Supply Chain Management - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Supply Chain Management

Description:

Mattel had expected to ship a lot of merchandise after the weekend, but retailers, wary of excess inventory, stopped ordering from Mattel. – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:45
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 38
Provided by: manuel96
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Supply Chain Management


1
Supply Chain Management
  • Lecture 22

2
Outline
  • Today
  • Finish Chapter 12
  • Sections 1, 2, 3
  • Section 2 up to and including Example 12.2
  • Thursday
  • Homework 5 due before class
  • Start with Chapter 14
  • Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9
  • Section 6 buyback and revenue sharing contracts
    only
  • Next week
  • Guest speaker Paul Dodge
  • SVP Supply Chain, ProBuild

3
Guest Lecture
  • Date
  • Tuesday April 13
  • Speaker
  • Paul Dodge (Senior Vice President Supply Chain)
  • Subject
  • Todays Supply Chain

4
Semester Outline
  • Tuesday April 6 Chap 12
  • Thursday April 8 Chap 14
  • Tuesday April 13 Paul Dodge guest lecture
  • Thursday April 15 Chap 14, 15
  • Tuesday April 20 Chap 15
  • Thursday April 22 Simulation Game briefing
  • Tuesday April 27 Review, buffer
  • Thursday April 29 Simulation Game

5
The Newsboy/Newsvendor Problem
6
The Newsboy/Newsvendor Problem
  • Order quantity (O)
  • Uncertain demand (D)
  • Cost of overstocking (Co c s)
  • The loss incurred by a firm for each unsold unit
    at the end of the selling season
  • Cost of understocking (Cu p c)
  • The margin lost by a firm for each lost sale
    because there is no inventory on hand
  • Includes the margin lost from current as well as
    future sales if the customer does not return

7
ONeill PsychoFreak 3347
  • The too much/too little problem
  • Order too much and inventory is left over at the
    end of the season
  • Order too little and sales are lost

Submit order to Manufacturer
Selling seaon
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Receive order from Manufacturer
Discount leftovers
8
ONeill PsychoFreak 3347
  • Gather economic data
  • Selling price (p 180)
  • Procurement cost (c 110)
  • Discount price (s 90)
  • Forecast demand
  • Empirical demand distribution
  • Normal demand distribution
  • Order quantity (so as to maximize profits)

9
Example Parkas at L.L. Bean
What is the expected demand?
Expected demand ?Dipi 1,026 parkas
10
Example Parkas at L.L. Bean
What is the expected overstock?
What is the expected understock?
Expected understock ?Understockipi 111 parkas
Expected overstock ?Overstockipi 85 parkas
11
Example Parkas at L.L. Bean
Cost c 45
Price p 100
Salvage value s 40
What is the expected profit?
Expected profit ?Profitipi 49,900
12
Example Parkas at L.L. Bean
(1 CSL)(p c)
CSL(c s)
Cost of understockingp c 55
Cost of overstocking c s 5
What is the optimal order quantity?
13
Example Parkas at L.L. Bean
(1 CSL)(p c)
CSL(c s)
What is the safety stock?
Safety stock Order quantity Expected Demand
14
Optimal Level of Product Availability
  • Expected marginal contribution of raising the
    order size from O to O1 (1 CSL)(p c)
    CSL(c s)

p c p s
Cu Cu Co
CSL Prob(Demand ? O)
O F-1(CSL, ?, ?) NORMINV(CSL, ?, ?)
15
Example 12-1 Evaluating the optimal service
level for seasonal items
  • The manager at Sportmart, a sporting goods store,
    has to decide on the number of skis to purchase
    for the winter season. Based on past demand data
    and weather forecasts for the year, management
    has forecast demand to be normally distributed,
    with a mean 350 and a standard deviation of 100.
    Each pair of skis costs 100 and retails for
    250. Any unsold skis at the end of the season
    are disposed of for 85. Assume that it costs 5
    to hold a pair of skis in inventory for the
    season. How many skis should the manager order to
    maximize expected profits?

