Environmental Variability on Acoustic Prediction Using CASS/GRAB - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 40
About This Presentation
Title:

Environmental Variability on Acoustic Prediction Using CASS/GRAB

Description:

Environmental Variability on Acoustic Prediction Using CASS/GRAB Nick A. Vares June 2002 Purpose Determine the impact of bottom type and wind variations due to ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:26
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 41
Provided by: nic1154
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Environmental Variability on Acoustic Prediction Using CASS/GRAB


1
Environmental Variability on Acoustic Prediction
Using CASS/GRAB
  • Nick A. Vares
  • June 2002

2
Purpose
  • Determine the impact of bottom type and wind
    variations due to limited data on bottom moored
    mine detection
  • Determine the significance of transducer depth on
    bottom moored mine detection

3
Relevance
  • Littoral engagement
  • Mine warfare
  • Diesel submarines
  • Unmanned Undersea Vehicles (UUVs)

4
CASS/GRAB
  • Comprehensive Acoustic Simulation System (CASS)
  • Gaussian Ray Bundle (GRAB) Eigenray model
  • Navy standard model for active and passive range
    dependent acoustic propagation, reverberation and
    signal excess
  • Frequency range 600Hz to 100 kHz

5
CASS/GRAB Model Description
  • The CASS model is the range dependent improvement
    of the Generic Sonar Model (GSM). CASS performs
    signal excess calculations.
  • The GRAB model is a subset of the CASS model and
    its main function is to compute eigenrays and
    propagation loss as inputs in the CASS signal
    excess calculations.

6
Comprehensive Acoustic Simulation System/Guassian
Ray Bundle (CASS/GRAB)
  • In the GRAB model, the travel time, source angle,
    target angle, and phase of the ray bundles are
    equal to those values for the classic ray path.
  • The main difference between the GRAB model and a
    classic ray path is that the amplitude of the
    Gaussian ray bundles is global, affecting all
    depths to some degree whereas classic ray path
    amplitudes are local. GRAB calculates amplitude
    globally by distributing the amplitudes according
    to the Gaussian equation

7
Mine Hunting Sonar
  • Generic VHF forward looking
  • CASS/GRAB input file for MIW with signal excess
    output
  • Generic bottom moored mine

8
AN/SQQ-32 Mine Hunting Sonar System
  • The CASS/GRAB Acoustic model input file used in
    this study simulates a VHF forward looking sonar,
    similar to the Acoustic Performance of the
    AN/SQQ-32.
  • The AN/SQQ-32 is the key mine hunting component
    of the U.S. Navys Mine Hunting and
    Countermeasure ships.

9
Detection Sonar and Classification Sonar Assembly
10
CASS/GRAB Input Parameters
  • Bottom depth
  • Target depth
  • Transducer depth
  • Wind speed
  • Bottom type grain size index
  • Frequency min/max
  • Self noise
  • Source level
  • Pulse length
  • Target strength/depth
  • Transmitter tilt angle
  • Surface scattering /reflection model
  • Bottom scattering /reflection model

11
Bottom Type Geoacoustic Properties
12
Bottom Type Variability
  • Muddy sand (3.0) and sandy silt (5.0)
  • Grain size index variation 1.0 in 0.5
    increments
  • 5.14 m/s, - 40, bottom 30 m, transducer 5.18 m

13
Yellow Sea Bottom Sediment Chart
  • Bottom Sediment types can vary greatly over a
    small area
  • Mud
  • Sand
  • Gravel
  • Rock

14
(No Transcript)
15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
Wind Variability
  • Muddy sand (3.0) and sandy silt (5.0)
  • Tilt angle - 40, bottom 30 m, transducer 5.18 m
  • 5.14 2.57 m/s wind

19
(No Transcript)
20
(No Transcript)
21
(No Transcript)
22
(No Transcript)
23
AN/SQQ-32 Employment
  • Variable depth high frequency sonar system
  • Sonar can be place at various positions in the
    water column to optimize the detection of either
    moored or bottom mines.

24
Transducer 5.18 m vs 25 m
  • Tilt angles 40 to 120
  • Wind 2.57 to 12.86 m/s
  • Coarse sand to silt bottoms
  • 30 m water depth

25
(No Transcript)
26
(No Transcript)
27
(No Transcript)
28
(No Transcript)
29
(No Transcript)
30
(No Transcript)
31
(No Transcript)
32
(No Transcript)
33
(No Transcript)
34
(No Transcript)
35
(No Transcript)
36
(No Transcript)
37
(No Transcript)
38
(No Transcript)
39
Conclusions
  • Bottom type and wind variability are important
    for sandy silt detections
  • Bottom type and wind data variability are on the
    order of a few decibels
  • Deep transducers provide higher signal excess for
    most detectable cases

40
Recommendations
  • Sensor improvements of a few decibels are
    significant for detection
  • Money would be better spent on sensor development
  • Employment of sensors deeper aids bottom moored
    mine detection
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com