Title: Contemporary Security Studies Alan Collins
1Contemporary Security StudiesAlan Collins
- Approaches to Security Studies
- Human Security
2Concepts and Tools
- Intellectual and Empirical Purpose
The human-centric tradition emphasises the
desirable human conditions for people to be
secure this now includes human security
Generally in state-centric arguments the state is
the referent object of security whereas in
human-centric arguments people are the referent
object
3Concepts and Tools
- Intellectual and Empirical Purpose
- Human Security Concepts
- Human development
- The nexus between development and conflict
- Growing normative humanitarian agenda
- Realpolitik interests
- The issues have serious local, regional and
global effects
4Human Security
- Towards an Analytical and Policy Framework
- Tensions and Reconciliation
5Analytical and Policy Framework
- The Means to Human Security
- The Narrow School focuses on threats of violence,
often called freedom from fear - The Broad School focuses on threats arising from
underdevelopment, often called freedom from want - The Very Broad School focuses on threats to all
human freedoms
6Reconciling Tensions?
- The development of a nexus between violence and
human development - Taking the narrow schools focus on political
violence as the dependent variable - Taking the broad schools focus on human
development as the independent variable
7Reconciling Tensions?
- A nexus between violence and development
establishes a policy framework for - Understanding causality
- Crisis management and prevention
But Is this a framework that can challenge the
state-centric argument of security?
8Human Security
- Necessary but not sufficient
- Human Security V State Security
9Human Versus State Security
- Necessary but not sufficient
- Realism
- Realism ignores a variety of threats that can
undermine the state and conditionality of
sovereignty - It is also unclear about its ultimate purpose
regarding the protection of people. - This casts doubt on its position as the dominant
concept
10Human Versus State Security
- Necessary but not sufficient
- Human security
- Human Security adds an important normative
dimension - However it is itself a necessary but not
sufficient security argument given the
contemporary context
11Necessary But Not Sufficient
State Security
Human security
Human Security State Security
- In principle both concepts are needed for an
understanding of security - There is a need to consolidate the conceptual
foundations of this proposition
12Human Security
- A Useful Concept for Practitioners
13The Concepts Utility to Practitioners
- Despite the rhetoric there is limited
implementation of the human security agenda by
states - UN active involvement in peace operations aimed
at addressing freedom from fear and want is one
of the reasons why there is a decrease in
internal conflict
In general state practitioners appear to refer to
or implement the human security agenda when it
serves their material interests
14The Decline in Political Violence
Human Security Centre (2005)
15Explaining the Decline
Increasing Conflict Prevention, Peace-Keeping and
Building and Post-Conflict Activities
Four-Fold Increase Peacemaking Missions
Seven-Fold Increase Contact Groups
Eleven-Fold Increase Economic Sanctions
Four-Fold Increase Peace Operations
Six-Fold Increase Preventative Diplomacy Missions
16The Want for Security
Afghan Population and the Perception of the
Largest Threats Facing the country
Asia Foundation (2004) and Rand Corporation (2005)