Law Enforcement Response - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Law Enforcement Response

Description:

Historically Beating one s wife was not a crime Police were not allowed to make arrests in misdemeanor cases ... police brutality and excessive force). – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:72
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 42
Provided by: HelenEi5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Law Enforcement Response


1
Law Enforcement Response
2
Historically
  • Beating ones wife was not a crime
  • Police were not allowed to make arrests in
    misdemeanor cases -- UNLESS they witnessed the
    crime

3
Police Response in Terms of Arrest
  • Dramatically changed since the 1980s due to
  • Changes in misdemeanor laws allowing for
    warrantless arrests
  • Changing social views and victim advocacy work
  • Increasing legal liability
  • Research focusing on the impact of arrest

4
Grounds for arrest by officer without warrant in
Tennessee T.C.A. 40-7-103
  • An officer may, without a warrant, arrest a
    person
  • For a public offense committed or a breach of the
    peace threatened in the officer's presence
  • When the person has committed a felony, though
    not in the officer's presence 
  • When a felony has in fact been committed, and the
    officer has reasonable cause for believing the
    person arrested has committed the felony 
  • On a charge made, upon reasonable cause, of the
    commission of a felony by the person arrested 
  • Who is attempting to commit suicide
  • If a law enforcement officer has probable cause
    to believe that a person has committed a crime
    involving domestic abuse, whether the crime is a
    misdemeanor or felony, or was committed within or
    without the presence of the officer
  • If a law enforcement officer has probable cause
    to believe that a person has violated one (1) or
    more of the conditions of release and verifies
    that the alleged violator received notice of the
    conditions
  • This list excludes some provisions in the
    statute that are unrelated to domestic violence.

5
Some early evidence of the importance of arrest
in domestic violence cases
  • Kansas City
  • Conducted in 1973 and reported that police had
    been to the home for a domestic violence call at
    least once in 90 of the cases involving a
    homicide
  • In 50 of the cases, police had been to the home
    5 or more times
  • Several other cities have found similar results
    and several have found that they had reductions
    in domestic homicide after implementing mandatory
    arrest polcies including Knoxville and
    Nashville

6
Recall that
  • The majority of domestic violence cases are
    simple/misdemeanor cases not felonies Thus much
    of the discussion about arrest and domestic
    violence has focused on misdemeanor arrest
  • Little controversy about the importance or impact
    of making arrests in felony cases

7
Studies that emphasize importance of arrest in
misdemeanor cases
  • Minneapolis Domestic Violence Experiment
  • Officers were instructed to randomly respond to
    misdemeanor assault cases in one of three ways
    arrest the suspect, order the suspect to leave
    for 8 hours, or mediate/advise the suspect about
    the behavior.
  • Cases were then monitored to determine the effect
    of these options

8
Major Finding Arrest Alone Deters Future
Battering
  • Data from Police Reports
  • 19 of those advised
  • 24 of those order to leave
  • 10 of those arrested
  • committed another assault within 6 months
  • Data from Victim Interviews
  • 37 of those advised
  • 33 of those order to
  • leave
  • 19 of those arrested
  • committed another assault within 6 months

9
After Minneapolis
  • Six additional studies were funded by the federal
    government to replicate the Minneapolis study.
  • Omaha, Nebraska
  • Colorado Springs, Colorado
  • Dade County Florida (Miami)
  • Milwaukee, Wisconsin
  • Charlotte, North Carolina
  • Atlanta, Georgia

10
Studies found
  • Did not find much support for the Minneapolis
    study. Arrest was not a strong deterrent.
  • Many differences in the way the studies were
    conducted makes it hard to compare them
    effectively.

11
Reasons to Continue Active Arrest Policies
  • Arrest works no better or NO WORSE than other
    responses
  • No other crime is required to demonstrate that
    arrest ALONE deters further criminality
  • Rest of the system must also be effective
  • Demonstrates a commitment to offender
    accountability
  • Identifies to victim, offender and society that
    domestic violence is a crime e.g. it reflects
    social and moral values

12
Reasons to Continue Active Arrest Policies (cont.)
  • Documents the incident
  • May be more than one way to measure effectiveness
    of arrest e.g. prevention of homicides and
    protection of children
  • Legal liability
  • Helps hold the entire criminal justice system
    accountable.

