Effects of Animal Viruses on Host Cells - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Effects of Animal Viruses on Host Cells

Description:

Effects of Animal Viruses on Host Cells (What does the virus do to the host cell?) Morphological Changes Virus lytic infections often cause very distinctive, visible ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:211
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: Instructio
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Effects of Animal Viruses on Host Cells


1
Effects of Animal Viruses on Host Cells
  • (What does the virus do to the host cell?)

2
Morphological Changes
  • Virus lytic infections often cause very
    distinctive, visible changes in the infected
    cell. These changes are called cytopathic
    effects (CPE) and they include
  • Inclusion bodies microscopically these are
    visible sites of viral assembly or cellular
    damage. They are often used as a diagnostic
    tool. Examples include
  • Virions in the nucleus (Adenovirus)
  • Virions in the cytoplasm (Rhabdovirus- negri
    bodies of rabies virus)

3
Negri Bodies of Rabies Virus
4
Morphological changes
  • Viral protein associated with host microtubules
    (Reovirus)
  • Factories of viral replication in the cytoplasm
    (Poxvirus)
  • Clumps of ribosomes in capsids (Arenavirus)
  • Clumps of chromatin (herpesviruses)
  • Morphological alterations
  • Nuclear pyknosis (shrinking) (Picornaviruses)
  • Proliferation of membranes (Picornaviruses)
  • Proliferation of the nuclear membrane
    (Alphaviruses)
  • Formation of vacuoles in the cytoplasm
    (Papovaviruses)
  • Apoptosis (will discuss this more later)
  • Formation of syncytia (Paramyxoviruses and
    Coronaviruses) which are giant, multinucleated
    cells formed by the fusion of plasma membranes

5
Syncytia formation
6
Morphological changes
  • Margination and breakage of chromosomes
    (Herpesviruses)
  • Rounding up and detachment of tissue culture
    cells due to apoptosis (Herpes and
    Rhabdoviruses)

7
Morphological changes
  • CPE is very rarely caused by a harmful protein
    with no other purpose in the infective process.
  • CPE is usually a secondary result of changes in
    the host metabolism caused by viral replication.
  • Viruses may halt or alter host cell DNA
    synthesis, transcription, and/or protein
    synthesis (translation)

8
Changes in the Host Cell Due To Viral Infection
  • Eukaryotic viruses are more likely to target host
    cell translation rather than transcription or DNA
    replication because the half-life of mRNAs is so
    long in eukaryotic cells (T1/2600 minutes).
  • If the virus wants to use the host translation
    machinery, it will need to compete with host
    mRNAs for a long time.
  • Therefore, it needs to shut off or slow down host
    mRNA translation while allowing viral translation
    to continue.
  • There are three steps in protein synthesis
    (translation) that are potential targets for
    viral action.

9
Inhibition of Eukaryotic Protein Synthesis
  • Initiation requires mRNA, 2 ribosomal subunits,
    special met-tRNAmet, initiation factors (eIF
    1-6), ATP, and GTP
  • Elongation requires charged tRNAs, elongation
    factors (EF1, and EF1B), and GTP
  • Termination requires a termination factor and
    GTP
  • Mechanisms to inhibit host cell protein synthesis
    may vary for the same virus in different hosts.
    They include
  • Competition
  • The virus may produce an overabundance of mRNAs
    an/or produce viral products that actually bind
    to and tie up host cell mRNAS to make them
    inaccessible to ribosomes (rhabdovirus and
    reovirus).

10
Inhibition of Eukaryotic Protein Synthesis
  • The viral mRNAs may have highly accessible and
    easily recognized initiation sequences that allow
    them to compete more effectively for the
    initiation factor 2 (eIF2). Therefore, there is a
    higher initiation of translation of the viral
    proteins (mengovirus and influenza virus).
  • There may be an inhibition of transport of host
    mRNA from the nucleus. Adenovirus allows
    selective transport of viral mRNAs from the
    nucleus, while inhibiting the transport of the
    host mRNAs.
  • The virus may degrade the host mRNAs
  • Bunyavirus uses primers derived from host cell
    mRNA for its own transcription in the cytoplasm.
    The 5 cap of the host mRNA plus 10-14 bases are
    cleaved by a viral enzyme. This is then used as
    the primer for transcription. This is similar to
    what influenza virus does in the nucleus.

