Title: Brief Interventions with College Student Drinkers: BASICS
1Brief Interventions with
College Student Drinkers
BASICS
- Jason R. Kilmer, Ph.D.
- The Evergreen State College
Saint Martins University
2What does research show about college student
drinking?
- Up to ninety percent of college students drink
alcohol - Twenty-five to fifty percent are heavy episodic
or binge drinkers - Students who abuse alcohol are at high risk for a
number of negative consequences
3Spectrum of Intervention Response
None
Mild
Moderate
Severe
Thresholds for Action
Specialized Treatment
Brief Intervention
Primary Prevention
4What is Harm Reduction?
- The ultimate goal of harm reduction is abstinence
this is clearly the best way to reduce and
eliminate negative consequences. - However, harm reduction approaches acknowledge
that any steps toward reduced risk are steps in
the right direction
5How are these principles implemented in an
intervention with college students?
- Legal issues are acknowledged if you are under
the age of 21, it is illegal to drink. - For those who want to abstain, appropriate skills
and strategies are reviewed. - However, if one makes the choice to drink, skills
are described on ways to do so in a less
dangerous and less risky way. - A clinician or program provider must elicit
personally relevant reasons for changing. - This is done using the Stages of Change model and
Motivational Interviewing.
6The Stages of Change Model (Prochaska
DiClemente, 1982, 1984, 1985, 1986)
- Precontemplation
- Contemplation
- Preparation/Determination
- Action
- Maintenance
7Stages of Change in Substance Abuse and
Dependence Intervention Strategies
Maintenance of Recovery Stage
Precontemplation Stage
Contemplation Stage
Action Stage
Relapse Stage
MOTIVATIONAL ENHANCEMENT STRATEGIES
ASSESSMENT AND TREATMENT MATCHING
RELAPSE PREVENTION MANAGEMENT
8Motivational Interviewing
Basic Principles
(Miller and Rollnick, 1991, 2002)
1. Express Empathy 2. Develop Discrepancy 3. Roll
with Resistance 4. Support Self-Efficacy
9Brief Alcohol Screening and Intervention for
College Students (BASICS)
- A non-confrontational, harm reduction approach
that helps students reduce their alcohol
consumption and decrease the behavioral and
health risks associated with heavy drinking.
10Brief Alcohol Screening and Intervention for
College Students (BASICS)
- BASICS is individually focused and involves the
delivery of personalized feedback - Alcohol content and the skills-training
information is introduced throughout the
intervention when relevant, applicable, or of
interest to the participant
11The Basics on BASICS
Brief Alcohol Screening and
Intervention For College Students
- Assessment
- Self-Monitoring
- Feedback Sheet
- Review of Information and Skills Training Content
(Dimeff, Baer, Kivlahan, Marlatt, 1999)
12What to assess? Some areas used for feedback
include...
- Drinking Patterns
- Quantity/Frequency
- Daily Drinking Questionnaire
- BAL Estimates
- Drinking Problems
- RAPI
- YAAPST
- Drinking Norms
- Alcohol Outcome Expectancies
- Stages of Change
13BASICS 4-year Drinking Outcomes by Treatment
Condition
14(No Transcript)
15(No Transcript)
16(No Transcript)
17(No Transcript)
18Norm Misperception
- Examines students perceptions about
- Acceptability of excessive behavior
- Perceptions about the rates of their peers
- Perception about the prevalence of their peers
19EXPECT Alcohol No Alcohol
GET No Alcohol Alcohol
20 What Is A Standard Drink? Absorption and
Oxidation Blood Alcohol Level and Effects
Factors Affecting Blood Alcohol Level
Tolerance Biphasic Effect Drug
Interactions
Information Reviewed During Feedback
21What Is A Standard Drink?
- 12 oz. beer
- 10 oz. microbrew
- 10 oz. wine cooler
- 8 oz. malt liquor
- 8 oz. Canadian beer
- 8 oz. ice beer
- 6 oz. ice malt liquor
- 4 oz. wine
- 2 1/2 oz. fortified wine
- 1 1/4 oz. 80 proof hard alcohol
- 1 oz. 100 proof hard alcohol
22Absorption and Oxidation of Alcohol
- Factors affecting absorption
- Food in stomach
- What one is drinking
- Rate of consumption
- Effervescence
- Factors affecting oxidation
- Time!
