Title: Echocardiographic Evaluation of Prosthetic Valves, Part I
1Echocardiographic Evaluation of Prosthetic
Valves, Part I
- Echo Conference
- 3/16/11
- Scott Midwall, MD
2Objectives
- Introduction to Prosthetic Valves (PV)
- Mechanical
- Biological/Tissue
- Appearance of Normally functioning Valves
- Approach to Evaluating PVs with echo and doppler
- Evaluating Prosthetic Aortic Valves
- Echo Case/Questions (EchoSap)
3 Overview
- Prosthetic Valves are classified as tissue or
mechanical - Tissue
- Actual valve or one made of biologic tissue from
an animal (bioprosthesis or heterograft) or human
(homograft or autograft) source - Mechanical
- Made of nonbiologic material (pyrolitic carbon,
polymeric silicone substances, or titanium) - Blood flow characteristics, hemodynamics,
durability, and thromboembolic tendency vary
depending on the type and size of the prosthesis
and characteristics of the patient
4Valves
- Stented
- Porcine xenograft
- Pericardial xenograft
- Stentless
- Porcine xenograft
- Pericardial xenograft
- Homograft
- Autograft
- Ball and cage (Starr-Edwards)
- Single tilting disc (Medtronic-Hall)
- Bileaflet (St. Jude, CarboMedics)
5Mechanical Valves
- Extremely durable with overall survival rates of
94 at 10 years - Primary structural abnormalities are rare
- Most malfunctions are secondary to perivalvular
leak and thrombosis - Chronic anticoagulation required in all
- With adequate anticoagulation, rate of thrombosis
is 0.6 to 1.8 per patient-year for bileaflet
valves
6Biological Valves
- Stented bioprostheses
- Primary mechanical failure at 10 years is 15-20
- Preferred in patients over age 70
- Subject to progressive calcific degeneration
failure after 6-8 years - Stentless bioprostheses
- Absence of stent sewing cuff allow implantation
of larger valve for given annular size-gtgreater
EOA - Uses the patients own aortic root as the stent,
absorbing the stress induced during the cardiac
cycle
7Biologic Valves Continued
- Homografts
- Harvested from cadaveric human hearts
- Advantages resistance to infection, lack of need
for anticoagulation, excellent hemodynamic
profile (in smaller aortic root sizes) - More difficult surgical procedure limits its use
- Autograft
- Ross Procedure
8(No Transcript)
9 Caged-Ball Valve
10Single-Leaflet Valve
11Bileaflet Valve
12(No Transcript)
13Stentless Aortic Graft Valve
14Stented Biologic Mitral Valve
15Approach to Valve Evaluation
- Clinical data including reason for the study and
the patients symptoms - Type size of replacement valve, date of surgery
- BP HR
- HR particularly important in mitral and tricuspid
evaluations because the mean gradient is
dependent on the diastolic filling period - Patients height, weight, and BSA should be
recorded to assess whether prosthesis-patient
mismatch (PPM) is present
16Echo Imaging of Prosthetic Valves
- Valves should be imaged from multiple views, with
attention to - Opening closing motion of the moving parts
(leaflets for bioprosthesis and occluders for
mechanical ones) - Presence of leaflet calcification or abnormal
echo density attached to the sewing ring,
occluder, leaflets, stents, or cage - Appearance of the sewing ring, including careful
inspection for regions of separation from native
annulus for abnormal rocking motion during the
cardiac cycle
17Echo Imaging
- Mild thickening is often the 1st sign of primary
failure of a biologic valve - Occluder motion of a mechanical valve may not be
well visualized by TTE because of artifact and
reverberations
18Evaluation of the Prosthetic Aortic Valve (AV)
19Imaging Considerations
- Identify the sewing ring, valve or occluder
mechanism, and surrounding area - Ball or disc is often indistinctly imaged,
whereas leaflets of normal tissue valves should
be thin with an unrestricted motion - Stentless or homograft may be indistinguishable
from native valves - One can use modified views (lower parasternal) to
keep the artifact from the valve away from the LV
outflow tract
20Doppler of Prosthetic AV
- Doppler velocity recordings across normal PVs
usually resemble those of mild native aortic
stenosis - Maximal velocity usually gt 2 m/s, with triangular
shape of the velocity contour - Occurrence of maximal velocity in early systole
- With increasing stenosis, a higher velocity and
gradient are observed, with longer duration of
ejection and more delayed peaking of the velocity
during systole
21(No Transcript)
22Doppler Velocity Index (DVI)
- Dimensionless ratio of the proximal velocity in
the LVO tract to that of flow velocity through
