Ram Sethu, Sethumandir - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

Ram Sethu, Sethumandir

Description:

Ram Sethu, Sethumandir Suspend project work Re-evaluate maritime impact, socio-conomic/strategic impacts Choose alternative channel Since tsunami (Dec. 2004), only ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:536
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: sanghpari
Category:
Tags: ram | sethu | sethumandir

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Ram Sethu, Sethumandir


1
Ram Sethu, Sethumandir
  • Suspend project work
  • Re-evaluate maritime impact, socio-conomic/strateg
    ic impacts
  • Choose alternative channel
  • Since tsunami (Dec. 2004), only two public
    hearings have been held
  • No public hearings have been held after 2-2-2005
    no explanations offered on impact of tsunami on
    chosen alignment
  • Save Ram Sethu, it is Sethumandir
  • Sarasvati Research CentreAkhila Bharatiya
    Itihasa Sankalana Yojana March 19,
    2007kalyan97_at_gmail.com S. Kalyanaraman, Ph.D.
    Former Sr. Exec., Asian Development Bank

2
NASA images showing bridge
3
How Ram Sethu saved Bharatam coastline on Dec.
26, 2004 (computer simulation)
4
Google earth 2007 satellite image showing
Dhanushkodi (India), Palk Strait (Globe2) and
Ramar Bridge (Globe1) and Talaimannar (Srilanka)
Ramar bridge
Park Straits
5
Malabar Bowen map (1747) drawn by Netherlands
shows Ramarcoil I (that is, Rama temple).
6
Ramar Bridge cited in map drawn by Joseph Parks,
Australian Botanical explorer (1788) (Map in
Sarasvati Mahal Lib., Thanjavur)
7
Ram Sethu renamed as Adams Bridge (by Colonial
regime)
  • Map of 1804 called Ram Sethu asAdams bridge
  • This map was drawn by Rennell, the First Surveyor
    General of British India
  • Since 15th cent. all geographers have always
    referred to it as a BRIDGE connecting Dhanushkodi
    (Bharatam) and Talaimannar (Srilanka)

8
Ram Sethu as World Heritage site
  • Valmiki describes the construction of Sethu in
    detail.
  • hastimaatraan mahaakaayaaH paaSaaNaamshca
    mahaabalaaH parvataamshca samutpaaTya yantraiH
    parivahanti ca Valmiki Ramayana 2-22-58Vaanara
    having huge bodies, with mighty strength uprooted
    elephant-sized rocks and mountains and
    transported them by mechanical contrivances
    (yantraih).
  • Vedavyasa refers to Nalasetu
  • nalasetur iti khyato yo 'dyapi prathito bhuvi
    ramasyajña? purask?tya dharyate girisa?nibha?
    MBh. 3.267.45
  • .... which even today, popular on earth as Nala's
    bridge, mountain-like, is sustained out of
    respect for Lord Rama's command. (Nala was son
    of Viswakarma)

9
Strategic implications
  • The bridge area is close to region with Thorium
    sands of Kerala (the largest deposits known in
    the world)
  • .
  • Explore the maritime zone for mineral resources
    to support Bharatams nuclear plans

10
Forster L, Forster P, Lutz-Bonengel S, Willkomm
H, Brinkmann B (2002) Natural radioactivity and
human mitochondrial DNA mutations. Proc Natl Acad
Sci USA 9913950-13954http//www.mcdonald.cam.ac
.uk/genetics/images/kerala_lowres.jpg
  • Close to Ramsethu, natural radioactivity from the
    black thorium sands of Kerala (India) is
    accelerating the DNA mutation rate in the local
    population.
  • Most of these new mutations have hit the same DNA
    positions that have mutated naturally in at least
    the past 60,000 years of human evolution.

11
Importance of Thorium for Bharat
  • From BARC website Thorium deposits - 3,60,000
    tonnes
  • The currently known Indian thorium reserves
    amount to 358,000 GWe-yr of electrical energy and
    can easily meet the energy requirements during
    the next century and beyond.
  • Indias vast thorium deposits permit design and
    operation of U-233 fuelled breeder reactors.
  • These U-233/Th-232 based breeder reactors are
    under development and would serve as the mainstay
    of the final thorium utilization stage of the
    Indian nuclear programme.
  • http//www.barc.ernet.in/webpages/about/anu1.htm

12
Indias nuclear fuel reserves explore near
Ramsethu (ilmenite sands)
  • The US study can be downloaded from
    www.carnegieendowment.org/publications Tellis
    notes that India reserves of 78,000 metric tons
    of uranium.
  • eight reactors allocating a quarter of their
    cores for the production of weapons-grade
    material, uranium needed would be 19,965 to
    29,124 tons.
  • two research reactors will need 938 to 1,088
    tons.
  • These would yield India 12,135 to 13,370
    kilograms of weapons-grade plutonium.
  • Thorium blanket as fuel will be the nuclear fuel
    of the future for Bharatam, which has the largest
    reserves of thorium in the world. .