13
  • Legal Authority to Arrest

14
Types of Arrest Laws/Policies
  • Laws/policies that allow for arrest sometimes
    called Preferred or Pro- Arrest
  • Laws/policies that require arrest called
    Mandatory Arrest

15
Arrest Practicies
  • Legal authority Is established by legislation
  • May be extended by policy as long as the policy
    is not less rigorous than the law
  • For example, a state may have a preferred arrest
    law but an individual department may have a
    mandatory arrest policy
  • However, an individual police department may not
    have a preferred arrest policy if state law
    mandates arrest

16
Policy Requirement (T.C.A. 38-12-106)
  • All law enforcement agencies with personnel who
    are likely to encounter situations of domestic
    violence shall adopt a policy regarding domestic
    violence and provide initial and continuing
    education concerning the dynamics of domestic
    violence, and the handling, investigation and
    response procedures concerning reports of
    domestic violence to all law enforcement
    personnel who are likely to encounter situations
    of domestic violence.

17
Model policy
  • Review model policy and compare to your
    departmental policy.

18
Tennessee Statute
  • Has a preferred arrest requirement
  • If a law enforcement officer has probable cause
    to believe that a person has committed a crime
    involving domestic abuse, whether the crime is a
    misdemeanor or felony, or was committed within or
    without the presence of the officer, the
    preferred response of the officer is arrest.
  • T.C.A. 36-3-619 (italics and bold added for
    emphasis)

19
Purpose of Preferred Response Legislative
Intent
  • To recognize the seriousness of domestic abuse as
    a crime and to assure that the law provides a
    victim of domestic abuse with enhanced protection
    from domestic abuse. A further purpose is to
    recognize that in the past law enforcement
    agencies have treated domestic abuse crimes
    differently than crimes resulting in the same
    harm but occurring between strangers. Thus, the
    general assembly intends that the official
    response to domestic abuse shall stress enforcing
    the laws to protect the victim and prevent
    further harm to the victim, and the official
    response shall communicate the attitude that
    violent behavior is not excused or tolerated.
  • T.C.A. 36-3-618

20
Preferred response
  • Means law enforcement officers shall arrest a
    person committing domestic abuse unless there is
    a clear and compelling reason not to arrest.
  • Applies only with respect to the primary
    aggressor.
  • T.C.A. 36-3-601 (italics and bold added for
    emphasis)

21
Legal Liability
22
Incidence and Costs of a Civil Suit
  • Increase in the number of successful civil suits
    filed against police since the 1960s
  • Successful suits relatively rare
  • There are many negative consequences even if case
    is won
  • Suits serve a function in society

23
Domestic Violence Liability Cases
  • 1970s and early 1980s -- many lawsuits
  • Most involved only injunctive relief
  • Tracy Thurman case in 1984 was an exception
  • Changed the way these cases were dealt with in
    many instances.

24
Liability Risk Domestic Violence
  • Liability risk is usually associated with police
    over-action (pursuit driving, misuse of deadly
    force, police brutality and excessive force).
  • In family violence cases, liability is often the
    result of police under-action such as failure to
    arrest, failure to enforce a court order and
    failure to provide equal protection.

25
Police are usually sued under
  1. State tort laws
  2. Federal laws Section 1983 cases

26
Fundamentals of State Tort Law
  • Three types
  • Intentional torts with extremely dangerous
    actions that are automatically assumed to be
    actionable. Generally do not apply to police
    officers
  • Intentional torts with intentional actions that
    lead to injury or damage. Examples include
    wrongful death and false arrest.
  • Negligence which is most common.

27
Negligence is
  • inadvertent behavior that results in damage or
    injury. Negligence requires the least awareness
    of foreseeable injury and has no requirement of
    intent.
  • It is by definition injury that is a result of
    inadvertent behavior.

