Myocardial contrast echocardiography in routine clinical practice - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 54
About This Presentation
Title:

Myocardial contrast echocardiography in routine clinical practice

Description:

Myocardial contrast echocardiography in routine clinical practice WHY ? Principles of Contrast echocardiography Blood appears black on conventional two ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1594
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 55
Provided by: accindiaO
Learn more at: https://www.accindia.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Myocardial contrast echocardiography in routine clinical practice


1
Myocardial contrast echocardiography in routine
clinical practice
2
WHY ?
3
Clinical and economic outcomes assessment with
MCE, Leslee et al, Heart 1999.
4
  • Principles of Contrast echocardiography
  • Blood appears black on conventional two
    dimensional echocardiography, not because blood
    produces no echo, but because the ultrasound
    scattered by red blood cells at conventional
    imaging frequencies is very weakseveral thousand
    times weaker than myocardiumand so lies below
    the displayed dynamic range

5
  • Contrast ultrasound results from scattering of
    incident ultrasound at a gas/liquid interface,
    increasing the strength of returning signal.
  • However, the bubble/ultrasound interaction is
    complex.
  • Understanding this interaction is key to
    performing, understanding, and interpreting a
    contrast echo study.

6
  • Physics in ultrasound
  • Unlike solid tissue, gas bubbles have acoustic
    properties that vary with the strength of the
    insonating signal. When insonated ----gt gas
    bubbles pulsate-----gt with compression at the
    peak of the ultrasound wave and expansion at the
    nadir.
  • An ultrasound beam with a frequency of 3 MHz,
    will result in bubble oscillation three million
    times per second AND hence are several million
    times more effective at scattering sound than red
    blood cells. With this movement, sound is
    generated and, combined with that of thousands of
    other bubbles, results in the scattered echo from
    the contrast agent.
  • Characterising this echo, from that of tissue,
    form the basis of contrast echocardiographic
    studies.

7
  • It is a remarkable coincidence that gas bubbles
    of a size required to cross the pulmonary
    capillary vascular bed (15 mm) resonate in a
    frequency range of 1.57 MHz, precisely that used
    in diagnostic ultrasound.

8
  • At low poweroutput (PO) settings, there is mostly
    a linear response (fundamental enhancement) with
    some generation of harmonic frequencies.
  • As the PO is increased, the bubbles generate more
    nonlinear resonance and thus generate greater
    harmonic frequencies.
  • At a high power setting, fracture and destruction
    of the microbubble occur, allowing the air or gas
    inside to be released.

(lt100 kPa)
(100 kPa1 Mpa)
9
  • Contrast imaging requires ultrasound machine
    settings to be optimised. Generally, this
    requires variation in the system power output,
    indicated on clinical systems as the mechanical
    index (MI) (most important parameter) The MI is a
    unit-less number that serves as an indicator of
    the nonthermal bioeffects.
  • This is an estimate of the peak negative pressure
    within insonated tissue defined as the peak
    negative pressure divided by the square root of
    the ultrasound frequency.
  • Display of the MI was made mandatory in the USA
    as a safety measure, to enable an estimate of the
    tissue effects of ultrasound exposure to be made.
    As this also reflects the mechanical effect of
    ultrasound on a contrast bubble, this has proved
    useful in developing machine settings for
    contrast ultrasound.

10
  • Standard clinical echocardiography imaging
    utilises an MI of around 1.0, but a lower
    setting, around 0.5, is usually optimal for left
    ventricular opacification.
  • To achieve myocardial perfusion imaging the
    extremes of power output are utilised
  • high MI (gt 1.2) is used to achieve bubble
    destruction in power Doppler imaging, and
  • ultra low MI (lt 0.1) required to induce linear
    oscillation of microbubbles required for real
    time myocardial perfusion imaging.

11
(No Transcript)
12
Current generation of contrast agents comprises
small, stabilized, gas-filled microbubbles that
can pass through the smallest capillaries.
  • Current microbubbles can be visualized within the
    left heart chambers after an intravenous
    injection for two reasons
  • (1) they are smaller than red blood cells
    and so can pass through the pulmonary
    capillaries, and
  • (2) they are stable, relative to time and
    pressure (they can persist long enough to travel
    through the pulmonary capillary bed, and they can
    withstand left-sided pressures).

