Disability Discrimination law in Employment and Education - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

Disability Discrimination law in Employment and Education

Description:

Disability Discrimination law in Employment and Education Joanna Shulman Principal Solicitor NSW Disability Discrimination Legal Centre In 2003- 53.2% of people with ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:377
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: clcnswOr
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Disability Discrimination law in Employment and Education


1
Disability Discrimination law in Employment and
Education Joanna Shulman Principal Solicitor
NSW Disability Discrimination Legal Centre
2
  • Overview
  • Disability Discrimination Law Generally
  • Employment Complaints
  • 3. Education Complaints

3
  • Commonwealth Law
  • Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (DDA)
  • NSW Law
  • Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (ADA)

4
(No Transcript)
5
  • General statement of the law
  • It is unlawful to discriminate against a person
    on the basis of one of the specified grounds in
    one of the specified areas of activity unless you
    can satisfy one of the defences

6
  • Types of Discrimination
  • 1. Direct Discrimination
  • Occurs where you treat somebody less favourably
    because of their disability.
  • The test
  • How would you treat a person in the same or
    similar circumstances who does not have the
    complainants disability?

7
  • 2. Indirect Discrimination
  • Occurs where you impose a rule on everyone which
    has a harsher effect on people with a disability.
  • The test
  • Is it harder for a greater proportion of
    individuals with a particular disability to
    comply with the rule?
  • Is the rule reasonable in the circumstances?

8
  • 3. Victimisation
  • The law prohibits treating a person in a
    detrimental manner because they have asserted
    their rights under discrimination law
  • Also applies to witnesses
  • Victimisation is an offence (6 months
    imprisonment)

9
  • 4. Harassment in the workplace, education and in
    the provision of goods and services
  • Disability - unlawful to harass another employee,
    commission worker, contractor worker or a job
    applicant on basis of disability

10
  • What does Disability include?
  • Physical - loss of mobility or part of the body
  • Neurological - including loss of or limited
    control of body actions
  • Sensory - Deafness, loss of speech, hearing or
    eyesight
  • Psychological disabilities
  • Anything that makes it difficult to remember,
    learn or understand
  • Disease, illness or infections - even if youre
    not sick now
  • Scarring and deformity

11
  • Areas of activity
  • Employment (including union membership,
    contractors etc)
  • Education
  • Goods, services and facilities (Federal) / Goods
    and services (State)
  • Access to premises
  • Accommodation
  • Buying land (Federal)
  • Sports
  • Requests for information
  • Registered clubs
  • Commonwealth laws and programs (Federal only)

12
  • When is discrimination lawful?
  • Generally
  • When it is too hard to avoid discriminating -
    unjustifiable hardship
  • When an exemption or exception exists in the law

13
  • What is meant by unjustifiable hardship
  • Section 11 of the DDA says that you take into
    account all relevant circumstances of the
    particular case including
  • the nature of the benefit or detriment to accrue
    or be suffered by persons involved, and
  • the effect of the disability of the person
    concerned, and
  • the financial circumstances and estimated amount
    of expenditure to be made by person claiming
    unjustifiable hardship, and
  • (in the case of provision of services/facilities)
    an action plan given to HREOC

14
  • Areas of Activity Employment
  • Points to Consider before lodging a complaint
  • Is it unlawful discrimination- Employee, job
    applicant or contractor
  • DDA or ADA Less than five employees?
  • Other employment law rights- unlawful
    termination, unfair/constructive dismissal,
    workers compensation, common law employment
    rights
  • Would Unlawful termination, Unfair Dismissal
    Constructive Dismissal get them a better outcome?
  • 4. Victimisation

15
  • Areas of Activity - Employment
  • Applicants for Employment
  • Unlawful to discriminate in the arrangements made
    for the purpose of determining who should be
    offered employment
  • Vickers v The Ambulance Service of NSW
    2006 FMCA 1232
  • There cannot be a blanket policy of not
    employing persons with a particular impairment in
    particular positions must allow disability to
    be assessed.
  • Also applies to all administrative and related
    steps up to the interview process
  • Wording of advertisements, interviewing
    processes, selection process etc.
  • cont.

16
  • Areas of Activity - Employment
  • Applicants for Employment- its unlawful to
    discriminate
  • In determining who should be offered employment
  • In the terms or conditions on which employment is
    offered.

17
  • Against Employees
  • Unlawful to discriminate on the basis of
    disability
  • in the terms or conditions of employment that the
    employer affords the employee or
  • by denying the employee access, or limiting the
    employee's access, to opportunities for
    promotion, transfer or training, or to any other
    benefits associated with employment or
  • by dismissing the employee- or
  • by subjecting the employee to any other
    detriment.

