Health Care: A Right or a Privilege? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Health Care: A Right or a Privilege?

Description:

Health Care: A Right or a Privilege? S. Theodoulou Health Policy Goal: to promote and attain the population s good health Involvement of the State in the provision ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:428
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: plazaUfl1
Learn more at: http://plaza.ufl.edu
Category:
Tags: care | health | privilege | right

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Health Care: A Right or a Privilege?


1
Health Care A Right or a Privilege?
  • S. Theodoulou

2
Health Policy
  • Goal to promote and attain the populations good
    health
  • Involvement of the State in the provision of
    health is a modern phenomenon
  • Link between welfare provision and good health
  • Clear link between labor productivity, economic
    growth, and the populations good health
  • 1 more year of male life expectancy1 GDP growth
    after 15 years
  • 2000- World Health Organization (WHO) published
    the first ever analysis of health systems (192
    countries)

3
WHO
  • Health insurance sould be extended to as many
    individuals as possible (especially the poor)

4
State Roles in the Provision of Health
  • Regulator
  • Funder/Purchaser
  • Provider/Planner

5
Brazil
  • 1940 Special Services for Public Health (SESP)
  • 1960s-80s The military centralized the
    system Privatization
  • 1967 National Institute of Social Wellness (INPS)
    optional care to the (urban) employed
  • Early 1970s Movement supporting public health
    reformObstacles (lack of resources, opposition
    of the private sector, the bureaucracy,
    corruption) The same obstacles exist today)
  • 1975 Plan for Immediate Care (PPA) First real
    step towards universalization- the INPS becomes
    more ambitious in scope, with the creation of the
    National Institute of Medical Assistance and
    Social Security.
  • Early 1980s Centralization (Integrated Health
    Act Program)

6
  • Reforma Sanitaria decentralization inthe
    provision of health services.
  • Goal to create a network of health services that
    cover the entire populationalso the rural part
    of the population.
  • 1988 Constitution Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS)
    Single and ambitious health system, in principle
    covering the whole nation. Foundation of the
    present system
  • 1990 Organic Health Law Universal State health
    care
  • Hindered by successive financial (and debt)
    crises
  • Gvt. Stronger commitment from 1985-92, then
    diminished for financial problems (IMF, World
    Bank loans, etc)

7
Organization
  • Two health care systems in Brazil
  • Public federal (basic services), state (endemic
    diseases, parental and infant care), municipal
    (emergency)
  • Private for profit institutions, philantropic
    institutions (Catholic Church), prepaid systems,
    cooperativesManaged care (corporations) since
    the mid 1990s
  • Imbalanced system, both geographically and in
    terms of class

8
Germany
  • Corporatist-Governmed system established by
    Bismark in the 1880s
  • Autonomous from the State
  • 90 Germans are covered
  • Principles
  • Solidarity commitment to take care of each other
  • Subsidiarity belief in shared power, mutual
    respect, and incorporating as many people as
    possible into the system. Self-help, family,
    voluntary associations
  • Corporatism party and labor forms of
    representation

9
History
  • 1864 Mutual Aid Societies
  • 1883 Health Insurance Act (sickness funds)
  • After WWII, 2 systems
  • East nationalized health care (erosion of the
    private sector)
  • West renewed commitment to the pre-War
    principles. Extension of coverage in the 1960s
  • 1970s Cost crisis (1975-1992, 13 laws addressed
    the problem)
  • 1992 Health Care Structural Reform Law (limits
    budgets to contributions, increases consumer
    choice, stricter controls, opens sickness funds
    to competition for clients)

10
Organization
  • Productive Efficient system
  • Corporatist, decentralized, multi-payer system
    based upon the same principles
  • The Federal gvt. Has no power of implementation
  • System centered on sickness funds, which have the
    status of public-law bodies and make health care
    decisions
  • Sickness funds are intermediaries between the
    Gvt. And the people
  • Comprehensive benefits
  • 9/10 Germans are enrolled in sickness funds
  • Disincentives to profit
  • Funded by taxes, gvt. Subsidies, and individual
    contributions. Also, private insurance

11
Great BritainHistory
  • The Poor Laws (workhouses/poorhouses)
  • 1911 National Health Insurance (all manual
    workers over 16 earning small salaries). Weekly
    payment
  • Until 1948, administered through voluntary
    associations and a few public facilities (most
    medicine was paid)
  • WWII and post-War led to the expansion of the
    system
  • 1942 Beveridge Report recommended the creation
    of a comprehensive national health system
  • 1946 National Health Service Act (NHS)
    nationalization of all hospitals, creation of
    health centers, redistribution of physicians
    across the country, teaching facilities,
    physicians could have private practice. Funded
    through taxes.

