Bacterioplankton communities: single-cell characteristics and physiological structure - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 115
About This Presentation
Title:

Bacterioplankton communities: single-cell characteristics and physiological structure

Description:

Bacterioplankton communities: single-cell characteristics and physiological structure Paul del Giorgio Universit du Qu bec Montr al Why study aquatic bacteria? – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:138
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 116
Provided by: cmoreSoes
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Bacterioplankton communities: single-cell characteristics and physiological structure


1
Bacterioplankton communities single-cell
characteristics and physiological structure
  • Paul del Giorgio
  • Université du Québec à Montrèal

2
Why study aquatic bacteria?
  • They are responsible for much of organic matter
    and nutrient transformation and mineralization
  • Bacteria are responsible for much of the aerobic
    respiration and all of anaerobic respiration in
    aquatic systems
  • Aquatic bacteria are one of the largest living
    reservoirs of carbon, P, N, Fe and other
    materials
  • Aquatic bacteria represent the largest surface in
    oceans and lakes
  • Bacterial biomass may be a significant food
    resource in aquatic food webs
  • Some bacteria pose sanitary or environmental
    problems

3
Ecosystem processes Carbon cycling Gas exchange
Trophic interactions Grazing (predation) Viral
mortality Competition
Bacterial community structure Bacterial
processes Production Respiration Nutrient
cycling
Resource supply the nature and amount of organic
matter and nutrients
4
What is community structure at the microbial
level?
  • Bacterial biomass
  • Bacterial cell size and morphology
  • Attached versus free-living cells
  • The distribution of cells with different
    functions
  • Taxonomic (phylogenetic) composition
  • The distribution of cells with different growth
    and metabolic rates

5
(No Transcript)
6
(No Transcript)
7
From Cole et al. (1988)
8
Bacterial response to changes in resources and
conditions
9
Bacterial response to changes in resources and
conditions
10
Bacterial response to changes in resources and
conditions
Changes in abundance
11
Ducklow 1999
12
Bacterial response to changes in resources and
conditions
Changes in composition of bacterial community
Changes in abundance
13
Bacterial response to changes in resources and
conditions
Changes in composition of bacterial community
Changes in composition of bacterial community
Changes in abundance
14
Bacterial response to changes in resources and
conditions
Changes in composition of bacterial community
?
Changes in composition of bacterial community
Changes in abundance
15
Bacterioplankton black box
16
a
Phototrophic
or
heterotrophic
Bacterioplankton black box
Caja negra del picoplancton
Caja negra del picoplancton
17
Starvation, dormancy, slow growth
  • Dormancy, starvation-survival, slow growth, and
    inactivity are often used interchangeably to
    denote low levels of cellular activity in marine
    bacteria, but these terms are not synonyms and
    refer to different states

18
Microbial bioenergetics maintenance versus growth
19
Starvation survival
  • Under conditions of extreme substrate and energy
    deprivation, marine bacteria may undergo a
    starvation response
  • The starvation response is regulated by specific
    genes and involves cell miniaturization, and
    profound changes in macromolecular composition,
    with the synthesis of specialized protective
    proteins
  • Prolonged starvation may lead to cell dormancy,
    which is a state of complete metabolic arrest
    that allows long-term survival under unfavorable
    conditions. Cells in a dormant state are still
    more resistant to other environmental stresses
  • There are costs and benefits associated to
    entering dormancy as opposed to maintaining a
    slow level of metabolic activity and growth as a
    response to low substrate availability
  • Resource patchiness and temporal variability play
    a major role in shaping the survival strategies
    of marine bacteria, whether it is slow growth,
    starvation response or dormancy

20
The distribution of cells into different
physiological categories is termed the
physiological structure of bacterioplankton
  • Within a bacterial community there is a continuum
    of activity, from dead to highly active cells
  • The categories used to describe the physiological
    structure are operational and depend on the
    methods used
  • The physiological structure is related, albeit in
    complex ways, to the size structure of the
    community, as well as to the phylogenetic
    structure, i.e. the distribution of cells into
    operational taxonomical units
  • The physiological structure is dynamic, i.e. the
    proportions of cells in various physiological
    states may vary at short time scales and small
    spatial scales

21
Nyström et al. 1992
22
The starvation sequence
Joux and Le Baron 2000
23
The reality of our disciplne
  • Thomas Brock's classic microbial ecology text
    (Brock 1966) is prefaced by a quote attributed as
    a graduate student motto. The motto simply
    states, 'microbial ecology is microbial
    physiology under the worst possible conditions'.

