Nuclear History - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 40
About This Presentation
Title:

Nuclear History

Description:

Nuclear History Chemistry 332 Seven Important Eras Pre-atomists Early atomists Late atomists Plum pudding model Nuclear model Planetary model Quantum mechanical model ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:14
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 41
Provided by: Educationa152
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Nuclear History


1
Nuclear History
  • Chemistry 332

2
Seven Important Eras
  • Pre-atomists
  • Early atomists
  • Late atomists
  • Plum pudding model
  • Nuclear model
  • Planetary model
  • Quantum mechanical model
  • For a more complete listing check out the nuclear
    history page

3
1. Pre-Atomists c. 650 BC
  • What was the world made of?
  • Thales- water because it was everywhere
  • Anaximenes- air because it was around and over us
  • Heraclitus- fire because it was an agent of
    change
  • Empedocles- offered ideas of opposite pairs of
    earth/air and fire/water
  • Aristotle- combined all above ideas and added the
    5th element ether

4
2. Early Atomists c. 470 BC- 55BC
  • Leucippus- if you cut something in half enough
    times, you will reach a particle that can no
    longer be cut

5
Democritus
  • Indivisible atomos
  • atoms were distinct in size and shape
  • each element was therefore unique
  • substances of the world were made from
    combinations of different atoms
  • substances could be changed by altering the
    mixture of the composition

6
Atoms or Not?
  • Aristotles followers said how can you have a
    piece of finite matter so small it cant be cut
    in half.
  • Atoms dont make sense
  • Besides- look at the proof of the 5 element
    theory
  • Democritus followers said that you just cant
    keep cutting something in half.
  • There must be some endpoint to the mess somewhere
    that is the basic building block of the universe

7
Who won?
  • Aristotles theories could be easily understood
  • The four (5) elements could be easily seen and
    understood
  • Democritus had no proof

Smoke air
fire
ashes earth
8
A little theory goes a long way
  • Because of this, the ideas of Aristotle prevailed
    scientific thinking for a long time
  • How long?
  • The next major theory doesnt arrive until the
    1800s!
  • Aristotles ideas lasted about 2000 years!!!

9
Were they Scientists?
  • Were Aristotle and Democritus scientists?
  • What makes a scientist?
  • Performing controlled experiments
  • Since neither could really did any experiments
    they were not scientists

10
So what were they?
  • What do you call a theorists who does not perform
    experiments?
  • A Philosopher

umatoms
11
3. Late Atomists
  • John Dalton (1766-1844) reinvents the ideas of
    atoms
  • Dalton begins to perform experiments with matter
    which chips away at Aristotles theories
  • Multiple proportions- atoms can combine in
    different whole number ratios to make different
    substances
  • CO -carbon monoxide is very different from
  • CO2- carbon dioxide
  • Dalton found that different masses of different
    elements combined in simple whole number ratios
    of masses

12
So what?
  • Two of Daltons contemporaries were Nicholson and
    Carlisle
  • If Aristotle was right, then none of the four
    elements (earth, air, fire, or water) could be
    broken down into further elements
  • Right about this time, two Italians, Volta and
    Galvani each invented an electrical stack which
    could deliver a constant electrical current
  • Nicholson and Carlisle ran electricity through
    water and.
  • It decomposed!!!

13
What did it decompose into?
  • They thought
  • HO --gt O H
  • But it came out in a 21 ratio of HO
  • Therefore (after others experiments)
  • 2 H2O --gt 2 H2 O2

14
And So?
  • Atoms came to be accepted in the general world
  • So what was the next question?
  • Whats inside atoms?

15
4. Plum Pudding Model
  • JJ Thomson (1856-1940)
  • Was using a Crookes tube
  • Found that running electricity through a gaseous
    element produced a stream of particles

16
Experimented with magnets
-
17
Experiment 2

18
Conclusions?
  • The stream of particles was
  • Negative
  • Overall, atoms are...
  • Neutral
  • Therefore, atoms must also contain charges that
    are...
  • Positive

19
Plum Pudding Model
  • Thomson figured out that atoms contained positive
    and negative charges but had no idea how they
    were arranged.
  • He guessed there was a diffuse positive cloud
    with negative charges randomly distributed

-
-
-
Diffuse positive cloud
-
-
-
20
5. Nuclear Model
  • Ernest Rutherford (1910)
  • Performed the famous gold foil experiment

21
Set-up
Positive particles
Uranium
Gold foil (0.00006 cm thick)
Detection screen
22
Hypotheses
  • If Thomson was correct and atoms contained only
    diffuse positive charge then
  • Most of these heavy positive particles should go
    right through, right?

23
Experiment
Positive particles
Uranium
Gold foil
Detection screen
24
Whats going on?
  • Most are going straight through
  • But some are being deflected
  • How much can they be deflected?

25
Continuation
26
HOLY ATOMS!
  • What conclusions can be drawn here?
  • There is something inside an atom that is heavy
    enough to deflect a particle straight back
  • That something must be positively charged
  • It must also be very small

27
Conclusions?
  • Heavy, dense, positively charged, small piece of
    the atom is.
  • The nucleus!!
  • Lets watch this animated

28
Nuclear Theory
  • Nucleus of atom contains _at_99.9 of the mass of
    the atom
  • Nucleus is positively charged
  • Electrons orbit the nucleus randomly and take up
    _at_99.9 of the space
  • Electrons are negatively charged

29
Side note
  • Notice that Rutherford has no mention of the
    neutron
  • Neutron wasnt discovered until 1933 by Chadwick

30
6. Planetary Model
  • Bohr proved that electrons dont orbit randomly
    around the nucleus
  • He postulated that they orbit the nucleus like
    planets do around the sun
  • They circle in well-defined energy levels
  • Jumping to and from energy levels absorbs or
    releases energy

31
Atomic Line Spectra
Expected to see a nice progression of color just
like normal BUT..
Prism or diffraction grating
Gas such as Neon or Hydrogen
32
Atomic Line Spectra
Instead he got just a few discrete lines of color!
Prism or diffraction grating
Gas such as Neon or Hydrogen
33
WHAT GIVES?
  • Why are only a few lines of color seen instead of
    the whole spectrum?
  • Bohr postulated that electrons exist at specific
    energy levels or quanta.
  • Electrons can only jump from specific energy
    level to specific energy level and not anywhere
    in between.

34
Planetary Model
e-
e-
e-
e-
35
For Example
OK
Energy level 2
NO!
OK
Energy level 1
36
For Example
Energy level 2
To go from 1 to 2 energy must be absorbed or put
into the system of a specific amount
Energy level 1
37
Or
Energy level 2
When you drop from a higher energy level to a
lower one energy is released in a specific amount
Energy level 1
38
For Electrons
3 ? 1
2 ? 1
Nucleus
3 ? 2
39
7. Quantum Mechanical Model
  • Heisenberg, Planck, Einstein, etc
  • 1900s to today
  • The world of the atom is so small that just by us
    looking for small pieces changes where they are
  • Thus we cant be sure exactly about these energy
    levels so.

40
Electron Cloud Model
e-
e-
e-
e-
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com