Lesson 4 Drilling Cost - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 41
About This Presentation
Title:

Lesson 4 Drilling Cost

Description:

Economic Procedure in above Table Also used with tungsten carbide insert bits when inserts are broken or pulled out of the matrix. Unfortunately, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:338
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 42
Provided by: Sara286
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Lesson 4 Drilling Cost


1
PETE 411 Well Drilling
  • Lesson 4 Drilling Cost Drilling Rate

2
Contents
  • The AFE
  • Drilling Cost and Bit Change
  • Factors Affecting Drilling Rate
  • Bit Weight, Rotary Speed
  • Bottom-hole Cleaning
  • Mud Properties, Solids Content
  • Hydrostatics

3
HW 2. ADE 1.12, 1.13, 1.14
Due Friday, Sept. 13, 2002
Assignments
Read ADE, Ch. 1 (All)Learn Rig Components
- Definitions
4
Before getting approval to drill a well the
Drilling Engineer must prepare an AFE- a
detailed cost estimate for the well
  • DRY
    COMPLETED
  • HOLE
  • INTANGIBLE COSTS
  • TANGIBLE COSTS
  • TOTAL COST

5
AUTHORIZATION FOR EXPENDITURE (AFE)
EXPENDITURE DRY HOLE
COMPLETED (24.5 DAYS) (32.5
DAYS)
INTANGIBLE COSTS LOCATION PREPARATION
30,000 65,000 DRILLING RIG AND
TOOLS 298,185 366,613 DRILLING
FLUIDS 113,543 116,976 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
77,896 133,785 CEMENTING 49,535
54,369 SUPPORT SERVICES 152,285 275,648
TRANSPORTATION 70,200 83,400
SUPERVISION AND ADMIN. 23,282 30,791
SUB-TOTAL 814,928
1,126,581 TANGIBLE COSTS TUBULAR
EQUIPMENT 406,101 846,529 WELL HEAD
EQUIPMENT 16,864 156,201 COMPLETION
EQUIPMENT 0 15,717 SUB-TOTAL 422
,965 1,018,447 SUB-TOTAL
1,237,893 2,145,028 CONTINGENCY
(15 ??) 1,423,577 2,466,782
6
Drilling Cost vs. Time
DEPTH ft
TD
DAYS or DOLLARS
7
Drilling Cost Analysis
  • The Drilling Engineer
  • Recommends drilling procedures that will
    safely drill and complete the well at the lowest
    cost possible
  • Makes recommendations concerning routine rig
    operations

8
The Drilling Engineer
  • Examples of routine rig operations
  • drilling fluid treatment
  • pump operation
  • bit selection
  • handling problems during the drilling process

9
The Drilling Cost Equation
Eq. 1.16
footage drilled with bit, ft/bit
Cf drilling cost, /ft Cb cost of bit,
/bit Cr fixed operating cost of rig,
/hr tb total rotating time, hrs tc total
non-rotating time, hrs tt total trip time
(round trip), hrs
10
Example 1.5
  • A recommended bit program is being prepared for a
    new well using bit performance records from
    nearby wells.
  • Drilling performance records for three bits are
    shown for a thick limestone formation at 9,000
    ft.
  • Determine which bit gives the lowest drilling
    cost if the operating cost of the rig is 400/hr,
    the trip time is 7 hours, and connection time is
    1 minute per connection.

11
Example 1.5 contd
  • Assume that each of the bits was operated at near
    the minimum cost per foot attainable for that
    bit.
  • Mean
  • Bit Rotating Connection Penetration
  • Cost Time Time
    Rate
  • Bit () (hours) (hours)
    (ft/hr)
  • A 800 14.8 0.1 13.8
  • B 4,900 57.7 0.4 12.6
  • C 4,500 95.8 0.5 10.2

Which bit would you select?
12
Solution
  • The cost per foot drilled for each bit type can
    be computed using Eq. 1.16. For Bit A, the cost
    per foot is

13
Solution
Similarly, for Bit B,
14
Solution, contd
  • Finally, for Bit C,

15
Solution, contd
  • Bit A 46.81 /ft
  • Bit B 42.56 /ft
  • Bit C 46.89 /ft
  • The lowest drilling cost was obtained using Bit
    B. - Highest bit cost but - intermediate bit
    life and ROP...

16
Drilling Costs
  • Tend to increase exponentially with depth. Thus,
    when curve-fitting drilling cost data, it is
    often convenient to assume a relationship between
    total well cost, C, and depth, D, given by
  • C aebD ..(1.17)

17
Drilling Costs, contd
C aebD
  • Constants a and b depend primarily on the well
    location.
  • Shown on the next page is a least-squares curve
    fit of the south Louisiana completed well data
    given in Table 1.7.
  • Depth range of 7,500 ft to 21,000 ft.
  • For these data,
  • a 1 X 105 dollars
  • b 2 X 10-4 ft -1.

