The Delaware Study - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 34
About This Presentation
Title:

The Delaware Study

Description:

The Delaware Study Full Name: The University of Delaware National Study of Instructional Costs and Productivity Initiated in 1992 by researchers – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:34
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 35
Provided by: budgetWay
Learn more at: http://budget.wayne.edu
Category:
Tags: delaware | study

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Delaware Study


1
The Delaware Study
  • Full Name The University of Delaware National
    Study of Instructional Costs and Productivity
  • Initiated in 1992 by researchers
  • at the University of Delaware

2
Purpose of the Delaware Study
  • Provide a set of
  • National Standardized Academic Benchmarks
  • for academic management research
  • Focused on Instructional Outputs,
  • not to be confused with
  • The Delaware Out-of-Classroom Activity Study
  • a separate study by the University of Delaware.

3
How is the Study Conducted?
  • Invitation to U.S. public and private
    universities and colleges
  • Participating institutions complete a
  • Data Collection Form giving
  • course, faculty, and cost/expenditure data
  • Data analyzed by the University of Delaware
    results sent to institutions.

4
Who Participates?
  • In 2005-06
  • Over 200 participating institutions
  • from 39 states
  • including 47 Research Institutions

5
What are the National Standardized Benchmarks?
  • Measures of
  • PRODUCTIVITY
  • Faculty teaching workloads ? credit hours /
    full-time equated faculty (FTEF)
  • COST OF INSTRUCTION
  • (direct instructional cost) / credit hour
  • SCHOLARLY ACTIVITY
  • (separately budgeted scholarly activity)
  • by Academic Discipline

6
What are the Academic Disciplines?
  • The U.S. Department of Education provides a
  • Classification of Instructional Programs (CIP),
  • a listing of different academic programs
  • Wayne State utilizes approximately 80 of these
    Academic Disciplines in classifying its Course
    Subject Offerings.

7
What Does the Data Collection Form Look Like?

8
Breaking Down the Data Categories
  • Faculty type
  • Tenured/Tenure Eligible
  • Other Regular Faculty
  • Supplemental Faculty
  • Teaching Assistants
  • Section type
  • Organized Class (OC)
  • includes Lab/Discussions/Recitations
  • Individualized Instruction (II)

9
Faculty Type Assignments
10
Faculty Type Assignments-Contd
11
Individualized Instruction Courses
12
  • 3 Important Caveats
  • in Using the Study

13
Caveat 1The Relationship between Course Subject
and Academic Discipline
  • There is NOT a 11 relationship between Academic
    Department and Academic Discipline. The
    relationship is 1Many.
  • Example

Sociology Department (College of Liberal Arts and
Sciences)
CIP Code 45.11 Sociology
College of Social Work
14
CIP Codes by School/College
15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
Caveats 2 Course Subject Classification
  • Given that the Delaware Study is intended as a
    cost study, classification of a course is by the
    instructional account paying for the instructor.
  • In some instances, this is not the same as the
    department offering the course.
  • A detailed breakdown is given in Appendix D of
    the Report.

19
Caveat 3 Cost/Expense Measures
  • We participated in the cost/expense portion of
    the Study but the results have not yet been
    evaluated.
  • Consequently, we may have faculty teaching load
    data only.
  • We may have (a) cost per credit hour or (b)
    expenditures on scholarly activity

20
An Additional Caveat
  • 2nd year of Wayne States Participation, fewer
    data issues required resolution.
  • Data deemed usable, with appropriate caution for
    possible outlying anomalies

21
Content of the Study
  • Summary Tables Charts
  • Table A- Faculty Teaching Workloads (SCH/FTEF)
  • Table B- Distribution of SCH by Faculty
    Category
  • Table C- Distribution of SCH by Course Level
  • For Table A-C above
  • -Summary
  • -Detail
  • -Charts
  • Quartiles for Table A - SCH and Class Sections
  • Appendices

22
(No Transcript)
23
Table A, Summary Totals
24
Table A, Student Credit Hours Per FTE
25
Chart A, Student Credit Hours per FTE Faculty
26
Table B, Normative Percent of Student Credit
Hours across Faculty Category
27
Chart B, Distribution of Student Credit Hours
Across Faculty Category
28
Table C, Normative Percent of Student Credit
Hours within Faculty Category
29
Chart C, Percent of Student Credit Hours within
Faculty Category
30
Quartiles
  • A Quartile Ranking in Comparison to Peers
  • is provided for
  • SCH / FTEF
  • FTES/FTEF
  • Organized Class Sections / FTEF

31
Table A, Quartiles
32
  • Closing Considerations

33
Why Participate in the Delaware Study?
  • Comparisons are made at the academic discipline
    level of analysis.
  • Teaching workloads are analyzed by faculty type,
    i.e., tenured and tenure track other permanent
    faculty supplemental faculty and graduate
    teaching assistants.
  • Participants can define their own peer groups.
  • The data definitions, methodology and data
    collection tools are regularly reviewed by
    representatives from participating institutions.
  • The Delaware Study is longitudinal, and enables
    you to track trend data over extended periods of
    time.
  • The measures enjoy widespread national acceptance
    and use.

34
Contact Information
  • Paul N. Moniodis
  • Executive Director, Institutional Research
  • 1309 Faculty/Administration Building
  • (313) 577-5743
  • Paul.Moniodis_at_Wayne.Edu
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com