Title: CHF (aka 1 whole cardiology fellowship in an hour)
1CHF (aka 1 whole cardiology fellowship in an
hour)
- Shawn Dowling, PGY 0.9 or 1.9?
2Epidemiology
- Currently, over 500,000 Canadians have HF
- 50,000 new cases per year
- MC reason for A in those gt65yoa
- Only CVS disease that is ? in prevalence
- One year MR after Dx ranges from 25-40, gt50 at
5 years (Framingham Heart Study)
3Definitions
- Congestive Heart Failure
- State in which the heart, at normal filling
pressures, is incapable of pumping a sufficient
supply of blood to meet the bodys metabolic
demands - Pulmonary Edema
- is a condition associated with increased loss of
fluid from the pulmonary capillaries into the
pulmonary interstitium and alveoli - Cardiac vs non-cardiac (i.e. ASA, toxins, sepsis,
ARDS, etc)
4Just a touch of Physiology
- Cardiac Output ? X
- _____ ____ - _____
- BP _____ x _____
5Just a touch of Physiology
- Cardiac Output HR X SV
- SV preload contractility- afterload
- BP SVR x CO
6- Preload
- Amt of stretch at ventricle before contraction
- Determined by venous rtn and compliance
- Heart has an optimal preload that allows for
maximal output (fwd flow) - Either ? venous rtn/EDV or ? compliance shift
increase preload and thus reduce optimal curve
7(No Transcript)
8- Contractility
- Amt of force generated by myocardium for a given
preload/afterload - Directly related to Ca
- Certain factors ? contr
- Physiologic ?O2, ?CO2, ?H, ischemia
- Rx ß-blocker, anti-dysrhythmic, Ca-antagonists,
barbituates, EtOH
9- Afterload
- Mural tension on cardiac cells during ventricular
contraction - Fx of SVR and cardiac chamber size
10Optimal Curve
?Contractility
Heart Failure
11Pressures
HP
COP
Pulmonary Vessels
12Putting it together
- In CHF
- ? in LVEDP ? ? Pulm HP (usu gt20) ? transudation
of fluids into the interstitium (exceeds the
ability of the lymphatics to compensate) ?
pulmonary congestion ? R heart failure from fluid
overload ? ? forward flow (? CO) and systemic
congestion
13The prerequisite boring stuff
MALADAPTIVE over time!!!
14Compensatory Mechanisms
- ? CO/ ? in LVEDP triggers a number of
compensatory mechanisms - Frank-Starling mechanisms (? stretch ? SV)
- Myocardial Hypertrophy (? LVEDP to maximize F-S
mechanisms) - Neurohormonal changes
15(No Transcript)
16Its actually quite simple If you just remember
RAS/ neurohormonal fundamentals
17Neurohormonal
Here you go!
- Goal is to ? CO via
- Adrenergic NS (? HR, ? cont, ? PVR)
- RAAS activated via kidney hypoperfusion
Mark, can you do the bilateral Posterior Shoulder
dislocation trick again.
18CHF
CHF
19Adrenergic NS
F-S mechm Hypertrophy
Compensatory mechm
20Nuff Physiology
21Types of HF
- Systolic vs Diastolic
- High-output vs Low-ouput
- What is it?
- RV vs- LV vs- Both (not going to talk about
isolated RV- consult pulmonary)
22Systolic vs Diastolic
- Systolic (2/3)
- (inadequate contn)
- Impaired contractility
- Impaired SV /- EF
- Sx of ? CO
- Diastolic (1/3)
- (inadequate relaxn)
- ? LV compliance
- LV filling pressure
- Venous congestion
23Impaired Contractility 1.MI 2.Chr volume
overload -MR -AR 3. Dilated CM
- ?? Afterload
- 1. AS
- 2. HTN
Systolic Dysfx
L-sided HF
Diastolic Dysfx
Impaird Vent Relaxn 1.LVH 2.Hypertrophic
CM 3.Restrictive CM
Obst to LV Filling 1.MS 2.Pericardial Consn or
tamponade
24Case 1
- 79 yo man
- CC Dyspnea sats were 83 via EMS
- PMHx ???
