Health Systems Approach to Referral and Treatment - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 72
About This Presentation
Title:

Health Systems Approach to Referral and Treatment

Description:

Health Systems Approach to Referral and Treatment John Sellors, MD, MSc Durres, Albania March 13, 2004 Overview Referral and treatment systems Diagnosis and treatment ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:84
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 73
Provided by: healthOsf
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Health Systems Approach to Referral and Treatment


1
Health Systems Approach to Referral and Treatment
  • John Sellors, MD, MSc
  • Durres, Albania
  • March 13, 2004

2
Overview
  • Referral and treatment systems
  • Diagnosis and treatment of cervical precancer
  • Monitoring and information systems

3
Cervical Cancer Screening
  • Since most sexually active women have already
    been infected, all are at risk.
  • Early identification and treatment of
    precancerous lesions (CIN) are the immediate
    needs.
  • Screening for early detection and treatment is
    essential.

4
Screening Methods - 2004
  • Cytology
  • Conventional cytology
  • Liquid-based cytology
  • Alternatives to Cytology
  • Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid (VIA)
  • Visual Inspection with Lugols Iodine (VILI)

With or without HPV DNA test for oncogenic types
5
Screening within a Health Care System
Screening test
Community participation
()
(-)
Repeat Periodically?
Colpo confirmation
()
Treatment
Follow-up
6
An Effective Screening Test Is Only One Part of a
Successful Program
7
Three Main Cervical Cancer Prevention Objectives
  • Encourage participation of women.
  • Screen with a high quality test.
  • Use effective and efficient treatment.

Robles S. PAHO, 2003
8
Referral Service Models for Colposcopy and
Treatment
  • Integrated, vertical or mixed.
  • Single or multiple visit.
  • Static or mobile.

9
Management Options After a Positive Screening Test
10
Indications for Colposcopy Referral
  • High grade abnormality on cytology.
  • Persistent low grade or inadequate cytology.
  • AGUS (Atypical Glandular Cells of Undetermined
    Significance) cytology.
  • Suspicious looking cervix on visual examination.

11
Exchange of Information is Important for Optimal
Care
  • Letter with reason for referral from screening
    provider to colposcopist.
  • Feedback on diagnosis from colposcopist to
    screening provider.

12
Colposcopy
  • A diagnostic test that confirms microscopic
    visual findings with a directed biopsy.
  • Permanent record possible with drawing of the
    findings or a photograph.
  • Can be done at any level of the health care
    system, usually by a physician.

13
Essential Tools for Colposcopy
  • 6 to 16 x magnifn.
  • Strong variable light
  • 250 mm focal distance for instruments
  • Solutions
  • normal saline
  • 3-5 acetic acid
  • Lugols iodine

14
Diagram of the Transformation Zone
Most Distal Cervical Crypt Opening
Transformation Zone
SCJ

Area of Ectopy
15
Squamocolumnar Junction (SCJ)
16
Location of Squamocolumnar Junction and
Transformation Zone
SCJ Squamocolumnar junction Sq. Epi - Squamous
epithelium TZ - Transformation zone Col. Epi -
Columnar epithelium
Illustration Mrs. S. Sankaranarayanan
17
Squamocolumnar Junction
18
Colposcopy Procedure
  • Wash the cervix with a 3-5 acetic acid solution.
  • Inspect the cervix under magnification (4X to
    20X).
  • Assess the entire TZ and any acetowhite areas
    take a biopsy of any abnormalities.

19
The Two Main Questions when Performing
Colposcopy...
  • Is the examination ADEQUATE?
  • Can I rule out CANCER?

20
If Colposcopy is Inadequate
  • Providing woman is not pregnant, always sample
    the endocervical canal (endocervical curettage or
    cytobrush cytology) when SCJ is not completely
    seen.

21
Primary Responsibility of the Colposcopist
Diagnose Cancer
  • At increased risk of cervical cancer
  • older age
  • larger lesion
  • higher grade cytology

22
A Normal Cervix on Colposcopy
  • Transformation zone is normal AND
  • Ectocervix is normal AND
  • Endocervix is normal

23
(No Transcript)
24
Common Colposcopy Pitfalls...
  • Failure to biopsy.
  • Failure to use an endocervical speculum to see
    SCJ.
  • Failure to do ECC if entire SCJ not seen.
  • Failure to record findings.

Adapted from Soutter
25
More Common Colposcopy Pitfalls...
  • Failure to communicate with pathologist.
  • Failure to later correlate histology with
    colposcopy.
  • Failure to perform self-auditing for QC.

Adapted from Soutter
26
Scoring Colposcopy Findings (Modified Reids
Index)
27
Reids Index versus Color for the Detection of
High Grade CIN
(n301)
Shaw et al. J Lower Gen Tract Dis, 2003
28
Colposcopy Documentation
  • Patient identification, personal data.
  • Contact information.
  • Reason for referral.
  • Description (Reids Index) and drawing of
    cervical findings showing biopsy site.
  • Colposcopic, histologic and cytologic findings.
  • Final diagnosis and management plan.