11
Inhibition of Eukaryotic Protein Synthesis
  • Herpes viruses (remember that they control the
    timing of their gene expression through positive
    and negative feedback loops)
  • First host mRNA is degraded. This is mediated by
    a protein found as part of the virion
  • Next, at the time that the ? genes get expressed,
    there is a complete shut down of host protein
    synthesis. This is due to a newly synthesized
    viral protein.
  • Blockage of initiation complex formation
  • Pox virus alters the specificity of the host cell
    ribosomes so that the viral mRNA is
    preferentially recognized
  • A phosphoprotein that is part of the virion acts
    on the 40S ribosomal subunit to hinder its
    association with the met-tRNA met, GTP, and eIF2.
    This equally inhibits host and viral translation.

12
Inhibition of Eukaryotic Protein Synthesis
  • Another viral protein that is not a part of the
    virion, somehow allows specific translation of
    viral messages only.
  • Covalent modification of translation related
    components
  • Inactivation by cleavage Poliovirus cleaves the
    cap-binding complex (eIF4) so that capped host
    mRNAs are no longer translated. How is viral mRNA
    then translated?
  • Inactivation by phosphorylation
  • Influenza A virus and adenoviruses inactivate the
    cap binding reaction by removing the required
    phosphate from eIF-4E
  • Picornaviruses act indirectly on the cap binding
    complex by phosphorylating 4E-bp1 which then
    competes with eIF-4G for binding to the active
    form of eIF-4E

13
Inactivation of the Cap-Binding Complex
14
Inhibition of Eukaryotic Protein Synthesis
  • A poxvirus structural core protein sequentially
    phosphorylates and inactivates three ribosomal
    proteins
  • VSV, adenovirus, mengovirus, and reovirus
    phosphorylate the ? subunit of eIF2. When eIF2 is
    phosphorylated, it forms a complex with GEF (GTP
    exchanging factor or eIF-2B) that cant exchange
    GDP for GTP. The exchange of GDP for GTP
    normally occurs upon formation of the initiation
    complex. This exchange allows ? to participate in
    the formation of a new initiation complex. When
    the exchange does not occur, ? is blocked from
    participating in the formation of a new
    initiation complex and the rate of translation
    initiation is slowed down for both host and viral
    mRNA. Since there is an overabundance of viral
    mRNA, this tips the scale even more in favor of
    viral mRNA translation.

15
Inhibition of Eukaryotic Protein Synthesis
16
Inhibition of Eukaryotic Protein Synthesis
  • The enzyme that phosphorylates eIE2? is called
    protein kinase RNA dependent (PKR). Its
    mechanism of action will be discussed later.
  • Increases in intracellular cation concentrations
    one of the environmental conditions that can
    influence the rate or efficiency of an enzymatic
    reaction is the concentration of particular
    cations (Na, K).
  • Some viruses alter the membrane permeability to
    cause an increase in intracellular Na.
  • This inhibits host cell, but not viral
    translation. (Sindbis virus inhibits the Na pump
    in the plasma membrane).

17
Inhibition of Eukaryotic Protein Synthesis
  • Some viruses produce inhibitory proteins
  • Mengoviruses produce a protein that binds to
    ribosomes and blocks translation after formation
    of the initiation complex, i.e., it inhibits
    elongation.
  • In summary, as an example, mengoviruses may use
    three different methods to halt host cell protein
    synthesis
  • Competition for initiation complexes
  • Inhibition of elongation
  • Phosphorylation of eIF-2.
  • The viral RNA of this virus is so efficient in
    initiation that it must use the other two
    mechanisms to free viral RNA for packaging into
    the genome!

18
Changes in the Host Cell Due To Viral Infection
  • Inhibition of host cell transcription
  • This may be secondary to the shut off of host
    mRNA translation.
  • Factors required for host cell transcription are
    not replaced when translation is halted.
  • Some viruses appear to actually inhibit host cell
    mRNA synthesis by acting directly or indirectly
    on RNA polymerase II by unknown mechanisms (polio
    and reovirus)
  • The viral RNA may inhibit transcription there
    is evidence that the VSV leader sequence may bind
    to an initiation factor for host transcription
    making it unavailable for host transcription.

19
Changes in the Host Cell Due To Viral Infection
  • Inhibition of host cell DNA replication
  • This may be secondary to decreased translation
  • Some viruses have proteins that may specifically
    inhibit host DNA synthesis (reovirus)
  • Poxvirus produces a protein that degrades SS DNA
    at the replication fork
  • Herpesviruses displace host chromatin from its
    normal association with nuclear matrix proteins
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com