- Meds metoprolol, ramipril, nitrates (hasnt
used in mts), lasix (no ? dose), advil,
allopurinol, - Approach? Dx? Precipitant?
25Case 1 (cont)
- ABCs IV, O2, monitored bed
- Hx, P/E
- Investigations?
- Reversible causes - i.e. ??
26- P/E
- VS 110/60, HR-90, RR-30, Sats 90 on NRB, afeb
- JVP???, HS present too wheezy to hear clearly
- Bibasilar crackles, peripheral edema
27Hx
- Sx of CHF
- L sided Sx
- SOB, SOBOE
- PND(?), Orthopnea(?)
- Fatigue/confusion
- R sided Sx
- Peripheral edema
- RUQ pain
- ? pointing to etiology
- CP or angina equivalent
- Palpitations
- Change in Rx/new Rx
- Change in diet
- Blood loss
28P/E findings in
- What we hear in the ER
- ? HR(ANS), ? RR
- Diaphoresis (ANS)
- Crackles / wheezes
- JVD (50 pts)
- Peripheral edema (1/3 pts)
- Hepatomegaly / HJR/Kussmauls sign (?)
- Peripheral Perfusion
- What the Cardiologists claim to find on p/e
- S3 (25), /- S4
- Loud P2
- Pulsus Alternans
- PMI laterally displaced
29Investigations
- Labs CBC, lytes, Cr/BUN, trop, ?miracle test
- ECG
- CXR
30So you think it CHF
- Whats your DDx
- Structural think of the components of the heart
(arteries, nerves, myocardium, valves,
pericardium) - Iatrogenic (Rx (what drug for this guy), diet,
fluids) - Incompliant with meds
- Infection/Increased metabolic demand H.O. HF
- Increased Afterload
31The son arrives
- Dad has a Hx of COPD longtime smoker, MI yrs
ago - SO is it CHF OR COPD????
- Anyone know of a blood test that may help?
- How should it be used?
32Brain Natriuretic Peptide
33BNP
- Polypeptide that is synthesized in the ventricles
in response to stretch/pressure - prePro-BNP ? Pro-BNP ? BNP (active) t1/2 20 min
- nt-BNP (inactive) t1/2 120 min
- Released in proportion to LV expansion reflecting
the LVEDP - Will discuss later its physiologic role later
34What we do know
- N BNP levels are affected by age, renal fx, drug
use (bb diuretics in particular) - Correlates with NYHA Class HF
- Likely has a role in Screening, Dx, Tx, Px,
- FP-?chronic CHF
- R heart failure PE, severe lung disease,
chronic/stable CHF
35Should emergency physicians use B-type
natriuretic peptide testing in patients with
unexplained dyspnea?
- CJEM review of 2 articles
NEJM 2002 347 161-167
Circulation 2002 106416-422
36- Prospective diagnostic test evaluation
international multicentre - 1586 pts,
- CHF Dx made by two cardiologists (reviewed
charts, blinded to BNP results)
37- Treating MDs PTP (i.e., pre-BNP) of CHF
- 46.9 fell into the 0-20 probability group,
- 27.9 fell into the 20-80 (clinically
uncertain) group, - 25.4 fell into the 80-100 probability group
- EPs or Internists
38675
346
110
39- BNP study authors concluded that based on
-
- That the rapid measurement of BNP, using a
cut-off value of greater than 100 pg/cc, will
improve clinicians' ability to differentiate CHF
from non-cardiac dyspnea in the emergency
department.
