CHF (aka 1 whole cardiology fellowship in an hour) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 75
About This Presentation
Title:

CHF (aka 1 whole cardiology fellowship in an hour)

Description:

CHF (aka 1 whole cardiology fellowship in an hour) Shawn Dowling, PGY 0.9 or 1.9? Epidemiology Currently, over 500,000 Canadians have HF 50,000 new cases per year MC ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:45
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 76
Provided by: remergsCo
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CHF (aka 1 whole cardiology fellowship in an hour)


1
CHF (aka 1 whole cardiology fellowship in an
hour)
  • Shawn Dowling, PGY 0.9 or 1.9?

2
Epidemiology
  • Currently, over 500,000 Canadians have HF
  • 50,000 new cases per year
  • MC reason for A in those gt65yoa
  • Only CVS disease that is ? in prevalence
  • One year MR after Dx ranges from 25-40, gt50 at
    5 years (Framingham Heart Study)

3
Definitions
  • Congestive Heart Failure
  • State in which the heart, at normal filling
    pressures, is incapable of pumping a sufficient
    supply of blood to meet the bodys metabolic
    demands
  • Pulmonary Edema
  • is a condition associated with increased loss of
    fluid from the pulmonary capillaries into the
    pulmonary interstitium and alveoli
  • Cardiac vs non-cardiac (i.e. ASA, toxins, sepsis,
    ARDS, etc)

4
Just a touch of Physiology
  • Cardiac Output ? X
  • _____ ____ - _____
  • BP _____ x _____

5
Just a touch of Physiology
  • Cardiac Output HR X SV
  • SV preload contractility- afterload
  • BP SVR x CO

6
  • Preload
  • Amt of stretch at ventricle before contraction
  • Determined by venous rtn and compliance
  • Heart has an optimal preload that allows for
    maximal output (fwd flow)
  • Either ? venous rtn/EDV or ? compliance shift
    increase preload and thus reduce optimal curve

7
(No Transcript)
8
  • Contractility
  • Amt of force generated by myocardium for a given
    preload/afterload
  • Directly related to Ca
  • Certain factors ? contr
  • Physiologic ?O2, ?CO2, ?H, ischemia
  • Rx ß-blocker, anti-dysrhythmic, Ca-antagonists,
    barbituates, EtOH

9
  • Afterload
  • Mural tension on cardiac cells during ventricular
    contraction
  • Fx of SVR and cardiac chamber size

10
Optimal Curve
?Contractility
Heart Failure
11
Pressures
HP
COP
Pulmonary Vessels
12
Putting it together
  • In CHF
  • ? in LVEDP ? ? Pulm HP (usu gt20) ? transudation
    of fluids into the interstitium (exceeds the
    ability of the lymphatics to compensate) ?
    pulmonary congestion ? R heart failure from fluid
    overload ? ? forward flow (? CO) and systemic
    congestion

13
The prerequisite boring stuff
MALADAPTIVE over time!!!
14
Compensatory Mechanisms
  • ? CO/ ? in LVEDP triggers a number of
    compensatory mechanisms
  • Frank-Starling mechanisms (? stretch ? SV)
  • Myocardial Hypertrophy (? LVEDP to maximize F-S
    mechanisms)
  • Neurohormonal changes

15
(No Transcript)
16
Its actually quite simple If you just remember
RAS/ neurohormonal fundamentals
17
Neurohormonal
Here you go!
  • Goal is to ? CO via
  • Adrenergic NS (? HR, ? cont, ? PVR)
  • RAAS activated via kidney hypoperfusion

Mark, can you do the bilateral Posterior Shoulder
dislocation trick again.
18
CHF

CHF
19
Adrenergic NS
F-S mechm Hypertrophy
Compensatory mechm
20
Nuff Physiology
21
Types of HF
  • Systolic vs Diastolic
  • High-output vs Low-ouput
  • What is it?
  • RV vs- LV vs- Both (not going to talk about
    isolated RV- consult pulmonary)

22
Systolic vs Diastolic
  • Systolic (2/3)
  • (inadequate contn)
  • Impaired contractility
  • Impaired SV /- EF
  • Sx of ? CO
  • Diastolic (1/3)
  • (inadequate relaxn)
  • ? LV compliance
  • LV filling pressure
  • Venous congestion

23
Impaired Contractility 1.MI 2.Chr volume
overload -MR -AR 3. Dilated CM
  • ?? Afterload
  • 1. AS
  • 2. HTN

Systolic Dysfx
L-sided HF
Diastolic Dysfx
Impaird Vent Relaxn 1.LVH 2.Hypertrophic
CM 3.Restrictive CM
Obst to LV Filling 1.MS 2.Pericardial Consn or
tamponade
24
Case 1
  • 79 yo man
  • CC Dyspnea sats were 83 via EMS
  • PMHx ???
  • Meds metoprolol, ramipril, nitrates (hasnt
    used in mts), lasix (no ? dose), advil,
    allopurinol,
  • Approach? Dx? Precipitant?