28
Four Elements of Negligence
  • A legal duty (a law, custom, judicial decision,
    or departmental policy that establishes a duty)
  • A breach of duty (facts that demonstrate a
    failure to adhere to the legal duty by an action
    or inaction)
  • Proximate cause (asks whether the injury would
    have occurred in the absence of the police
    behavior)
  • Damage or injury

29
Public Duty Doctrine Exception
  • Legal concept that holds that governmental
    functions, such as police protection, are owed to
    the general public and not to individuals and
    therefore there is no cause of action or
    subsequent liability for the failure to protect
    individuals from injuries by a third party
  • Translated, police cannot protect every
    individual in society unless there is some
    special relationship and therefore cannot be
    sued in most instances where citizens are harmed

30
In Tennessee
  • All governmental entities are immune from suits
    for any injuries that result from the activities
    of governmental entities that are engaged in the
    exercise and discharge of any of their official
    functions, UNLESS

31
  • There is a failure to exercise or perform a
    discretionary function or
  • There is an act of false imprisonment , false
    arrest, malicious prosecution, intentional
    trespass, abuse of process, libel, slander,
    deceit, interference with contract rights,
    infliction of mental anguish, invasion of right
    of privacy, or civil rights

32
The special duty protection does not exist when
  • a public official affirmatively undertakes to
    protect the plaintiff and the plaintiff relies
    upon the undertaking
  • a statute specifically provides for a cause of
    action against an official or municipality for
    injuries resulting to a particular class of
    individuals, of which the plaintiff is a member,
    from failure to enforce certain laws or
  • a plaintiff alleges a cause of action involving
    intent, malice, or reckless conduct

33
In plain language
  • If the conduct falls under the special duty
    exemption and is a substantial factor in bringing
    about the harm, and the harm could have been
    reasonably foreseen by a person of ordinary
    intelligence liability may result.

34
Most common negligence risks for domestic
violence cases
  • Failure to Protect
  • Failure to Arrest
  • Failure to Render Assistance

35
Victims also can sue in federal court
  • Called Section 1983 cases refers to The Civil
    Rights Act of 1871, Title 42, Section 1983
  • Prohibits anyone, under color of law (e.g. police
    officers) from being deprived of any right under
    the Constitution or federal law and established
    legal liability in cases where this occurs
  • For domestic violence cases, these cases have
    focused on 14th Amendment violations of equal
    protection under the law

36
Thurman v Torrington (1984)
  • Victim had her neck broken and was repeatedly
    stabbed in the presence of a police officer
  • Department had long and repeated track record of
    doing nothing despite many calls for service
    where there was probable cause to have taken
    action
  • Federal court ruled in her favor in a Section
    1983 case and found that her 14th amendment
    rights had been violated when the police
    department failed to protect her simply because
    she was married to her assailant
  • Ruling was for about 2 million dollars
  • Case had a major impact

37
Post Thurman
  • Federal cases make it difficult to sue
  • DeShaney child abuse case
  • Gonzales protective order case
  • The Court holds generally that there is no legal
    avenue for a due process claim under Section 1983
    cases.

38
More Risk of Liability at State Level
  • Especially true in Tennessee
  • As of 2004, Tennessee is one of two states where
    the Supreme Court has held that there is a
    special duty to protect when protective orders
    are involved.
  • Matthews v Pickett County

39
Relationship between Policy and Liability
  • Mandatory and preferred arrest policies limit
    officer discretion in arrest situations
  • May help insulate police departments against
    liability if departments can demonstrate officers
    were informed about the policies and were trained
  • The courts will examine patterns and practices of
    the department (including the culture)

40
Departmental steps to avoid legal liability
  • Know the law
  • Quality training is essential
  • Supervision is critical
  • Documentation is critical
  • Evaluate and document known problems

41
As an individual officer
  • Best way to protect yourself
  • KNOW THE LAW AND DEPARTMENTAL POLICIES AND
    ENFORCE THEM
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com