k.boyd@ed.ac.uk - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

k.boyd@ed.ac.uk

Description:

ISTs ETHICS * DEAD METAPHORS OF BIOTECHNOLOGY ... Ethics of Animal Husbandry in a Time of Climate Change J Agric Environ Ethics DOI 10.1007/s10806 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:7
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: Own2311
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: k.boyd@ed.ac.uk


1
  • ISTs ETHICS
  • k.boyd_at_ed.ac.uk

2
DEAD METAPHORS OF BIOTECHNOLOGY
  • technology suggests a process over which we
    have control?
  • techne (art, skill, craft) from
  • tikto (to bring into the world, beget or bear)
  • teknon (that which is borne or born, cf. the
    Scots bairn, a child)
  • What may have to be borne about childrenis that
    they do not turn out to be what was hoped for or
    expected.
  • The Two-Edged Sword Biotechnology and
    Mythology in Kltozko AJ (ed) The Cloning
    Sourcebook OUP 2001 94-108

3
RISKS OF BIO-ENGINEERING
  • In hardware engineering, the number of
    unknowns is practically nil, and the engineer
    can accurately predict the properties of his
    product. For the biological engineer, who has to
    take over, sight-unseen, the untold complexity
    of the given determinants with their
    self-functioning dynamics, the number of unknowns
    in the design is immense.
  • Jonas H. Philosophical Essays. Chicago U of
    Chicago P 1974143
  • evolution in the fast lane
  • Rollin B The Frankenstein Syndrome Cambridge CUP
    1995

4
REDUCING RISKS OF UNKNOWN UNKNOWNS?
  • By bottom up approaches cf., e.g., synthetic
    biology biobricks?
  • By lifetime monitoring cf., xenotransplantation?
  • By implanting only to achieve a specific and
    well-established result, e.g.,
  • Cochlear implants (1970s-80 adults, 1980s-90s
    children) ?
  • Brain pacemakers DBS for Parkinsons,
    depression, OCD ?
  • Computer translation into action (respiratory
    control/manipulation of prosthetic limbs) of
    neurons firing in the motor cortex. ?
  • Naufel S Nanotechnology, the Brain, and
    Personal Identity in Hays SA et al (eds)
    Nanotechnology, the Brain, and the Future.
    Yearbook of Nanotechnology in Society 3 2013
    167-178

5
JUSTIFYING RISKS
  • Risks of unknown unknowns may be morally
    justifiable if
  • prior to use in humans the therapy has been shown
    to be sufficiently effective and safe
  • the condition (disease/disability) to be treated
    is sufficiently serious
  • a sufficient population of healthy volunteers and
    patients is prepared to give
  • sufficiently informed consent to participating in
    human studies
  • Each of these sufficients involves a judgement
    , which by definition is fallible and
    contestable, and needs to be negotiated between
    the parties involved e.g. in all cases
    ultimately legislators and the law, but
    specifically in (1) scientist and regulators, in
    (2) with those who have the condition (including
    those who may not believe their condition is a
    disability), in (3), scientists and
    statisticians, and in (4) participants.

6
WORRIES ABOUT ENHANCEMENT
  • No bright line can be drawn in principle between
    therapy and enhancement
  • Presumably STIs could be used to extend
    capacities already extendable by external
    devices, or mental or physical training, e.g.
  • night sight, distance sight/hearing/smell, speed,
    and (how defined?) intelligence
  • How serious are the risks of enhancing any one
    of these
  • on the individuals other capacities (Aspergers,
    dogs)
  • or the integrity of their physiology and
    personality ?
  • Can running the risks (unknown unknowns) of
    enhancement be morally justified?

