Title: Oncology management of CNS tumours Neil Burnet
1Oncology management of CNS tumoursNeil Burnet
- University of Cambridge Department of Oncology
Oncology Centre, Addenbrookes Hospital
ECRIC CNS study day 7th April 2009
2Introduction
- Treatment modalities for cancer
- What data do oncologists want?
- Examples of uses of Registry data
3(No Transcript)
4Cancer treatment modalities
5Cancer treatment modalities
- Modalities
- (Surgery)
- Radiotherapy
- Chemotherapy
- Consider efficacy
- Consider costs
6Oncology management
7(No Transcript)
8Radiotherapy
- Radiotherapy is an anatomical treatment
- Treats a specific area
- Localising the tumour target is crucial
- Imaging is key
- Better localisation better outcome
- Localising normal structures allows avoidance
9CT the technology advance
10Glioblastoma imaging
MR (magnetic resonance) imaging
11Radiotherapy
- Immobilise the patient
- Relate today's patient position to tumour imaging
12Radiotherapy
- High precision positioning
- Relocatable stereotactic frame
13Radiotherapy
14Radiotherapy imaging
CT MRI
15- GBM planning
- Using CT MR together
MRI CT
16Radiotherapy imaging
17Target volume delineation
18Radiotherapy
- Planning and delivery technology now very
different - Old square planning
- Was conventional in 1960s 1990s
- Conformal (dose conforms to shape of target in
3D) - Ultra-conformal (includes concave shape)
- known as IMRT (intensity modulated radiotherapy)
- 21st century technology
19Treatment volumes compared
Conformal
Ultra-conformal IMRT
Square plan
20 21- Some shielding with lead blocks
22Treatment volumes compared
Conformal
Ultra-conformal IMRT
Square plan
23Conformal RT plan
24IMRT plan (TomoTherapy)
- Ca nasopharynx
- 68 Gy to primary (34)
- 60 Gy to nodes (34)
- Cord dose lt 45 Gy
- No field junctions
- No electrons
25IMRT plan
- Skull base meningioma
- Shaping of dose around optic nerves and chiasm
- Tumour 60 Gy
- Optic chiasm 50 Gy
26(No Transcript)
27Radiotherapy dose
- Biological effect depends on
- Total dose
- Number of fractions
- (Dose per fraction)
- Overall treatment time
Complex relationship
28Radiotherapy dose
- Single fraction
- Very destructive
- Known as radiosurgery
- Must physically avoid normal tissue
- Multiple fractions
- Spare normal tissue
- Enhances therapeutic radio
- Allows treatment including normal tissue
29RT dose and fractions
- For a given dose, and overall time, biological
effect depends on number of - Actually depends on dose/
30Chemotherapy
- Use in accordance with NICE Guidelines
- At first presentation, with (surgery ) RT
- Temozolomide
- Also at relapse
- PCV
- Monitor
- Blood count, nausea, liver function ( other s/e)
- Progression
31Chemotherapy
- Most chemo for CNS tumours is oral
- Temozolomide
- Invented in UK
- Revolutionised treatment of GBM
32RT TMZ for GBM
EORTC Randomised trial results
Plt0.001
33Cancer cure and cost
34Cancer cures by modality
- References
- SBU. The Swedish council on technology assessment
in health care Radiotherapy for Cancer. 1996 - Cancer Services Collaborative 2002
35The Cancer Reform Strategy
Prof. Mike Richards 2007
36Effectiveness and cost
- cures of cancer Ratio
care cost - Radiotherapy 40 5 8.0
- Chemotherapy 11 18 0.6
- Surgery 49 22 2.2
37What data do oncologists really want?
38What data do oncologists really want?
- What data do oncologists really want or need?
- Types of CNS tumour
- Prognostic factors
- Treatment intent
- Treatment details
- Dates
39Tumour types in oncology clinic
- Note 20 with benign tumours
40CNS tumour types - 1
- Glial tumours
- Astrocytoma (inc Pilocytic Juvenile Pilocytic)
- Oligodendroglioma
- Oligo-astrocytoma
- Glioblastoma (GBM)
- Ependymoma ( subependymoma)
- Meningioma
- Pituitary adenoma Craniopharyngioma
41CNS tumour types - 2
- Vestibular schwannoma (aka acoustic neuroma)
- Medulloblastoma
- Germinoma teratoma
- Lymphoma
- Neurocytoma Ganglioglioma
- Pineoblastoma
- Primitive neuro-ectodermal tumour (PNET)
- (Chordoma chondrosarcoma)
- (Metastases)
42CNS tumour types - 3
- Many tumour types
- Prognosis varies enormously
- Survival from days to weeks to cure
- Affected by tumour type
- Grade (ie how malignant)
- Essential to know detail
- Detail must be collected
43Grade affects prognosis
- High grade glioma
- Grade III
- Grade IV GBM
- - Surgery RT only
- - Radical treatment
- - Addenbrookes data
44Grade affects prognosis
- Histology is not the only tumour feature which
affects outcome
45Radiotherapy Oncology 2007 85371-378
- Radiology adds to pathology grade
- Need to include information from imaging
46What data do oncologists really want?
- Prognostic factors
- Age
- Performance status
- ? Size
- Extent of surgical resection (hard to evaluate)
- Treatment intent
- Radical
- Palliative
47What data do oncologists really want?
