Group LTCI and Federal Legislation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Group LTCI and Federal Legislation

Description:

We both wanted 'uniformity' but we wanted uniform products across the states and they wanted it inside of their state by all of the different carriers ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:52
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: afl
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Group LTCI and Federal Legislation


1
Group LTCI and Federal Legislation
  • Session 36
  • Tuesday, February 28, 2006
  • Session Producer
  • Jeremy Pincus, Principal
  • The Forbes Consulting Group, Inc.

2
PANEL
  • Robert Blancato, President, Matz, Blancato
    Associates
  • John Greene, Director of Federal Affairs,
    National Association of Health Underwriters
  • David Martin, Corporate Secretary and General
    Director, LTC Contracts Legislative Services,
    John Hancock
  • Roy Gosselin, CLU, Assistant Vice President, Long
    Term Care Division, MetLife

3
AGENDA
  • Overview of Legislative Activity (Blancato)
  • Long Term Care Insurance
  • Medicaid Reform
  • Recommendations from WHCOA

4
AGENDA
  • Expectations for Group LTCI Industry (Greene)
  • Near Term
  • Long Term

5
AGENDA
  • Preparing for changes to group and multi-life
    LTCI products
  • (Martin Gosselin)
  • Partnership Expansion
  • Section 125
  • Others

6
Additional Insight
  • The following slides submitted by
  • John Cutler

7
  • Unfortunately, John Cutler is not able to
    participate at the ILTCI in person. John,
    however, has provided significant insight
    throughout the preparation for this session and
    has given permission to share his insight into
    the mood in Washington and its effect on GLTCI.

8
  • Health-based federal legislative proposals are
    distinguished from retirement security issues
    which is the other way the Congress and
    Administration often look at LTCi

9
  • LTC Partnerships YES, we finally have language
    that reverses the Waxman amendment and allows
    the Partnerships to expand into all the states

10
  • LTC Partnerships the provisions of law are in
    S. 1932 but will still need the development of
    regulations by CMS (in consultation with NAIC)
  • Technical corrections possibility via Congress,
    as well

11
  • Administration views including potential CMS
    regulatory solution to uniformity/portability
    will be important, especially if it can be done
    via the Medicaid waiver authority and not through
    the state insurance departments

12
  • FLTCIP experience relevant here in that we
    negotiated with the four states to no avail. We
    both wanted uniformity but we wanted uniform
    products across the states and they wanted it
    inside of their state by all of the different
    carriers

13
  • Other parts of Reconciliation Bill of interest
    Impact of estate planning, asset protection,
    look-back period changes the environment in which
    you are selling insurance

14
  • Other parts of Reconciliation Bill of interest
    National Long Term Care Information Clearinghouse
    would be set up by HHS (likely CMS and AoA in
    concert)

15
  • Other players that will impact the future of
    Medicaid should be on your radar screen
    principally the Administrations Medicaid
    Commission and the National Governors Association
  • And dont forget Medicare-related ideas

16
  • Other health-related notions like HSAs also will
    have some impact on how long term care insurance
    is delivered

17
  • And Section 125 could well pass one of these days
    cheaper than the above-the-line deduction and
    more in tune with the way Congress looks at group
    benefits

18
  • Possible next step by Congress -- National
    regulatory standards or maybe even a new federal
    regulatory agency as has been done in interstate
    banking (and favored by ACLI)

19
What Will the Future of Group Long-Term Care Look
Like?
  • Employers will be mad that employees were sold
    non-compound products and do not have sufficient
    coverage when they get to time of claim (and come
    to the employer for redress) this will be the
    next big fight with the regulators
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com