Title: Vandalism
1Vandalism
- Sofia Pereira
- Jason Perez
2Downsizing Deviance
- This is the indifference to lower levels of a
given transgressive behaviour as higher levels of
such behaviour become more frequent and, hence,
more significant. - Catch it low to prevent it high. This is the
idea that if one successfully seeks to diminish
the occurrence of low-level aggressive enactment,
then higher levels of aggression also become less
likely
3Monetary Costs
- Accurate estimates of monetary costs are hard to
locate for the same reasons that reliable
vandalism incidence data are difficult to obtain. - However, many studies have shown that the
incidence and cost of vandalism are high and
rising.
4Social Costs
- Vestermark and Blauvelt state
- The impact of a 79 cent can of spray paint, used
to paint racial epithets on a hallway wall, far
exceeds the monetary cost of removing the paint.
A racial confrontation could result, which might
force the closing of the school for an indefinite
period - Reilly asserts
- The victim of vandalism experiences a sense of
having been singled out by an unkind fate, a
heightened sense of vulnerability, of not being
safe even on his own grounds there is a sense of
impotent rage and a desire for revenge.... The
victim of vandalism becomes more alienated from
his neighbours...more fearful.... and more
hostile and suspicious of strangers...
5Social Costs
- Social Costs
- - The presence of vandalism gives rise to
concern that more of the same will follow.
Research has shown that incivility leads to more
incivility and that litter, broken windows,
abandoned buildings, and the like create a sense
of disorder and decline which may lower the
inhibition level of both residents and passersby
and thus permit and in a sense encourage further
such deteriorative behavior. - - In the school setting, Vestermark and
Blauvelt suggested that the social cost of
vandalism is the summation of three components
1)its impact on the schools educational program
2)its psychological impact on both students and
adults 3)its degree of disruptiveness of group
or intergroup relations.
6Social Costs
- Vestermark and Blauvelt created four types of
vandalism in terms of monetary and social costs - -Type I Vandalism incidents having both a high
monetary cost as well as a high social cost - -Type II Vandalism incidents having a high
monetary cost but a low social cost. - -Type III Vandalism incidents having a low
monetary cost but a high social cost. - -Type IV Vandalism incidents having both a low
monetary cost as well as a low social cost.
7Prevalence of vandalism
- A survey conducted by the Ontario Task Force on
Vandalism to gauge public opinion regarding
contemporary vandalism found that 37 of the
Toronto residents and 56 residing outside
Toronto, indicated that they thought vandalism
was a problem and 67 of the Toronto residents
polled believed that vandalism had increased over
the previous five years. - According to Wiesenthal
- -In another survey of Ontario secondary school
students, only about half described vandalism as
either quite or very serious. Overall in this
group, vandalism was regarded as less serious
than either shoplifting or breaking and entering.
8Prevalence of Vandalism
- According to Chepynoha and Parwicki
- - Toronto high school students indicated that a
substantial number of both male and female high
school students did not consider many kinds of
vandalism serious (ie. writing on desks or
walls). The importance of this survey is that
acts which are most likely seen as serious by
most of the community, are not consistently seen
that way by the high school students who may be
the very perpetrators of such acts.
9Measuring the incidence of Vandalism
- - It is difficult to estimate the extent of
vandalism due to the various definitions
regarding what in fact constitutes a vandalistic
act. - - Firm approximations are not easily arrived at,
and when they are, they are likely to be serious
underestimations. - -The method of assessing conviction on vandalism
charges is not practical since only a very small
proportion of offenses are even brought to court. - - Police data are also suspect, since small
offenses may not be reported. - -Many victims elect not to report
vandalistic acts because they believe that little
will follow from their act or reporting. Only an
estimated 3-4 of vandalistic acts lead to
prosecution
10The Ontario Task Force on Vandalism Vandalism
Self-Report Study (1980)
- Purpose
- Method
- Procedure
- Design of Questionnaire
- Part A
- Part B
- Part C
- Part D
11- Results
- Discussion
- Conclusion
12Vandalism vs. Depreciative Behaviour
- a path worn in a campus lawn by students
creating and repeatedly taking a shortcut. - a chipped corner to a hallway wall, banged time
and again by workers pushing loaded carts. - Park playground equipment broken as a result of
long and often overly energetic use.
13Vandalism vs. Depreciative Behaviour
- Depreciative behaviour differs from vandalism in
- Intent
- Awareness
- Responsibility
14Defining Vandalism
- There are a variety of definitions of vandalism.