40- Problem
- Most of the patients (1514/1586) were either in
the CHF unlikely group (0-20 probability) or in
the CHF likely group (80-100) - Therefore the CJEM reviewers looked at
indeterminate group
41- By setting a binary cut-off of 100mcg
- Characteristics of the test are much lower than
what was prev stated - Therefore these results will not really help us
- Sensitivity 79 (7286)
- Specificity - 71 (6676)
- PPV - 58 (5165)
- NPV - 87 (8391)
- LR -2.7 (2.23.3)
- LR - 0.3 (0.20.4)
42- Based on prior studies BNP researchers looked
at absolute values and tried to risk stratify
based on these - PRIDE study looked at proBNP(ntBNP)
- Retrospectively developed an Acute CHF score (not
yet prospectively validated)
43Diagnostic Algorithm
- ProBNP lt300 CHF unlikely (NPV 99 - dont
mention Sens/Spec) - ProBNPgt10,000 CHF likely (PPV 94 if prior Hx
of CHF and 99 if no Hx CHF)
44- Elevated proBNP (age cutoffs) 4 pts
- Interstitial edema on CXR 2 pts
- Orthopnea 2 pts
- Absence of fever 2 pts
- Current Loop Diuretic use 1 pt
- Age gt75 - 1 pt
- Rales on lung exam 1 pt
- Absence of a cough 1 pt
45- Score gt 7 high predictive value of CHF
- Sens 90, Spec - 90, PPV 83
46- RCT, ED setting
- N452 BNP (225) or no BNP (227)
- Told treating MD if lt100 CHF unlikely, gt500 CHF
likely, 100-500 indeterminate - Endpoints
- LOS and costs
aka BASEL study
47- BNP
- ? Time to Tx
- ? hospitalization,
- ?ICU admissions,
- ?LOS,
- ?costs
48CHR
- ? Getting it, ? When
-
- Likely getting proBNP (ntBNP)
- Run on the same machine as trops therefore approx
approx same wait
49BNP in Summary
- Likely coming to the region
- Ongoing research as to how to use it
- Likely will be absolute cut-offs ( ie less than
300 no CHF, gt10,000 CHF) - And some sort of scoring system/further
investigations to assess those in the middle
50CHF w/N heart size?
- Is this possible?
- Whats your DDx?
- Cardiac v- non-cardiac
- Acute
- Chronic
51Case 2
- 68 y.o. female
- CC Dyspnea progressive 2-3/7
- PMHx MI, CHF,
- Meds cardio cocktail (ASA, plavix, altace,
metoprolol, lipitor) - VS HR-120, RR-40, BP-110/80, sats-78
52Class of CHF - Killip
- Derived retrospectively in the 60s, post-MI pts
- I - No CHF - 5 mortality
- II - Mild CHF (bibasilar rales and S3) - 15-25
mortality - III - Frank pulmonary edema - 40 mortality
- IV - Cardiogenic shock - 80 mortality
- Killip T 3rd, Kimball JT. Treatment of myocardial
infarction in a coronary care unit. A two year
experience with 250 patients. Am J Cardiol. 1967
Oct20(4)457-64.
53NYHA Classification
- Class I No limitation of physical activity
- Class II Slight limitation of activity. Dyspnea
and fatigue with moderate activity (gt2flights of
stairs) - Class III Marked limitation of activity. Dyspnea
and fatigue with minimal activity (i.e. lt 2
flights of stairs - Class IV Severe limitation of activity. Sx are
present at rest
54Treatment Goals
- Improve Oxygenation (AB)
- Decrease PA pressures while maintaining adequate
cardiac and systemic perfusion i.e. ? congestive
state (C) via - ?Cardiac workload (?pre/afterload)
- Controlling excessive Na/H20 retention
- Improve cardiac contractility
55Treatment Modalities
- TREAT PPTs (shock em, cath em, dialyze em or
cut em) - Lasix
- Morphine
- Nitro
- Oxygen
- Position pt/ve pressure vent/Invasive vent
- Novel RX (nesiritide, ACE I)
56Jessup 2003, NEJM
57Lasix?
- The benefits of lasix(esp early) are primarily
from its venodilation properties, not its
diuretic effects - But, lasix ramps up the neurohormonal pathways
and can precipitate cardiac arrhythmias and death
58- Dosing ??
- No absolute dosing regime, dpnt on ?lasix naïve,
kidney function, route of administration - High dose lasix and low dose nitro has worse
outcomes (?MR) than low dose lasix and high dose
nitro
59Morphine?
- Acts to ? ANS, ? agitation, ? myocardial O2
consumption - Sacchetti et al showed it increased ICU
admissions odds ratio 3.0 - No evidence for and mounting evidence against
- Likely some role in extremely anxious individual
60Nitro?