16
Example 12-1 Evaluating the optimal service
level for seasonal items
Average demand (mean) ?
Standard deviation of demand (stdev) ?
Material cost c
Price p
Salvage value s
Cost of understocking Cu
Cost of overstocking Co
Optimal cycle service level CSL
Optimal order size O
350
100
100
250
85 5 80
p c 250 100 150
c s 100 80 20
Cu/(Cu Co) 150/170 0.88
NORMINV(CSL, ?, ?) 468
17
When Demand is Normally Distributed
  • Expected profits (p s)?Fs((O ?)/?) (p
    s)?fs((O ?)/?) O(c s)F(O, ?, ?) O(p
    c)1 F(O, ?, ?)Expected overstock (O
    ?)Fs((O ?)/?) ?fs((O ?)/?)
  • Expected understock (? O)1 Fs((O
    ?)/?) ?fs((O ?)/?)

18
Example 12-1 Evaluating the optimal service
level for seasonal items
  • Expected profits (p s)?Fs((O ?)/?) (p
    s)?fs((O ?)/?) O(c s)F(O, ?, ?) O(p
    c)(1 F(O, ?, ?))59,500NORMDIST(1.18,0,1,1)
    17,000NORMDIST(1.18,0,1,0) 9,360NORMDIST(468,
    350,100,1) 70,200(1 NORMDIST(468,350,100,
    1)) 49,146
  • Expected overstock (O ?)Fs((O ?)/?)
    ?fs((O ?)/?) (450 350)NORMDIST((450
    350)/100,0,1,1) 100NORMDIST((450
    350)/100,0,1,0) 108
  • Expected understock (? O)1 Fs((O ?)/?)
    ?fs((O ?)/?) (350 450)1
    NORMDIST(((450 350)/100,0,1,1)
    100NORMDIST((450 350)/100,0,1,0) 8

19
Factors Affecting the Optimal Level of Product
Availability
Consider two products with the same margin. Any
leftover units of one product are worthless.
Leftover units of the other product can be sold
to outlet stores. Which product should have a
higher level of product availability?
20
Intermezzo
CSL
1
Higher salvage value leads to lower Co
0
Co/Cu
21
Factors Affecting the Optimal Level of Product
Availability
Consider two products with the same margin. Any
leftover units of one product are worthless.
Leftover units of the other product can be sold
to outlet stores. Which product should have a
higher level of product availability?
Consider two products with the same cost but
different margins. Which product should have a
higher level of product availability?
22
Intermezzo
CSL
1
Nordstrom
Discount store
0
Co/Cu
23
Maximizing Expected Profits
  • Cost of over- and understocking have a direct
    impact on both the optimal cycle service level
    and profitability

How could one improve profitability?
24
Improving Supply Chain Profitability
  • Two obvious ways to improve profitability
  • Increase salvage value of each unit
  • Sport Obermeyer sells winter clothing in south
    America during the summer.
  • Buyback contracts with manufacturer
  • Decrease the margin lost from a stock out
  • Arrange for backup sourcing or provide substitute
    product
  • Car part suppliers, McMaster-Carr and
    W.W.Grainger, are competitors but they buy from
    each other to satisfy the customer demand during
    a stockout

25
Improving Supply Chain Profitability
  • Another way to improve profitability
  • Reduce demand uncertainty
  • Improved forecasting Use better market
    intelligence and collaboration to reduce demand
    uncertainty
  • Quick response Reduce replenishment lead time so
    that multiple orders may be placed in a selling
    season
  • Postponement In a multiproduct setting, postpone
    product differentiation until closer to point of
    sale
  • Tailored sourcing Use a low lead time, but
    perhaps an expansive supplier as a backup for a
    low-cost, but perhaps long lead time supplier

26
Example Impact of Improved Forecasting
  • Demand is Normally distributed with a mean of ?
    350 and standard deviation of ? 150
  • Purchase price c 100
  • Retail price p 250
  • Salvage value s 80

