Title: CH 5. Micropropagation
1CH 5. Micropropagation
2 6-1. Introduction
  Rapid and mass production of healthy plants
  Micropropagation  Clonal propagation
 In vitro propagation Â
3culture
virus-free plants
1. Meristem shoot tip ----------gt  Â
? 2. Explants ----------------gt
shoot ---gt plants embryogenesis
3. Explants ---------------------gt ? Â
organgenesis
somatic embryos
Artificial seeds
46-2. Micropropagation through shoot tip culture
 Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3
Â
 plant mass production
-------gt hardening root development
  Explant cut ---gt subculture  (leaf
meristem) transplanting  into
soil  cut ---gt subculture
 Advantitious Acclimatization  shoots
-------gt cut ---gt subculture Â
Culture in field Â
56-2. Micropropagation through shoot tip culture
Stage 1 establishment of the aseptic system
 Stage 2 multiplication of propagula by
repeated subculture  Stage 3 transfer the
plantlets into soil  Â
66-2. Micropropagation through shoot tip
culture 6-2-1. Stage 1 aseptic culture system
Source of explant  Apical shoot apex
 Axillary bud  Undeveloped flower bud Â
76-2. Micropropagation through shoot tip
culture 6-2-1. Stage 1 aseptic culture system
86-2. Micropropagation through shoot tip
culture 6-2-2. Stage 2 rapid propagation
 Repeatedly subculture  Propagation rate?
 Efficiency? / Expense?   e.g. One
explant -----gt 5 -----gt 52 -----gt 53
-----gt 54 -----gt 55 Â 1st 2nd
3rd 4th 5th  ? lt----- lt-----
lt----- 15625 56 lt----- Â 6th
shoot yield ?
period ?
times ?
variation ?
activity ?
9e.g.
Weeks No. shoots Subculture within 24
wks Total no. of shoots  ---------
----------------- -------------------------------
---- -----------------Â 2 2 2
12 4096 Â 4 4 4 6 4096 Â
6 8 8 4 4096 Â 8 14
14 3 2744 Â 12 18 18 2 324
 24 30 30 1 30 Â
------------------- ----------------
expense efficiency   Â
10TIMECOURSE FOR PRODUCTION OF VIRUS INDEXED
REGISTERED RED RASPBERRIES
Year Conventinal Micropropagation 1 Establis
h Several screened nuclear greenhouse
stock block30 plants plants
used to establish in vitro stages I,
II 5 stage II transfers (5 fold
multiplication/ transfer) 3125
plants greenhouse rooting and field
planting 2 Transplant 300 Harvest
31,000 suckers
suckers (foundation I) 4 Transplant
3000 suckers (foundation II) 6 Harvest
30,000
11COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL MICROPROPAGATION OF
VIRUS INDEXED REGISTERED RED RASPBERRIES Conv
entional Micropropagation Duration 6
years 2 years Labor Dig replant every 2
years Subculture every 4 weeks unskilled
(Inexpensive) skilled (more expensive) Space
More, but less expensive (field) Less, but more
expensive (laboratory) Required to
prevent viral Screening, fumigation, spraying
None infection
12(No Transcript)
136-2. Micropropagation through shoot tip
culture 6-2-1. Stage 1 aseptic culture system
146-2. Micropropagation through shoot tip
culture 6-2-2. Stage 2 rapid propagation
156-2. Micropropagation through shoot tip
culture 6-2-2. Stage 2 rapid propagation
166-2. Micropropagation through shoot tip
culture 6-2-2. Stage 2 rapid propagation
176-2. Micropropagation through shoot tip
culture 6-2-2. Stage 2 rapid propagation
186-2. Micropropagation through shoot tip
culture 6-2-2. Stage 2 rapid propagation
196-2. Micropropagation through shoot tip
culture 6-2-2. Stage 2 rapid propagation
206-2. Micropropagation through shoot tip
culture 6-2-2. Stage 2 rapid propagation
216-2. Micropropagation through shoot tip
culture 6-2-3. Stage 3 transplanting
At CW, as with many commercial labs, rooting in
culture (in vitro) is skipped in favor of rooting
out of culture (ex vitro). This tray of unrooted
microshoots has now been taken out of the sterile
environment. The microcuttings, as they are
called, are trimmed up and soaked in a rooting
hormone (auxin) solution...
226-2. Micropropagation through shoot tip
culture 6-2-3. Stage 3 transplanting
...then planted in flats much like young bedding
plants. At this point they still have no roots.
236-2. Micropropagation through shoot tip
culture 6-2-3. Stage 3 transplanting
Flats of unrooted microcuttings are transferred
to a fog chamber within a greenhouse. Directly
out of culture, the plantlets need high humidity
levels and reduced light (similar to the in vitro
environment).
246-2. Micropropagation through shoot tip
culture 6-2-3. Stage 3 transplanting
Over the next 10-14 days, fogging is diminished
and the tent opened up, until the plants do not
need extra protection (ie. the plantlets on the
right). This process is known as acclimatization
or hardening off.
256-2. Micropropagation through shoot tip
culture 6-2-3. Stage 3 transplanting
The microcuttings have rooted, transplanted into
larger cells, and increased greatly in size in
only a few weeks.