13
THORIUM, a very rare metal, is a gray powder with
metallic lustre which, heated in Air, burns with
great splendour.Produces Thoria, snow-white
whilst hot, yellow when cold. Thorium does not
exist native, but combined with Silica in Thorite
Found in Norway,and in min'ral Monascite. J.
Carrington Sellars, Chemistianity, 1873, p.
156-157
  • http//elements.vanderkrogt.net/images/thorite.jpg
  • Thorium was named after Thor, the mythical
    Scandinavian god of war.
  • The most important source of thorium is the
    mineral monazite. The largest reserves of thorium
    are in placer deposits. (A placer deposit is a
    deposit of heavy-mineral sands deposited by
    moving water.) Some thorium has been recovered
    from igneous veins and igneous carbonate deposits
    called carbonatites.

14
This is a mid-sea channel (unlike Panama and Suez
Canals which are land-based)
  • A team of scientists from led by Dr.V.J.Loveson
    of the Council for Industrial and Scientific
    Research (CISR) New Delhi, studying placer
    deposits in the area, says an estimated 40
    million tonnes of Titanium alone has been
    deposited in the entire stretch of 500 kilometer
    coastline.
  • Tsunami of Dec. 2004 has changed bathymetry
    (sea-depth) of the region
  • NIOT core samples should be subjected to detailed
    geological analysis for evaluation of mineral
    resources

15
Alternative alignments identified since 1961
(need reevaluation wrt tsunami) Kilakarai reef
(red) sankha (Rs. 50 crore turn-over p.a.8000
yr old industry)Manali reef (blue) algae
(ayurvedic drug) http//sethusamudram.gov.in
16
Strategic locus Diego garcia, Trincomalee,
Straits of Malacca
  • Bharatam has a geostrategic role in safeguarding
    the sea-lanes between Straits of Hormuz and
    Straits of Malacca.
  • The channel should be close to Pamban island and
    not close to Kaccha Tivu or the international
    waters (ocean border between Bharat and Srilanka)
  • Decide on alignment in consultation with coast
    guard, navy and nuclear other security experts.

17
US Navy operational directive historic waters,
intl. waters
  • India's ClaimsARCHIPELAGIC, STRAIGHT BASELINES,
    HISTORIC CLAIMS
  • Aug 76 Act No. 80  Enables government to declare
    waters as historic. Jun 79 Law No. 41Waters of
    Palk Bay between coast and boundary with Sri
    Lanka claimed as internal waters waters of Gulf
    of Mannar between coast and maritime boundary
    claimed as historic waters.This claim is not
    recognized by the United States.  U.S. conducted
    operational assertions in 1993 and 1994, to Gulf
    of Mannar claim in 1999.

18
Violation of due process
  • NEERI did NOT review the present alignment
  • NEERI (environment) and NIOT (sea-depth or
    bathymetry) reviews did NOT take into account
    impact of tsunami (which happened on Dec. 26,
    2006, two years after NEERI evaluation)
  • PMO asked (March 8, 2005) for a review of tsunami
    impact
  • Raghupathy, Chairman, Tuticorin Port Trust gave a
    reply on 30 June 2005 (without consulting NEERI
    and NIOT)
  • On 2 July 2005 PM and Chairperson UPA inaugurate
    project at Madurai
  • PM should explain how he satisfied himself within
    two days the adequacy of the replies given by
    Raghupathy.
  • Why were the 16 questions raised by PMO NOT
    referred to NEERI and NIOT?

