Functional Neurosurgery Managing Parkinson s Disease with - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 31
About This Presentation
Title:

Functional Neurosurgery Managing Parkinson s Disease with

Description:

Functional Neurosurgery Managing Parkinson s Disease with Deep Brain Stimulation Ravi Vissapragada STN is 11 to 12 mm lateral to the AC-PC line, 3 to 4 mm anterior ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:114
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: bineurosu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Functional Neurosurgery Managing Parkinson s Disease with


1
Functional Neurosurgery
  • Managing Parkinsons Disease with Deep Brain
    Stimulation

Ravi Vissapragada
2
Case Introduction
  • P.R 63 yo male suffering with Parkinsons
    disease for 15 years attending Neurology for
    worsening Parkinsons disease and drug related
    dyskinesia
  • Seen in clinic for a Deep Brain Stimulation
    procedure consult

3
Presenting Complaint
  • P.R signs of parkisonism began 15 years ago
  • First noted in gait examination in a diminished
    arm swing noted on the left side
  • P.R started on Sinemet (carbidopa-levodopa)
  • Also treated with Mirapex (Pramipexole)
  • Needed increasing doses and tightened dose
    intervals, leading to prominent dyskinesia
  • Decreasing Sinemet and Mirapex worsened the
    effect of the disease and was not tolerable

4
History
  • Drugs
  • Amantadine, Carbidopa-Levodopa,
    Oxycodone-Acetaminophen, Parsitan, Pramipexole,
    Simvastatin, Sotalol, Zolpidem, Aspirin, Docusate
  • Allergies
  • Atorvastatin (Lipitor)
  • PMHx
  • Diabetes Mellitus Type II
  • Coronary Artery Disease
  • Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
  • PSHx
  • Lumbar fusion
  • FHx
  • Heart disease
  • SHx
  • Retired gentleman, lives with wife

5
UPDRS
  • Unified Parkinsons Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS)
    motor score off the medication was 22 and on
    medication was 6
  • Higher score indicates more disability
  • Highest motor score 108
  • 22 Minimal to mild disability overall with
    moderate disability in some areas

6
Examination
  • Vitals
  • To 97.4
  • BP 148/86
  • HR 68
  • RR 16
  • SaO2 95 on 2L
  • General inspection
  • Appearing well
  • Oriented to time and place
  • Language fluent
  • Noticeably cervical and upper extremity
    dyskinesias
  • Neurological Exam
  • Extraocular movements intact, without nystagmus. 
    Gaze midline, without roving eyemovements
  • Sensation to light touch intact and symmetric in
    all divisions of face bilaterally, without
    numbness
  • Face symmetric, no weakness of facial musculature
  • Tongue midline.  Extends without fasciculations
  • Palate elevates symmetrically
  • Shoulders elevate 5/5 bilaterally 
  • Sensory Sensation to light touch  
  • Motor No drift, No asteryxis
  • Mild rigidity in all limbs
  • Full strength bilaterally
  • Reflexes 2
  • Coordination intact

7
Laboratory Results
  • Blood work
  • Hb 13.9
  • RBC 4.79
  • Hct 43.4
  • MCV 91
  • WBC 5.8
  • Differential
  • Neutrophils 65.9
  • Lymphocytes 25.5
  • Monocytes 4.9
  • Eosinophils 2.8
  • Basophils 0.8
  • Coagulation
  • Plt Ct 209
  • PT/PTT were not obtained day of procedure, but
    were normal earlier
  • Renal Function
  • Urea 12
  • Creatinine 0.7
  • Na 141
  • K 4.1
  • Cl- 105
  • HCO3 26
  • Anion gap 14
  • Glucose 113

8
Coronal View of Subthalamic Nuclei
9
(No Transcript)
10
Implanted Micro-electrodes before and after
surgery
11
Parkinsons Disease
http//medicaltechnologyavenue.blogspot.com/2008/1
2/parkinson-twitch.html
12
Parkinsons Disease
  • Type of movement disorder
  • Characterized by
  • Bradykinesia
  • Rigidity
  • Tremors
  • Pathophysiology
  • Degeneration of dominergic cells in the pars
    compacta of substantia nigra
  • Projects to the striatum to participate in the
    Direct/Indirect Pathway

