THE ARTICLES OF CONFEDERATION - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

THE ARTICLES OF CONFEDERATION

Description:

THE ARTICLES OF CONFEDERATION Topic #5 * * * * * * Original U. S. Governments The Declaration of Independence did not create a new U.S. government. – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:76
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: umbc
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: THE ARTICLES OF CONFEDERATION


1
THE ARTICLES OFCONFEDERATION
  • Topic 5

2
Original U. S. Governments
  • The Declaration of Independence did not create a
    new U.S. government.
  • Nor did prescribe what form such a government
    should take however, it did prescribe that
  • it should be based on the consent of the
    governed
  • it should secure, not abridge, natural rights
    and
  • it should lay its foundation on such principles
    and organizing its powers in such form, as to the
    peoples shall seem most likely to effect their
    Safety and Happiness.
  • It was generally understood that the consent of
    the governed was given by
  • convening a group of (directly or indirectly)
    elected delegates
  • who would draft a constitution (in effect, a
    social contract)
  • that would be subject to some form of popular
    ratification (by which the constitution/social
    contract would be agreed to)
  • It was further understood that the existing
    states would remain in existence as significant
    political entities.

3
Original U. S. Governments (cont.)
  • How was the new U.S. governed?
  • Prior to the Declaration of Independence
  • Even the colonies had considerable self
    government
  • elected local/town governments
  • popularly elected (lower house, at least)
    colonial legislatures
  • appointed (royal) governors
  • built-in conflict between legislature and
    executive
  • Extent of franchise
  • far from universal (but much more extensive than
    in Britain) primarily adult white males owning
    some property
  • voting (and office-holding) qualifications varied
    across colonies and were often scaled to office
  • The revolution accelerated democratic trends in
    popular sentiments and political institutions.
  • Opinion was radicalized
  • Revolutionary leaders sought popular support.
  • Exit by loyalists.

4
Original U. S. Governments (cont.)
  • After the Declaration of Independence
  • Colonial governments gt state governments
  • States held constitutional conventions to draft
    new constitutions.
  • Typically
  • Bicameral legislature (both houses elected)
  • Governor (a weak office, usually selected by the
    legislature, with a short term and few powers)
  • Suffrage and office-holding qualifications
    generally liberalized (but still not universal)

5
Original U. S. Governments (cont.)
  • At the national/continental level
  • The provisional Second Continental Congress
    remained in session and
  • supervised the war effort (not very effectively),
    and
  • drafted a set of Articles of Confederation and
    sent them to the states for ratification in
    November 1777,
  • which were not ratified and put into effect until
    March 1781.
  • The Articles of Confederation are commonly and
    correctly said to have provided for only a weak
    central government.
  • But it is important to understand precisely the
    most crucial ways in which the A. of C. central
    government was too weak.
  • To help understand this, we revert to social
    contract theory.

6
A Constitution as a Social Contracts
  • The social contract theory of Hobbes and Locke
    pertains to individuals in a state of nature (and
    to a perhaps not very realistic-seeming thought
    experiment).
  • We can apply the same logic more realistically to
    collectivities (e.g., states vs. individual
    persons) that lack a central government
  • States gt U.S. government
  • European nations gt European Union
  • All nations gt United Nations (or a stronger
    world government)

7
Constitutions as Social Contracts (cont.)
  • Consider the formation of larger political union
    in social contract theory terms.
  • Consolidation
    Dimension _________________________
    ________________________

  • anarchic confederal
    federal unitary
  • system system
    system system
  • One extreme anarchic system no union
  • Other extreme unitary system total union
  • A Hobbsian social contract among states
  • In effect, state governments agree to abolish
    themselves and create an all-powerful central
    government.

8
Constitutions as Social Contracts (cont.)
  • Intermediate positions on the consolidation
    dimension (con)federal systems.
  • Such systems result from social contract among
    states that is Lockean in nature, in that
  • the states agree give up some powers and
    functions and give them to the central
    government, but at the same time
  • the states retain other powers and functions and
    deny them to the central government, so
  • the central government has some powers but they
    are limited, and
  • there are two independent and distinct levels of
    government,
  • i.e. the states and the central government.

9
Constitutions as Social Contracts (cont.)
  • In U.S. constitutional language
  • Delegated powers are the powers given up by the
    states and delegated to the central government.
  • Reserved powers are the powers not given up by
    the states and not delegated to the central
    government.
  • In anarchic systems, all powers are reserved and
    none are delegated.
  • In unitary systems, all powers are delegated and
    none are reserved.
  • In con/federal systems, there is some balance
    between delegated and reserved powers.
  • In this respect, there is no fundamental
    difference between confederal and federal
    systems.
  • The difference between confederal and federal
    systems pertains to how delegated power are
    exercised and how the central government operates.