the prosthesis - DVI VLVO/ VPrAV
- DVI is calculated as the ratio of respective VTIs
and can be approximated as the ratio of
respective peak velocities - Incorporates the effect of flow on velocity
through the valve and is much less dependent on
valve size
23DVI
- Helpful measure to screen for valve dysfunction,
particularly when the CSA of the LVO tract cannot
be obtained or valve size is unknown - DVI is always lt 1
- DVI lt 0.25 is highly suggestive of significant
obstruction - DVI is not affected by high flow conditions
through the valve, including AI
24(No Transcript)
25Doppler Prosthetic AV
- High gradients may be seen with normal
functioning valves with - Small size
- Increased stroke volume
- PPM
- Valve obstruction
- Conversely, a mildly elevated gradient in the
setting of severe LV dysfunction may indicate
significant stenosis - Thus, the ability to distinguish malfunctioning
from normal PVs in high flow states on the basis
of gradients alone may be difficult
26Doppler Continued
- Other qualitative and quantitative indices that
are less dependent on flow should be evaluated - Contour of the velocity
- In a normal valve, even in high flow, there is a
triangular shape, with early peaking of the
velocity and short acceleration time (AT) - With PV obstruction, a more rounded velocity
contour is seen, with velocity peaking almost in
mid-ejection, prolonged AT - Cutoff of AT of 100 ms differentiates well
between normal and stenotic PVs
27Effective Orifice Area (EOA)
- EOA PrAV (CSA LVO x VTI LVO) / VTI PrAV
- EOA is dependent on size of inserted valve
- Should be referenced to the valve size of a
particular valve type - For any size valves, significant stenosis is
suspected when valve area is lt 0.8 cm2 - However, for the smallest size valve, this may be
normal because of pressure recovery - Largest source of variability is measurement of
the LVO tract
28(No Transcript)
29Doppler Parameters of Prosthetic AV function in
Mechanical and Stented Biologic Valves in
Conditions of Normal Stroke Volume
30(No Transcript)
31Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch (PPM)
- When the EOA of the inserted prosthesis is too
small in relation to the patients BSA - A given valve area acceptable for a small,
inactive person may be inadequate for a larger
physically active individual - Main consequence is the generation of higher than
expected gradients through a normally functioning
valve
32PPM Continued
- Commonly seen in
- Patients with small aortic annulus sizes,
particularly women - Patients whom indication for AVR was AS as
opposed to AI - Young patients, who outgrow their initially
inserted prosthesis - Failure of post-op regression of LV mass index at
6 months may be clue to presence of PPM - For patients with exertional symptoms without
evidence of primary valve dysfunction, stress
echo should be entertained to further evaluate
33Evaluation of Prosthetic AI
- With color doppler, one can evaluate the
components of the color AI jet - Flow convergence, vena contracta, extent in the
LVO tract and LV - Normal physiologic jet are usually low in
momentum, depicted by homogenous color jets that
are small in extent - Ratios of jet diameter/LVO diameter from
parasternal long-axis imaging and Jet area/LVO
area from parasternal short-axis imaging are best
applied for central jets
34Prosthetic Valve AI
- With eccentric AI jets, measurement of jet width
perpendicular to the LVO tract will cut the jet
obliquely and risk overestimation - Entrainment of jet in the LVO tract may lead to
rapid broadening of the jet just after the vena
contracta-gt overestimation
35Significant AI, AV Dehiscence
36AI in PVs
- Contrary to native valves, the width of the vena
contracta may be difficult to accurately measure
in the long-axis in the presence of a prosthesis - Imaging of the neck of the jet in short-axis, at
the level of the sewing ring allows determination
of the circumferential extent of the
regurgitation - Approximate guide
- lt 10 of sewing ring suggests mild
- 10-20 suggests moderate
- gt 20 suggests severe
- Rocking of the prosthesis usually associated
with gt40 dehisscence
37Spectral Doppler and PVAI
- PHT is useful when the value is lt200 ms,
suggesting severe AI, or gt 500 ms, consistent
with mild AI - Intermediate ranges may reflect other hemodynamic
variables such as LV compliance and are less
specific - Holodiastolic flow reversal in the descending
thoracic aorta is indicative of at least moderate
AI - Severe is suspected when the VTI of the reverse
