Title: Corporate Governance Update
1Corporate GovernanceUpdate
- Matthew J. Maletta Allergan, Inc.
(Maletta_Matthew_at_Allergan.com) - Patrick S. McGurn RiskMetrics Group
(patrick.mcgurn_at_riskmetrics.com) - Diane A. Thompson Ernst Young LLP
(Diane.Thompson_at_ey.com) - David C. Lee Gibson, Dunn Crutcher LLP
(DLee_at_gibsondunn.com)
2Overview - 2008 Season Proxy Developments and
Shareholder Proposals
- Some significant areas
- Credit Crisis
- Politics/Upcoming Elections
- Executive Compensation
Gibson, Dunn Crutcher LLP
3Executive Compensation Overview
- Amendment of SEC executive compensation rules in
2006, which have resulted in increased disclosure
regarding executive compensation including a new
requirement relating to Compensation Discussion
Analysis - Challenges for executive compensation in a
down-year
Gibson, Dunn Crutcher LLP
4Executive Compensation Shareholder Proposals
- Effect of new disclosure requirements on
shareholder activism - Omission of performance targets from CDA
- Shareholder Proposals regarding Executive
Compensation - Say on Pay Institutional investors requesting
companies to hold a non-binding shareholder vote
on executive compensation. - Aflac was the first U.S. company to implement
Say on Pay, with 93 of votes cast voting For
the following resolution - Resolved, that the shareholders approve the
overall executive pay-for-performance
compensation policies and procedures employed by
the Company, as described in the Compensation
Discussion and Analysis and the tabular
disclosure regarding named executive officer
compensation (together with the accompanying
narrative disclosure) in this Proxy Statement.
5Executive Compensation Proposals (cont.)
- Pay for Performance different types of proposals
requesting executive pay to be tied to
performance measures - E.g., proposals requesting performance-based
criteria for compensation, such as option grants - Clawbacks
- Limited clawback in Section 304 of
Sarbanes-Oxley. - Some companies have policies or plan amendments
requiring the board to seek recoupment of bonuses
and other incentive compensation payments to an
executive on the basis of having met or exceeded
performance goals based on financial results
subsequently the subject of a restatement.
6Majority Voting/Proxy Access
- Majority Voting
- Historically, U.S. public companies have
generally used a plurality voting standard in
director elections. - Under a majority vote standard
- In uncontested elections, shareholders can vote
For or Against a director nominee, or can
abstain from voting. - A director nominee is elected to the board only
if a majority of the votes cast vote For the
nominee. - Companies who adopt majority voting typically
also adopt a provision requiring any holdover
director (i.e., an incumbent not reelected by a
majority vote) to tender a resignation. - Contrast with the Pfizer model retain
plurality voting but adopt a director resignation
policy. - Institutional investors typically do not view
director resignation policies as adequate. As a
result, 44 of SP 500 companies had adopted
majority voting as of November 2007.
Gibson, Dunn Crutcher LLP
7Majority Voting/Proxy Access (cont.)
- Proxy Access
- SEC proposed 2003 proposed rules to permit proxy
access were never adopted, but debate resurfaced
following AFSCME v. AIG decision in Second
Circuit in September 2006, which called into
question the SECs rule permitting exclusion of
shareholder proposals that would implement proxy
access. - SEC Chairman Cox has indicated that the SEC plans
to revisit proxy access for the 2009 proxy
season. - Shareholders have submitted their own proposals
8Accountability issues dominate 2008 season
RiskMetrics Post-2008 Season Reviewand Preview
of 2009
606 of 1149 proposals come to votes
Breakout season for SOP
Pay and board issues dominate proponents agendas
Lions share of MTV PFP proposals withdrawn
Source RiskMetrics/ISS Governance Services
9Voting Support Stagnates in 08(average votes
cast)
RiskMetrics Post-2008 Season Reviewand Preview
of 2009 (cont.)
Support grows for MTV and IC
Three issues average majority support five in 07
Source RiskMetrics/ISS Governance Services
10 Shareholder proposals in 2008
RiskMetrics Post-2008 Season Reviewand Preview
of 2009 (cont.)
More than one of every four were withdrawn
One of five was thrown out by the SEC
Majority voting, PFP and sustainability dominate
engagements
Source RiskMetrics/ISS Governance Services
11Advance Notice Bylaw Provisions
- Establishes a deadline and notice requirements if
a shareholder wants to propose nominations or
have other business considered at a shareholders
meeting. - Ensures adequate notice of matters so that a
company and its other shareholders can evaluate
all the matters to be voted upon and the company
can address those matters in its own proxy
statement. - Separate process from SEC Rule 14a-8.
Gibson, Dunn Crutcher LLP
12Advance Notice Bylaw Provisions (cont.)
- Recent Delaware Cases
- JANA Master Fund, Ltd. v. CNET Networks, Inc.
(Delaware Supreme Court, May 2008) and Levitt
Corp. v. Office Depot, Inc. (Delaware Chancery
Court, April 2008). - Both cases addressed the scope of advance notice
bylaws and held that a shareholder did not have
to comply with the companys advance notice
provisions in order to nominate directors. - Advance notice bylaws also impacted by the
growing frequency of hedging and short positions. - Difficult for companies and shareholders to
ascertain the nature and extent of a
shareholders interest in the company when a
shareholder seeks to nominate directors or
propose other business. - Impact Companies are reviewing and amending
their bylaws in light of the Delaware decisions
and hedging concerns.
Gibson, Dunn Crutcher LLP
13Officer Fiduciary Duties
- Miller v. McDonald (Delaware Bankruptcy Court,
April 2008) - Fiduciary duty case brought by bankruptcy trustee
against directors and executive officers - Executive officers subject to Caremark
obligations relating to duty to oversee
Gibson, Dunn Crutcher LLP