The larger the microbubbles, the better the
contrast effect
13
  • The properties of the Air- filled microbubble are
    -
  • a strong reflector of ultrasound and highly
    soluble
  • But has low persistence and lacks stability
    because air diffuses out. This shrinking
    microbubble becomes less and less reflective.
  • WHEREAS
  • Gases are of high molecular weight are-
  • not very soluble hence stable with longer
    persistence.
  • Persistence prolongs contrast effect so that
    assessment of left ventricular borders and wall
    motion can be made.

14
(No Transcript)
15
  • The ultrasonic characteristics depends on -
  • a) size of the bubble
  • b) composition of the shell and the gas in the
    shell.
  • The outer shell of the microbubbles is composed
    of many different substances, including
  • albumin, polymers, palmitic acid,or
    phospholipids.
  • This composition determines its elasticity, its
    behavior in an ultrasonic field, and the methods
    for metabolism and elimination.
  • In general, the stiffer the shell, the more
    easily it will crack or break with ultrasonic
    energy. Conversely, the more elastic the shell,
    the greater its ability to be compressed or
    resonated and to produce a nonlinear backscatter
    signature.

16
  • The major technical difficulties in using
    contrast agents for left ventricular
    opacification are
  • the need to resonate but not burst microbubbles
    and
  • to maintain adequate bubble concentration within
    the cavity.
  • injection of a sufficient concentration of
    microbubbles and
  • the proper ultrasonographic equipment settings
    to optimize image quality.
  • Inadequate bubble concentration, causes less
    opacification of the chamber, which was a
    difficulty with first-generation agents because
    of excessive bubble destruction when insonified
    with ultrasound.
  • Left ventricular opacification requires a long
    duration of the contrast effect for the
    assessment of left ventricular borders in
    suboptimal patients both in rest and under
    stress.
  • Contrast agents that are easily destroyed will be
    useful in myocardial perfusion studies.

17
  • CONTRAST AGENTS FOR ULTRASOUND
  • Initially contrast echocardiography utilised free
    air in solution but these large, unstable bubbles
    were not capable of crossing the pulmonary
    vascular capillary bed, allowing right heart
    contrast effects only.
  • The first agents capable of left heart contrast
    after intravenous injection (first generation
    agents) were air bubbles stabilised by
    encapsulation (Albunex) or by adherence to
    microparticles (Levovist).
  • Replacing air with a low solubility fluorocarbon
    gas stabilises bubbles still further (second
    generation agentsfor example, Optison, SonoVue),
    greatly increasing the duration of the contrast
    effect.
  • Third generation agentsnot yet commercially
    availablewill use polymer shell and low
    solubility gas and should producemuch more
    reproducible acoustic properties.

18
  • PERFORMING A CONTRAST STUDY
  • Bubbles are prone to destruction by physical
    pressure, hence requires meticulous attention to
    the preparation and administration.
  • The agent should be prepared immediately before
    injection and vents used when withdrawing the
    agent into the syringe. Bubbles tend to float
    towards the surface and the contrast vial or
    syringe should be gently agitated each time fresh
    contrast administration is required.
  • Injection through a small lumen catheter
    increases bubble destructiona 20 G or greater
    cannula should be used.
  • Very small volumes of contrast are needed using
    second generation agents (lt 1 ml) and a flush is
    required by using a three way tap,with contrast
    injected along the direct path to minimise bubble
    destruction, and saline flush injected into the
    right angle bend.
  • For myocardial perfusion work, infusion produces
    more reproducible results with the potential for
    quantification6 but brings its own problems.
    Bubbles in agents currently available are buoyant
    and will tend to rise to the surface of the
    syringe.
  • Purpose designed infusion pumps which agitate
    contrast continuously are in development but not
    yet widely available.