Though varying in inclusiveness, these several
definitions as a group highlight - Intentionality
- Destructiveness
- Property Ownership
15Cohens typology of vandalism
- Vandalism as institutional rule-breaking
- Ritualism
- Protection
- Play
- Writing-Off
- Walling-In
16Cohens typology of vandalism
- Ideological vandalism
- A rule is broken as a means toward some explicit
and conscious ideological end. an example would
be the spraying of War on a series of Stop
signs or the destruction of highway billboards by
environmental groups. - There is no consensus over the content of the
rule which is being broken and, more
particularly, the content of the rule is being
explicitly and consciously challenged. An
example of this class of behaviour would be
embassy bombings and attacks.
17Cohens typology of vandalism
- Conventional vandalism
- Acquisitive vandalism
- Tactical vandalism
- Vindictive vandalism
- Play vandalism.
- Malicious vandalism
18Motivational Typologies
- Martin offered
- Predatory vandalism
- Vindictive vandalism
- Wanton vandalism
- Thaw described
- Hostility-directed acts
- Acts of thoughtlessness
- Acts of carelessness
19Hypothesized causes of vandalism
- Social Decay
- Inadequate parenting
- Lenient Courts
- Boredom
- Conformity pressure
- Developmental causation
- Environmental factors
- Aesthetic causation
- Enjoyment theory
- Inequity theory
20Who is the Vandal?
21Where do frequent acts of vandalism occur?
- Schools
- Libraries
- Museums
- Trains
- Buses
- Stations
22The Person-Environment Duet
- In Krupats (1985) view
- -The relationship of person to environment is
dynamic rather than static. Its a reciprocal
relationship in which our environment shapes the
people and the people shape the environment. - We then use this relationship to look at
vandalistic behaviour. The physical and social
environment determines this vandalistic
behaviour, thus, we must change the environment
to reduce vandalistic acts. - Also, we must assess the responsibility of the
person committing the crime.
23Ways to change the vandal
- Rather than changing the environment, here the
intervention target is the vandal. - Cohen suggested 3 person-oriented strategies
- 1-Education
- 2-Deterrence and retribution
- 3-Deflection
24Intervention Strategies
- The following interventions focus on the physical
and social environment and also at directly or
indirectly at changing the vandal. - All these strategies have been used for a defence
against vandalism. - Although all these strategies are used to reduce
vandalism, they are also considered an enjoyable
challenge for the vandals, which may increase the
vandals behaviour ( Wise, 1982)
25Interventions
- 1. TARGET HARDENING
- -toughened glass
- -steel framed bus seats
- -reinforced phone or meter coins
- Wise termed de-opportunizing design
26Interventions
- 2. ACCESS CONTROL
- -locked gates, doors, windows
- -use of guard dogs
- -reduced number of building entrances
- 3.DEFLECTING OFFENDER
- -graffiti boards and mural programs
- -steering of pathway circulation (paving
shortcuts) - -interesting wallpaper
27Interventions
- 4.CONTROLLING FACILITATORS
- -having control over the sales of spray paint
- -placing bus stops, public phones in no
isolated locations - -placing fire alarms and light switches from
reach or hangout areas - 5.EXIT-ENTRY SCREENING
- -closed-circuit TV
- -detectors (metal, motion)
- -library book tags
28Interventions
- 6.FORMAL SURVEILLANCE
- This is surveillance done by police, guards,
monitors, citizen groups, or other paid or
volunteer security personnel - 7.NATURAL SURVEILLANCE
- -community after-school use
- -use of store aisle mirrors
- -low trimming of shrubbery and plants
-
29Interventions
- 8.TARGET REMOVAL
- -removal of bus seats that are hidden from the
drivers view - -removing ground level windows
- -removing of outside plant bulbs
- 9.IDENTIFYING PROPERTY
- -property marking with business logo, school
district ID, or social security number -
30Interventions
- 10. REMOVING INDUCEMENTS
- -rapid repair of damaged property
- -rapid removal of graffiti
- -removal of bars over toilet stall doorways
- 11. RULE SETTING
- 12.EDUCATION
- -vandalism awareness walks
- -anti vandalism films/games
- -vandalism education programs
31Interventions
- 13.PUBLICITY
- -anti vandalism advertising
- 14.PUNISHMENT
- -suspension from schools
- -fines
- -restitution
32Interventions
- 15.Counseling
- 16.Involvement
33Intervention Evaluation
- Lindsley suggested there exist three-intervention
evaluations - ) Rigorless magician
- 2 Rigor Mortician
- 3 Rigorous clinician
- We must also look at each intervention with
regards to its relevance to the real world.
34Supplementary Information
- Taking the Train How graffiti art became an
urban crisis in New York City By Joe Austin
35Supplementary Information
- Article Graffiti magic in a parking lot
(Toronto Star Sept. 14, 2003).