- Increase cGMP and causes vasodilation
- Nitrates ? nitrites ? NO ? cGMP ? vasc smooth
muscle relaxn - Primarily a venodilator- ? preload _at_ ?doses
- Can cause arterial dilation - ? afterload _at_ ?
doses - Shown to be effective in ? MR and improving Sx
61Nitrates
- Topical onset in decreasing PCWP at 20 30
minutes with peak effect at 120 minutes - IV Dose is 10mcg/min and can be titrated up
every 3 5 minutes until desired effect - Sublingual NTG decreased PCWP by 36. Onset was
4 min, peak at 9 minutes - Spray onset of 1-2 minutes with peak at 5
minutes
62Back to the Case
- 69 yr lady continues trying to die on you despite
maximized medical management - Shes sating around 88, WOB, RR starting to
fall, become more tired - Still protecting her airway/secretions, BP 110
- Is there anything you could do to help with her
respiratory status?
63Non-Invasive Ventilation
- ? FRC, ? oxygenation, ?WOB, ?pre/afterload
- CIs
- Unstable
- Not Breathing
- Airway reflexes are absent
- Unable to control secretions
- Not cooperative alert enough for NPPV
- Unable to fit mask
- Recent upper airway or GI surgery
- ?Ischemic Sounding CP
64Evidence for NPPV in CHF
- Meta-analysis
- 3 RCTs of CPAP, 1 RCT of CPAP vs. BiPAP
- Results
- CPAP
- decs intubation rate RRR 26 (13-38)
- Trend to decd mortality RRR 6.6 (-3 -16)
- BiPAP vs. CPAP
- No significant differences but higher rate of MI
in BiPAP group ?due to baseline differences
early termination - CPAPgtBiPAP if possible
Pang D et al. The effect of positive pressure
airway support on mortality and the need for
intubation in cardiogenic pulmonary edema a
systematic review. CHEST 1998 1141185-1192
65Niseritide?
66Nesiritide
- Human recombinant BNP
- Throught to be a very sexy new drug for the mgmnt
of CHF in the US - Like nitro, also ? cGMP to cause vasodilation and
therefore ? LV filling pressures
67(No Transcript)
68- DB-RCT
- Efficacy arm niseritide v-placebo
- Comparative arm niseritide v- std therapy
- RESULTS
- Efficacy arm Niseritide had s.s. ?PCWP
- Comparative arm niseritide had similar
improvements in clinical status, dyspnea and
fatigue when compared with std therapy
69IV Nesiritide vs Nitroglycerin in the therapy of
decompensated CHF(VMAC)
- DB-RCT, approx 500 pts
- 1? endpt PCWP
- 2? endpt Sx relief _at_ 3 hrs
- RESULTS
- ? PCWP (and improved other cardiac indices)
- No improved Sx relief at 24hrs
- No significant difference in mortality at 18/12
(25 for nesiritde, 21 Nitro, p0.32
70- Equivalent to Nitro (at best)
- Significant hypotension, bradycardia, renal dysfx
- Trend to higher MR
- JAMA, 2005. Pooled analysis of 860 patients
- MR was 7.2 v 4.0 , p0.059(niseritide v- std
Tx) - Nesiritide manufacturers sponsored the study
- SUMMARY No benefit, likely more bad than good
71ACE-Inhibitor?
72ACE-I
- Placebo-Controlled, Randomized, Double-Blind
Study of Intravenous Enalaprilat Efficacy and
Safety in Acute Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema - DB-RCT, enalaprilat (1mg/2 hours) v- placebo
- Outcomes (all are hemodynamic parameters)
- ? PCWP
- ? diastolic and MAP
- ? arterial oxygen tension
- ? arterial oxygen saturation
73ACE-I
- Hamilton et al, Acad Emer Med, 19963205-212.
- DB-RCT, captopril vs placebo std Tx
- Captopril group had better improvement (43 vs
25, p0.03, less intubation (9 vs 20 not
s.s.) - Sacchetti et al showed that it decreased the
admissions to ICU odds ratio 0.29
74Role of ACE-I
- ???
- ?Consider in sick CHFers
- Add if other therapies are not working
- Formulations in the CHR
75Summary
- BNP has a role, still trying to figure out
exactly what/how it will fit in - Nitrogtlasix
- Morphine maybe - not a first line Rx
- PPV yes - very effective
- ACE-I yes- but for who?
- Niseritide No
- Pressors Yes (not discussed here)