Title: THEME A CO2 capture, transport, usage
1THEME ACO2 capture, transport, usage
UKCCSC Meeting, 27 - 28 March 2006 Edinburgh
- Leader
- John Oakey
- Cranfield University
Power Generation Technology Centre
2Theme A
UKCCSC Meeting, 27 - 28 March 2006 Edinburgh
- A1 Theme A Integration
- A2 Fossil Energy Supply
- A3 CCS Synergies Real Time Supply
- A4 CCS as a Bridge to H2
- A5 Fossil Fuel Use
- A6 CO2 Transport
- A7 Long Term Utilisation
3UKCCSC Meeting, 27 - 28 March 2006 Edinburgh
Overview of Sub-theme A1 Theme A Integration
Synthesise and add to theme A activities to
develop technical options for carbon capture
deployment in the UK
Input from all theme A participants and advice
from all other themes (especially on storage)
- Aberdeen
- 1 - Definition of Case Studies (windows of
opportunity in UKCS based on modelling) - 2 Economics (costs of capture to give
cost/supply curve) - 3 Policy/Incentives
- Imperial College
- 1 Review paper on CO2 capture and transport
to influence debate, scenarios case studies
- Reading
- 1 Guidelines based on theme A scenarios and
sensitivity analysis (subtheme A1)
External consultation exercise with variety of
stakeholders (Jon Gibbins to lead for UKCCSC?)
Led by Theme Leader John Oakey
Power Generation Technology Centre
4UKCCSC Meeting, 27 - 28 March 2006 Edinburgh
Overview of Sub-theme A2 Fossil Energy Supply
Provide background for decision making on the
role that can be played by CCS in meeting UK
energy supply objectives
- Reading
- 2 - Life cycle costs emissions with without
CCS - 3 - Power plant scheme scenarios scenario
collation - 4 - Sensitivity analysis
A2.a Database of LC energy costs CO2 emissions
report/CD
- Aberdeen
- 4 Storage Scenarios
A2.b Definition of theme A scenarios - report
Input from Theme B
Input from Newcastle 4 (theme A5)
A2.c Sensitivity analysis report/CD
Require inputs from A2/A3/A4/A5
scenarios limited to information required for
technical cost assessment
Sub-theme Leader Tim Cockerill
Power Generation Technology Centre
5DeliverablesA.2.a Database of LC energy costs
CO2 emissionsA.2.b Definition of Theme A
ScenariosA.2.c Sensitivity Analysis Report
UKCCSC Meeting, 27 - 28 March 2006 Edinburgh
- TASK A.2.1 Overall assessment of lifecycle costs
and emissions of fossil fuel supply options - TASK A.2.2 Assessment of impact of future energy
supply scenarios - TASK A.2.3 Summary of published and produced
data
Power Generation Technology Centre
6UKCCSC Meeting, 27 - 28 March 2006 Edinburgh
Overview of Sub-theme A3 CCS Synergies Real
Time Supply
Investigate the impact of using renewable energy
and nuclear in combination with CCS systems
Advice from stakeholders (including DTI and UKERC)
- Manchester
- Real time supply modelling
- 1 Model design
- 2 Model development
- 3 Model use
- Imperial College
- 2 Capture plant definition (work done in A4)
- 3 Consultation on simplified scenarios
- 4 CCS flexibility value from real time
analysis trading etc - 5 Biomass links (including with TSEC Biomass
consortium)
- Cranfield
- 1- Biomass reports/ links to biomass projects
- Nottingham
- 1 - Biomass reports/links to biomass projects
Sub-theme Leader Jon Gibbins
Power Generation Technology Centre
7A.3.a Assessment of potential role and value of
CCS for grid operation
UKCCSC Meeting, 27 - 28 March 2006 Edinburgh
- TASK A3.1 Capture plant technical definition
- TASK A3.2 Consultation on simplified scenarios
- TASK A3.3 CCS flexibility value from real time
analysis trading
A.3.b Biomass co-combustion assessment
Power Generation Technology Centre
8A.3.4. Biomass links
UKCCSC Meeting, 27 - 28 March 2006 Edinburgh
- Evaluation of the possible candidate renewable
energy fuels availability and supply - Potential interactions with capture technologies
Biomass co-processing. - - Extending the range of biomass feedstock that
can be used and considering future power plant
design to maximise the amount of biomass co-fired
- Quantification of benefits of using co-firing of
renewable fuels
- Modelling of CO2 reduction in different energy
demand scenarios - Maintain links with TSEC Biomass consortium
Power Generation Technology Centre
9UKCCSC Meeting, 27 - 28 March 2006 Edinburgh
Overview of Sub-theme A4 CCS as Bridge to H2
Explore the opportunities for producing H2 using
CCS (including consideration of new sectors and
offsets negative CO2 output and saleable
credits etc)
- Nottingham
- 2 H2 from methane
- 3 Jet fuel from biomass
- 4 Gasification cycle data (reports from other
projects)
- Imperial College
- 6 H2 use in gas turbines and fuel cells near
term H2 production
- Cranfield
- 2 Gasification technical assessment
- 2a Reforming of gaseous feedstocks e.g. BP
- (both to address H2 purity)
- (H2 dilution of natural gas supplies? H2
requirements for transport applications?)