19
(No Transcript)
20
(No Transcript)
21
  • A PFO is diagnosed if more than three
    microbubbles pass from right to left atrium
    within three cardiac cycles of right atrial
    opacification.
  • Crude quantification is possible with
  • a small shunt defined as 310 bubbles,
  • a medium shunt 1020, and
  • a large shunt gt 20 bubbles.
  • An initial study should be performed during
    normal respiration, when the normal reversal of
    atrial pressure gradient in early systole may be
    sufficient to allow shunting if a large defect is
    present.

22
(No Transcript)
23
(No Transcript)
24
LEFT VENTRICULAR OPACIFICATION
  • Assessment of left ventricular (LV) systolic
    function is the most common indication for
    echocardiography. Accurate assessment and
    quantification is dependent on visualising the
    entire endocardium in cross section.
  • Tissue harmonic imaging has greatly improved
    image quality and reduced the number of
    non-diagnostic studies.
  • Contrast opacification of the left ventricular
    cavity enhances endocardial border definition and
    has been shown to increase diagnostic accuracy in
    suboptimal studies at rest and during stress.
  • This is the major clinical use of left heart
    contrast echocardiography at present

25
  • Contrast echo is useful in the assessment of LV
    function in patients ventilated in intensive
    care, reducing the time required to obtain
    diagnostic information and obviating the need for
    trans-oesophageal echocardiography.
  • While apical imaging is greatly enhanced,
    para-sternal views may deteriorate, at least
    initially,with contrast in the right ventricle
    attenuating visualisation of the left. For this
    reason, apical views should routinely be obtained
    first in any contrast study.
  • LV opacification is also used to delineate LV
    anatomy, particularly apically, confirming
    pseudo-aneurysm, apical hypertrophy or
    ventricular non- compaction and demonstrating
    filling defects, typically apical thrombus.

26
  • MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING
  • Myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) is
    the imaging of a contrast agent within the
    myocardial capillary vascular bed is
    reproducible, real time, noninvasive assessment
    of myocardial perfusion during rest and stress,
    at the bedside and in the cardiac catheterisation
    laboratory.
  • At present, MCE remains difficult and suboptimal
    imaging prohibits routine use.
  • While LV cavity opacification with contrast can
    make a difficult study diagnostic, only those
    with high quality baseline B mode images are
    suitable for MCE with current equipment.
  • Intravenous injection of contrast results in
    very low concentration of bubbles in the
    myocardium, with only 510 of cardiac output
    entering the coronary circulation. As more than
    90 of intramyocardial blood volume is within the
    capillary compartment, contrast bubbles are
    imaged at low velocity with slow replenishment
    following bubble destruction.

27
  • Dissolution and destruction of microbubbles by
    both intramural pressure and ultrasound exposure
    further limits any contrast effect. Thus,
    contrast specific imaging modalities must be
    used. Broadly, there are two approaches used to
    overcome the problems inherent in myocardial
    contrast perfusion imaging intermittent imaging
    and pulse inversion or power modulation imaging.
  • Flash imaging, utilising a pulse of echo at high
    MI to destroy all microbubbles within the
    myocardium, combined with low MI real time MCE
    allows assessment of perfusion in real time .
    This technique can be used to quantify rate of
    bubble replenishment in the myocardium

28
(No Transcript)
29
(No Transcript)
30
(No Transcript)
31
LVO PROTOCOLS FOR A BOLUS INJECTION OFCONTRAST
32
(No Transcript)
33
(No Transcript)
34
  • New possibilities have emerged with
    second-generation contrast agents containing high
    molecular- weight gases such as fluorocarbons
    (Optison, MBI/Mallinckrodt Sonazoid, Nycomed
    Amersham, Amersham, Bucks, U.K. and EchoGen,
    Sonus/Abbott, Seattle, WA, U.S.A.) or sulphur
    hexafluoride (SonoVue, Bracco, Milan, Italy).
  • In a phase III multi centre trial that compared a
    first generation (Albunex) with a second
    generation (EchoGen) contrast agent demonstrated
    the superiority of fluorocarbon-containing
    microbubbles over sonicated human albumin for LV
    cavity opacification, endocardial border
    definition, duration of effect, salvage of
    suboptimal echocardiograms, diagnostic confidence
    and potential to influence patient management.