How many units should be ordered as ? changes?
27
Example Impact of Improved Forecasting
Increase in forecast accuracy increases a firms
profits
28
Impact of Improved Forecasting
  • Better forecasts leads to reduced uncertainty
  • Decreases both the overstocked and understocked
    quantity
  • Increases a firms profits

29
Impact of Quick Response
  • Quick response is a set of actions a supply chain
    takes to reduce replenishment lead time

Lead time30 weeks
Selling season14 weeks
30
Impact of Quick Response
  • If quick response (reduction in replenishment
    lead time) allows multiple orders in the season
  • A buyer can usually improve forecast accuracy
    after observing demand
  • Less overstock, less understock
  • Higher profits

31
Example Impact of Quick Response
  • Mattel was hurt last year by inventory cutbacks
    at Toys R Us, and officials are also eager to
    avoid a repeat of the 1998 Thanksgiving weekend.
    Mattel had expected to ship a lot of merchandise
    after the weekend, but retailers, wary of excess
    inventory, stopped ordering from Mattel. That led
    the company to report a 500 million sales
    shortfall in the last weeks of the year ... For
    the crucial holiday selling season this year,
    Mattel said it will require retailers to place
    their full orders before Thanksgiving. And, for
    the first time, the company will no longer take
    reorders in December, Ms. Barad said. This will
    enable Mattel to tailor production more closely
    to demand and avoid building inventory for orders
    that don't come.

Wall Street Journal, Feb. 18, 1999
32
Mattel Inc. Toys R Us
  • Decreasing replenishment lead times requires
    tremendous effort from the manufacturer, yet
    seems to benefit the retailer at the expense of
    the manufacturer
  • Hence, the benefits resulting from quick response
    should be shared appropriately across the supply
    chain

Did Mattels action help or hurt profitability at
Toys R Us?
33
Impact of Postponement
  • Postponement is delaying product differentiation
    (customization) until closer to the time of the
    sale of the product
  • Delaying the commitment of the work-in-process
    inventory to a particular product
  • Examples
  • Dell delivers customized PC in a few days after
    customer order
  • HP printer places power supply modules, labels in
    appropriate language on to printers after the
    demand is observed
  • Motorola cell phones are customized for different
    service providers after demand is materialized
  • McDonalds assembles meal menus after customer
    order

34
Example Impact of Postponement
  • Benetton sells knit sweaters in four colors at a
    retail price p 50
  • Option 1 (Long lead time) Dye the threat then
    knit the garment. Results in manufacturing cost c
    20.
  • Option 2 (Short lead time). Knit the garment
    then dye the garment. Results in manufacturing
    cost c 22
  • Benetton disposes any unsold sweaters at the end
    of the season in clearance for s 10.
  • For each color 20 weeks in advance demand
    forecast
  • Normally distributed with a mean of ? 1000 and
    a standard deviation of ? 500

35
Example Impact of Postponement
? 1000, ? 500
? 4000, ? 1000
p 50c 20s 10 CSL (p c)/(c s) O
NORMINV(CSL,?,?)
p 50c 22s 10 CSL (p c)/(c s) O
NORMINV(CSL,?,?)
CSL 0.75 O 1,3374 5,348
CSL 0.70 O 4,524
Expected profits94,576
Expected profits98,092
36
Tailored Postponement
  • By postponing all garment types, production cost
    of each product goes up
  • When this increase is substantial or a single
    products demand dominates all others (causing
    limited uncertainty reduction via aggregation), a
    partial postponement scheme is preferable to full
    postponement.
  • Tailored postponement allows a firm to increase
    profits by postponing differentiation only for
    products with the most uncertain demand products
    with more predictable demand are produced at
    lower cost without postponement

37
Tailored (Dual) Sourcing
  • Tailored sourcing is a business strategy where a
    firm uses a combination of two supply sources
  • The two sources must focus on different
    capabilities
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com