Intrinsic Sphincter Deficiency - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Intrinsic Sphincter Deficiency

Description:

Intrinsic Sphincter Deficiency & Slings Nader Gad MBChB, MChGO, FRCOG, FRANZCOG Consultant & Senior Lecturer in O&G Royal Darwin Hospital, Darwin, Australia – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:69
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 38
Provided by: continenc
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Intrinsic Sphincter Deficiency


1
Intrinsic Sphincter Deficiency Slings
  • Nader Gad
  • MBChB, MChGO, FRCOG, FRANZCOG
  • Consultant Senior Lecturer in OG
  • Royal Darwin Hospital, Darwin, Australia

2
Definition of ISD
  • SLPP less than 60 cmH2O
  • MUCP less than 20 cmH2O
  • Type III Stress Incontinence (Proximal urethra
    open at rest)

3
Classification of SUI
Clinically During UDA Bladder neck proximal urethra During Rest Bladder Neck Proximal urethra During Stress Cystocele
Type 0 No SUI is seen Probably due to momentary voluntary contraction of External Urethral sphincter closed at rest At or above inferior Margin of SP Descend open None
Type I Closed at rest Above inferior Margin of SP Open Descend less than 2 cm None or Small Cystocele
Type IIA Closed at rest Above inferior Margin of SP Open Rotational descent characteristic of cysto-uretherocele Present
Type IIB Closed At or below inferior Margin of SP Open May be further descent
Type III Open at rest Proximal urethra no longer function as sphincter
4
Causes Of ISD
  • Previous Pelvic Surgery
  • Anti-incontinence surgery
  • Urethral diverticulectomy
  • Radical Hysterectomy
  • Urethrotomy
  • Resection or incision of vesical neck
  • Aging Hypo-oestrogenic States
  • Pelvic Irradiation
  • Neurologic Conditions
  • Myelodysplasia
  • Anterior spinal artery syndtome
  • Lumbosacral neurologic conditions
  • Shy-Drager syndrome

5
Treatment of ISD
  • McGuire et al(1978 )were the first to note that
    ISD present in
  • 75 of women of patients who failed in multiple
    surgeries for SUI
  • 13 with no previous anticontinence surgery
  • Difficult to determine is it cause or effect?

6
Treatment of ISD
  • Sand et al (1987)
  • High failure rate of Burch colposuspension in
    women with low MUCP compared to those with MUCP
    more than 20cm H2O
  • Failure rate of Burch at 3 months FU
  • Low MUCP 54
  • Normal MUCP 18

7
Treatment of ISD
  • Most data show simple elevation of the bladder
    neck is ineffective
  • Recommend more obstructive procedure

8
Treatment of ISD
  • Proximal Suburethral slings (Traditional)
  • Mid-Urethral Tension-free Slings
  • TVT
  • TOT
  • 3. Artificial sphincter
  • 4. Urethral Bulking Procedures

9
Proximal Suburethral Slings
  • First introduced by Giordano in 1907 using
    Gracilis muscle flap
  • Aldridge in 1942, developed the Fascial sling
  • The principle
  • Create a hammock underneath bladder neck to
    prevent descent and provide a backboard at UVJ
    against which the urethra is compressed during
    increase of intra-abdominal pressure

10
Types of Proximal Slings
Biologic Synthetic
Fascia lata Mersilene
Rectus fascia Nylon
Gracilis muscle flap Marlex
Pyramidalis muscle flap Gore-tex
Round ligament Silastic
Ox dura mater Polypropylene mesh
Porcine small intestine submucosa
Cadaver fascia
11
Patient most un-suitable
  • History of irradiation
  • Previous sling erosion
  • Having surgery on the urethra at the same time
    (e.g., urethral diverticulectomy)
  • Having POP surgery at the same time

12
Proximal Urethral slings
  • Overall success for SUI ISD at 5 years 80
    90
  • Summitt et al (1990)
  • Sling procedure success rates were
  • 93 in ISD HMBN
  • 20 in ISD no HMBN