35
  • Reilly et al demonstrated that a second
    generation contrast agent could significantly
    improve the quality of echocardiograms in the
    intensive care unit. They evaluated wall motion
    analysis with standard fundamental
    echocardiography, harmonic echocardiography and
    contrast echocardiography. Wall motion was seen
    with greater confidence after contrast
    echocardiography.
  • Another study, Kornbluth et al. in mechanically
    ventilated patients, showed the use of contrast
    was superior to tissue harmonic imaging for
    endocardial border delineation, wall motion
    scoring and quantification of ejection fraction.

36
  • In Stress echocardiography a sizeable proportion
    of patients can benefit from the additional use
    of contrast media to improve endocardial border
    detection.
  • At peak exercise image quality is often low
    because of tachycardia. Only when endocardial
    borders are well delineated and reproducible can
    useful results be expected with stress
    echocardiography.
  • The use of contrast during stress
    echocardiography in patients with suboptimal
    imaging may have a positive impact on cost it
    can indeed enhance diagnostic confidence in
    stress echocardiography, with improvement in
    image quality in approximately 50 of patients.
  • In a group of poorly echogenic patients
    undergoing dopamine echocardiography,Voci et
    al.30 demonstrated that infusion of insonicated
    albumin provided adequate LV opacification in 90
    of patients, with significant reduction in
    inter-observer variability in ejection fraction
    measurements.

37
  • At present, the best solution for improving
    endocardial border visualization is a combination
    of intravenous contrast LV opacification and
    harmonic imaging.
  • In a review of 200 patients referred for stress
    echocardiography, a combination of native tissue
    harmonic imaging and contrast application was
    used. The combination resulted in significantly
    better visualization of the endocardium as
    compared with fundamental contrast imaging, and
    an increased inter-observer agreement for border
    detection, which increased from 83 in
    fundamental mode without contrast to 95 with
    contrast native tissue harmonic imaging.

38
  • Contrast stress echocardiography, despite the
    added cost of the agent, can still provide a cost
    saving of 15, and accuracy and outcome
    assessment are similar to those of nuclear
    techniques.
  • For conventional stress echocardiography, recent
    reports have documented that its diagnostic
    accuracy is similar to that of myocardial
    perfusion evaluation using nuclear techniques.
  • Currently, if the patient does not have a good
    acoustic window then stress echocardiography
    should not be performed without contrast
    enhancement.
  • The maximum yield of contrast enhancement has
    been demonstrated when approximately two to six
    segments are not satisfactorily delineated.

39
Comparison of myocardial contrastechocardiography
with single-photon emissioncomputed tomography
  • MCE may be compared with single-photon emission
    computed tomography (SPECT).
  • Results of the earliest studies that compared MCE
    with SPECT were encouraging. However, larger
    clinical trials have shown that MCE, when
    compared with SPECT, has a good specificity but
    relatively low sensitivity. The question of
    training is important.
  • The study conducted by Marwick et al., which
    involved centres for which MCE was not initially
    a routine investigation, showed that performance
    and interpretation of perfusion echocardiography
    requires special expertise.
  • The recent introduction of new techniques such as
    harmonic power Doppler resulted in good
    concordance between MCE and SPECT.
  • A study conducted by Rocchi et al revealed
    excellent sensitivity and specificity (82 and
    95, respectively) in detecting viable myocardium
    in segments supplied by infarct-related arteries,
    but more studies are needed to establish the
    value of MCE.