13
Cortex
Striatum (Ach)
Globus Pallidus (ext. segment)
Substantia Nigra Pars Compacta
?
Subthalamic Nucleus
Thalamus VA, VL
14
Guidelines for Treatment of Parkinsons
Disease-Jankovic and Aguilar.
  • Ensure correct diagnosis
  • Determine level of motor, mental, sensory,
    autonomic, and other impairments
  • Educate the patient about the disease and
    importance of mental and motor activity
  • Consider putative neuroprotective agent(s)
  • Select the most appropriate symptomatic therapy,
    targeted to the most troublesome symptoms
  • Consider surgery (Deep Brain Stimulation) in
    patient who are levodopa-responsive but their
    levodopa-related motor complications cannot be
    managed adequately with medication adjustments
  • Therapy must be customized and tailored to the
    individual needs of the patient

15
Deep Brain Stimulation
  • Surgical procedure to implant device to stimulate
    subthalamic nucleus in the basal ganglia
  • Applications
  • Parkinsons disease
  • Dystonia
  • Essential Tremor
  • Major Depression
  • Tourettes Syndrome

http//blog.bioethics.net/2009/02/dbs-for-ocd-omg/
16
Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinsons Disease
  • Indications
  • Refractory to medical therapy after trial with
    multiple agents
  • Patients with levodopa induced dyskinesias
  • Patients suffering primarily from rigidity and
    bradykinesia
  • Contraindications
  • Significant dementia
  • DBS noted to cause cognitive impairment
  • Increased risk of intracerebral hemorrhage
  • Coagulopathy, hypertension, anti-platalet therapy
    that cannot be withheld
  • Ipsilateral hemianopsia risk of contralateral
    optic nerve injury
  • Age gt 85 years
  • Non-idiopathic Parkinsonism
  • Shy-Drager, PSNP, OPCA, Arteriosclerotic
    Parkinsonism (lacunar infarcts)

17
Deep Brain Stimulation Procedure
  • Done in 2 stages
  • Stage 1
  • Stereotactic frame put on patient (under
    sedation)
  • Stereotactic MRI
  • Trajectory identified
  • Burr Hole made
  • Dura dissected
  • Probe passed down
  • Testing begins after passing the probe down to
    subthalamic nuclei
  • Monitoring by sending electrical impulses through
    the tip of the probe to identify the correct
    location to place micro-electrode
  • Also monitoring by testing clinical effects of
    stimulation
  • Electrode placed and lead left under the scalp
  • Repeated on contralateral side if bilateral DBS
  • Stage 2
  • Attaching the lead to the battery

18
Potential Complications
  • Intracerebral Hemorrhage 1
  • Wound Infection 3-5
  • Lead Fracture
  • Battery Failure

19
Literature Overview
20
Bilateral Deep Brain Stimulation vs. Best Medical
Therapy Weaver et al. 2009
  • Compares 6-month outcomes for patients with PD
    who received DBS or the best medical therapy
  • RCT of 255 patients with PD (Hoehn and Yahr stage
    2) stratified by age and study site
  • Bilateral DBS of subthalamic nuclei or globus
    pallidus
  • Best medical therapy actively managed by
    movement disorder neurologists
  • Measuring outcome
  • Time spent in the on state without troubling
    dyskinesia
  • On state defined as good motor control with
    unimpeded motor function
  • Measured primarily using motor diaries, motor
    function, QoL, cognitive function, and adverse
    events

Hoehn and Yahr stage 2 Bilateral symptoms,
minimal disability, posture and gait affected
Patient Selection Stage 2 or greater off
medication, but have symptoms (motor fluctuations
and dyskinesias) on medications, must be
responsive to Levodopa, experince 3 hrs/24
hrs, were receiving medical therapy for 1 month
or longer, aged gt 21yrs Exclusion criteria
atypical syndromes, previous surgery for PD,
surgical contraindications, active alcohol or
drug abuse, dementia, or pregnancy
21
Results
22
A Randomized trial of Deep Brain Stimulation for
Parkinsons DiseaseDeuschl et al. 2006
  • European study
  • Randomized-pairs trial of 156 patients with
    advanced Parkinsons and severe motor symptoms
  • Deep Brain Stimulation vs. Medical Management
  • Measured QoL from baseline to six months
  • PDQ-39 (Parkinsons Questionnaire)
  • UPDRS part III
  • Exclusion criteria
  • Age lt 75, no dementia/psychiatric illnesses,
    symptoms must be limiting daily functioning
  • Optimized medical care provided by Neurologists
    specializing in movement disorders
  • Bilateral Deep brain stimulation of subthalamic
    nucleus using stereotactic imaging and standard
    microelectrode sampling techniques