13
Common Complications of Proximal Suburethral
Slings
  • Longer recovery
  • Has the highest rate of retention 2-37

14
TVT ISD
  • Rezapour (2001) First report on 49 women
  • F-U for 3-5 years
  • 74 completely cured
  • 12 improved
  • 14 no improvement
  • Majority more than 70 years old MUCP less
    than 10 cmH2O

15
TVT ISD
  • Overall Success rate 55 74
  • (less than the 80-90 with PSUS)
  • Some experts advise when TVT in ISD
  • tape is placed in immediate proximity with
    urethra (still without tension) instead of aiming
    for a ¼ inch gap

16
TVT Complications
  • Voiding difficulties
  • Recurrent UTI
  • Bladder perforation (5-10)
  • Erosion (3 5 )
  • Vascular injury
  • Bowel injury
  • Haematoma
  • Nerve injury
  • Death (6 reported deaths by September of 2002)

17
TOT Slings
  • It leaves the sling in a more horizontal or
    hammock-like rather than U-orientation
  • Less operative time
  • Avoid risk of injury to bladder (only few
    reported cases) bowel major vessels

18
TVT vs TOT (Monarc)Miller et al (2006)
  • Retrospective study of 145 women Comparing TOT
    (Monarc) vs TVT under GA or Spinal anaesthesia
  • Monarc was nearly 6 times more likely to fail
    at 3 months after surgery in women with
    borderline MUCP (42 cm H2O or less)
  • In this study women with MUCP 20cmH2O or less
  • were exclusion criteria of TOT but not TVT

19
Failure Rate TVT vs TOTMiller et al 2006
TVT (60) Monarc (85)
All (145) Objective Subjective 3 14 9 16
MUCP 42 or less (81) Objective Subjective 3 13 16 23
MUCP more than 42 (64) Objective Subjective 4 16 2 6
20
TVT vs TOT vs Sling Jeon et al (2008)
  • Retrospective study of 253 women with ISD defined
    as LPP less than 60 cmH2O or MUCP less than 20
    cmH2O
  • - PVS 87
  • TVT 94
  • TOT 72
  • TOT (polypropylene Iris, Dowmedics Co, Korea,
    Outside in )
  • Regional of General Anaesthesia

21
TVT vs TOT vs SlingJeon et al (2008)
  • Cure rates after 2 years
  • PVS 87
  • TVT 87
  • TOT 35
  • Cure rate after 7 years
  • PVS 59
  • TVT 55

22
TVT vs TOT vs SlingJeon et al (2008)
Complications PVS (n87) TVT (n94) TOT (n72) P value
Bladder injury 1 (1.2) 0 0 0.6
De novo urgency 14 (16) 14 (15) 13 (18) 0.9
Voiding dysfunction (one month or longer) 18 (19) 17 (18) 8 (11) 0.75
V.D. Requiring surgery 0 3 (3.1) 1 (1.4) 0.26
Recurrent UTI 2 (2.3) 6 (6.4) 0 0.06
Mesh Erosion - 1 (1.1) 1 (1.4) 1
23
Darwin Experience
  • Retrospective study of my First 25 cases of the
    TVT-O procedures (JJ)
  • Procedure were completed in all women under
    sedation and local anaesthesia
  • Outcome of the procedure
  • Complication intra- post-operative
  • Success rate Subjective Cough test
  • Any difference in outcome when ISD present?