266-2. Micropropagation through shoot tip
culture 6-2-3. Stage 3 transplanting
After all that work, the plants are ready for the
field. They are moved to a shade house at least
one week before planting to finish the
hardening-off process
276-2. Micropropagation through shoot tip
culture 6-2-4. Commercial production - Scale up
-- Quantity  -- Quality  Phenotype
aberrations Impact on production scheduling
286-2. Micropropagation through shoot tip
culture 6-2-4. Commercial production - Scale up
Some problems   Asynchronous
development  Vitrification
(hyperhydration, glassiness ) Â Physiological
disorder of shoot cultures  Water-soaked
appearance  still can grow, and multiply
 but can not be rooted  Chronic
contamination  Rooting Â
Variation Â
296-3. Artificial seeds
Cultured cells  Single cell origin
  Somatic embryo  Encapsulation
 Somatic seeds  Germi
nation Â
306-3. Artificial seeds 6-3-1. Cell culture
Fast growing cells High frequencing for
embryogenesis Long-term potential for
embryogenesis Less somatic variation
Synchrony
317-3. Artificial seeds 7-3-2. Encapsulation
Sodium alginate Embryoid in culture
medium ø 4mm 50 mM CaCl2
15-30 min Capsules ø 4.5 - 5.0 mm 0.8 -
1.2 g/cap Calcium
alginate Embryoid Nutrient
326-3. Artificial seeds 6-3-3. Germination
-- Germination in vitro --
Germination in soil  Synchrony Â
Germination rate  Develop into complete
plants  Negligible variation Â
336-4. Applications of micropropagation
Virus-free plant production
Germplasm preservation
346-4. Applications of micropropagation 6-4-1.
Virus-free plant production
Original problem   Vegetatively
Transmitted  propagated plants Virus
disease to new plants Yield / Quality
 Â
356-4. Applications of micropropagation 6-4-1.
Virus-free plant production
Unevenly distribution of virus in plants Â
 Holme, 1948 Kassanis, 1957  Close to
meristem shoot apical / root gt virus
concentration   Why? -- high concentration
of hormones in meristem  -- competition
between cell division and virus multiplication
  During culture of meristem gt eliminate
virus  -- rapid growth of callus  --
contact with the nutrient medium
366-4. Applications of micropropagation 6-4-1.
Virus-free plant production
Meristem culture for producing virus-free
plants   1. Explant size Large
/ Small ? Â Â 2. Bud location Apical
/ Axillary ? Â Â 3. Season e.g.
Carnation early spring / late autumn ---gt easy
to culture  winter ---gt easy to
root  summer ---gt virus-free Â
376-4. Applications of micropropagation 6-4-1.
Virus-free plant production
Meristem culture for producing virus-free
plants  4. Heat treatment 1890 Kobus
sugarcane 50 - 52 oC water 30 min. 1936
Kunkel peach 50 oC water 10 min. / 35 - 38
oC air 2-4 weeks gt less suffering from
virus disease better growth 1969 Nyland
Goheen review gt 90 viruses 30
diseases, curable by heat _at_ Heat
pretreatment of plants ---gt meristem culture
e.g. Potato heat 8 wks / 18 wks ---gt 50 /
100 virus free _at_ Meristem culature ---gt
heat e.g. Chrysanthemum heat 10 days / 30
days ----gt 9 / 90 virus free Â
386-4. Applications of micropropagation 6-4-1.
Virus-free plant production
- Meristem culture for producing virus-free plants
 - 5. Antiserum treatment inactivate
virus  - 6. Medium Â
396-4. Applications of micropropagation 6-4-1.
Virus-free plant production
Detection of virus  meristem
culture ---gt micropropagation ---gt plants in soil
---gt detection of virus
 Virus-free plants   e.g. Asparagus Goose
berry Rhubarb  Banana Horse
radish Strawberry  Cassava Pea Sugarcane
 Cauliflower Potato Sweet potato
 Garlic Rasp berry Yams Â
406-4. Applications of micropropagation
416-4. Applications of micropropagation
426-4. Applications of micropropagation
The plant on the right is virus free.
436-4. Applications of micropropagation
446-5 Embryogenesis
45- In somatic embryogenesis the embryos regenerate
from somatic cells, tissue or organs either de
nove directly from the tissues, which is the
opposite of zygotic or sexual embryogenesis.
46Various terms for non-zygotic embryos
- Adventious embryos somatic embryos arising
directly from other organs or embryos. - Parthenogenetic embryos formed by the
unfertilized egg. - Androgenetic embryos formed by the male
gametophyte.
47Somatic embryogenesis differs from organogenesis
- Bipolar structure with a closed radicular end
rather than a monopolar structure. - The embryo arises from a single cell and has no
vascular connection with the mother tissue.
48- The initiation and development of embryos from
somatic tissues in plant tissue culture was first
recognized by Steward et al. (1958) and Reinert
(1958, 1959) in culture of Daucus carota.
49(No Transcript)
50Two routes to somatic embryogenesis
(Sharp et al., 1980)
- Direct embryogenesis
- The embryos initiate directly from explant in the
absence of callus formation. - Indirect embryogenesis
- Callus from explant takes place from which
embryos are developed.
51Types of embryogenic cells
- Pre-embryogenic determined cells, PEDCs
- The cells are committed to embryonic development
and need only to be released. Such cells are
found in embryonic tissue. - Induced embryogenic determined cells, IEDCs
- In majority of cases embryogenesis is through
indirect method. Specific growth regulator
concentrations and/or cultural conditions are
required for initiation of callus and then
redetermination of these cells into the
embryogenic pattern of development.
52Factors of embryogenic induction
- Floral or reproductive tissue
- Auxin (2,4-D)
- Reduced nitrogen in the medium.
53Somatic embryogenesis as a means of propagation
is seldom used
- High probability of mutations
- The method is usually rather difficult.
- Losing regenerative capacity become greater with
repeated subculture - Induction of embryogenesis is very difficult with
many plant species. - A deep dormancy often occurs with somatic
embryogenesis.