STRESS (Stress Test Relevance and Education Self Study - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

STRESS (Stress Test Relevance and Education Self Study

Description:

STRESS (Stress Test Relevance and Education Self Study) Robert Post, M.D. Caisson Hogue, M.D. Stephen Thomas, M.D. Background Prior to discharge of these patients ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:30
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: muscEdudf
Learn more at: http://www.musc.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: STRESS (Stress Test Relevance and Education Self Study


1
STRESS (Stress Test Relevance and Education Self
Study)
Robert Post, M.D. Caisson Hogue, M.D. Stephen
Thomas, M.D.
2
Background
  • The Trident/MUSC Family Medicine Residency
    Program (FMRP) admits many patients (10-15) with
    a chief complaint of chest pain.  
  • Although some patients have findings of ACS, the
    majority have negative cardiac enzymes and normal
    EKG findings.

3
Background
  • Prior to discharge of these patients, the team
    often asks Does this patient need a stress
    test? to aid in a diagnosis of coronary artery
    disease (CAD).
  • Among various studies, the prevalence of CAD in
    patients who present to an ER with chest pain is
    5-25
  • In 2002, the American College of Cardiology
    (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) published
    guidelines for exercise testing.

4
Guidelines
  • These guidelines stratify patients into risk
    categories based on age, gender, and type of
    chest pain when patients are to undergo stress
    tests for diagnostic reasons.
  • Risk factors for coronary artery disease are not
    factored into the analysis except for patients
    with unstable angina (ACS).

5
Guidelines
6
Guidelines
7
Guidelines
  • Low risk (lt10 pretest probability) -
  • No further testing needed
  • Intermediate Risk (10-90 pp) -
  • Stress Test Recommended
  • High Risk (gt90 pp) -
  • Do Not Stress, cardiac catheterization or
    cardiology consult

8
Guidelines
  • For Unstable Angina
  • High Risk
  • Cardiac Catheterization
  • Intermediate Risk
  • Stress after 2-3 days if asymptomatic (Class I)
  • Stress after CIPs negative x 3 and no EKG
    changes (Class 2a)
  • Low Risk
  • Stress when asymptomatic for 8-12 hours

9
Purpose
  • To determine if patients admitted to the
    Trident/MUSC FMRP inpatient service with chest
    pain are receiving stress testing according to
    the ACC/AHA guidelines.

10
Methods
  • Retrospective chart review of patients admitted
    to the FMRP from 1/1/06 to 8/31/06 provided the
    baseline data.
  • All charts were reviewed simultaneously by at
    least 2 members of the research team
  • Charts were identified by patients who had
    troponins ordered
  • Of these charts, those who presented with a chief
    complaint of chest pain fit criteria for the study

11
Methods
  • Data Recorded
  • Age
  • Gender
  • Type of chest pain (typical, atypical,
    nonanginal, unstable angina)
  • Contraindications
  • Risk category
  • Intervention (stress test, cardiac
    catheterization, cardiology consult, no
    intervention)

12
Definition of Chest Pain
  • Typical Anginal Pain is defined as
  • substernal chest pain or discomfort that is
  • provoked by exertion or emotional stress and
  • relieved by rest and/or nitroglycerin.
  • Atypical Anginal Pain meets 2 of these
    requirements
  • Nonanginal Pain meets 1 requirement
  • Unstable Angina
  • Accelerating or progressively worsening chest
    pain that occurs at rest and is resistant to
    nitroglycerin

13
Methods
  • Based on a patients age, gender, and type of
    chest pain, the patient was assigned a risk
    category.
  • It was also recorded if the patient received a
    stress test, and if this matched the
    recommendation that correlates with the risk
    category

14
Methods
  • The intervention of a Point-of-care reminder
    (concise, easy-to-read review of the ACC/AHA
    exercise testing guidelines) and education was
    provided to the inpatient team members on a
    bi-monthly basis
  • After the intervention (5/07), monthly chart
    reviews on all patients meeting criteria are
    conducted for follow-up data collection.
  • This project was approved as exempt research by
    the MUSC and Trident Medical Center IRBs

15
Outcome Measures
  • A comparison between the pre- and
    post-intervention data sets of the proportion of
    stress tests ordered that met the ACC/AHA
    guidelines.

16
Results
  • 396 charts total were reviewed for the
    pre-intervention data set
  • 62 charts (15.7) met criteria for the study
  • 32 patients were male, and 30 were female
  • Overall mean age 51.6 years
  • Male mean age 46.3 years
  • Female mean age 57.4 years

17
Types of Pain
18
Risk Categories
19
Males
20
Females
21
Overall
22
Results
  • A similar analysis of the post-intervention data
    will also be reported.
  • Continuous variables will be analyzed using the
    Students T-test, and proportions will be
    analyzed using the Chi-squared test

23
Discussion
  • Management of chest pain is common on a family
    medicine inpatient service.
  • Appropriately ordering stress tests is an
    important aspect of patient care.
  • The FMRP inpatient service should reduce the
    number of stress tests ordered on high risk
    patients.

24
Discussion
  • Conversely, we need to increase the number of
    stress tests ordered on intermediate risk
    patients.
  • The FMRP Inpatient service is generally not
    ordering stress tests for low risk patients,
    which follows the guidelines.
  • Overall, more data is needed for the
    pre-intervention data set

25
Conclusion
  • Guidelines exist for exercise testing, and
    education regarding guidelines should improve
    appropriate use of the exercise test.

26
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com