- Treatment intent
- Might be clear from treatment
- GBM RT 60 Gy (30) radical
- 30 Gy (6) palliative
- Need to know if intent changes
- eg due to progression
48Radiotherapy details
- Area treated
- Total dose
- Number of fractions
- Overall treatment time
- Dates
- Time (delay) to start RT
- Overall time (duration) of RT
49Chemotherapy details
- Drug(s)
- Dose
- Number of cycles given
- Dates
50(No Transcript)
51Examples of Registry data use
- Measuring disease burden - AYLL
- GBM outcome
- Modelling chemotherapy use
52Measuring disease burden
1
- Simple mortality figures do not tell the whole
story - Other measures show alternative aspects of
mortality - Burden on society
- Burden to the individual affected
- With particular thanks to Peter Treasure at ECRIC
53Measuring disease burden
- Method
- Detail deaths from specific tumour type
- Compare to standardised matched population
- Sum the difference
54Measuring disease burden
- CNS tumours
- 2 of cancer deaths simple mortality
- 3 of the years of life lost - YLL
- YLL shows the burden on society
55Average Years of Life Lost
- Divide YLL by number of affected patients
- Average Years of Life Lost AYLL
- AYLL shows the burden to the affected person
- Easily understood measure, including by patients
- CNS tumours account for 20 years of lost life
- This is higher than any other adult tumour type
56Average Years of Life Lost
57Measuring disease burden
- CNS tumours
- 2 of cancer deaths
- 3 of the years of life lost YLL
- 20 years of lost life per individual - AYLL
58Average Years of Life Lost
- In the 2007 Cancer Reform Strategy reference made
to the poor overall outcome of brain CNS
tumours in terms of AYLL - Encouraging that alternative measures of
mortality are being acknowledged by the
government - UK Government Department of Health (2007)
http//www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/
Lettersandcirculars/Dearcolleagueletters/DH_080975
59Measuring disease burden
- AYLL is an effective measure of disease burden to
the affected person - AYLL has other uses
- Compare disease burden with research spending
- AYLL does not match NCRI research spending
- The mis-match is most extreme for CNS tumours
60Average Years of Life Lost per affected patient
versus NCRI spending
Burnet et al. Br J Cancer 2005 92(2) 241-5
61GBM outcome
2
62GBM outcome
- GBM traditionally terrible
outloook - Addition of temozolomide (TMZ) chemotherapy has
transformed the outlook - Can we reproduce trial results?
The scream Edvard Munck
63TMZ RT for GBM
EORTC Randomised trial results
Plt0.001
64TMZ RT for GBM
Addenbr RT alone
65TMZ RT for GBM
Addenbr RT TMZ Addenbr RT alone
66TMZ RT for GBM
Addenbr RTTMZ
Plt0.001
67GBM outcome
- Our results match the international trial
- Endorsement of our treatment pathway
- Good news for patients !
Patient photo
68Modelling chemotherapy use
3
69Modelling chemotherapy use
- TMZ chemo combined with RT ( surgery) has
revolutionised the outcome for patients with GBM - TMZ is given in 2 parts
- Concurrent daily with RT
- Adjuvant for 6 cycles after RT
- Are both parts of value?
70TMZ treatment schema
- Chemo-RT programme with temozolomide (TMZ)
RT
TMZ
- Component 2
- Adjuvant
- 5 days every 28, x 6 cycles
- Component 1
- Concurrent with RT
- Daily for 42 days
0 6 10 14 18
22 26 30 34
Week
71Modelling chemotherapy use
- Build model of patient survival
- Allow treatment with RT and with chemo
- Fit model to Kaplan Meier survival curves to
derive values for tumour growth and response to
treatment - Test
- TMZ RT concurrent
- RT followed by TMZ adjuvant
72EORTC trial Model - RT concurrent TMZ
RT concurrent TMZ near perfect fit
73Modelling chemotherapy use
- RT concurrent TMZ produces near perfect fit
- Suggests concurrent TMZ is the effective
component - Suggests adjuvant TMZ may not add anything
- Omitting 6 cycles of adjuvant TMZ would
- Spare toxicity
- Improve QoL (likely) - finish treatment 6/12
earlier - Save money
74Modelling chemotherapy use
- Incidence of GBM
- 33 cases per million population per annum
- Cost of TMZ 1 course
- Concurrent 3900
- Adjuvant 7100
- With thanks to
- David Greenberg Peter Treasure,
- Eastern Cancer Registration Information Centre
(ECRIC), Cambridge - Brendan OSullivan,
- Chemotherapy Pharmacist, Addenbrookes Hospital
75Modelling chemotherapy use
- UK
- Population 60 m
- GBM cases (33 x 60) 1,980 p.a.
- GBM patients treated radically 50
- Number requiring TMZ 990 p.a.
76Modelling chemotherapy use
- UK
- Population 60 m
- GBM cases (33 x 60) 1,980 p.a.
- GBM patients treated radically 50
- Number requiring TMZ 990 p.a.
- Cost TMZ 11 m p.a.
- Saving by using only
concurrent TMZ 7 m p.a.
77Improving survivorship
Patient photo
Photo of patient and family
78Acknowledgements
- Colleagues
- Sarah Jefferies
- Raj Jena
- Fiona Harris
- Phil Jones
- Peter Treasure
- Norman Kirkby
- Lara Barazzuol
- EORTC
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)
Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre - RJ is supported by The Health Foundation, UK
- NFK was supported by an EPSRC discipline-hopping
grant
79(No Transcript)