29
Purposes Served by Clinic Documentation
  • Copy sent to referral source.
  • Aide memoire for clinical care and management
    plan.
  • QC of colposcopy skills (histology correlation).
  • Medicolegal record.

30
Treatment Methods for Cervical Precancer
  • Outpatient
  • Cryotherapy
  • Loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP,
    LLETZ)
  • Hospital Inpatient
  • Cold knife Conization
  • Hysterectomy

31
Referral Networks
Adapted from Service Program Guide, ACCP 2004
32
Cryotherapy
  • May be done at any level of health care system by
    trained nurse or physician.
  • The procedure is simple and low-cost.
  • 80-90 effective in treating even high-grade
    precancerous lesions.
  • Suitable lesions covered by probe and not
    involving the canal.

33
Cryotherapy Procedure
  • Rule out pregnancy.
  • A metal probe that is cooled by a refrigerant gas
    (CO2 or N2O) is placed on the ectocervix.
  • The area is frozen for 3 min, thawed 5 min, and
    frozen for 3 min again.

34
Cryotherapy equipment components
35
Expected Side Effects of Cryotherapy
  • Mild cramping
  • Profuse, watery vaginal discharge for about 1
    month
  • Spotting, light bleeding for 1-2 weeks

36
Cryotherapy Overview
  • Systematic overview of the literature
  • Definitions (acceptability, safety,
    effectiveness, long term sequelae)
  • Evidence for each outcome
  • Other issues (lesion size grade, age, low
    resource setting)

ACCP publication, 2003
37
Definitions
  • Acceptability - side effects _at_ lt1 month (pain,
    vasomotor, discharge, spotting)
  • Safety - complications _at_ lt1 month (PID, bleeding,
    necrotic plug)
  • Effectiveness - (lesion-free _at_ gt1 year)
  • Long term sequelae - problems after 1 month
    (stenosis, infertility, obstetrical problems)

38
Acceptability - Best Evidence(43 papers)
  • Vasomotor - 10 to 20 (Townsend 71, 83)
  • Pain - lt labor, 4 (scale of 0 to 10) (Sammarco
    93, Harper 97)
  • Discharge - universal, 1/3 malodorous, usually
    lt 1 month (Berget 87)
  • Spotting - lt 1/4, 3 days (Kwikkel, 85 Berget
    87)

39
Safety/ComplicationsBest Evidence (40 papers)
  • PID - lt 1 (Mitchell, 98 Berget, 87), higher
    in adolescents (10)
  • Severe Bleeding - none reported (Mitchell, 98
    Kwikkel, 85 Townsend, 83 Berget, 87)
  • Necrotic plug syndrome - lt3 (Schantz, 84
    Berget, 87 Creasman, 73) suspect this is due
    to endocervical canal freezing-not recommended

lt1 month
40
Sequelae Best Evidence (32 papers)
  • Stenosis - lt 2 needed dilation in the clinic
    (Mitchell, 98)
  • Obstetrical problems - all low powered
    comparative studies no differences in rapid
    labor, C-S, abortion rates (Benrubi, 84
    Hemmingsson, 82)
  • Infertility - no valid studies

gt 1 month after treatment
41
Effectiveness - Cure Rates
  • Colposcopy cytology _at_ 1 year
  • histologic confirmation
  • Double Freeze CIN 1 CIN 2 CIN 3
  • Berget, 91 90.9 90.9 86.4
  • Olatunbosun, 92 83.3 96.9 80.8
  • Tangtrakul, 83 88.9 85.7 78.5

42
Cure Rates - Other Factors
  • Lesion size, age - no evidence
  • Time to detection of failure (cumulative)
  • 1 yr 2 yr 3 yr 4yr 5 yr
  • 61.7 74.0 81.5 91.4 100
  • (Benedet, 87)
  • by ECC 50.0
  • - 82.2 (Ferenczy, 85)

43
Overview Conclusions
  • Cryotherapy 90 effective for ectocervical CIN
    lesions
  • Acceptability
  • vasomotor, spotting lt25
  • pain, discharge - universal
  • Safety - PID lt 1, Necrotic plug lt 3
  • Long term sequelae - poor evidence

44
LEEP/LLETZ
  • LEEPLoop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure
  • sometimes referred to as LLETZ Large Loop
    Excision of the Transformation Zone

45
What Is LEEP/LLETZ?
  • An excisional method, using a thin electric wire
    to remove the entire TZ and therefore removes the
    affected tissue.
  • This is a key feature of LEEP - it removes tissue
    which can be examined further, rather than
    destroying the tissue by freezing.

46
What Is LEEP/LLETZ?
  • Requires more equipment, including an electricity
    source, a smoke evacuator, and local anesthetic.
  • 90 effective in treating women for precancerous
    lesions the first time used.
  • More side effects for the patient.
  • Relatively higher cost.