25
Case 1 (cont)
  • ABCs IV, O2, monitored bed
  • Hx, P/E
  • Investigations?
  • Reversible causes - i.e. ??

26
  • P/E
  • VS 110/60, HR-90, RR-30, Sats 90 on NRB, afeb
  • JVP???, HS present too wheezy to hear clearly
  • Bibasilar crackles, peripheral edema

27
Hx
  • Sx of CHF
  • L sided Sx
  • SOB, SOBOE
  • PND(?), Orthopnea(?)
  • Fatigue/confusion
  • R sided Sx
  • Peripheral edema
  • RUQ pain
  • ? pointing to etiology
  • CP or angina equivalent
  • Palpitations
  • Change in Rx/new Rx
  • Change in diet
  • Blood loss

28
P/E findings in
  • What we hear in the ER
  • ? HR(ANS), ? RR
  • Diaphoresis (ANS)
  • Crackles / wheezes
  • JVD (50 pts)
  • Peripheral edema (1/3 pts)
  • Hepatomegaly / HJR/Kussmauls sign (?)
  • Peripheral Perfusion
  • What the Cardiologists claim to find on p/e
  • S3 (25), /- S4
  • Loud P2
  • Pulsus Alternans
  • PMI laterally displaced

29
Investigations
  • Labs CBC, lytes, Cr/BUN, trop, ?miracle test
  • ECG
  • CXR

30
So you think it CHF
  • Whats your DDx
  • Structural think of the components of the heart
    (arteries, nerves, myocardium, valves,
    pericardium)
  • Iatrogenic (Rx (what drug for this guy), diet,
    fluids)
  • Incompliant with meds
  • Infection/Increased metabolic demand H.O. HF
  • Increased Afterload

31
The son arrives
  • Dad has a Hx of COPD longtime smoker, MI yrs
    ago
  • SO is it CHF OR COPD????
  • Anyone know of a blood test that may help?
  • How should it be used?

32
Brain Natriuretic Peptide
33
BNP
  • Polypeptide that is synthesized in the ventricles
    in response to stretch/pressure
  • prePro-BNP ? Pro-BNP ? BNP (active) t1/2 20 min
  • nt-BNP (inactive) t1/2 120 min
  • Released in proportion to LV expansion reflecting
    the LVEDP
  • Will discuss later its physiologic role later

34
What we do know
  • N BNP levels are affected by age, renal fx, drug
    use (bb diuretics in particular)
  • Correlates with NYHA Class HF
  • Likely has a role in Screening, Dx, Tx, Px,
  • FP-?chronic CHF
  • R heart failure PE, severe lung disease,
    chronic/stable CHF

35
Should emergency physicians use B-type
natriuretic peptide testing in patients with
unexplained dyspnea?
  • CJEM review of 2 articles

NEJM 2002 347 161-167
Circulation 2002 106416-422
36
  • Prospective diagnostic test evaluation
    international multicentre
  • 1586 pts,
  • CHF Dx made by two cardiologists (reviewed
    charts, blinded to BNP results)

37
  • Treating MDs PTP (i.e., pre-BNP) of CHF
  • 46.9 fell into the 0-20 probability group,
  • 27.9 fell into the 20-80 (clinically
    uncertain) group,
  • 25.4 fell into the 80-100 probability group
  • EPs or Internists

38
675
346
110
39
  • BNP study authors concluded that based on
  • That the rapid measurement of BNP, using a
    cut-off value of greater than 100 pg/cc, will
    improve clinicians' ability to differentiate CHF
    from non-cardiac dyspnea in the emergency
    department.