40
No-reflow phenomenon
  • Restoration of epicardial flow in the
    infarct-related artery, as indicated by
    Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI)
    grade 3 flow, does not necessarily imply normal
    flow at the level of the microcirculation. The
    no-reflow phenomenon was initially observed in
    the 1970s by Kloner et al and was subsequently
    confirmed clinically by MCE, which can define the
    presence and extent of flow at the level of the
    microcirculation.
  • In the 39 patients with acute myocardial
    infarction (AMI) before and immediately after
    successful coronary recanalization studied by Ito
    et al. up to 23 of patients showed lack of
    microvascular reperfusion (or no-reflow)
    despite a fully patent infarct-related artery.
  • In another study of 86 patients who underwent
    coronary revascularization and MCE with
    intra-coronary application of contrast, reduced
    myocardial contrast effect was demonstrated in
    all patients with TIMI grade 2 flow. In 16 of
    patients with TIMI grade 3 flow, reduced
    myocardial reperfusion was seen. Those patients
    had a reduced wall motion score and ejection
    fraction at 28 days as compared with patients
    with normal myocardial perfusion by MCE, and
    their outcome was similar to that of patients
    with TIMI grade 2 flow.
  • These findings demonstrate significant
    correlation between myocardial perfusion and LV
    function.

41
  • Porter and coworkers demonstrated that adequate
    perfusion imaging may be achieved with
    intravenous injection of perfluorocarbon-exposed
    sonicated dextrose albumin. In one study,
    conducted in 45 consecutive patients 24 16
    days after an AMI, 29 of the patients with TIMI
    grade 3 flow showed evidence of contrast defect.
    The patients had a significant increase in both
    end-systolic volume and wall motion score index
    at follow-up (4 weeks after myocardial
    infarction).
  • In another study, in which power Doppler harmonic
    imaging was used for identification of
    reperfusion after AMI, showed very good
    sensitivity and specificity (82 and 95,
    respectively) of this technique in depicting
    perfusion status in segments supplied by infarct-
    elated arteries.

42
  • Moreover, the accuracies of power Doppler
    harmonic imaging MCE and SPECT were similar (90
    and 92 on segmental basis, and 98 versus 98 on
    coronary artery territory basis), which
    apparently provides evidence for the superiority
    of this technique in the assessment of myocardial
    perfusion over the techniques that are based on
    greyscale modalities.
  • There was a correlation between perfusion defects
    and functional recovery after 6 weeks, yielding
    prognostic information for the recovery of
    ventricular function and allowing differentiation
    between stunned and necrotic myocardium.
  • MCE has great potential in this context because
    it offers the unique possibility of exploring the
    integrity of the microcirculation in vivo, a
    fundamental prerequisite for myocardial viability

43
Acute coronary syndromes
  • In the emergency room, detection of normal
    perfusion may allow safe discharge and may avoid
    the costs of unnecessary hospitalization.
  • In the case of detectable perfusion defect
    without previous myocardial infarction, an acute
    coronary syndrome may be diagnosed and, depending
    on the extent of this defect, a conservative or
    aggressive diagnostic approach may be applied.
  • In the situation of established AMI, Agati et
    al. compared the infarct size and microvascular
    perfusion 1 month after AMI in relation to the
    applied therapy primary coronary angioplasty or
    thrombolysis. That study showed that, after
    successful recanalization of the infarct related
    artery, primary angioplasty is more effective
    than thrombolysis in preserving microvascular
    flow and preventing extension of myocardial
    damage.
  • MCE is a simple bedside method to monitor the
    success of therapy, and may help in the
    decision-making process (i.e. whether to proceed
    to coronary angiography and rescue interventions
    when thrombolytic therapy fails to achieve full
    reperfusion).

44
Chronic ischaemic heart disease
  • Currently available methods for detection of
    myocardial ischaemia have several limitations.
  • Stress ECG is positive in only 50 patients with
    single vessel disease (stenosis gt70) and
    provides limited information on the extent of
    ischemia. Stress echocardiography is currently
    the most important diagnostic method. The
    sensitivity and specificity for CAD are between
    80 and 90. However, flow must be reduced to 50
    in at least 5 of the myocardium to detect new
    wall motion abnormalities. Additionally, stress
    echocardiography cannot be used when an unstable
    process is suspected.
  • Myocardial scintigraphy is currently the only
    well established method that directly addresses
    myocardial perfusion, but this technique is not
    as widely available as echocardiography it is
    more expensive and has a lower spatial
    resolution.
  • The potential value of MCE in the diagnosis,
    treatment, follow-up and outcome prediction of
    CAD is clear, especially with the fact that MCE
    can identify very early stages in the ischaemic
    cascade.