12
  • 1974 Attempt to integrate the national with the
    regional with the local levels. Creation of
    Regional Health Authorities (RHA) and District
    Health Authorities (DHA)
  • 1980 NHS becomes more autonomous and specialized.
    More power ffor RHAs
  • 1982 Elimination of RHAs. DHAs become fully
    responsible for the administration of health
  • 1979 Margareth Thatcher (backed by Milton
    Friedman and von Hayek) believed that
    privatization would improve the performance of
    the system
  • 1983 Griffith Report, recommended to move to an
    insurance-based health system. Did not work

13
The 1990s and New Labour
  • 1989 the NHS in crisis
  • 1990 National Health Service and Community Act
    (encourages competition within the health
    industry)
  • Since 1997 New Labour has maintained the system
  • 1990sthe State imposed a Market into the
    state-administered system

14
Organization
  • Universal Access to Health Care for all citizens
  • 80 paid through general taxation (plus
    individuals regular contributions plus
    co-payments)
  • NHS, internal market made up of purchasers and
    providers. State central control
  • DHAs buy services from public, private, or
    semi-private providers
  • 2002 Integrated care, groups practitioners in
    local community groups
  • Health gap (mostly geographical)

15
Japan
  • WHO 2000 Report ranks the Japanese as the 1
  • Japanese culture introduces healthy habits
  • Comprehensive national health care program

16
History
  • Before WWII, German influence
  • 1922 Health Insurance Law offered coverage to
    certain workers (2,000,000)
  • 1938 Ministry of Health and Welfare
  • War led to extend coverage to many more Japanese
  • After WWII and the American occupation
  • 1948 Medical Service Law/Social Medical Fee
    Payment Fund
  • 1961 Every Japanese had coverage (Universal
    System). Golden Era

17
Problems
  • 1970s Rising Costs (1972 Free Health for 72)
  • 1970s/80s Gaps and inequities
  • New Health Problems drugs, suicide, pollution,
    inadequate housing, cancer
  • Japan has the fastest-aging population in the
    world

18
Organization
  • Universal Coverage
  • More beds than any other nation
  • Sophisticated technology
  • Insurance funded by both employers and employees
  • Physicians are revered (and make a lot of )
  • Complex and fragmented system
  • Public health centers (prevention), physicians
    offices (diagnoses), clinics (treatment), and
    hospitals (intensive care)
  • Public/private (20 co-payments)
  • 2000 National Long Term Care Insurance Program
    (foreign corporations)

19
Sweden
  • 1660 Collegium Medicum
  • 1752 First General Hospital in Stockholm
  • 1800 King Gustavus Adolphus created crown
    hospitals (for soldiers with syphilis)
  • 119th century- Expansion of crown hospitals in
    scope and territoryDecentralization of health
    care at the county level
  • 1874 Public Health Act (expanded coverage)
  • From the late 1930s, the Social Democrats
    organized a universal health care system
  • 1955 the National Insurance Law covered the
    entire population
  • 1959 Elimination of private beds
  • 1969 Elimination of private practice for
    physicians
  • 1976 Reversal (allows private health services)
  • 1982 Health and Medical Services Act
  • 1990s Objective decentralization

20
Organization
  • Health Care is seen as public responsibility and
    supported by the national insurance system
  • Health care is seen as a basic human right
  • All residents are covered
  • Physicians perceive salaries
  • National Ministry, National Board of Health and
    Welfare, County councils (provide health, run
    hospitals). Some competition with private
    providers
  • System funded by personal income taxes, the
    National Health Insurance System, National
    Grants, and user fees

21
Problems
  • Lack of physicians
  • Uneven geographical distribution of resources

22
United States
  • 1 in per capita expenditure in health
  • 37 in performance (in our sample, only better
    than Brazil)
  • The best technology and research, but...
  • 18 population uninsured, and 50 underinsured
  • Why?

23
History
  • Entrepreneurial tradition
  • Since the 1798 Public Health Service, Gvt. Seen
    as only a safety net for the poorest
  • Prior to WWI, 4,000 hospitals run by religious or
    civil associations were established (charged
    fees)/ workshops for training physicians
  • 1933 Blue Cross (1st pre-payment system)
  • 1940s Private Insurance growth
  • 1946 Hill-Burton hospital and Survey and
    Construction ActFederal contribution to build
    hospitals
  • President Trumans attempt to develop national
    insurance defeated by lobbysts from the American
    Medical Association

24
  • 1960s, Johnsons extension of health insurance to
    those who qualified for social security
  • 1963 Community Mental Centers
  • 1966 Comprehensive Health Planning Act
  • Medicare/Medicaid (intended to work as private
    insurance)
  • 1973 Health Maintenance Organization Act (HMO)
    subsidized the formation of prepaid insurance
    groups (offering good services)
  • Managed Care System (PPOs IPAs)
  • 1974 National Health Planning and Resource
    Development Act (NHPRD)200 health planning areas
    to guide the provision of health services
  • 1980s Reagans further privatization
  • Escalating health costs

25
The 1990s
  • Acknowledgment of crisis of the system
    (emergency)
  • Congress examined different plans to reorganize
    the system
  • 1992 Clintons goals to extend health insurance
    to all Americans, to reduce costs
  • October 1993 Clintons project begun to be
    discussed. Proposal to pass a Health Security
    Act. Republicans had their own plans. All plans
    reached a dead end.
  • Why? Lobbying by the Medical Associations and
    drug corporations

26
Problems
  • Business lobbying
  • American political culture that sees national
    health care as socialism and fears big gvt.
  • The American system of checks and balances does
    not work well in the area of health
  • The U.S., a paradox of excess and deprivation
  • 3 tiers people with private insurance coverage,
    people in the HMOs, and the uninsured
  • System financed with federal funds (56), and
    resources provided by the state and local levels
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com