Nuclear Energy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Nuclear Energy

Description:

Nuclear Energy Nuclear Energy How does a nuclear reactor work? Is it a major energy source worldwide? Is it Green? Problems Waste Disposal Accidents Future Research ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:56
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: alphaChe
Category:
Tags: energy | nuclear

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Nuclear Energy


1
Nuclear Energy
2
Nuclear Energy
  • How does a nuclear reactor work?
  • Is it a major energy source worldwide?
  • Is it Green?
  • Problems
  • Waste Disposal
  • Accidents
  • Future
  • Research
  • Generation IV

3
Nuclear Energy Plant
  • Nuclear Fission
  • 235U n ? 236U ? 92Kr 141Ba g 3n
  • Chain Reaction
  • Controlled by control (graphite) rods and water
    coolant
  • Heat from reactor is cooled by circulating
    pressurized water
  • Heat exchange with secondary water loop produces
    steam
  • Steam turns turbine generator to produce
    electricity

4
Present Nuclear Energy
  • 100 plant produce about 20 of the electricity
    in US
  • 431 plants worldwide in 31 countries produce
    about 17 of the worlds electricity
  • Environmental Impact
  • No Greenhouse gases
  • Completely contained in normal operation
  • Spent fuel issue

5
Waste Disposal
  • Waste kept at plant, but running out of room.
  • Site chosen in Nevada for nuclear waste.
  • Research on safe transportation
  • Nuclear proliferation fuel is very dilute and
    not easily converted to weapons grade
  • Stored in very heavy casings (difficult to steal)

6
Accidents
  • Nuclear Meltdown
  • Fukushima Daiichi
  • Chernobyl
  • Three Mile Island
  • Environmentalist watch dogs note other near
    misses in recent years

7
Fukushima - 2011
  • 6 Power plants on site
  • 9.0 earthquake , followed by a 45 ft tsunami
  • Flooded power plant
  • 1/10 radiation that was released in Chernobyl
    accident

8
More info
  • Reactor 4 had been defueled at time of shutdown
    and Reactors 5 and 6 were in shutdown mode for
    routine maintenance
  • The tsunami destroyed the connection to the grid
  • The tsunami flooded the pumps, shorting them out
  • Reactors 1-3 experience complete meltdown

9
more
  • Tokyo in 2008, an IAEA expert warned that a
    strong earthquake with a magnitude above 7.0
    could pose a "serious problem" for Japan's
    nuclear power stations.
  • In the late 1990s to comply with new regulatory
    requirements, three additional backup generators
    for reactors Nos. 2 and 4 were placed in new
    buildings located higher on the hillside. All six
    reactors were given access to these generators,
    however the switching stations that sent power
    from these backup generators to the reactors'
    cooling systems for Units 1 through 5 were still
    in the poorly protected turbine buildings. All
    three of the generators added in the late 1990s
    were operational after the tsunami. If the
    switching stations had been moved to inside the
    reactor buildings or to other flood-proof
    locations, power would have been provided by
    these generators to the reactors' cooling
    systems.
  • Hydrogen Explosions Zr 2 H2O ? ZrO2 2 H2
  • Sea water

10
Chernobyl (1986)
  • A planned test gone horribly wrong
  • The test
  • See if turbine generator could power the water
    pumps that cool the reactor in the event of a
    loss of power
  • Crew shut off power too rapidly, producing a Xe
    isotopes that poisons the reactor
  • In response the rods were lifted to stimulate
    reaction
  • The lower cooling rate of the pumps during the
    experiment led to steam buildup that increase
    reactor power
  • Temperature increased so rapidly, that rod
    insertion could not be performed in time to stop
    meltdown
  • Roof blew off, oxygen rushed in a caused fire
    that spread radioactive material over a large area

11
Blame
  • Management communication
  • A bizarre series of operator mistakes
  • Plant design, poor or no containment vessels
  • Large positive void coefficient (steam bubbles in
    coolant)
  • Poor graphite control rod design
  • Poorly trained operators
  • Shut off safety systems
  • Helicopter drops
  • Coverup

12
Consequences
  • Deaths of plant and workers
  • Medical problems (short and large term)
  • Thyroid cancer
  • Contaminated soil as far as Great Britain
  • Billions of

13
Comparison
  • A key difference between the Fukushima accident
    and the Chernobyl accident was that the Chernobyl
    explosion shattered the fuel and flung it out of
    the reactor building, while at Fukushima there
    was no steam explosion driven by the release of
    fission energy.

14
Three Mile Island
  • Partial meltdown
  • No radiation escaped
  • Caused fear of nuclear power and cost in terms
    of clean up
  • Operator error and lack of safety backups in
    design
  • In some ways the accident showed how the kind of
    catastrophic disaster at Chernobyl is avoidable

15
types
  • Generation I retired one of a kinds
  • In operation Gen II and Gen III
  • Gen II was a large design changes
  • Gen III and Gen II, upgraded with many safety
    features along the way
  • Gen III plus (passive safety systems)
  • Gen IV, 30 yrs away

16
Gen IV
  • Very High Temperature Reactor
  • Advance Nuclear Safety
  • Address Nuclear Nonproliferation and Physical
    Protection Issues
  • Are Competitively Priced
  • Minimize Waste and Optimize Natural Resource
    Utilization
  • Compatible with Hydrogen Generation

17
Gen IV Roadmap - 2002
  • Solicited design models
  • Chose six design models to base future research
  • Out of these six, the DOE has relatively recently
    selected two for further investment
  • Very-High Temperature Reactor (VHTR)
  • Sodium-Cooled Fast Reactors (SFR)

18
Very-High Temperature Reactor
  • Reach temperatures gt 1000 C
  • Drive water splitting for hydrogen production 2
    M m3
  • 50 efficiency for producing electricity
  • Heat and power generation
  • Fuel recycling/reprocessing
  • Fuel coating requirements, absorbers, ceramic
    rods, vessel materials, passive heat removal
    systems

19
Show pic
20
Actinide management
  • To support effective actinide management a fast
    reactor must have a compact core with a minimum
    of materials which absorb or moderate fast
    neutrons. This places a significant heat transfer
    requirement on the coolant.

21
Sodium-Cooled Fast Reactors
  • Old technology
  • Management of waste
  • Low system pressure, high thermal conductivity,
    large safety margins.
  • Burns almost all of the energy in uranium, as
    opposed to 1 in todays plants
  • Smaller core with higher power density, lower
    enrichment, and lower heavy metal inventory.
  • Primary system operates at just above atmospheric
    pressure
  • Secondary sodium circulation that heats the water
    (if it leaks, no radiation release)
  • Demonstrated capability for passive shutdown and
    decay heat removal.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com