19
Present channel alignment will it cope with a
tsunami? Prof. Tad S Murthy says, NO.
20
Serious concerns raised by scientists about the
present alignment
  • Prof. Tad S Murthys objections were cited in
    PMOs letter of Jan. 2005
  • Prof. Tad S Murthy is a tsunami expert who
    advised Govt. of India on tsunami warning system
    and edited Tsunami journal for over 20 years
  • He said Change the mouth of the alignment (Bay
    of Bengal) norwestwards to avoid destruction of
    Kerala by next tsunami
  • Scientists say tsunami is likely to recur as in
    Japan and Hawaii. Japan has built protective
    coastal walls
  • Tsunami protective measures should become an
    integral part of the channel and the channel
    should be re-aligned

21
Prof. Tad S. Murthys views (1)
  • The Tuticorin Port Trust, which is executing the
    channel project, does not think a realignment is
    necessary."(This) I absolutely disagree with. I
    have analysed the problem to my complete
    satisfaction," Murty maintained. He cited the
    example of the Alberni canal on Vancouver Island
    in British Columbia."The Sethusamudram canal
    has many characteristics similar to the Alberni
    canal, and this is the reason I am concerned.
    "In the March 28, 1964, Alaska earthquake
    tsunami, outside of Alaska the largest tsunami
    amplitude was at the head of the Alberni canal
    well inland and not at the open coast as everyone
    expected. Later, I explained this was due to (a
    phenomenon known as) quarter wave resonance
    amplification," Murty explained.
  • http//www.elaw.in/issue/sethu.htm

22
Prof. Tad S. Murthys views (2)
  • From tad murty lt tadmurty_at_gmail.comgtDate Feb
    21, 2007 1256 AM To Kumar Chellappan
    ltkumarchellappan_at_gmail.com gt
  • Q. Could you be specific about the south Kerala
    angle in the eventuality of another tsunami?------
  • A. During the Indian Ocean tsunami of 26th
    December 2004, the very southern part of Kerala
    was generally spared  from a major tsunami,
    mainly because the tsunami waves from Sumatra
    region travelling south of the Sri Lankan
    Island,  partially diffracted northward and
    affected the central  part of the Kerala
    coast.Since tsunami is a long gravity wave
    (similar to tides and storm surges) during the
    diffraction process, the rather wide turn it has
    to take spared  south Kerala coast. On the
    otherhand,  deepening the Sethu Canal  might
    provide a more direct route for the tsunami and
    this could impact south Kerala.In late  2005  I
    had a face to face discussion in Chennai  during
    a very cordial meeting with Shri Raghupathy(I do
    not know his exact title, but he is the head of
    the project, to the best of my knowledge) during
    which I raised this point. I requested him to
    consider slightly re-orienting the entrance of
    the Sethu  canal on the Bay of Bengal side, so
    that in future tsunami events, tsunami energy
    will not be preferentially funnelled into the
    Sethu canal. Shri Raghupathy assured me that he
    will look into this matter. When a senior IAS
    officer  like Shri Raghupathy says something, I
    beleive him and I have no further concerns on
    this matter.

23
Heritage, Eco-wealthDhanushkodi washed away in
1964 Rama-paadam1220 m. mandapam
Ramalingesvara mandir(17th cent.) Coral reef
24
90-year old Pamban (cantilever) bridge
25
Dhanushkodi aerial view, Intl. waters
26
Dhanushkodi, fishing villages
27
Summary
  • PMOs 16 queries of Jan. 2005 should be evaluated
    by a multi-disciplinary team
  • Re-evaluate and choose from four previous
    alignments (no impact on Ramasethu (Adams
    Bridge)
  • Re-evaluate environmental and bathymetry reports
    based on impact of the last tsunami of Dec. 24,
    2006
  • Start maritime exploration to place Bharatams
    nuclear program on a self-reliant phase using
    thorium
  • Suspend channel work until this re-evaluation is
    completed
  • Respect peoples sentiments

28
Dredging status 16 March 2007
                                                  
                 
 
No progress in Palk Bay II (40.68 kms.) Total
dredging quantity 20.95 m. cum
http//sethusamudram.gov.in/Projectstatus.asp
29
What can be done?
  • 1. PM to be asked to get a fresh evaluation done
    by NEERI and NIOT
  • 2. Demonstrate the implications to
  • His Excellency President of India
  • Honble Chief Justice, Supreme Court
  • Honble Judge, Rameswaram Court
  • 3. PIL in Supreme Court The last PIL filed (June
    2005) in Madras HC was not entertained stating
    mega projects should not be stalled in the name
    of environmental concerns and directed that
    proceedings of the public hearings be immediately
    sent to the Union Environment Ministry.)
    http//www.deccanherald.com/deccanherald/Jun292005
    /national1251322005628.asp
  • 4. Issues related to impact of tsunami were NOT
    brought up in the the June 2005 PIL.
  • 5. Create public awareness on the issues involved
    to force the government to re-evaluate and/or
    re-align the channel after consultations with
    multi-disciplinary teams.
  • 6. Raise the issue in Parliament as serious a
    world heritage concern as Ayodhya.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com