Title: Regulating the Quality and Safety of Foods
1Regulating the Quality and Safety of Foods
2The Elements of Food Safety
Law
Safety
Policy
Science
3Safety System Basics
- Only safe and wholesome foods may be marketed
- Regulatory decision-making is science-based
- Government has enforcement responsibility
- Manufacturers, distributors, importers, and
other are expected to comply and face liability
for noncompliance - Regulatory process is transparent and accessible
to the public
4National Food Safety Initiative
- Food safety from farm to table
- New interagency strategy to prevent food borne
disease - Assesses current system of regulation
- Recommends actions to improve food safety
5Food Borne Illness Outbreaks
- Hudson Foods
- Largest recall of beef in U.S. history
- 25 million pounds
- Escherichia coli 0157H7
- Supplier to Burger King and Safeway
- Fined 332,000 by OHSA
6Scope of Regulatory Responsibility
- 6,100 meat and poultry processing facilites
- 50,000 food establishments
- 537,000 commercial restaurants
- 172,000 institutional food programs
- 190,000 retail stores
- 70,000 separately labeled food products
7The Problem
- Resistance and virulence of emerging pathogens
- Patchwork system of food safety regulation
- Lack of an effective, low cost method of
ensuring
safety of food products - Lack of regulatory oversight beyond commercial
facilities - Lack of effective consumer education programs
8Food Safety Regulation
- 12 different federal agencies derive their
authority over food products from 35 different
federal statutes - US spents gt1 billion annually on Food Safety
Regulation
9Federal Agencies with some jurisdiction over food
products
FDA USDA FTC(Advertising) EPA(Pesticides)
CDC(Foodborne illness) US Customs(Imports) DOT(Transportation) NOAA(Seafood HACCP Training)
CVM(Veterinary Medicine) AMS(Shell Eggs surveillance) CFSAN APHIS(Border quarantines)
DOC BATF(Alcohol and Firearms) FSIS ERS (food safety education)
10Scientific Issues in Food Safety
- Hazard Identification
- Microbiology
- Chemistry
- Toxicology
- Epidemiology
- Risk Assessment
- HACCP /Quality Systems
- Zero tolerance
- Lethal Processing Step
11Regulatory Issues
- Food Additive Regulation
- Labeling
- Novel Food Processing
- Standardization
- Responsibility (liability)
- Food Irradiation
- Genetic Modifications
- Consumer protection
12Policy Issues
- Risk Assessment
- Centralization (Food Czar)
- Strict Liability
- Global Harmonization and Standardization
- GATT / NAFTA (Fortress Europe)
13Consumer Expectations
- Consumers expect safe, hazard free food
- Responsibility is shared by
- food producers
- processors
- purveyors
- regulatory agencies
14Safety
- Freedom from danger, risk or injury
- Any of the various devices designed to prevent
accident such as a gun lock - A play in which a member of the offensive team
is forced to down the football in his own end zone
15Good Manufacturing Practices(GMPs)
16Regulation vs Cooperation
- FDCA gave authority and responsibility to FDA for
ensuring safety in food supply - FDCA prohibits poisonous or deleterious
substances in food - GMPs reference in FDCA states
- food is adulterated if it may have been rendered
injurious to health by conditions under which it
was prepared, packed or held...
17Food borne illness
- 24 million people per year
- cost of 7 billion
- 10,000 deaths
- mishandling at retail level is a factor
- 12 million workers in 1 million establishments
- regulatory agencies alone cannot prevent
- cooperation with industry required
18Adulteration under the FDCA
- Food MAY be adulterated if-
- prepared under insanitary conditions
- proof of actual adulteration not necessary
- proof of illness not necessary
- conditions under which food is prepared, packed,
or held is determinant
19Good Manufacturing Practices
- Procedures developed to ensure production of
safe, wholesome foods and to provide safe working
environment - Not "process specific", relate to entire
operation - GMPs include facilities/grounds, equipment pest
control, receiving and storage, process control,
product recall and personnel training.
20First proposal for GMPs
- proposed rule December, 1968
- final rule April, 1969
- original GMPs regulation very broad
- FDA then attempted to develop specific industry
GMPs - FDA concluded it was more effective to strengthen
umbrella GMPs - revisions to GMPs in 1986
21Product specific GMPs
- thermally processed low-acid canned foods
- acidified foods
- bottled drinking water
22GMPs Regulations
- 21CFR Part 110
- Subpart A - General Provisions
- Subpart B - Building and Facilities
- Subpart C - Equipment
- Subpart D - Reserved
- Subpart E - Production and Process Controls
- Subpart F - Reserved
- Subpart G - Defect Action Levels
23GMPs Regulations
- written as mandatory requirements
- consistent use of shall rather than should
- GMPs used in inspections of plant and warehouses
24GMPs - General Provisions
- provides definitions
- important in understanding implications and
applications - personnel
- management has responsibility for performance of
personnel
25GMPs - Buildings and Facilities
- buildings must be designed and constructed to
facilitate effective maintenance and sanitation - results specified rather than method for
achieving - detailed expectations in sanitation of operations
26GMPs - Equipment
- equipment and utensils
- designed and constructed to be easily and
properly cleaned - temperature measuring and recording on
refrigerators and freezers - measurement of critical parameters
27GMPs Production and Process Controls
- end results emphasized
- ensuring that no adulterated food enters
marketplace - terms used subject to variation in interpretation
- raw materials and ingredients properly
- inspected, analyzed
- segregated, stored
- handled
28Production and Process Controls
- manufacturing operations must be monitored
- pH, water activity, temperatures
- elimination of metal from product
- personnel should be trained and aware of GMP
requirements
29GMPs - Defect Action Levels
- natural or unavoidable defects may be in food
- not harmful at levels present
- present even with GMPs