18
  • Defences in Employment Discrimination
  • 1. When a person cant actually do a job -
    inherent requirements
  • AND
  • Necessary accommodations would cause
    unjustifiable hardship
  • (Only applies at point of hiring and firing)
  • Onus on respondent
  • Inherent Requirement Whether the position
    would be essentially the same if that requirement
    was dispensed with Qantas Airways v Christie
    (1998) 193 CLR 280
  • Inherent requirements do not need to be
    particularised at time of employment Vickers v
    The Ambulance Service of NSW 2006 FMCA 1232
  • No requirement to modify type of employment to
    meet needs of disabled employee Cosma v Qantas
    Airways 2002 FCA 640

19
  • Defences in Employment Discrimination
  • 2. Detrimental treatment not because of
    disability performance issues, redundancies
  • 3. Comparator is someone who exhibits same
    manifestations of disability
  • Purvis
  • Forbes v Australian Federal Police (Commonwealth
    of Australia) 2004 FCAC 95, the comparator was
    a non-disabled employee who had been absent from
    work for a long period and whose relationship
    with the AFP had irretrievably broken down,
    despite the fact that the applicants absence
    from work was a manifestation of her depressive
    illness.

20
  • Areas of Activity Education
  •        
  • Student (not parent)
  • DDA or ADA? - Private educational authority/
    Education Stds
  • Other Avenues to resolve dispute Breach of
    privacy, common law, internal reviews etc
  •     
  •     

21
  • Areas of Activity Education
  •        
  • Unlawful to discriminate against a student on the
    basis of disability, or on basis of disability of
    an associate in
  • accepting the student for admission to a school
    or on terms of condition of admission
  • by denying the student access, or limiting the
    students access, to any benefit provided by the
    educational authority or
  •      by expelling the student or
  •      by subjecting the student to any other
    detriment, or
  •      by developing curricula or training courses
    having a content that will either exclude the
    person from participation, or subject the person
    to any other detriment or
  •        by accrediting curricula or training
    courses having such a content.
  • Unjustifiable Hardship Defence Applies  
  •     
  •     

22
  • Disability Standards for Education 2005
  • Compliance with education standard is compliance
    with DDA
  • Non-compliance is a breach of DDA
  • Expressly requires reasonable adjustments,
    obligation to consult and not to harass or
    victimise.
  • Covers broad range of education providers
    public, private, secondary, tertiary, community
    colleges
  • Standard will not necessarily provide a
    complete code that displaces all application of
    the DDA. Will depend on terms of the particular
    standard, the particular circumstances of the
    case and judicial interpretation of in
    accordance with.

23
  • Main changes heralded by the Education Standard
  • Applies to all education providers
  • Applies to all aspects of education
  • (Potentially) a clearer outline of duties and
    rights for education providers and students
  • Encourages a transparent, balanced and
    consultative approach to making adjustments
    between the education provider and the student
  • Requires pro-active measures, especially to
    prevent harassment and victimisation

24
  • Grey areas
  • Public health exception very broad danger of
    being applied too hastily and inhumanely
    (solitary confinement!)
  • In terms of an adjustment, what is reasonable?
  • How broad is the requirement to consider others
    affected by the adjustment?
  • What is meant by reasonable timeliness in
    providing the adjustment?
  • What will consulting the student require?
  • Are university clubs, eating facilities (uni
    owned and branded), off-site curriculum/assessment
    tasks, uni sporting teams covered?
  • What about overseas students? What about overseas
    campuses?

25
  • What to Do About Purvis?
  • Purvis v DET (2003) 202 ALR 133
  • While the definition of disability includes
    behavioural manifestations, when considering
    whether direct discrimination occurred it is
    necessary to compare the treatment of the student
    with the disability with a student who exhibited
    the violent behaviour but did not have the
    disability.
  • Makes direct discrimination cases where student
    has behavioural disabilities hard to run.

26
  • What to Do About Purvis?
  • Still have indirect discrimination cases
  • Ferguson v Department of Education 2005 FMCA
    TAFE required Mr Fergurson (who was profoundly
    deaf) to comply with a requirement that he
    undertake his learning and complete his course
    within a reasonable time without the benefit of a
    needs assessment.
  • Hurst and Devlin v Education Qld2005 FCA 405
    The respondents imposed a requirement that the
    applicants receive their education in English
    without the assistance of an Auslan teacher or
    interpreter.
  • Hinchliffe v University of Sydney 2004 FMCA
    85 The Applicant undertake her university
    studies without all of her course materials being
    provided in an alternative format, either at all
    or at the same time as other students received
    their course materials.

27
  • Conciliating Education Cases
  • Keep Expectations reasonable- schools are
    constrained by budgets and resources
  • Early conciliations are better
  • Be creative in suggestions for resolution check
    HREOC Conciliated outcomes page
  • Focus on the Future- Education plans, Alternative
    disciplinary procedures, behaviour management
    plans, timetable for consultation with parents.
  • Compensation is rare
  • Be extra- careful with broad confidentiality
    clauses which cannot be complied with because of
    need to seek medical treatment etc.

28
  • QUESTIONS ????

29
  • Contact details
  • Telephone (02) 9310 7722
  • Toll free 1800 800 708 (outside Sydney)
  • TTY (02) 9310 4320
  • Toll free TTY 1800 644 419 (outside Sydney)
  • Email info_at_ddlcnsw.org.au
  • www.ddlcnsw.org.au
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com