Buprenorphine Use in Opioid Dependency - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 31
About This Presentation
Title:

Buprenorphine Use in Opioid Dependency

Description:

... toes were not gangrenous, but simply dirty. If the nurses would wash her toes, ... Washing her toes and informing her that they were still gangrenous did not ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:150
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: lifebrid
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Buprenorphine Use in Opioid Dependency


1
What do we need to transform this mayhem into a
legitimate medical procedure?
2
Procedural Competency and Informed Consent
Orientation
Charles R. Albrecht III, MD Associate Program
Director, Hospital Medicine Section JHU/Sinai
Hospital Residency Program in Internal
Medicine Division Director, General Internal
Medicine
3
(No Transcript)
4
Professional Responsibilities
  • The medical profession
  • Commitment to
  • Professional Competence
  • Honesty with Patients
  • Patient Confidentiality
  • Maintaining appropriate relationships with
    patients
  • Improving Quality of care
  • Improving Access to care
  • A just distribution of finite resources
  • Scientific Knowledge
  • Maintaining trust by managing conflicts of
    interest
  • Ann Intern Med 20021136243-246

5
Basic Bioethical Compass
6
Basic Bioethical Compass
  • Autonomy
  • Nonmaleficence
  • Beneficence
  • Justice

7
History of Informed Consent
  • Slater vs. Baker and Sapleton 1767
  • It appears from the evidence of the surgeon that
    it was improper to disunite the callous without
    consent this is the usage and law of surgeons
    then it was ignorance and unskillfulness in that
    very particular, to do contrary to the rule of
    the profession, what no surgeon ought to have
    done.

8
History of Informed Consent
  • Salgo v. Leland Stanford Junior University Board
    of Trustees 1957
  • Physicians have a positive legal obligation to
    disclose information about risks, benefits, and
    alternatives to patients.
  • This decision popularized the term informed
    consent.

9
Definition
  • Informed consent is when a person autonomously
    authorizes a physician to undertake diagnostic or
    therapeutic interventions for him or herself.
  • Three fundamental requirements are
  • Disclosure
  • Understanding
  • Voluntariness

10
Case presentation
  • A 71 year old with PAD is admitted with gangrene
    of three toes. The residents explain to her the
    likelihood that, without amputation the infection
    will spread, leading to either amputation, or
    even death. She was able to recount everything
    she was told but refused to proceed with surgery.
  • Thoughts????
  • Disclosure, Understanding, Voluntariness

11
6 fundamental elements of disclosure needed for
informed consent
  • Diagnosis and prognosis
  • Nature of the proposed intervention
  • Alternative interventions
  • Risks associated with interventions
  • Benefits of each intervention
  • Likely outcomes of each intervention
  • Disclosure, Understanding, Volutariness

12
Case presentation
  • When asked why, she explained that, although she
    thought the doctors were sincere in their desire
    to help her, they were mistaken about her
    condition. Her toes were not gangrenous, but
    simply dirty. If the nurses would wash her toes,
    which she couldnt reach, they would no longer be
    black and she could go home. Washing her toes
    and informing her that they were still gangrenous
    did not change her view she continued to claim
    that it was dirt and not gangrene that was the
    cause of the problem. ---Thoughts now?????

13
Background
  • Capacity vs. Competence
  • How are we doing?
  • Studies show we infrequently communicate all
    relevant information
  • 1057 consents, 11 provided alternatives, 8
    provided pros and cons, 1.5 assessed patients
    understanding of the information

14
History of Physician Patient Relationship
  • 1847 AMA- The obedience of a patient to the
    prescriptions of his physician should be prompt
    and implicit(the patient) should never permit
    his own crude opinions.
  • 1953 JAMA 69 physicians never told their
    patients if they had cancer
  • 1961 JAMA 90 physicians never told their
    patients if they had cancer
  • 1979 JAMA 97 physicians preferred to tell
    patients of their diagnosis of cancer

15
Risk prevails
  • The nature of the risks
  • Their magnitude
  • The probability of each occurring
  • When the consequence might occur

16
Standards
  • Physician Standard
  • The physician should disclose information which
    a reasonable medical practitioner would make
    under the same or similar circumstances.
  • Reasonable person Standard
  • Physicians should disclose all information that a
    reasonable person in the patients circumstances
    would find material to their medical decision.