24
If I could do it all over again, I would be a
microbial ecologist. Ten billion bacteria live in
a gram of soil... They represent thousands of
species, almost none of each are known to
science Wilson, E.O. 1994. Naturalist. Island
Press
25
Approaches to measuring single-cell properties
26
Some approaches used to assess bacterial
characteristics in situ that are culture
independent
  • Microautoradiography to assess uptake of
    radiolabeled organic compounds
  • RNA (and other macromolecular) contents
  • Vital stains as indices of cell metabolism
    (Fluorescein, Calcein, INT, CTC)
  • Stains that reflect membrane polarization and
    integrity (PI, Oxonol, SYTOX, TOPRO)
  • Structural integrity under TEM

27
Heissenberger et al. 1996 Examples of cell and
capsule structure observed by TEM in
bacterioplankton samples
28
Zweifel Hagström (1995)
Site BT (106) NuCC () MPN ()
Baltic Sea, NB1 2.5 - 3.2 4 - 6 0.1 - 0.3 Baltic
Sea, SR5 0.7 - 1.2 17 - 27 7 - 14 Baltic Sea,
US5b 0.6 - 2.7 12 - 27 6 - 15 North Sea,
Skagerrak-1 1.1 - 1.4 2 - 5 0.5 - 0.6 North Sea,
Skagerrak-2 0.2 - 0.8 4 - 32 0.2 -
0.8 Mediterranean, Point B 0.5 20 16
29
(No Transcript)
30
(No Transcript)
31
Marie et al. 1997Marine picoplankton
32
Cytometric enumeration of in situ aquatic
bacteria using green nucleic acid stains
33
Cytometric detection of dead or injured bacteria
in situ using exclusion nucleic acid stains
34
Cytometric detection of in situ bacteria with
depolarized membranes using the Oxonol DiBAC
35
Cytometric detection of in situ actively
respiring bacteria using CTC
36
In situ hybridation visualized with
epifluorescence microscopy
37
RNA probing of bacterioplankton using
epifluorescence and cytometry
38
Figs. 1 y 2 from Heissenberger et al. (1996)
39
Autoradiography
From Hoppe (1976)
3H-AA
3H-thymidine
3H-aspartic
14C-glucose
CFU
Percentage of total cells
40
Smith and del Giorgio 2003
41
Bouvier et al. 2007
42
Bouvier et al. 2007
43
(No Transcript)
44
(No Transcript)
45
Bouver et al. 2007
46
(No Transcript)
47
Lebaron et al. 2001 River and coastal samples
48
Longnecker et al. 2006
49
del Giorgio and Gasol in press
50
(No Transcript)
51
Søndergaard and Danielsen 2001 The highly active
CTC fraction is seasonally much more dynamic
than the total bacterial abundance in lakes
52
(No Transcript)
53
The universe of DAPI-positive particles
Low activity Dormancy
High activity
Medium activity
Death
Lysis
No BT
TEM
PI (damage)
Dibac (depolarization)
CTC
Microautoradiography
DNA content
54
The regulation of the physiological structure of
bacterioplankton communities has three main
components
  • Environmental factors that influence the
    individual level of metabolic activity and cell
    integrity and damage, such as substrate and
    nutrient availability, UV and temperature
  • Physical and biological factors that influence
    the persistence and loss of the various
    physiological fractions, such as selective
    grazing and viral infection, and selective
    degradation
  • Intrinsic phylogenetic characteristics that
    modulate the response of different bacterial
    strains to the above factors

55
Example Bacterial succession along the
transition between fresh and salt waters
  • Does bacterial composition change abruptly along
    a salinity gradient in an estuary?
  • Is the compositional succession accompanied by
    changes in the physiological structure of the
    community along this salinity gradient?