18
Fig. 1-65. Least-square curve fit of 1978
completed well costs for wells below 7,500 ft in
the south Louisiana area.
19
Penetration Rate
  • When major variations are not present in the
    subsurface lithology, the penetration rate
    usually decreases exponentially with depth.
    Under these conditions, the penetration rate can
    be related to depth, D, by
  • where K and a2 are constants.

WHY?
20
Drilling Time
  • The drilling time, td , required to drill to a
    given depth can be obtained by separating
    variables and integrating. Separating variables
    gives

Integrating and solving for td yields
21
Drilling Time contd
  • Plotting depth vs. drilling time from past
    drilling operations
  • A. Allows more accurate prediction of time
    and cost for drilling a new well
  • B. Is used in evaluating new drilling
    procedures (designed to reduce drilling
    time to a given depth).

22
EXAMPLE - Cost per ft
  • t R D Total Cost Cf
  • hr fph ft /ft
  • 5 90 475 36,950 77.80
  • 10 80 900 47,800 53.10
  • 20 60 1,600 69,200 43.30
  • 25 50 1,875 79,750 42.50
  • 30 40 2,100 90,200 43.00
  • 35 30 2,275 100,550 44.20
  • 40 20 2,400 110,800 46.20

These cost data are plotted below.
23
Cost per ft for one entire bit run
80
70
60
Minimum Cost
50
40
24
Economic Procedure in above Table
  • Can pull bit after about 25 hr. (42.50/ft)
  • - the precise pulling time is not critical
  • Note that the cost in dollars per foot was
    43.00 after 30 hr.
  • Primarily applicable to tooth-type bits where
    wear rate is predictable.

25
Economic Procedure in above Table
  • Also used with tungsten carbide insert bits
    when inserts are broken or pulled out of the
    matrix.
  • Unfortunately, wear rate with insert bits is
    unpredictable.
  • Economically, the insert bit should be pulled
    when the cost in /ft begins to increase.

26
Economic Procedure in Table
  • Bits pulled for economic reasons make it hard
    to obtain wear information.
  • Operator might pull bit after 120 hr of use but
    part of bit might get left in hole. Recovery is
    very difficult. Avoid!
  • 75 of rock bits are pulled green or before the
    bit is worn out.

27
An increase in TORQUE may indicate that a bit
should be pulled. Experience often dictates when
to pull bit (footage or hours).
28
Factors that affect Penetration Rate
Variables
  • Type of Drill bit
  • Bit weight
  • Rotary speed
  • Bottom-hole cleaning
  • Mud properties
  • Rock hardness
  • Formation pore pressure

Fixed Factors
29
Bit Selection is based on
  • Past bit records
  • Geologic predictions of lithology
  • Drilling costs in /bit...
  • Drilling cost in /ft

30
Bit Weight and Rotary Speed
  • Increasing bit weight and rotary speed boosts
    drilling rate
  • These increases accelerate bit wear
  • Field tests show that drilling rate increases
    more or less in direct proportion to bit weight

31
40,000 lbf
Consider 10 hole (dont overdo!!)
Drilling Rate, ft/hr
Bit Weight x 1,000 lb/in
32
Dont overdo! Casing wear, bit life ...
Drilling Rate, ft/hr
Rotary Speed, RPM
33
EFFECT OF BACK PRESSURE Keep DP_bit const. 550
psi
Drilling Rate, ft/hr
34
EFFECT OF BACK PRESSURE 0 - 5,000 psi
Drilling Rate, ft/hr
Hydrostatic Pressure, 1,000s of psi
35
EFFECT OF DRILLING FLUID mud vs. gas
Drilled with mud
Depth, ft
Drilled with gas
Drilling Time, days
36
EFFECT OF DRILLING FLUID water vs. air
Depth, ft
Rotating Time, hours
37
Relative Drilling Rate,
Old style water course bits
38
EFFECT OF SOLIDS IN THE MUD
39
Hydrostatic Pressure Gradient
  • Fresh Water Pressure Gradient 0.433 psi/ft
  • Density of Fresh Water 8.33 lb/gal
  • Hydrostatic Pressure (at 12,000 ft depth)
  • with water p Gw Depth (vertical depth)
  • 0.433 psi/ft 12,000 ft
  • 5,196 psi

40
Hydrostatic Pressure
  • with 14 lb/gal mud p GM Depth

0.052 14.0 12,000 8,736 psig

(5,196 psi with water)
41
Hydrostatic Pressure Required
  • What mud weight is required to balance a pore
    pressure of 10,000 psig at a vertical depth of
    12,000 ft?

MW 16.03 lb/gal
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com