https://coecs.ou.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Dynamic Cone Penetrometer Testing on Airport Subgrade Soils


1
Dynamic Cone Penetrometer Testing on Airport
Subgrade Soils
Researcher Michael Watts REU Sponsor Dr. Mike
Mooney
2
What is a Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP)?
8 kg. hammer drops 575 mm
Hammer hits an anvil sending the cone-tipped rod
into the soil
3
Dynamic Penetration Index (DPI)
  • A ruler is used to measure the distance rod sinks
    into the soil.
  • DCP measurements are recorded as a Dynamic
    Penetration Index (DPI)
  • DPI depth / of blows for cone-tipped rod to
    reach that depth

4
Uses of the DCP
  • Quick test for characterizing subgrade soils
  • Correlations have been developed between DPI and
    a soil strength value called the California
    Bearing Ratio (CBR)
  • CBR values are used in pavement design
  • Recent efforts have focused on developing
    correlations between DPI and Resilient Modulus
    (Mr), rather than correlations for empirical
    tests such as the CBR test

5
Purpose of Research
  • Test effectiveness of DCP as an airport subgrade
    soil profiling tool
  • To compare Mr calculations based on DCP to Mr
    calculations from a non-destructive test,
    Spectral Analysis of Surface Waves (SASW)

6
Test Methods
  • Goldsby and Seminole Airports
  • Holes drilled in asphalt using gas core-driller
  • DCP tests were performed either in the core-hole
    or in a offset hole
  • Soil was removed for lab tests using a hand auger
  • Shawnee Airport
  • Same procedures as Goldsby and Seminole, except
    SASW tests were performed prior to core-drilling
    at test sites

7
(No Transcript)
8
(No Transcript)
9
Results of DCP Testing
10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
If only REU lasted until December. . .
  • Further study could have focused on
  • Exploring further the relationship between DPI
    and soil material/water content
  • Comparing Mr calculations based on DPI to Mr
    values derived from lab tests on the same soil
  • Exploring the differences in Mr values based on
    DCP testing from Mr values based on SASW testing
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com