56
(No Transcript)
57
Bacterial composition
Fresh Salt
Fresh Salt
Relative abundance,
Distance downriver, Km
58
(No Transcript)
59
(No Transcript)
60
(No Transcript)
61
(No Transcript)
62
(No Transcript)
63
Environmental stress influences the physiological
structure of bacterioplankton
  • What about biological interactions, such as
    grazing and viral infection

64
Viles and Sieracki 1992
65
Fukuda et al. 1998
66
(No Transcript)
67
Gonzalez et al. 1990 Flagellate and ciliate
grazing is strongly size-dependent. This had
strong implications on the influence of bacterial
structure on food web interactions within the
microbial loop
68
(No Transcript)
69
(No Transcript)
70
Hahn and Höfle 1999Grazing influences the size
distribution within individual bacterial
taxa.Great morphological plasticity in bacteria
71
Gasol et al. (1995)
Total
Dapi
Percent
Active
González et al. 1990
Relative grazing efficiency
CTC
Chrzanowski Simek. 1990
Size (µm3)
72
Selective grazing of live and active cells by
protists
73
In situ dyalysis bag experiments in the
Mediterranean Sea to follow the dynamics of
active and inactive cells in the presence and
absence of protistan grazing showed selective
grazing and significant cell inactivation
-0.43
Black box approach
1.09
0.87
0.08
-0.77
Using single-cell measurements
0.69
0.06
A
A
0.24
0.44
0.81
0.86
I
I
-0.19
-0.19
del Giorgio et al. 1996
74
Lake Microcosm Experiments(with David Bird, Rox
Maranger and Yves Prairie, UQÀM)
  • Water samples were filtered through 0.8 µm (to
    remove grazers), or unfiltered
  • Water samples were incubated in dialysis bags in
    situ in Lac Cromwell (Québec)
  • Three UV/light treatments
  • We followed thee abundance of highly active cells
    (CTC) and injured/dead cells (TOPRO)

75
How do environmental and biological factors
interact to shape the physiological structure of
bacterioplankton?
76
Experimental design
77
Reducing protozoan grazers resulted in higher
proportions of CTC cells. The grazing effect may
be related to size-selective removal
No Grazers
Grazers
Grazers
78
There was an interaction between grazing and
light (or UV) that affected the proportion of
CTC cells.
No grazers
No grazers
No grazers
Grazers
79
The proportion of cells that took up the
exclusion strain TOPRO increased with UV exposure
PAR 80 UVA 70 UVB
PAR 30 UVA 0 UVB
PAR 0 UVB0 UBA
Maranger et al. 2001
80
There is an inverse pattern of CTC and TOPRO
cells in relation to UV/light exposure
81
Some conclusions regarding the link between
grazing and bacterioplankton activity (I)
  • Grazing and UV radiation both affect the
    physiological structure of bacterioplankton
  • Grazing is highly selective and preferentially
    removes active cells
  • Active cells appear to be on average larger than
    less active or dormant cells
  • Grazing selectivity may be based on size

82
Some general ecological patterns in microbial
(II)
  • In aquatic microbial communities, small size and
    low activity represent a refuge against predation
    and perhaps viral infection
  • Large cells must find alternative refuges
    attachment, parasitism, chemical defenses
  • In other types of communities it is often the the
    small and the weak that are selectively removed
  • General allometric rules, i.e. size versus
    specific activity, do not necessarily apply to
    aquatic microbial communities

83
Are there links between single-cell activity and
the phylogenetic affiliation of bacterial cells?
84
Single-cell analyses that link composition with
activity and function
Hibridization (FISH) and in situ reverse
trabscription (ISRT) 16S rRNA mRNA Chen et al.
1997
In situ hibridization and microautoradiography
(MAR-FISH) 16S rRNA 3H-TdR Lee et al.
1999 Cottrell Kirchman 2000
Activity probes, cytometry cell sorting and
molecular analyses CTC, FACS, DGGE Bernard et
al. 2000 Zubkov et al. 2001


In situ hybridization and DNA synthesis
16S rRNA BrdU Pernthaler et al 2002
85
Zubkov et al. 2001 Celtic Sea
86
Does the active fraction (CTC) have the same
composition than the inactive fraction ?
Bernard et al. 2000
87
Urbach et al. 1999 Used BromodeoxyUridine
(BrdU), an analog of thymidine, to detect growing
cells Cells incorporating BrdU can be detected
using immunofluorescence
88
Linking growth to phylogeny BrdU-incorporation
  • Found that the BrdU-incorporating (growing)
    communities were substantially different from the
    total communities
  • This suggests that the numerically dominant
    groups are not necessarily those that are the
    most active