Input from biomass co-combustion work in A3?
Sub-theme Leader John Oakey
Power Generation Technology Centre
10A.4.a Technical review and assessment using CCS
for H2 production in other sectors
UKCCSC Meeting, 27 - 28 March 2006 Edinburgh
- TASK A.4.1 Scope of H2 production uptaking
actual gasification technology
- Review of steam reforming technology to produce
hydrogen
- Review of coal gasification and IGCC
Power Generation Technology Centre
11UKCCSC Meeting, 27 - 28 March 2006 Edinburgh
- TASK A.4.2 Scope of coal underground gasification
- TASK A.4.3 Catalytic cracking of methane at low
temperatures - TASK A.4.4 Jet fuel from biomass
- TASK A.4.5 H2 use in gas turbines and fuel cells
Power Generation Technology Centre
12UKCCSC Meeting, 27 - 28 March 2006 Edinburgh
Overview of Sub-theme A5 Fossil Fuel Use
Assess some key capture technologies
International Test Centre at Regina
- Nottingham
- 5 Adsorption technologies economics reports
from other projects
- Imperial College
- 7 Power plant (steam cycle) model
- 8 Amine scrubber modelling with power plant
model (Imperial 7) - 9 Technical work on power plant flexibility
with capture
Gasification assessment in A4
A5.a Technical description of various capture
plant technologies
- Cranfield
- 3 Lime capture chemical looping technologies
reports from other projects - 3a Oxy-fuel coal (input from IC), gas, etc.
- 4 CCS impact on RAMO
- 5 Impact of CCS on plant operating
cycles/flexibility
Technical advice on transport (A6) and storage (B)
Sub-theme Leader John Oakey
Power Generation Technology Centre
13A.5.a Technical description of various capture
plant technology
UKCCSC Meeting, 27 - 28 March 2006 Edinburgh
- TASK A.5.1 Identification and review of the
different carbon capture technologies - TASK A.5.2 Power plant model
A.5.b Assessment of technical implications of
various capture plant technologies
- TASK A.5.3 Impact of CCS on plant operating
cycles/flexibility
Power Generation Technology Centre
14A.5.1.1. Evaluation of the state of art of
pre-combustion capture technologies
UKCCSC Meeting, 27 - 28 March 2006 Edinburgh
CO2 pre-combustion capture at a coal gasification
plant in North Dakota, USA. This plant employs a
physical solvent process to separate 3.3 MtCO2
per year from a gas stream to produce synthetic
natural gas. Part of the captured CO2 is used for
an EOR project in Canada.
Power Generation Technology Centre
15A.5.1.2. Evaluation of the state of art of
oxyfuel combustion
UKCCSC Meeting, 27 - 28 March 2006 Edinburgh
Oxy-Combustion Pilot Plant
5 MWe CES water cycle plant at Kimberlina,
California
Flue gas 97 CO2 Recycle 75
Power Generation Technology Centre
16A.5.1.3. Evaluation of the state of art of
post-combustion technologies
UKCCSC Meeting, 27 - 28 March 2006 Edinburgh
- Lime capture chemical looping technologies
reports from other projects - Adsorption technologies economics reports
from other projects - Solvent absorption technologies - Amine scrubbing
- Membranes technologies
CO2 post-combustion capture at a plant in
Malaysia. This plant employs a chemical
absorption process to separate 0.2 MtCO2 per year
from the flue gas stream of a gas-fired power
plant for urea production (Courtesy of Mitsubishi
Heavy Industries).