24
Darwin Experience
  • ISD was defined as valsalva or cough LPP less
    than 60 cmH2O and/or MUCP 20 cm H2O or less
  • Women with ISD were given the option to chose
    between TVT vs TVT-O
  • TVT have a higher cure rate than TVT-O in women
    with ISD
  • TVT has the potential risk of bowel or major
    blood vessels injury

25
Patients studied
Public 7 28
Private 18 72
GP referral 20 80
Specialist Ref 5 20
Age 39 66 years 39 66 years
Parity 1 6 1 6
Presence of SUI In All women 100
Urgency 9/25 36
Urge incontinence 5/25 20
Frequency 6/25 24
Nocturia 5/25 20
Previous surgery for SUI 3/25 12
Previous Hysterectomy 10/25 40
Previous POP repair 6/25 24
26
UDA Findings
Presence of POP 15/25 60
HMBN 21/25 84
ISD 10/25 40
HMBN ISD 6/25 24
ISD alone 4/25 16
DI 2/25 8
27
ISD
  • Of the ten women with diagnosis of ISD
  • a. 5 women (50) had MUCP lt 20cm H2O
  • 4 women had leakage on valsalva
  • the remaining patient had leakage on Cough LPP of
    less than 60 cm H2O, this patient was the only
    patient lost to follow up.

28
Sedation
  • Bolus of 1-2 mg midazolam
  • Then propofol 1 infusion at a rate of
    20-40mls/hour titrated to effect
  • A small bolus of propofol (10-30mg) and/or
    alfentanil (100 200mcg) may be used when
    required in some patients during penetration of
    Obturator membranes.

29
Local Anaesthesia
  • The local anaesthetic agent used was a total of
    80 100 ml of 0.25 prilocaine with adrenaline
    (1200,000)

30
Local Anaesthesia
  • Administration of local anaesthesia to
  • the area of the suburethral vaginal incision
  • paraurethral lateral dissection
  • expected tape passage through the Obturator
    foramen and muscles and the exit on the skin of
    the inner upper part of the thigh on both sides.

31
Cough Test
  • Once tape is inserted, cessation of all sedation
  • Bladder is filled to a volume similar to that
    when SUI was demonstrated during UDA
  • Cystoscopy performed
  • When patient is awake enough, operative table is
    tilted head up about 30 degrees
  • patient is instructed to cough strongly and the
    tape is very slowly adjusted to the point when
    urinary leakage just stops

32
Operative Short-term Complications
Intra-operative complications 0 0
Short term Urinary retention 0 0
Short Term DI 1/25 4 One woman had 2 episode of nocturnal enuresis on the 2nd and 7th postoperative and day that resolved by the time she was reviewed 5 weeks later
Short term postoperative complications 2/25 8 2 patients (8) developed significant pain in the upper thigh that resolved by 6 weeks post surgery
33
Hospital Stay
AM list 7 28
Discharge of AM list on same day 6/7 86
PM List 18 72
Discharged on the same day 2/18 11
Discharged next morning 14/18 78
Discharged within 48 hours 2/18 11
34
Follow-up
Duration of FU Mean 4 52 weeks Average 13.3 weeks
Duration to Audit Mean 7 156 weeks Average 53 weeks
35
Long Term Outcome
Urinary retention 0 0
Urgency 2 8 Two woman developed mild urgency
Other complications 1 4 Pain in the vagina required excision of part of the tape
No further SUI 24/24 100
36
August 2008Anast et al from Missouri, USA
  • TOS (Trans-Obturator Sling) placement a
    outside-in (ObTape Coloplast Surgical,
    Humeleback, Denmark)
  • 124 patients had leakage on valsalva
  • 29 had low VLPP (Less than 60 cmH2O)
  • 71 had higher VLPP

37
August 2008Anast et al, Missouri, USA
At a mean of 12 month Low VLPP (29) High VLPP (71)
Subjective Cure rate 93 79
Bladder perforation (6 patients) 3 6
Complication rate 11 29
38
Conclusion
  • TVT-O under local anaesthesia and sedation with
    the Cough Test in Theatre is very effective and
    safe surgical treatment of SUI in women with or
    without ISD.
  • Shortcomings of the Study
  • Retrospective
  • Small number of the patient in this study
  • Relatively short term follow up period
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com