Hamasaki et al. 2007
Hamasaki et al. 2004
89
Cottrel and Kirchman 2003
Showed that the contribution of the major groups
to Tdr and Leu assimilation varied greatly along
a salinity gradient
Also showed that some groups contribute
disproportionately to total bacterial activity
90
del Giorgio and Gasol in press
91
What is the link between single-cell activity and
phylogenetic affiliation?
  • MAR-FISH analysis analyses show that in most
    cases there is a mixture of cells that are active
    and inactive in substrate uptake within any given
    bacterial group, suggesting that the level of
    single-cell activity is not intrinsic but rather
    that members of the same group may express very
    different levels of activity depending on their
    microenvironment and of their immediate history
  • This scenario would further suggest that resource
    microheterogeneity may play a key role in
    determining the distribution of activity within
    bacterial assemblages
  • Alternatively, the heterogeneity of single-cell
    activity detected within broad phylogenetic
    groups may indicate that within these groups
    there is a wide range of genetic diversity, that
    is expressed as a wide range in metabolic
    responses of different cells to the same set of
    environmental conditions
  • This establishes two extreme scenarios, i.e. the
    physiological structure entirely due to
    environmental heterogeneity, microscale
    patchiness and temporal variability, versus
    physiological heterogeneity due entirely to
    genetic/phenotypic diversity. Where along this
    gradient lie natural bacterioplankton assemblages
    is still a matter of study

92
Azam 1998
93
Microscale variability in coastal bacterial
community structure
Seymour et al. 2004
HDNA
Total BA
LDNA
D1 group
94
Some general ecological conclusions from these
examples
  • There are intense bacterioplankton phylogenetic
    successions along environmental gradients,
    associated to physiological stress and possibly
    cell mortality
  • Predation is a major structuring factor in
    microbial communities, but predator-prey
    interactions may be distinct in microbial systems
  • Some general ecological notions, such as
    allometric relationships, refuge and succession
    theory, may not effectively describe the
    microbial world

95
Ducklow 2001
96
Variability in specific BP (BP / BA) and BR (BR /
BA) in marine waters
del Giorgio and Gasol in press
97
Variability in abundance of microbial components
Landry and Kirchman 2002
98
We know that there is an upper limit to bacterial
growth rate, but how slowly can a bacterial cell
grow?
  • There are thermodynamic constraints that
    determine both the upper and lower limits of cell
    growth
  • Slow growth still requires the operation of
    tranport systems, the maintenance of cell
    membranes, and the turnover of proteins and
    nucleic acids.

99
Microbial bioenergetics maintenance versus growth
100
del Giorgio and Gasol in press
101
(No Transcript)
102
del Giorgio and Gasol in press
103
What about other components of the microbial food
web The coupling between protist predators and
their bacterial prey
  • There is evidence that protist grazing may
    profoundly affect the physiological (and
    taxonomic) structure of bacterioplankton
  • But does the distribution of single cell activity
    affect protist activity?

104
(No Transcript)
105
(No Transcript)
106
b-GAM
107
(No Transcript)
108
Feedback at the population level
Protist biomass
Protist grazing
Bacterial Biomass/ production
?
Feedback at the cellular level
Protist single cell activity
Bacterioplankton structure
?
109
Some patterns concerning protist-bacteria
interactions
  • Microbial predators can respond to prey
    fluctuations at the population level, like
    predators in other types of systems
  • But microbial predators can also respond at the
    level of cellular metabolism
  • This response is much faster and allows microbial
    predator-prey systems to be more tightly coupled
    than any other system
  • This tight coupling provides overall stability to
    the ecosystem

110
Zooplankton
300 l-1
Microphyto-
100 ml-1
Ciliates
2000 l-1
Flagellates
Nanophyto-
103 ml-1
1000 ml-1
107 ml-1
?
?
?
Picoplancton
111
An important aspect of the functioning of
bacterial communities is social behavior
112
Ducklow 2001
113
14
Size does matter! Smaller organisms have higher
surface area (SA) to volume (V) ratios. Consider
a spherical microbe SA 4?r2 V 4/3 ?r3 So,
SAV 4?r2/4/3 ?r3 1/r That is, as organisms
get bigger, SAV gets smaller
114
(No Transcript)
115
Approaches
Bacterial physiological parameters
intact membrane
Potentiel Membrane
Intégrité Membrane PI (Live/Dead Baclight)
damaged membrane
intact membrane DiOC6(3)
ADN
damaged membrane DiBAC4(3)
Content SYTO13
ADN
Turn over H3 Thymidine uptake
Turn over H3 Thymidine uptake
Protéines
Respiration
Protein
ETS
Turn over H3 Leucine uptake
CTC
Firefly Luciferase
Bioluminescence
enzyme
Enzymatic Activity
Luciferin
-Bulk metabolism -Single cell activity
Substrate Biolog
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com