Corporate Governance Update - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

Corporate Governance Update

Description:

Patrick S. McGurn RiskMetrics Group (patrick.mcgurn_at_riskmetrics.com) ... Aflac was the first U.S. company to implement 'Say on Pay,' with 93% of votes ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:136
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: financ
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Corporate Governance Update


1
Corporate GovernanceUpdate
  • Matthew J. Maletta Allergan, Inc.
    (Maletta_Matthew_at_Allergan.com)
  • Patrick S. McGurn RiskMetrics Group
    (patrick.mcgurn_at_riskmetrics.com)
  • Diane A. Thompson Ernst Young LLP
    (Diane.Thompson_at_ey.com)
  • David C. Lee Gibson, Dunn Crutcher LLP
    (DLee_at_gibsondunn.com)

2
Overview - 2008 Season Proxy Developments and
Shareholder Proposals
  • Some significant areas
  • Credit Crisis
  • Politics/Upcoming Elections
  • Executive Compensation

Gibson, Dunn Crutcher LLP
3
Executive Compensation Overview
  • Amendment of SEC executive compensation rules in
    2006, which have resulted in increased disclosure
    regarding executive compensation including a new
    requirement relating to Compensation Discussion
    Analysis
  • Challenges for executive compensation in a
    down-year

Gibson, Dunn Crutcher LLP
4
Executive Compensation Shareholder Proposals
  • Effect of new disclosure requirements on
    shareholder activism
  • Omission of performance targets from CDA
  • Shareholder Proposals regarding Executive
    Compensation
  • Say on Pay Institutional investors requesting
    companies to hold a non-binding shareholder vote
    on executive compensation.
  • Aflac was the first U.S. company to implement
    Say on Pay, with 93 of votes cast voting For
    the following resolution
  • Resolved, that the shareholders approve the
    overall executive pay-for-performance
    compensation policies and procedures employed by
    the Company, as described in the Compensation
    Discussion and Analysis and the tabular
    disclosure regarding named executive officer
    compensation (together with the accompanying
    narrative disclosure) in this Proxy Statement.

5
Executive Compensation Proposals (cont.)
  • Pay for Performance different types of proposals
    requesting executive pay to be tied to
    performance measures
  • E.g., proposals requesting performance-based
    criteria for compensation, such as option grants
  • Clawbacks
  • Limited clawback in Section 304 of
    Sarbanes-Oxley.
  • Some companies have policies or plan amendments
    requiring the board to seek recoupment of bonuses
    and other incentive compensation payments to an
    executive on the basis of having met or exceeded
    performance goals based on financial results
    subsequently the subject of a restatement.

6
Majority Voting/Proxy Access
  • Majority Voting
  • Historically, U.S. public companies have
    generally used a plurality voting standard in
    director elections.
  • Under a majority vote standard
  • In uncontested elections, shareholders can vote
    For or Against a director nominee, or can
    abstain from voting.
  • A director nominee is elected to the board only
    if a majority of the votes cast vote For the
    nominee.
  • Companies who adopt majority voting typically
    also adopt a provision requiring any holdover
    director (i.e., an incumbent not reelected by a
    majority vote) to tender a resignation.
  • Contrast with the Pfizer model retain
    plurality voting but adopt a director resignation
    policy.
  • Institutional investors typically do not view
    director resignation policies as adequate. As a
    result, 44 of SP 500 companies had adopted
    majority voting as of November 2007.

Gibson, Dunn Crutcher LLP
7
Majority Voting/Proxy Access (cont.)
  • Proxy Access
  • SEC proposed 2003 proposed rules to permit proxy
    access were never adopted, but debate resurfaced
    following AFSCME v. AIG decision in Second
    Circuit in September 2006, which called into
    question the SECs rule permitting exclusion of
    shareholder proposals that would implement proxy
    access.
  • SEC Chairman Cox has indicated that the SEC plans
    to revisit proxy access for the 2009 proxy
    season.
  • Shareholders have submitted their own proposals

8
Accountability issues dominate 2008 season
RiskMetrics Post-2008 Season Reviewand Preview
of 2009
606 of 1149 proposals come to votes
Breakout season for SOP
Pay and board issues dominate proponents agendas
Lions share of MTV PFP proposals withdrawn
Source RiskMetrics/ISS Governance Services
9
Voting Support Stagnates in 08(average votes
cast)
RiskMetrics Post-2008 Season Reviewand Preview
of 2009 (cont.)
Support grows for MTV and IC
Three issues average majority support five in 07
Source RiskMetrics/ISS Governance Services
10
Shareholder proposals in 2008
RiskMetrics Post-2008 Season Reviewand Preview
of 2009 (cont.)
More than one of every four were withdrawn
One of five was thrown out by the SEC
Majority voting, PFP and sustainability dominate
engagements
Source RiskMetrics/ISS Governance Services
11
Advance Notice Bylaw Provisions
  • Establishes a deadline and notice requirements if
    a shareholder wants to propose nominations or
    have other business considered at a shareholders
    meeting.
  • Ensures adequate notice of matters so that a
    company and its other shareholders can evaluate
    all the matters to be voted upon and the company
    can address those matters in its own proxy
    statement.
  • Separate process from SEC Rule 14a-8.

Gibson, Dunn Crutcher LLP
12
Advance Notice Bylaw Provisions (cont.)
  • Recent Delaware Cases
  • JANA Master Fund, Ltd. v. CNET Networks, Inc.
    (Delaware Supreme Court, May 2008) and Levitt
    Corp. v. Office Depot, Inc. (Delaware Chancery
    Court, April 2008).
  • Both cases addressed the scope of advance notice
    bylaws and held that a shareholder did not have
    to comply with the companys advance notice
    provisions in order to nominate directors.
  • Advance notice bylaws also impacted by the
    growing frequency of hedging and short positions.
  • Difficult for companies and shareholders to
    ascertain the nature and extent of a
    shareholders interest in the company when a
    shareholder seeks to nominate directors or
    propose other business.
  • Impact Companies are reviewing and amending
    their bylaws in light of the Delaware decisions
    and hedging concerns.

Gibson, Dunn Crutcher LLP
13
Officer Fiduciary Duties
  • Miller v. McDonald (Delaware Bankruptcy Court,
    April 2008)
  • Fiduciary duty case brought by bankruptcy trustee
    against directors and executive officers
  • Executive officers subject to Caremark
    obligations relating to duty to oversee

Gibson, Dunn Crutcher LLP
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com