- People burn off a very predictable .016 from
their BAC per hour
23Blood Alcohol Level
- .02 Relaxed
- .04 Relaxation continues, Buzz develops
- .06 Cognitive judgment is
impaired - .08 Nausea can appear, Motor coordination is
impaired
24Blood Alcohol Level (continued)
- .10 Clear deterioration in cognitive
judgment and motor coordination - .15-.25 Black outs
- .25-.35 Pass out
Lose consciousness Risk of Death - .40-.45 Lethal dose
25Factors Affecting Blood Alcohol Level
- Time
- B.A.L. is reduced by .016 every hour
- Weight
- Sex differences
- Very pronounced differences between men and women
- Example
26Example of B.A.L. differences between men and
women
- 160 pound man
- 120 pound woman
- Both have 5 drinks over 3 hours
- What blood alcohol level will they obtain?
27Tolerance
Siegel, S. Ramos, B.M.C. (2002) Applying
laboratory research Drug anticipation and the
treatment of drug addiction. Experimental and
Clinical Psychopharmacology, 10, 162-183.
28Questions
- When people start to lose their buzz, what do
they usually do? - Do they ever get their buzz back?
- For people with tolerance, is the buzz you get
now as good as the buzz you used to get when you
first started drinking?
29Alcohols Biphasic Effect
Euphoria - Up
Point of Diminishing Returns
Cultural Myth About Alcohol
Feeling Scale
0
After Tolerance Develops
__
Dysphoria - Down
Time
30How Explanation of Alcohols Biphasic Effect is
Used
- Point of Diminishing Returns
- Highlights point at which positives are maximized
and negatives are minimized - Demonstrate Why Tolerance Results in Increase In
Negative Health Risks - Help Put Student Experiences In a Context
31Drug Interactions
- Potentiation
- Antagonistic
32Areas In Which College Students May Experience
Consequences
- Academic Failure
- Blackouts
- Hangovers
- Weight Gain
- Tolerance
- Decisions
- Impaired sleep
33Areas In Which College Students May Experience
Consequences (continued)
- Finances
- Family History
- Alcohol-Related Accidents
- Time Spent Intoxicated
- Relationships
- Legal Problems
- Work-Related Problems
34(No Transcript)
35(No Transcript)
36(No Transcript)
37Specific Tips for Reducing the Risk of Alcohol Use
- Set limits
- Keep track of how much you drink
- Space your drinks
- Alternate alcoholic drinks w/non-alcoholic drinks
- Drink for quality, not quantity
- Avoid drinking games
- If you choose to drink, drink slowly
- Dont leave your drink unattended
- Dont accept a drink when you dont know whats
in it
38(No Transcript)
39Motivational Interviewing
A Definition
- Motivational Interviewing is a
- Person-centered
- Directive
- Method of communication
- For enhancing intrinsic motivation to change by
exploring and resolving ambivalence
40What is resistance?
- Resistance is a function of interpersonal
communication - Continued resistance is predictive of (non)
change - Resistance is highly responsive to counselor
style - Getting resistance? Change strategies.
41The Spirit of
Motivational Interviewing
- Direct persuasion is not an effective method for
resolving ambivalence. - The counseling style is generally a quiet and
eliciting one. - The counselor is directive in helping the client
to examine and resolve ambivalence. - Readiness to change is not a client trait, but a
fluctuating product of interpersonal interaction. - The therapeutic relationship is more like a
partnership than expert/recipient roles.