40
  • Problem
  • Most of the patients (1514/1586) were either in
    the CHF unlikely group (0-20 probability) or in
    the CHF likely group (80-100)
  • Therefore the CJEM reviewers looked at
    indeterminate group

41
  • By setting a binary cut-off of 100mcg
  • Characteristics of the test are much lower than
    what was prev stated
  • Therefore these results will not really help us
  • Sensitivity 79 (7286)
  • Specificity - 71 (6676)
  • PPV - 58 (5165)
  • NPV - 87 (8391)
  • LR -2.7 (2.23.3)
  • LR - 0.3 (0.20.4)

42
  • Based on prior studies BNP researchers looked
    at absolute values and tried to risk stratify
    based on these
  • PRIDE study looked at proBNP(ntBNP)
  • Retrospectively developed an Acute CHF score (not
    yet prospectively validated)

43
Diagnostic Algorithm
  • ProBNP lt300 CHF unlikely (NPV 99 - dont
    mention Sens/Spec)
  • ProBNPgt10,000 CHF likely (PPV 94 if prior Hx
    of CHF and 99 if no Hx CHF)

44
  • Elevated proBNP (age cutoffs) 4 pts
  • Interstitial edema on CXR 2 pts
  • Orthopnea 2 pts
  • Absence of fever 2 pts
  • Current Loop Diuretic use 1 pt
  • Age gt75 - 1 pt
  • Rales on lung exam 1 pt
  • Absence of a cough 1 pt

45
  • Score gt 7 high predictive value of CHF
  • Sens 90, Spec - 90, PPV 83

46
  • RCT, ED setting
  • N452 BNP (225) or no BNP (227)
  • Told treating MD if lt100 CHF unlikely, gt500 CHF
    likely, 100-500 indeterminate
  • Endpoints
  • LOS and costs

aka BASEL study
47
  • BNP
  • ? Time to Tx
  • ? hospitalization,
  • ?ICU admissions,
  • ?LOS,
  • ?costs

48
CHR
  • ? Getting it, ? When
  • Likely getting proBNP (ntBNP)
  • Run on the same machine as trops therefore approx
    approx same wait

49
BNP in Summary
  • Likely coming to the region
  • Ongoing research as to how to use it
  • Likely will be absolute cut-offs ( ie less than
    300 no CHF, gt10,000 CHF)
  • And some sort of scoring system/further
    investigations to assess those in the middle

50
CHF w/N heart size?
  • Is this possible?
  • Whats your DDx?
  • Cardiac v- non-cardiac
  • Acute
  • Chronic

51
Case 2
  • 68 y.o. female
  • CC Dyspnea progressive 2-3/7
  • PMHx MI, CHF,
  • Meds cardio cocktail (ASA, plavix, altace,
    metoprolol, lipitor)
  • VS HR-120, RR-40, BP-110/80, sats-78

52
Class of CHF - Killip
  • Derived retrospectively in the 60s, post-MI pts
  • I - No CHF - 5 mortality
  • II - Mild CHF (bibasilar rales and S3) - 15-25
    mortality
  • III - Frank pulmonary edema - 40 mortality
  • IV - Cardiogenic shock - 80 mortality
  • Killip T 3rd, Kimball JT. Treatment of myocardial
    infarction in a coronary care unit. A two year
    experience with 250 patients. Am J Cardiol. 1967
    Oct20(4)457-64.

53
NYHA Classification
  • Class I No limitation of physical activity
  • Class II Slight limitation of activity. Dyspnea
    and fatigue with moderate activity (gt2flights of
    stairs)
  • Class III Marked limitation of activity. Dyspnea
    and fatigue with minimal activity (i.e. lt 2
    flights of stairs
  • Class IV Severe limitation of activity. Sx are
    present at rest

54
Treatment Goals
  • Improve Oxygenation (AB)
  • Decrease PA pressures while maintaining adequate
    cardiac and systemic perfusion i.e. ? congestive
    state (C) via
  • ?Cardiac workload (?pre/afterload)
  • Controlling excessive Na/H20 retention
  • Improve cardiac contractility

55
Treatment Modalities
  • TREAT PPTs (shock em, cath em, dialyze em or
    cut em)
  • Lasix
  • Morphine
  • Nitro
  • Oxygen
  • Position pt/ve pressure vent/Invasive vent
  • Novel RX (nesiritide, ACE I)

56
Jessup 2003, NEJM
57
Lasix?
  • The benefits of lasix(esp early) are primarily
    from its venodilation properties, not its
    diuretic effects
  • But, lasix ramps up the neurohormonal pathways
    and can precipitate cardiac arrhythmias and death

58
  • Dosing ??
  • No absolute dosing regime, dpnt on ?lasix naïve,
    kidney function, route of administration
  • High dose lasix and low dose nitro has worse
    outcomes (?MR) than low dose lasix and high dose
    nitro

59
Morphine?
  • Acts to ? ANS, ? agitation, ? myocardial O2
    consumption
  • Sacchetti et al showed it increased ICU
    admissions odds ratio 3.0
  • No evidence for and mounting evidence against
  • Likely some role in extremely anxious individual