flow approximates that of the forward flow - Holodiastolic flow reversal in the abdominal
aorta is usually indicative of severe AI
38(No Transcript)
39Part II-Evaluation of Prosthetic Mitral Valve
40Evaluation of Prosthetic MV
- A major consideration with echo is the effect of
acoustic shadowing by the prosthesis on
assessment of MR - Problem is worse with mechanical valves
- On TTE, LV function is readily evaluated, but the
LA is often obscured for imaging and doppler
interrogation - TEE provides visualization of the LA and MR but
shadowing limits visualization of the LV - Thus, comprehensive assessment of PMV requires
both TTE TEE when valve dysfunction is suspected
41Prosthetic MV Imaging Considerations
- In the parasternal long-axis view, the prosthesis
may obscure portions of the LA and its posterior
wall - MR may be difficult to evaluate
- Parasternal long-axis views allows visualization
of the LVO tract, which can be impinged by higher
profile prostheses - Apical views allow visualization of leaflet
excursion for both bioprosthetic and mechanical
valves - May allow detection of thrombus or pannus
- Vegetations can be seen but are often masked by
acoustic shadowing
42Doppler Evaluation of PMV
- Complete exam should include
- Peak early velocity
- Estimate of mean pressure gradient
- Heart Rate
- Pressure half-time (PHT)
- Determination of whether regurgitation is present
- DVI and/or EOA as needed
- LV/RV size and function
- LA size if possible
- PA systolic pressure
43Peak Early Mitral Velocity
- Peak E velocity is easy to measure
- Provides simple screen for prosthetic valve
dysfunction - Can be elevated in hyperdynamic states,
tachycardia, small valve size, stenosis, or
regurgitation - Inhomogeneous flow profile across caged-ball and
bileaflet prostheses can lead to doppler velocity
measurements that are elevated out of proportion
to the actual gradient - For normal bioprosthetic MVs, peak velocity can
range from 1.0 to 2.7 m/s
44MV Peak Velocity
- In normal bileaflet mechanical valves, peak
velocity is usually lt 1.9 m/s but can be up to
2.4 m/s - As a general rule, peak velocity lt 1.9 m/s is
likely to be normal in most patients with
mechanical valves unless there is markedly
depressed LV function
45Mean Gradients of MV
- Normally less than 5-6 mm Hg
- Values up to 10-12 mm Hg have been reported in
normally functioning mechanical valves - High gradients can be due to hyperdynamic
states, tachycardia or PPM, regurgitation, or
stenosis
46MV Pressure Half-time (PHT)
- A large rise in PHT on serial studies or a
markedly prolonged single measurement (gt200 ms)
may be a clue to the presence of obstruction - PHT seldom exceeds 130 ms across normal pv
- Minor changes in PHT occur as a result of
nonprosthetic factors including - Loading conditions
- Drugs
- AI
- PHT should not be obtained in tachycardic rhythms
or 1st degree blocks when the E A velocities
are merged or the diastolic filling period is
short
47(No Transcript)
48(No Transcript)
49EOA of PMV
- Calculation from PHT, as traditionally applied in
native MS, is not valid in prosthetic valves due
to its dependence on LV and LA compliance and
initial LA pressure - EOAPrMV stroke volume/VTIPrMV
- Usually reserved for cases of discrepancy between
information obtained from gradients and PHT
50Prosthetic MV and DVI
- DVI VTIPrMV/ VTILVO
- DVI can be elevated with stenosis or
regurgitation - For mechanical valves, a DVI lt 2.2 is most often
normal - Higher values should prompt consideration of
prosthesis dysfunction
51Doppler Parameters of Prosthetic MV Function
52Prosthetic MV Regurgitation
- Since direct detection of prosthetic MR is often
not possible with TTE, particularly with
mechanical valves, one must rely on indirect
signs suggestive of significant MR - Such signs include
- Hyperdynamic LV with low systemic output
- Elevated mitral E velocity
- Elevated DVI
- Dense CW regurgitant jet with early systolic
maximal velocity - Large zone of systolic flow convergence toward
the prosthesis seen in the LV - Clinical symptoms presence of the above
findings represents a clear indication for TEE
53Prosthetic MV Regurgitation
- Assessment of severity of prosthetic MR can be
difficult at times because of the lack of a
single quantitative parameter that can be applied
consistently in all patients - Currently, best method is to integrate several
findings from both TTE and TEE that together
suggest a given severity of regurgitation
54Echo Doppler Criteria for Severity of
Prosthetic MR from TTE/TEE
55TTE of Prosthetic MV
56TEE of Same MV