Title: Designing the HyFlex World
1Designing the HyFlex World
- Dr. Brian Beatty
- Instructional Technologies
- San Francisco State University
- AECT 2006
2Hybrid, Flexible Courses for All Students
- Hybrid a mix of face to face and online
activities - Flexible students can choose their method of
participation weekly - All courses within the ITEC program (potentially)
- Why is this important?
3(No Transcript)
4(No Transcript)
5ITEC_at_SF State
- 150 graduate students pursuing Masters degree
- Courses
- Approx. 24 courses
- Class size ranges from 8-20
- Time slots 4-7, 7-10 PM
- All students and instructors commute from 2 to
60 miles
6(No Transcript)
7Traveling to campus for class can be
inconvenient, difficult or absolutely impossible!
8Who are SFSU students?
9(No Transcript)
10ITEC Students
- Most work full time
- Teachers and Library / Media Specialists
- Educational Software Developers
- Trainers
- Instructional Designers
- Many in career transition
- Many with families at home
11Itec_at_sfsu Helping people in education, business
and communities learn Teaching and Learning
with technology is our business!
12What is a HyFlex course?
13HyFlex Course Principles
- Learner Choice Provide meaningful alternative
participation modes and enable students to choose
between participation modes weekly (or
topically). - Equivalency Provide equivalent learning
activities in all participation modes. - Reusability Utilize artifacts from learning
activities in each participation mode as
learning objects for all students. - Accessibility Equip students with technology
skills and access to all participation modes.
Note these are universal principles - generally
applicable to all HyFlex courses.
14(No Transcript)
15Sample Week
16Standard Class Session
17Online Participation
18Sample Media Files
- Instructor Audio Listen
- Presentation with Instructor Audio View
media\801_wk10_usability.mp4 - Student Group Discussion Slides with Audio -
View media\wk2_history_itec801.mov
19(No Transcript)
20(No Transcript)
21(No Transcript)
22(No Transcript)
23Technology !_at_!
- Online delivery system (we use Moodle)
- Content Development/Presentation
- PPT, Word, Acrobat, Camtasia, Dreamweaver,
Audition, Podifier - Streaming video connection
- Client content (plugins and players)
- Web browser, PPT Viewer, MP3 player, podcast
player (iTunes), Quicktime, Acrobat Reader - Internet connection
24Creating Your HyFlex World
- Identify learning goals
- Develop instructional objectives
- Create (or gather) content
- Select instructional activities (SIO tool)
- Create (and communicate) clear instructions
- Prepare learning supports
25Questions
- How is this different than what we are already
doing? - How much more work is this for the instructor?
- for the students?
- How do students respond?
- Do students take advantage of the flexibility?
26Student Comments in-class
- I found the time interacting with the professor
and classmates to be extremely helpful. I don't
think that you can replace the value of this time
with online instruction. - I enjoyed attending class name to interact
with my classmates, especially for the peer
review and case study activities. Class time was
when questions got answered or clarification was
given. Even though we could read the info in the
textbook or handouts, the in-class sessions
seemed to be when the information ultimately got
cemented for me.
27Student Comments online
- Very useful convenient when scheduling
conflicts occurred - but added value was the fact
that you were still listening to the face-to-face
interactions from the class. - Attending class online was a valuable alternative
for me when I was otherwise unable to attend in
person. I appreciated having access to materials
online that simulated the in-class experience. - I liked the flexibility and not having to commute
to the school campus.
28Student Comments online
- A lot of writing! The online sessions were
rigorous, that's for sure. It was almost "easier"
to attend class. But on the flip side, all the
online material for class name, especially the
recorded live lectures, was very useful. There
weren't any exercises or resources that didn't
add to the learning. - Make sure an audio file compatible with the ipod
is available every week. This was one of the most
valuable offerings on ilearn. Lectures could be
listened to over and over again. I must have
listened to the instructional objectives lecture
five times to and from work that week. It was
great for review and clarification of things I
missed during the lecture.
29Survey Results (1)
- Face to face instruction was useful
- Strongly Agree - 85
- Agree 15
- Online instruction was useful
- Strongly Agree 43
- Agree 57
30Survey Results (2)
- Preference for face to face only
- Neither Agree nor Disagree - 28
- Disagree - 57
- Strongly Disagree - 14
- Preference for online only
- Disagree - 43
- Strongly Disagree - 57
31Survey Results (3)
- I prefer to choose my own blend of online and
face to face learning experiences. - Strongly Agree 29
- Agree 57
- Disagree 14
32Research?
- Do students learn more effectively? Do students
prefer to create their own blend of learning
activities? - Does a HyFlex course require more effort from the
instructor? (How much more? Where is extra effort
expended?) - Does a HyFlex course require more effort from
students? - Which courses, instructors, and students
(content, learning goals, values, etc.) are
candidates for HyFlex design?
33HyFlex _at_ SF State
- This semester 5 courses in ITEC Masters program
- Informally assessing student preferences,
instructor load, technical support requirements - Recruiting additional instructors on campus
- Spring 2006 7 courses in ITEC program, others?
- Formal assessment of participation patterns and
student performance, instructor load
34Contact
- Dr. Brian Beatty
- bjbeatty_at_sfsu.edu
- HyFlex Design (DRAFT)
- http//itec.sfsu.edu/hyflex/hyflex.pdf
- HyFlex Presentation
- http//itec.sfsu.edu/hyflex/hyflex.ppt