60
Nitro?
  • Increase cGMP and causes vasodilation
  • Nitrates ? nitrites ? NO ? cGMP ? vasc smooth
    muscle relaxn
  • Primarily a venodilator- ? preload _at_ ?doses
  • Can cause arterial dilation - ? afterload _at_ ?
    doses
  • Shown to be effective in ? MR and improving Sx

61
Nitrates
  • Topical onset in decreasing PCWP at 20 30
    minutes with peak effect at 120 minutes
  • IV Dose is 10mcg/min and can be titrated up
    every 3 5 minutes until desired effect
  • Sublingual NTG decreased PCWP by 36. Onset was
    4 min, peak at 9 minutes
  • Spray onset of 1-2 minutes with peak at 5
    minutes

62
Back to the Case
  • 69 yr lady continues trying to die on you despite
    maximized medical management
  • Shes sating around 88, WOB, RR starting to
    fall, become more tired
  • Still protecting her airway/secretions, BP 110
  • Is there anything you could do to help with her
    respiratory status?

63
Non-Invasive Ventilation
  • ? FRC, ? oxygenation, ?WOB, ?pre/afterload
  • CIs
  • Unstable
  • Not Breathing
  • Airway reflexes are absent
  • Unable to control secretions
  • Not cooperative alert enough for NPPV
  • Unable to fit mask
  • Recent upper airway or GI surgery
  • ?Ischemic Sounding CP

64
Evidence for NPPV in CHF
  • Meta-analysis
  • 3 RCTs of CPAP, 1 RCT of CPAP vs. BiPAP
  • Results
  • CPAP
  • decs intubation rate RRR 26 (13-38)
  • Trend to decd mortality RRR 6.6 (-3 -16)
  • BiPAP vs. CPAP
  • No significant differences but higher rate of MI
    in BiPAP group ?due to baseline differences
    early termination
  • CPAPgtBiPAP if possible

Pang D et al. The effect of positive pressure
airway support on mortality and the need for
intubation in cardiogenic pulmonary edema a
systematic review. CHEST 1998 1141185-1192
65
Niseritide?
66
Nesiritide
  • Human recombinant BNP
  • Throught to be a very sexy new drug for the mgmnt
    of CHF in the US
  • Like nitro, also ? cGMP to cause vasodilation and
    therefore ? LV filling pressures

67
(No Transcript)
68
  • DB-RCT
  • Efficacy arm niseritide v-placebo
  • Comparative arm niseritide v- std therapy
  • RESULTS
  • Efficacy arm Niseritide had s.s. ?PCWP
  • Comparative arm niseritide had similar
    improvements in clinical status, dyspnea and
    fatigue when compared with std therapy

69
IV Nesiritide vs Nitroglycerin in the therapy of
decompensated CHF(VMAC)
  • DB-RCT, approx 500 pts
  • 1? endpt PCWP
  • 2? endpt Sx relief _at_ 3 hrs
  • RESULTS
  • ? PCWP (and improved other cardiac indices)
  • No improved Sx relief at 24hrs
  • No significant difference in mortality at 18/12
    (25 for nesiritde, 21 Nitro, p0.32

70
  • Equivalent to Nitro (at best)
  • Significant hypotension, bradycardia, renal dysfx
  • Trend to higher MR
  • JAMA, 2005. Pooled analysis of 860 patients
  • MR was 7.2 v 4.0 , p0.059(niseritide v- std
    Tx)
  • Nesiritide manufacturers sponsored the study
  • SUMMARY No benefit, likely more bad than good

71
ACE-Inhibitor?
72
ACE-I
  • Placebo-Controlled, Randomized, Double-Blind
    Study of Intravenous Enalaprilat Efficacy and
    Safety in Acute Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema
  • DB-RCT, enalaprilat (1mg/2 hours) v- placebo
  • Outcomes (all are hemodynamic parameters)
  • ? PCWP
  • ? diastolic and MAP
  • ? arterial oxygen tension
  • ? arterial oxygen saturation

73
ACE-I
  • Hamilton et al, Acad Emer Med, 19963205-212.
  • DB-RCT, captopril vs placebo std Tx
  • Captopril group had better improvement (43 vs
    25, p0.03, less intubation (9 vs 20 not
    s.s.)
  • Sacchetti et al showed that it decreased the
    admissions to ICU odds ratio 0.29

74
Role of ACE-I
  • ???
  • ?Consider in sick CHFers
  • Add if other therapies are not working
  • Formulations in the CHR

75
Summary
  • BNP has a role, still trying to figure out
    exactly what/how it will fit in
  • Nitrogtlasix
  • Morphine maybe - not a first line Rx
  • PPV yes - very effective
  • ACE-I yes- but for who?
  • Niseritide No
  • Pressors Yes (not discussed here)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com