- FDA establishes DALs when necessary and possible
- defect level may not be reduced by blending
30Summary of General GMPs
- Intended to prevent adulteration
- Opportunity for considerable judgment in defining
and interpreting regulations - spirit of GMPs is to do what is reasonable and
necessary to ensure safe and unadulterated food
supply
31Specific GMPsLow acid canned foods
- Life threatening risk if improperly processed
- Requires supervision of personnel who have been
trained - Regulations quite detailed for equipment design
and operation - Extensive record keeping requirements
32Acidified foods
- Defined as a low acid food with
- Aw greater than 0.85
- acid added to lower pH to 4.6 or lower
- Product examples
- includes beans, cucumbers, cabbage
- excludes carbonated beverages
- Personnel trained under approved program
33Bottled Drinking Water
- All water sealed in bottles, packages for human
consumption - Regulations are general and similar to umbrella
GMPs - Source of water must be approved
- Sanitation, equipment designed, personnel
emphasized - Extensive record keeping
34The History of HACCP
- HACCP initiated in early 1960s as cooperative
effort - Pillsbury
- NASA
- Natik labs of U.S. Army
- U.S. Air Force Space Laboratory
- Purpose was to produce zero defect food for
astronauts
35HACCP History
- NASA asked Pillsbury to design products for use
in outer space - Pillsbury presented HACCP plan at 1971 Conference
on Food Protection - FSIS asked NAS to evaluate inspection process and
recommend modernization - HACCP recommended by NAS to FSIS in 1985
36HACCP
- Sec. 342 of FDCA is basis for HACCP (Adulteration
provisions) - By adopting HACCP, companies share in
responsibility for safety - GMPs and HACCP are increasingly important as more
and more food is produced, processed, and handled
by others
37HACCP Basics
- Defects always possible with less than 100
testing - Detection of hazards by end product testing is
only as good as statistics behind sampling and
testing protocols - HACCP prevents rather than detects
38HACCP Basics
- Seven elements
- Science based system of food safety
- Made mandatory in EU
- Mandatory for seafood first (1995)
- Meats (beef, pork, poultry) in 1996
- Voluntary for other products
39Seven Steps of HACCP
- Assess Potential Hazards
- Determine Critical Control Points
- Establish requirements for each CCP
- Establish procedure to monitor each CCP
- Establish corrective action if deviation
- Establish record keeping procedures
- Establish procedure to monitor effectiveness
40Step 1 Determine Potential Hazards
- First step in developing program
- what hazards might exist
- What is a hazard
- poisonous or deleterious substance (P/D)
- microbiological
- chemical
- physical
- Hazard more specific than adulterant b/c product
may be adulterated without being hazardous
41Sources of hazards
- Review of operation to determine where hazard
might occur - ingredients and other raw materials
- breakdown in some part of process
- Knowledgeable person must review
- ingredients
- formula
- process
- storage conditions
42Step 2 Identify Critical Control Points (CCPs)
- CCP is a point at which a hazard might develop
- if hazard results from loss of control, point is
critical - QCP is point where quality might be affected
- if reduction in quality occurs, point is a
quality control point
43Step 3 Establishing Control Limits
- Hazard may develop if CCP out of control
- Determine how much out of control results in a
hazard - Limits must be set for each CCP
- Knowledge of both hazards and the process is
important
44Step 4 Establish System to Monitor CCPs
- Monitoring system to determine when process
exceeds limits - Continuous monitoring preferred with immediate
correction - Periodic sampling and testing may be only
reasonable alternative - Continuous or frequent monitoring used to
establish trends
45Step 5Corrective action
- May be as simple as rejecting a shipment or
ingredient - May require adjusting calibration of measuring
device - May necessitate shutting down an operation
46Step 6 Record Keeping
- Must have effective record keeping system to
- demonstrate establishment of system
- document its utilization
- verify efficacy
47Step 7Verification of Program - HACCP Plan
- Written plan to describe system
- May be shown to FDA as evidence that plan has
been developed - Monitoring data and records of actions may be
reviewed by - company management
- regulatory officials
48HACCP Plan
- Section 123.6 requires that every processor shall
have implemented a written HACCP plan specific to
the process and the product - FSIS has developed "Generic HACCP Models" for
major process categories - Must be signed by "responsible establishment
individual" - HACCP training big business
49Flow Charts
- Step by step path traveled by food during
processing - Shows CCPs
- Shows where to take corrective action
- Can use to monitor CCPs
- Helps verify effectiveness
50HACCP Issues
- Should HACCP be voluntary or mandatory?
- Should small businesses be exempt?
- Should foreign exporters be exempt?
- What records should be available?
- What training should be required?
51GMPs and HACCP
- Prior to the development of HACCP plan,
establishment should verify that all GMPs are in
place and effective - Effective GMP programs ensure that HACCP plans
focus specifically on the critical control points
necessary to ensure product safety
52GMPs and HACCP
- GMPs establish guidelines, requirements, and
expectation for reducing adulteration - GMPs along cannot guarantee safety
- HACCP represents joint effort
- Policies, procedures, regulations are evolving
53ISO - 9000
- International Food Quality Standards
- Non-prescriptive
54Standardization
- GATT and NAFTA
- Harmonization of trade restrictions
- Fortress Europe Concept
- Single Europe Act
- Free movement of goods and services
- History of Standardization
- Eli Whitney
55ISO-9000
- Non-prescriptive standard that does not specify
how a company's quality assurance must occur, but
mandates that a company define appropriate
quality standards, document its processes, and
prove that it consistently adheres to both.