42Four Principles of Motivational
Interviewing
- Express Empathy
- Research indicating importance of empathy
- Develop Discrepancy
- Clients values and goals for future as potent
contrast to status quo - Client must present arguments for change
provider declines expert role
43Four Principles of
Motivational Interviewing
- Roll with Resistance
- Avoid argumentation
- Confrontation increases client resistance to
change - Labeling is unnecessary
- Providers role is to reduce resistance, since
this is correlated with poorer client outcomes - If resistance increases, providers shift to
different strategies - Client objections or minimization do not demand a
therapist response
44Four Principles of Motivational
Interviewing
- Support Self-Efficacy
- Clients are responsible for choosing and
implementing change - Confidence and optimism are predictors of good
outcome in both therapists and clients
45OARS
Building Blocks for a Foundation
- Ask Open-Ended Questions
- Cannot be answered with yes or no
- Provider does not know where answer will lead
- Affirm
- Takes skill to find positives
- Should be offered only when sincere
46Examples of Key Questions
- What do you make of this?
- Where do you want to go with this now?
- What thoughts do you have about what you might
want to do about this? - What ideas do you have about things that might
work for you?
47OARS
Building Blocks for a Foundation
- Listen Reflectively
- Effortful process Involves Hypothesis Testing
- Can be used strategically (amplify meaning or
evaluation or contrast) - Summarize
- Periodically through sessions
- Demonstrates to client you are listening
- Provides opportunity for shifting
48Building Blocks for a Foundation
- Strategic goal
- Elicit Self-Motivational Statements
- Self motivational statements indicate client
concern or recognition of need for change - Arrange the conversation so that client makes
arguments for change
49Reflective Listening
A Primary Skill
- Hypothesis testing approach to listening
- Statements, not questions
- Voice goes down
- Can amplify meaning or feeling
- Can be used strategically
- Takes hard work and practice
50Hypothesis Testing Model
51Motivational Interviewing Strategies
- Reflection
- My partner wont stop giving me crap about my
drinking. - Your partner is concerned about your drinking.
- -- or --
- And that annoys you.
- -- or --
- It feels like your partner is always on your
case.
52Motivational Interviewing Strategies
- Amplified Reflection
- I dont see any reasons to change my
drinking...I mean, I just like drinking alcohol. - Sounds like there no bad things about drinking
for you.
53Motivational Interviewing Strategies
- Double-Sided Reflection
-
- Student Ive been drinking with my friends in
the dorm. My parents are pissed about it.
Theyre always saying that it makes my depression
worse. - Clinician Sounds like you get a hard time
from your parents about how drinking affects your
depression. - Student Yeah I mean, I know that it affects my
mood a little, but I dont drink that much and
when I do, I really enjoy it, you know?
54Motivational Interviewing Strategies
- Double-Sided Reflection
- Clinician What do you enjoy about drinking?
- Student I like the fact that it helps me chill
out with my friends. - Clinician Let me see if I am getting you right..
Sounds like on the one hand you enjoy drinking
because you feel that it helps you chill out with
your friends, and on the other hand it youve
noticed that it has some effect on your mood.
55Resistance Strategies
- Why is it important to pay attention to
resistance? - Research relevant to resistance and client
outcomes - Motivational interviewing focuses on reducing
resistance
56Types of Resistance
- Argument
- Challenging
- Discounting
- Hostility
- Interruption
- Talking over
- Cutting off
- Ignoring
- Inattention
- Non-response
- Non-answer
- Side-tracking
- Denial
- Blaming
- Disagreeing
- Excusing
- Reluctance
- Claiming Impunity
- Minimizing
- Pessimism
- Unwillingness to change
57Signs of Readiness for Change
- Decreased resistance.
The client stops arguing, interrupting,
denying, or objecting. - Decreased questions about the problem.
The
client seems to have enough information about his
or her problem, and stops asking questions.
There is a sense of being finished. - Increased questions about change. The client
asks what he or she could do about the problem,
how people change if they decide to, etc.
58Signs of Readiness for Change
- Resolve. The client appears to have reached a
resolution, and may seem more peaceful, relaxed,
calm, unburdened, or settled. - Self-motivational statements. The client makes
direct self-motivational statements. - Envisioning. The client begins to talk about how
life might be after a change. - Experimenting. If the client has had time
between sessions, he or she may have begun
experimenting with possible change approaches
(e.g., going to an A.A. meeting, going without
drinking for a few days, reading a self-help
book).