Power Generation Technology Centre
17 A.5.1.3.1. Lime capture chemical looping
technologies
UKCCSC Meeting, 27 - 28 March 2006 Edinburgh
- A.5.1.3.3. Solvent absorption technologies -
Amine scrubbing
Power Generation Technology Centre
18A.5.2. Power Plant model
UKCCSC Meeting, 27 - 28 March 2006 Edinburgh
- Review of performance standards required for
retrofit of CCS on current fossil plants and new
more integrated fossil systems - Develop model of steam cycle for carbon capture
plant
- Define modes of operation of capture plant
- Basic amine system modelling (for application to
steam power plants with post-combustion capture) - Integrated optimisation of amine scrubber
modelling with power plant model
Power Generation Technology Centre
19A.5.3. Impact of CCS on plant operating
cycles/flexibility
UKCCSC Meeting, 27 - 28 March 2006 Edinburgh
- Identify technologies with most potential for
integration with likely developments in fossil
generation - Identify optimum capture performance in the
context of a flexible power plant producing low
cost electricity - Determine the main factors that influence the
cost of CO2 capture - CCS impact on RAMO
- Influence of CCS on flexibility of IGCC
Cost of CO2 Capture
Power Generation Efficiency
Source IEA GHG studies
Power Generation Technology Centre
20UKCCSC Meeting, 27 - 28 March 2006 Edinburgh
Overview of Sub-theme A6 CO2 Transport
Generate and collate information on CO2 transport
options for the UK
Theme B, GIS and Jeremy Colls (Nottingham)
- Newcastle
- 1 - UK source/sink analysis CO2 quantities
(review) - 2 - CO2 injection technologies review
- 3 Regulatory impacts on CO2 transport
- 4 - Transport scenarios link to theme A1
- 5 Transport options costs
- Cranfield
- 6 Pipeline materials review
- 7 Pipeline failure risk analysis
A6.a Functional and technical review of CO2
transport (including regulations)
- Aberdeen
- 5 Transport cost modelling
A6.b CO2 transport scenarios for the UK including
economic analysis
Sub-theme Leader Martin Downie
Power Generation Technology Centre
21UKCCSC Meeting, 27 - 28 March 2006 Edinburgh
- A.6.a. Functional and technical review of CO2
transport (including regulations)
- TASK A.6.1 UK source/sink analysis-CO2
quantities - TASK A.6.2 Technical and Regulatory requirements
for CO2 transport - TASK A6.3 Transport Options
A.6.b. CO2 Transport scenarios for the UK
including economic analysis
- TASK A6.4 Transport scenarios
- TASK A6.5 Strategic options cost modelling
Power Generation Technology Centre
22A.6.1. UK source/sink analysis - CO2 quantities
UKCCSC Meeting, 27 - 28 March 2006 Edinburgh
- Review sources location CO2 characteristics
distribution - Review sinks capacity, geological integrity,
proximity to coast, existing infrastructure, EOR.
Sink assessment/ranking/selection - Identify locations of suitable offshore storage
reservoirs - Identify possible locations of CCS plants, and
quantities of CO2 to be transported - Identify existing pipeline infrastructure
Sleipner CO2 injection into Utsira deep saline
reservoir
Power Generation Technology Centre
23A.6.3. Transport Options
UKCCSC Meeting, 27 - 28 March 2006 Edinburgh
- Transport overland, existing or new pipelines
- Sub sea transport using existing or new pipelines
- Transport by ship, collection from distributed
sources, delivery to sink
Photo Dakota Gasification
Power Generation Technology Centre
24A.6.4. Transport scenarios
UKCCSC Meeting, 27 - 28 March 2006 Edinburgh
- Identify specific locations of suitable offshore
storage reservoirs for scenario - Identify possible location of specific CCS plant,
and quantities of CO2 to be transported with
respect to the gradual deployment of CCS within
the context of the possible energy supply
scenarios developed in other themes - Technical assessment and optimisation of CCS
transport strategies - Specify regulatory constraints that might impact
on developments - Setting specifications and costs for offshore
injection platforms - Assessment of costs, technical and operational
requirements (including energy consumption) for
pipe and ship based transport for the CCS
deployments envisaged above - Devise optimal transport strategies for various
CCS deployment scenarios
Possible CCS systems sources for which CCS might
be relevant, transport, and storage options
Power Generation Technology Centre
25Capture Storage Costs
UKCCSC Meeting, 27 - 28 March 2006 Edinburgh
A.6.5. Strategic options cost modelling
- Modelling prospective production of oil and gas
from UKCS to 2030 - Modelling prospective end of field lives and
economic end of infrastructure in UKCS to 2030
- Modelling Supply/Cost Curves for CO2 Capture
Transportation (and Injection Storage EOR) - Modelling Economic Incentives for CO2 Capture
Transportation (and Storage/EOR) - Integrate results of detailed transport studies
within the techno-economic model to inform/modify
life cycle analysis
Cost of CO2 Transport
Source www.ieagreen.org.uk
Power Generation Technology Centre
26UKCCSC Meeting, 27 - 28 March 2006 Edinburgh
Overview of Sub-theme A7 Long Term Utilisation
To develop, for the first time, catalysts which
allow photocatalytic reduction to be performed
in supercritical CO2
- Nottingham
- 6 Develop catalysts
- 7 Probe methods of catalysis
- 8 Use, investigate and assess catalysts
developed
Sub-theme Leader Mike George
Power Generation Technology Centre
27UKCCSC Meeting, 27 - 28 March 2006 Edinburgh
Cross Theme Interactions Involving Theme A
Activities
- Newcastle
- Link to theme B re. GIS work on sinks and
injection technologies - Link to theme C on Nottingham work on
environmental impact of leaks - Link to GIS for sources/sinks etc
- Aberdeen
- Input from Theme B for various tasks
- Imperial College
- Input from Theme B for plant flexibility
definition - Output to GIS from biomass work (if appropriate)
- Input from GIS for review paper in A1
- All Theme A
- Publish papers and articles and update website
- Input to integrating modelling as
required/appopriate
- Input to Theme A Required from All Other Themes
- (not shown schematically)
- Advice etc for technical options exercise in
theme A1
Power Generation Technology Centre
28(No Transcript)
29(No Transcript)
30(No Transcript)
31(No Transcript)
32(No Transcript)
33(No Transcript)
34(No Transcript)
35(No Transcript)
36(No Transcript)
37(No Transcript)
38(No Transcript)
39(No Transcript)