SAFTA: Negotiating status and Evaluation Deshal de Mel IPS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

SAFTA: Negotiating status and Evaluation Deshal de Mel IPS

Description:

SAFTA: Negotiating status and Evaluation Deshal de Mel IPS, Colombo, Sri Lanka Introduction SAFTA was signed in 2004 in Islamabad Tariff liberalisation implemented on ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:119
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: iinComPkI
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: SAFTA: Negotiating status and Evaluation Deshal de Mel IPS


1
SAFTA Negotiating status and Evaluation
  • Deshal de Mel
  • IPS, Colombo, Sri Lanka

2
Introduction
  • SAFTA was signed in 2004 in Islamabad
  • Tariff liberalisation implemented on July 1st
    2006
  • Several issues remain which threaten the success
    of the agreement Sensitive lists, NTBs, TLP,
    BTAs.

3
Table 1 Intra-SAARC Import Trade
Source IMF, Direction of Trade Statistics,
Yearbook 2005.
4
Table 2 Intra-SAARC Export Trade
Source IMF, Direction of Trade Statistics,
Yearbook 2005.
5
Tariff Liberalisation Program
  • The TLP stipulates 0-5 tariffs for Non-LDCs by
    2013 (SL 2014), LDCs 2016
  • Danger of SAFTA losing relevance due to competing
    RTA/BTAs
  • Article 7.2 allows countries wishing to move
    faster to do so unilaterally
  • Better approach to include fast track for heavily
    traded goods in SAARC

6
TLP
7
India and Pakistan
  • Pakistan trade with India based on a specified
    positive list
  • Economic and political reasons for concerns about
    altering the status quo
  • India feels ve list is against the spirit of the
    agreement
  • Potential for improvement in political relations
    through SAFTA

8
Sensitive Lists
  • Article 7.3(b) recommends that the sensitive list
    be reviewed every 4 years
  • This time frame possibly too long given the size
    of SLs in SAFTA
  • Should adopt progressive reduction of SL a la
    ASEAN FTA

9
Table 5 Trade Restriction under SAFTA
Source Calculated using WITS data.
10
Table 4 Bilateral Trade Restriction under SAFTA
Source Calculated using WITS data.
11
Non-tariff Barriers
  • Increasingly important as tariffs fall
  • Over-regulation safety standards, other
    safeguards
  • Entry point restrictions
  • Bureaucratic processes
  • Customs procedures
  • Delays in transit due to border issues
  • No mechanism to reduce NTBs recent discussion
    to include notification

12
Transaction Costs
  • South Asia plagued by transaction costs
  • Trade facilitation increasingly important for
    modern trade, benefits resonate beyond SAFTA
  • SAFTA agreement has extensive list of TF measures
    without binding commitments
  • TF measures have high fixed costs, benefits felt
    in medium-long run, thus little political will to
    implement

13
Trade Facilitation
  • More prudent to identify few key measures
    producing tangible benefits in SR
  • Simplify and harmonize customs operation
  • Transit simplification
  • Standards Harmonization
  • Binding commitments for implementation and SDT
    for LDCs required.
  • Additional measures to be progressive

14
Dispute Settlement Mechanism
  • Yet to determine operationalisation of DSM
  • SAFTA DSM too long, 330 days. ASEAN 290, MERCOSUR
    265, NAFTA 310
  • Excess time in 1st stage, accused can delay
    consultations by a month
  • Time allowed for compliance 90 days in SAFTA. 30
    days in ASEAN, MERCOSUR

15
DSM
  • Length of DSM attributed to LDC requirements.
  • Better to use differentiated time periods for
    LDCs and Non-LDCs
  • Voting on consensus basis, problematic
    considering heterogeneity of interests
  • Consensus to block or simple majority system are
    alternatives to consensus basis

16
Inclusion of Services
  • Contribution of services value added to GDP is
    40 in South Asia
  • Important to ensure this sector does not forego
    benefits of liberalisation
  • Identify complementarities and liberalise
  • Telecom IT
  • Aviation
  • Medical services
  • Education

17
Inclusion of Services
  • Tourism
  • Couple services with economic cooperation to
    extend benefits to LDCs
  • Possible 3x formula,
  • Lessons from CEPA, progressive, sequential
    liberalisation. Building services database.
  • Study on inclusion of services in SAFTA is
    ongoing.

18
Table 7 Volume of Intra-SAARC Trade (2004)
Source IMF, Direction of Trade Statistics,
Yearbook, 2005.
19
Positives
  • Extent of informal trade in South Asia
  • Potential for ve political spillovers
  • Potential for attracting FDI
  • Impact on poverty needs steps to improve access
    to markets for the poor
  • Consumers competition, falling prices and
    increased variety

20
Conclusion
  • Negotiations have made progress since Islamabad
    2004
  • But key areas left unaddressed or under-addressed
  • Importance of SAFTA given stalling of the Doha
    round
  • Parallel importance of superseding competing
    RTA/BTAs
  • Supply capacities TA best endeavours
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com