7
JUSTIFYING ENHANCEMENT
  • Unknown unknowns of enhancement again could be
    discovered only by experiment
  • Experiment could be morally and scientifically
    justified only if (eventually) conducted on a
    sufficiently large and diverse population of
    volunteers, whose informed consent could be
    judged to be the moral justification.
  • Could enough be induced? Possibly some, if in a
    sufficiently competitive context
    (sport/military/academic)
  • If enough, would wider (social) moral
    justification be required?
  • Harm principle and equity would require that
  • benefits and risks of enhancement should be
    evenly spread across individuals/communities/soc
    iety/societies
  • wider Sustainability is a moral idea that
    involves equity over time and reflects both
    intra-generational and inter-generational
    obligations to the larger human community, and to
    the nonhuman world.
  • Gjerris M, Gamborg C. Röcklinsberg H, Anthony R
    The Price of Responsibility Ethics of Animal
    Husbandry in a Time of Climate Change
  • J Agric Environ Ethics DOI 10.1007/s10806-010-92
    70-6

8
VIRTUE ETHICS
  • ethics is not something you are done with at some
    point, but it is a continuous effort to
    illuminate the moral terrain and to understand
    our basic values in light of our current
    challenges
  • Gjerris M, Gamborg C. Röcklinsberg H, Anthony R
    The Price of Responsibility Ethics of Animal
    Husbandry in a Time of Climate Change
  • J Agric Environ Ethics DOI 10.1007/s10806-010-92
    70-6
  • RESPECT
  • RESPONSIBILITY
  • REALISM
  • RECOURSE TO THE GOLDEN RULE
  • ISTs for home monitoring of people with mild
    Alzheimers greater independence or greater
    isolation?

9
METAPHYSICS OF RECOGNITIONG Gillett Cyborgs and
moral identity J Med Ethics 2006327983. doi
10.1136/jme.2005.012583
  • What change in an object results in a
    metaphysical difference so that we have a
    different object (or kind of object) on our hands
    from the one with which we started?
  • it is the total form that is revealed in a lived
    life story that gives a being the identity which
    matters morally and that identity, in the sense
    we respond to it in our moral thinking, is
    somewhat indifferent to the material of which the
    being is made except in so far as that material
    affects the relevant lived experience (which is
    not independent of how we react and respond).
  • need for reflective or perceptual equilibrium,
    involving both intuitions and a rational analysis
    of the facts surrounding relevant encounters and
    their characteristics. In the end, however, one
    judges according to the responses one finds
    evoked in oneself and their sustainability over
    time, and to reflection, in much the way that the
    Aristotelians claim. Faced with this strange
    moral fruit we, suck it and see.
  • Is the being before me able to feel pain? Does
    the being before me develop attachments and make
    an appeal to me? Does the being before me have a
    story in which moral participation features?
    what we ought to do is to be true to our nature
    as beings who live as members of a kingdom of
    ends able to recognise, take account of, and
    respond to each others subjectivities as they
    are revealed in lived experience when we interact
    with each other and tell our stories.
  • in any imaginable case, I think we ought to
    react on the basis of a sum, albeit complex,
    dynamic, and impossible to reduce to
    formulations, of the mutual participation in
    language games where morality is relevant. On the
    basis of that complex engagement in a many
    faceted discourse, our conception (metaphysical
    if you like) of what a human being is is derived
    from the beings with whom we share these
    formative and sustaining interactions.
  • the epistemic virtues needed to gather the data
    relevant to the metaphysical question cannot be
    exercised in the absence of the right moral
    attitudes.
  • It therefore seems to me that a cyborg is, on the
    present account, as human as his or her life
    among us indicates to those who approach the
    encounter with an openness to others and a sense
    of life. The creature concerned ought then to be
    treated as such an acquaintance would treat them.

10
MORALITY OF RESPONSIBILITY
  • Especially with respect to the brain, where
    technology intimately affects the person at the
    location of their decision-making, personhood
    becomes an issue. For example, if the user of a
    brain pacemaker is in fluenced by stimulation to
    become more impulsive, and he or she commits a
    crime, how should the user be treated? Is he or
    she a full person who is expected to uphold
    standards of society by not breaking the law?
    Alternatively, should society give this
    individual leniency because the technology aspect
    of his or her being cannot be held morally
    accountable?
  • Naufel S Nanotechnology, the Brain, and Personal
    Identity in Hays SA et al (eds) Nanotechnology,
    the Brain, and the Future.
  • Yearbook of Nanotechnology in Society 3 2013
    167-178
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com