Title: Channel Design
1Channel Design
- Stable Drainage Conveyance Channel Design using
Flexible Linings - Reference FHWA HEC 15
2Relevance
- Roadside channel is included in highway
right-of-way - Channel gradient typically parallels highway
grade - Mild gradients can lead to severe hydraulic
conditions (e.g., erosion, flooding)
3Equilibrium
- Design a channel that performs within acceptable
limits of stability - Channel boundaries may be
- rigid (static equilibrium)
- channel lining resists erosive forces of flow,
but subject to failure if a portion is damaged
(frost, slumping) - flexible (dynamic equilibrium)
- sediment supply rate equals sediment transport
rate - Flexible linings can tolerate some change in
shape w/o loss of integrity - bank instability and lateral migration cannot be
tolerated in highway drainage channels
4Flexible Lining
- Generally less expensive
- Permit infiltration
- Natural looking
- Simulate natural flow
- Habitat opportunities
- Pollutant removal
5Flexible Linings
- Subject to erpsion
- Channel geometry limited within right of way
6Analysis Methods Static Equilibrium
- permissible velocity
- 1920s research by Bureau of Reclamation
(empirical) - permissible tractive force
- focus on shear stresses at interface between
lining and fluid - more realistic model
7Tractive Force
- Hydrodynamic force of water flowing in a channel
- Basis of design tractive forces should be less
than the critical shear stress of lining
t average shear stress on channel g unit
weight of water (9810 N/m3 R hydraulic radius S
average bed slope
8Permissible Shear and Velocity
- By substitution in Mannings equation, we get a
relationship between permissible velocity and
permissible shear stress
9Shear Stress Determination
- Maximum shear stress in a straight channel
occurs on the channel bed and is less than or
equal to the shear stress at maximum depth of
flow (d) - Flow on a bend creates higher stresses on channel
sides than in straight section. - Values for K can be found in charts
10Shear Stress Distribution - Bottom
11Shear Stress Distribution - Bend
12Flexible Lining Design
- Procedure
- compute normal depth
- determine shear stress at maximum depth
- permissible shear stress is force required to
initiate movement of lining - keep shear stress less than permissible shear
stress
13Design Procedure
- Select a flexible lining and determine
permissible shear stress - estimate flow depth range for lining, channel
geometry - determine Mannings n for lining and flow depth
- Calculate flow depth
- Compare calculated depth with estimated depth to
a closure of lt0.03 m. - Repeat
- Calculate shear stress at normal depth
- Determine needs for bends and side slopes
14Determining Permissible Shear Stress
- Research and field studies yield tabulated
results for different linings (see Table 2) - For rock riprap and large diameter stone (with
D50 in meters), permissible shear stress is
15(No Transcript)
16Permissible Shear Stress for Non-Cohesive Soils
17Determining Maximum Shear Stress
- Use equation
- For channel bends, use Chart 10 to determine
value of Kb - The length of protection downstream is function
of roughness of lining and depth of flow (see
Chart 11)
18Kb Factor for Bends (Chart 10)
19Lining Design Continued
- Compute Normal Depth
- Mannings Equation
- See table 3
20Mannings Roughness Coefficient (n)
21Side Slope Stability
- Channel side slopes greater than 1V3H with
gravel or riprap may be unstable - Depends upon angle of repose for rock
22Allowable Velocity
23(No Transcript)
24Design Considerations - Riprap Lining
- Riprap gradation and thickness
- smooth size distribution curve
- smaller stones fill interstices between large
stones - interlock - D100/D50 and D50/D20 between 1.5 and 3
- Use angular rock round rock is OK on slopes
lt1V 3H (length is 3X thickness or breadth) - Thickness of layer 1.5 X thickness of largest
rock diameter
25Rock Riprap Filter Design
- Use of granular filter material under rock riprap
(overlying a soil base).