45
  • In a study conducted by Meza et al. MCE had a
    good negative predictive value (gt80) for
    estimating attenuated regional function 60 days
    after surgery.
  • In a study that assessed the ability to detect
    angiographically significant CAD with accelerated
    intermittent imaging after intravenous contrast
    administration during stress echocardiography, an
    agreement between regional perfusion and
    quantitative angiographic findings was found in
    217 of the 270 regions analyzed (k 061, 80
    agreement, gt50 stenosis).
  • The greatest incremental benefit of accelerated
    intermittent imaging versus wall motion was
    gained with dobutamine-induced stress. The
    contrast studies depicted 90 of the regions
    supplied by a vessel with more than 50 stenosis,
    whereas wall motion analysis depicted only 32 (P
    0001).
  • In a study by Porter et al. accelerated
    intermittent imaging allowed real-time assessment
    of myocardial blood flow and wall thickening
    simultaneously, though this requires further
    assessment and validation.

46
Collateral blood flow assessment
  • The extent of coronary collateral circulation can
    determine the percentage of necrotic myocardium
    during AMI
  • In the study conducted by Sabia et al. MCE could
    define the percentage of the risk area provided
    by collaterals, and there was only partial
    correlation with angiographic degree of
    collaterals.
  • In the study conducted by Mills et al.in animals,
    those investigators demonstrated the possibility
    of following the development of coronary
    collateral circulation using serial MCE
    examinations. This method may permit
    investigation of the physiology of collateral
    development in vivo and may allow the results of
    therapeutic angiogenesis to be monitored.

47
  • Recent advances in MCE
  • Transthoracic echocardiography following contrast
    injection helps to detect LV thrombi .
  • With high-resolution Doppler echocardiography
    coronary vasomotion and flow reserve from the
    chest without the need for contrast agents can be
    measured.
  • Development of tissue specific microbubbles,
    which would allow drug delivery or clot
    identification.
  • Finally, the development of bubbles with a very
    narrow distribution may open the possibility to
    measure intra-cavitary pressures in a
    non-invasive manner.

48
Assessment of Myocardial Postreperfusion
Viability by Intravenous Myocardial Contrast
Echocardiography Analysis of the Intensity and
Texture of Opacification, Koji Ohmori, MD,
Circulation April 17, 2001
  • examined the relationship between the
    opacification pattern produced by a new
    intravenous dodecafluoropentane contrast agent
    and histological evidence of necrosis or
    viability after reperfusion of coronary
    occlusion.

49
(No Transcript)
50
  • This is the first application of echo texture
    analysis to quantify altered opacification
    pattern produced by intravenous MCE in infarcted
    segments after reperfusion.
  • Thus, these data suggested that texture
    characterization of the contrast opacification
    pattern has the potential to complement
    conventional intensity measurements of
    intravenous MCE in determining myocardial
    viability after reperfusion.

51
Identification of Hibernating Myocardium With
Quantitative Intravenous Myocardial Contrast
Echocardiography Comparison With Dobutamine
Echocardiography and Thallium-201 Scintigraphy
Sarah Shimoni, Circulation February 4, 2003
52
(No Transcript)
53
Conclusion
  • Implementation of contrast into clinical practice
    will increase the diagnostic power of
    echocardiography, providing complex structural
    and functional information in a fast one stop
    shop examination, without a large increase in
    overhead costs.
  • However, much work needs to be done to
    understand the behaviour of bubbles to improve
    image quality and to implement new solutions into
    echocardiographic equipment.
  • However, rigorous cost-effectiveness analyses
    have not been done, particularly in perfusion
    studies. In an era of poor resources, it is
    impossible to overlook economic constraints.
  • On the basis of current evidence, it appears that
    contrast echocardiography can improve health
    outcomes at reasonable cost and may represent
    good value for money, even if it is a
    cost-increasing technology.
  • This aim will be achieved once echocardiography
    is refined to the point that it can offer a
    high-quality, conclusive result in almost every
    examination, and provide anatomical, perfusion
    and functional data all in one examination. This
    can hopefully be done with the help of contrast
    media.

54
Thank you
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com