10
Confederal vs. Federal Systems
  • The Articles of Confederation (1781-1789) created
    a confederal union of states,
  • In contrast, the subsequent U.S. Constitution
    (1789-????) created a federal union of states.
  • They were similar in that both entailed a balance
    between delegated and reserved powers.
  • The balance between delegated and reserved powers
    was somewhat more favorable to the central
    government under the Constitution than the A. of
    C.
  • But this is largely a matter of degree.
  • The fundamental difference between the A. of C.
    and the Constitution (and between federal and
    confederal systems generally) pertains to how the
    central govern-ment exercises its delegated
    powers.

11
The Articles of Confederation
  • Under the A. of C., the central government may be
    characterized as government by the states and of
    the states.
  • The A. of C. provided for government by the
    states in the following respects.
  • Members of the Confederal Congress were not
    elected by the people of their states.
  • Rather they were appointed by their state
    governments moreover
  • they did not have fixed terms, so
  • they could be recalled at any time, and
  • they were paid by their state governments, not
    the U.S.

12
The Articles of Confederation (cont.)
  • Voting in the unicameral Confederal Congress
  • Each state delegation in Congress cast one vote
    (regardless of the size of the delegation or the
    population of the state).
  • State delegations could have 2-7 members.
  • A 7/13 (simple majority) vote was sufficient only
    for procedural and minor questions.
  • A 9/13 (supramajoity) vote was required for major
    questions including .
  • A 13/13 (unanimity) vote was required to approve
    amendments to the A. of C.
  • Congress (The United States in Congress
    Assembled) was the sole organ of the central
    government.
  • There was no central government executive or
    judiciary.
  • Congress had an executive committee (Council of
    States) that remained in session year round.
  • Congress (in particular, the Council of States)
    supervised the several central government
    departments, e.g., Treasury, Army, Navy.

13
The Articles of Confederation (cont.)
  • A. of C. provided for government of the states
    in the following fundamental respect.
  • Congress could not directly exercise most of the
    powers delegated to it.
  • For example, the delegated powers of Congress
    included conducting foreign affairs and providing
    for the common defense.
  • Exercising these powers requires money and
    manpower.
  • But Congress itself could not lay and collect
    taxes.
  • Only states had the power to lay and collect
    taxes.
  • Congress had to lay assessments on the state
    governments (in accordance with an agreed upon
    quota of contribution), asking the states
    transfer funds to the U.S. Treasury.
  • Likewise, Congress could not recruit (let alone
    conscript) men into the U.S. armed forces and
    likewise had to rely on states to provide
    manpower and/or organize their own militias.

14
The Articles of Confederation (cont.)
  • Congress could make treaties with foreign nations
    (e.g., with Britain regarding property claims).
  • But Congress had to rely
  • on state legislatures to pass appropriate laws to
    carry out the terms of a treaty, and
  • on state courts to enforce them.
  • In summary, there were no direct connections, in
    terms of either representation or authority,
    between the central government and the people of
    the United States.
  • See the following diagram ?
  • This was the critical weakness of the A. of C.

15
Summary Confederal Diagram
16
Hamilton, Federalist 16
  • Hamiltons Federalist 16 is a strong critique of
    the Articles of Confederation and of confederal
    systems in general.
  • Confederation may be styled the parent of
    anarchy.
  • What if a state does not meet their obligations?
  • Congress cannot put a state in jail for failure
    to pay its assessment.
  • All it can do is resort to force against the
    recalcitrant state(s).
  • But the guilt of all states becomes the
    security of all.
  • It seems to require no pains to prove that the
    States ought not to prefer a national
    Constitution which could only be kept in motion
    by the instrumentality of a large army
    continually on foot to execute the ordinary
    requisitions or decrees of the government.

17
Hamilton, Federalist 16
  • Yet such perpetual resort to force is the plain
    alternative involved by those who wish to deny
    the central government the power of extending
    its operations to individuals.
  • The central government must carry its agency to
    the persons of the citizens. It must stand in
    need of no intermediate legislations but must
    itself be empowered to employ the arm of the
    ordinary magistrate to execute its own
    resolutions. The majesty of the national
    authority must be manifested through the medium
    of the courts of justice. The government of the
    Union, like that of each State, must be able to
    address itself immediately to the hopes and fears
    of individuals and to attract to its support
    those passions which have the strongest influence
    upon the human heart. It must, in short, possess
    all the means, and have aright to resort to all
    the methods, of executing the powers with which
    it is intrusted, that are possessed and exercised
    by the government of the particular States.

18
Articles of Confederation (cont.)
  • By the mid-1780s, there was a widespread view
    that the A. of C. were not working and the
    confederation was unraveling.
  • This in due course led to a convention that
    drafted a new constitution that did endure.
  • The new constitution was based on federal, rather
    than confederal, principles.

19
Summary Federal Diagram
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com