47
Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure (LEEP) of
an Ectocervical Lesion With One Pass
Illustration Electrosurgery for HPV-related
Diseases of the Lower Genital Tract, 1992
48
LEEPAdverse Effects
  • Possible side effects of LEEP are similar to
    cryotherapy, but chance of severe bleeding is
    slightly higher.
  • Less than 2 of women have moderate to severe
    post procedure bleeding.
  • Women may have a brown or black discharge for up
    to two weeks after LEEP.

49
Cone Biopsy
  • Done under general anesthesia in the hospital by
    a gynecologist.
  • Cone biopsy removes the entire circumference of
    the transformation zone and most of the cervical
    canal.
  • If outpatient treatment appropriate and
    available, conization is not necessary for
    treatment of cervical precancer.

50
Cone Biopsy
51
Cone Biopsy
52
Cone Biopsy
  • Useful to see if microinvasive cancer is present
    if so, it can be treated with just a
    hysterectomy.
  • Also used to examine the tissue in the
    endocervical canal if there is concern about
    disease there.

53
Cone BiopsyPossible Serious Side Effects
  • Bleeding
  • Infection

54
Cone BiopsyPossible Sequelae
  • Most women can have a normal pregnancy and
    delivery after cone biopsy.
  • In rare cases, cone biopsy can cause problems
    with subsequent pregnancies - spontaneous
    miscarriage or a long labor due to cervical
    stenosis.

55
Hysterectomy
  • Done in the hospital and requires general
    anesthesia.
  • Usually done for cancer that has not spread
    beyond the cervix.
  • If no other indication and outpatient treatment
    is available, not necessary for treatment of
    cervical precancer.

56
Danforths Obstetrics Gynecology, 6th edition
Hysterectomy
57
HysterectomyPossible Side Effects
  • Bleeding, infection, accidental injury to other
    organs, such as the bowel or bladder.
  • Ovaries may also be removed, creating a
    menopausal state.

58
Goal of a Cervical Cancer Prevention Program
  • To reduce the incidence, morbidity and mortality
    from cervical cancer.

59
Data Requirements for Program Evaluation
  • Population of interest (population register or
    census)
  • Register of screening tests (cytology labs)
  • Follow up on positive tests (colposcopy clinics
    and histopathology labs)
  • Invasive cervical cancers (cancer registry)
  • Deaths from cervical cancer (vital statistics)

Adapted from Miller AB. Cervical Cancer Screening
Programs Managerial Guidelines, WHO 1992
60
Model of an Information Reporting System
  • Cytology Labs
  • Identifiers
  • Personal data
  • Smear data
  • Health Centers
  • Cytology Labs
  • Histopath. Labs
  • Screening Treatment Program
  • Government
  • Researchers

Cervical Screening Database
  • Histopathology Labs
  • Identifiers
  • Biopsy/treatment data

Editing Linkage
Periodic Linkages with Ext Databases
  • Colposcopy/Treatment Center
  • Identifiers
  • Colpo Diagnosis
  • Treatment

Population Database
Mortality File
  • Hospital
  • Data
  • hysterectomies

Cancer Registry
adapted from Marett L. Cancer Care Ontario, 2001
61
Core Indicators for Program Evaluation
  • Coverage ( of population of interest screened)
  • Follow up of positive tests
  • Inadequate rate of cytology
  • Histopathology-cytology agreement
  • Performance testing

62
Core Indicator - Coverage
  • Screening data from all cytology labs which are
    linked to give woman-specific information.
  • Population register.

63
Core Indicator Follow up of Test-Positives
  • Screening data on all positives.
  • Colposcopy clinic data for all visits.
  • Screening test and colposcopy data linked to
    provide woman-specific information.

64
Can You Suggest an Approach for the Other Core
Indicators?
  • Inadequate rate of cytology.
  • Histopathology-cytology agreement.
  • Performance testing example QC for
    colposcopists Cryotherapy LEEP.

65
Data for Continuous Program Monitoring
  • Data quality is preferable to quantity
  • Only collect essential data that will be used.

66
Indicators and Corrective Actions
67
Sources of Clinical Care Data
  • Screening, Referral, Recall
  • Cytology lab records
  • Screening clinic records
  • Colposcopy, Diagnosis, Treatment, Recall
  • Colposcopy clinic records
  • Histopathology lab records

68
Communication of Results and Recall
  • Effective information and outreach systems ensure
    that patients receive test results, periodic
    screening and appropriate follow-up after
    treatment.
  • Women who have negative screening results should
    come for periodic repeat screening.

69
Record of Screening
  • Screening provider should keep a register of each
    smear sent to lab, test result, communication
    with client.
  • Medicolegal implications.

70
Record of Referral Visit
  • Colposcopist should keep a register of each
    client seen final diagnosis communication with
    client.
  • Medicolegal implications.

71
Recall Tickler System
  • A simple card file, organized by month and year,
    can be set up in any clinic to serve as a
    reminder for the recall of patients for follow-up
    visits or screening visits.

72
John Sellors, MD, MScSenior Medical
AdvisorReproductive Healthjsellors_at_path.org206.
285.3500
  • www.path.org
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com