59Research on brief individualized feedback
interventions using peers and professionals
- With Greek System students, Larimer, et al.
(2001) found - Fraternity men in intervention condition
decreased drinks per week peak BAC - No change for sorority women
- Peers were at least as effective at promoting
change in drinking behavior as professionals - OLeary, et al. (2002) found peer providers were
not as effective for women as were professional
providers
60The Alcohol Research Collaborative (ARC)
- In ARC, for first-year students with at least one
heavy drinking episode, compare several
approaches, including three brief interventions - Peer-delivered BASICS intervention
- Peer-delivered Alcohol Skills Training Program
(ASTP) - Web-BASICS
61ARC assignment to condition
- After screening and baseline, 637 students were
randomized to a condition of the study - 399 participants were randomized to BASICS, ASTP,
Web-BASICS or Control - 86 completed 3-month follow-up, and 83
completed 6-month follow-up - Participant completion rates by condition
- Web-BASICS 83.7
- BASICS 74.7
- ASTP 67.0
62Satisfaction Ratings
- Overall high satisfaction, with ASTP (M5.35)
BASICS (M4.99) higher than web-BASICS (M4.58) - More learned about alcohol in ASTP (M5.68) and
BASICS (M5.49) than Web-BASICS (M4.87) - Web-BASICS more convenient to participate in
(M5.79) than ASTP (M4.78) (no difference
between groups with convenience of BASICS
(M5.24))
63Post-Intervention Impressions of Peers
Percentage rating mildly/moderately/strongly agree
- Participants agreed presenters seemed
- Warm and understanding (90.9 of ASTP 97.3 of
BASICS) - Competent and well-trained (97.0 of ASTP 98.6
of BASICS) - Knowledgeable about alcohol use (93.9 of ASTP
91.8 of BASICS) - Well organized (87.9 of ASTP 93.2 of BASICS)
64Limitations prior to data analysis
- Randomization issues (students assigned to BASICS
had fewer drinks per week and lower RAPI scores
than in other conditions) - Outcome variables were skewed, so data were log
transformed for analytic purposes
65No time by group interactions for total drinks or
negative consequences Specific planned
comparisons indicated that BASICS reduced total
drinks per week more than control did
Total Drinks per Week
p lt .01
66Time by group interaction for peak
drinks Significant reductions for ASTP from
baseline to 3-mo. and 3-mo. to 6-mo. Significant
reductions for BASICS and web-BASICS from
baseline to 3-mo.
Peak Drinks per Occasion
p lt .01
67Conclusions
- Baseline differences make it hard to interpret
results - Implementing a peer-led intervention is feasible
- Support for all three interventions reducing peak
drinks/occasion only BASICS significantly
reduced total drinks per week - Some delayed effects in ASTP
- Initial reactivity in assessment for controls on
peak drinks that failed to be maintained over
time
68Peer Therapist Training for ARC
- Reading packet for facilitators
- Initial 8 hours of training on alcohol content
clinical technique - Practice facilitating with a mock participant
volunteer - Weekly group supervision
- Possibility of individual meetings for more
practice and supervision
69Peer Therapist Training (continued)
- MITI Coding Team reviews for adherence and
compliance assessment - Detailed review/feedback written after tape is
reviewed by supervisors - Peer therapist facilitates only once MITI Coding
Adherence is reached - While interventions occur, facilitators attend
weekly group supervision - Facilitators may need to attend an hour
individual or pair supervision with an RA during
weeks when an session is completed
70Implementing BASICS
- Determining Assessment/Measures
- Generating Graphic Feedback/Personalized BAC
cards - Training of providers
- Supervision/Consultation if needed
- Therapist drift (issues of fidelity)
- Need for ongoing assessment and, if needed,
training
71Thank You!
- Special thanks to Ann Quinn-Zobeck
- All the best in your prevention efforts!
- Jason Kilmer
- kilmerj_at_evergreen.edu
- (360) 867-6775