17
Alternatives to Patient
  • Reasonable Person Standard/ Emergency
  • Advance Directives
  • Health Care Proxy
  • Surrogates
  • Spouse?children?parents?siblings
  • Two Physician Consent
  • We hereby certify that this is an emergency, that
    the patient is unable to give consent, and there
    is no indication that the patient has withheld
    consent for this procedure

18
(No Transcript)
19
Decision Making Capacity
  • MMSE ?
  • Functional Tests
  • MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool-Treatment
  • Making and communicating a choice
  • Understanding relevant information in context
  • Expression of ones values

20
An Algorithm to assessing decision making
capacity (Miller and Marin. Emerg Med Clinic
North Am 200018233-241)
  • Do the history and physical exam confirm that the
    patient can communicate a choice?
  • Can the patient understand the essential elements
    of informed consent?
  • What is your medical condition.
  • What is the treatment being recommended?
  • What might happen if you accept treatment?
  • What might happen if you do not accept treatment?
  • What are the alternatives and the probable
    consequences (including no treatment)?

21
An Algorithm to assessing decision making
capacity (Miller and Marin. Emerg Med Clinic
North Am 200018233-241)
  • Can the patient assign personal values to the
    risks and benefits of intervention?
  • Can the patient manipulate the information
    rationally and logically?
  • Is the patients decision making capacity stable
    over time?

22
Issues of Competency/ Capacity
  • Conflict between protecting patient from harm
    (beneficence/ nonmaleficence) and the duty to
    respect the wishes of a competent patient
    (autonomy) OR Although a physician shall
    respect the rights of patients (AMA Principles of
    Medical Ethics 2001) including self
    determination, does the right of the patient to
    decide for themselves extend to the right to make
    a bad decision?

23
ABIM procedures
  • Procedures required to be performed safely and
    competently by the ABIM
  • The minimum number of procedures recommended is
    given in parenthesis. These procedures must be
    done under direct supervision of the attending
    physician and must have been successful
    procedures (not attempts).
  • ACLS (1) (orientation)
  • Drawing Venous Blood (5) (Floor rotations)
  • Drawing Arterial Blood (5) (ICU rotation)
  • Pelvic exam, Pap smear and endocervical culture
    (5) (Clinic)
  • Placing a peripheral venous line (5) (Floor and
    ED rotation)

24
Procedural Competency
  • Cognitive stage- explain and demonstrate
  • Performance erratic and broken into distinct
    stages
  • Integration stage- practice and feedback
  • Performance with fewer interruptions
  • Automatic stage- little cognitive input
  • Performance is efficient, fluid, precise

25
Cognitive Competence
  • Indications
  • Contraindications
  • Patient Preparation
  • Pain management
  • Sterile technique
  • Proper handling
  • Test result Interpretation
  • Complications
  • Recognize and manage
  • Explanation
  • To the patient for informed consent

26
ICCE-T
  • Indications
  • Contraindications
  • Complications
  • Explanation
  • Test Results

27
Procedures to Know, Understand And Explain
  • Abdominal Paracentesis (lecture)
  • Arthrocentesis (lecture)
  • Central Venous Line Placement (lecture)
  • Incision and Drainage of an Abscess (ER)
  • Lumbar Puncture (lecture)
  • Nasogastric Intubation (lecture)
  • Pulmonary artery catheter placement (CCU)
  • Thoracentesis (lecture)

28
Time out Policy
  • The TIME OUT refers to mandated policy
    referring to the verification of site and patient
    prior to an invasive procedure including
    paracentesis, arthrocentesis, central line, LP,
    and thoracentesis. Before any invasive procedure
    that exposes the patient to more than minimal
    risk the healthcare team verifies
  • Correct patient by 2 patient identifiers (name,
    mr, dob)
  • Correct procedure (informed consent and
    documentation)
  • Correct Site and Side
  • A prefabricated sticker is available on the floors

29
Post procedural note
  • Required elements
  • Pre/postop diagnoses
  • Procedure
  • Operator
  • Estimated blood loss
  • Complications
  • Specimens
  • A prefabricated note is available on intranet.

30
Procedural Supervision
  • May be supervised by someone who has attained
    competency to perform the procedure independently
  • During working hours, you may call any of the
    academic hospitalists to supervise, preferably
    the team attending

31
Supervision by Academic Hospitalists
  • Try to have a set time in mind
  • Obtain required labs
  • If a patient of a private attending, discuss the
    procedure with the attending and let them know
    you are asking us to supervise
  • Obtain informed consent
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com