23
Results
24
(No Transcript)
25
Expectation and the Placebo Effect in Parkinsons
Disease Patients with Subthalamic Nucleus Deep
Brain StimulationMercado et al.
  • 10 patients with idiopathic Parkinsons Disease
    and bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain
    stimulation procedures selected
  • UPDRS III (motor) Scores obtained in 4 situations
    (off medication)
  • Stimulus OFF Patient aware
  • Stimulus OFF Patient blind
  • Stimulus ON Patient aware
  • Stimulus ON Patient blind
  • Results
  • OFF stimulus patients who were aware had higher
    UPDRS
  • ON stimulus patients who were aware had lower
    UPDRS scores

26
Five-Year Follow up of Bilateral Stimulation of
the Subthalamic Nucleus in Advanced Parkinsons
DiseaseKrack et. al
  • 5 year prospective study
  • 49 consecutive patients with bilateral
    stimulation of subthalamic nucleus
  • Assessed at 1 year, 3 years, 5 years
  • On medication (levodopa)
  • Off medication
  • UPDRS III used to motor function scores
  • Results after 5 years
  • Motor function improved greatly off medication
  • Dyskinesia improved markedly on medication
  • Worsening akinesia, speech, postural stability,
    freezing of gait, and cognitive function

27
Bottom Line
  • Deep Brain Stimulation Good or Bad??
  • Factors
  • Patient
  • Age, preference, symptoms, surgically fit
  • Multidisciplinary team input
  • Facing the facts
  • Improvement of all symptoms in the first year of
    DBS
  • Including akinesia, gait, speech, postural
    stability
  • Patients are usually elderly folk with multiple
    comorbidities and debilitating symptoms
  • Thus 1 year of symptomatic relief is a
    significant improvement

28
Post-Operative Details
  • Surgery was well tolerated
  • No pain except at surgical sites
  • No confusion reported (by wife and daughter)
  • Exam
  • Awake, alert, and oriented to time and place 3.5
    hrs post-surgery
  • Vitals
  • To 97.4
  • BP 148/86
  • HR 68
  • RR 16
  • SaO2 95 on 2L
  • No neurologic deficit noted
  • Mild rigidity and bradykinesia noted
  • No dyskinesia

29
Thank you
30
Acknowledgements
  • Dr. Papavassiliou
  • Dr. Fred Lam
  • Dr. Andrey Zinchuk
  • Dr. Chen

31
Bibliography
  • Rodriguez RL. Pearls in Patient Selection for
    Deep Brain Stimulation. Neurologist. 2007
    Sep13(5)253-60
  • M. S. Greenberg. Surgical Treatment of
    Parkinsons Disease. Handbook of Neurosusrgery
    6th Ed., 15.2365-6, 2006
  • Deuschl et al. A Randomized Trial of Deep Brain
    Stimulation for Parkinsons Disease. N Engl J Med
    2006355896-90
  • Jankovic, Aguilar. Current approaches to the
    treatment of Parkinsons Disease.
    Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 20084 (4)
    743-75
  • Weaver et al. Bilateral Deep Brain Stimulation vs
    Best Medical Therapy for Patients With Advanced
    Parkinsons Disease A Randomized Controlled
    Trial. JAMA. 2009301(1)63-73
  • Temel. Blokland.The functional role of the
    subthalamic nucleus in cognitive and limbic
    circuits. Progress in Neurobiology 76 (2005)
    393-413.
  • Mercado et al. Expectation and the Placebo Effect
    in Parkinsons Disease Patients With Subthalamic
    Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation. Movement
    Disorders. 21 (2006). 1457-1461.
  • Krack et al. Five year Follow-up of Bilateral
    Stimulation of Subthalamic Nucleus in Advanced
    Parkinsons Disease.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com