Writing the Argumentative Essay By Caryl Bishop - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Writing the Argumentative Essay By Caryl Bishop

Description:

Writing the Argumentative Essay By Caryl Bishop Argumentation . . . the art of influencing others, through the medium of reasoned discourse, to believe or act as ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:396
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: libartsUc
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Writing the Argumentative Essay By Caryl Bishop


1
Writing the Argumentative Essay
  • By Caryl Bishop

2
Argumentation
  • . . . the art of influencing others, through the
    medium of reasoned discourse, to believe or act
    as we wish them to believe or act.

3
Structure of Argument
  • Claim
  • Proposition
  • Support
  • Evidence
  • Motivational Appeals
  • Warrant
  • Assumption(s) that have been taken for granted

4
Features of Argumentation
  • Writer
  • Develop your own ETHOS or borrow from established
    authority
  • Audience
  • Know your audience and be sensitive to their
    views
  • Text
  • Use the language to make your point, but be
    careful not to misuse language

5
The Writer
  • Ethos
  • Your own
  • You must look like you know what youre talking
    about
  • Educate yourself on the issue(s) before writing
  • Borrow from authority
  • Be sure to give appropriate credit where due

6
The Audience
  • Who is your audience?
  • Qualities you should presume of your audience
  • Assume they are as knowledgeable about your topic
    as you are.
  • Assume they are aware of common knowledge.
  • Assume they could be fundamentally opposed to
    your argument and be sensitive to their
    prejudices
  • Dont Alienate Your Audience

7
The Text
  • Argue from logic and reason
  • Do NOT base your entire argument on
  • Emotion
  • Religious Conviction
  • Tradition
  • Avoid fallacious logic
  • There are a multitude of formal errors in logic,
    known as FALLACIES

8
Some Common Fallacies
  • Hasty Generalization
  • Faulty Use of Authority
  • Post Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc
  • False Analogy
  • Ad Hominem
  • False Dilemma
  • Slippery Slope

9
Hasty Generalization
  • Black or White thinking
  • Prejudice
  • Drawing Hasty Conclusions
  • Insufficient Evidence

10
Faulty Use of Authority
  • Misuse of a source
  • Misquoting
  • Fitting the quotation to your own needs
  • If four out of five dentists prefer Colgate,
    dont use the one dentist who prefers Crest as
    your authority!

11
Post Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc
  • After this, therefore because of this
  • Faulty Cause and Effect Reasoning

12
False Analogy
  • Faulty Connection Between Two Things Being
    Compared

13
Ad Hominem
  • Against the Man
  • Attacking the person rather than attacking an
    issue.
  • If you dont like this administrations policies,
    and want to see them changed, dont attack the
    President, address the issues you want changed.

14
False Dilemma
  • Black or White Fallacy
  • There are only two alternatives, no room for
    compromise and no grey areas.
  • Nearly every issue has at least two sides, and
    somewhere, someone has determined that the OTHER
    side is the only legitimate approach.
  • Nothing is black and white there are shades of
    grey everywhere!

15
Slippery Slope
  • The assumption that A will inevitably lead to
    B
  • Then B will inevitably lead to C
  • And so on
  • And so on

16
More Common Fallacies
  • Begging the Question
  • The Straw Man Fallacy
  • Two Wrongs Make a Right
  • Non-Sequitur
  • Ad Populum
  • Appeal to Tradition
  • Faulty Emotional Appeal

17
Begging the Question
  • The statement being argued actually assumes the
    issue has already been proven true.
  • An argument that assumes itself

Circular Reasoning
18
Straw Man Fallacy
  • Set up a slightly different problem and attack
    it, rather than the problem at issue
  • Diverts attention away from the real issue
  • Wag the Dog

19
Two Wrongs Make A Right
  • But all my friends are doing it
  • Diverts attention away from the question at issue

20
Non-Sequitur
  • It does not follow
  • Erroneous Cause and Effect Reasoning
  • Uses irrelevant information to back of a claim

21
Ad Populum
  • Appeals to the prejudices of the people
  • Appeals to popular opinion
  • Appeals to what you believe your teacher wants to
    hear

22
Appeal to Tradition
  • But weve always done it that way before
  • Just because it has always been that way doesnt
    make it right

23
Faulty Emotional Appeals
  • Dont base your whole claim on an appeal to
    emotion
  • Dont use emotional appeals that are
  • Irrelevant to the argument
  • Draw attention away from the real issue
  • Appear to conceal another purpose

24
Adapted from Elements of Argument A Text and
Reader By Annette T. Rottengberg
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com