Ayn Rand 19051985 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Ayn Rand 19051985

Description:

RandNozick. 1. 7/17/09. Ayn Rand 1905-1985 (?) The Virtue of Selfishness ... Ayn Rand: ... Rand: 'what is the cause of today's egalitarian trend? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:220
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: hetagy
Category:
Tags: ayn | rand

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Ayn Rand 19051985


1
Ayn Rand 1905-1985 (?)
  • The Virtue of Selfishness
  • ja Randin suoranainen viha valtiovaltaa kohtaan

2
Ayn Rand
  • the only proper, moral purpose of a government
    is to protect mans rights, which means to
    protect him from physical violence to protect
    his right to his life, to his own liberty, to his
    own property and to the pursuit of his own
    happiness without property rights, no other
    rights are possible

3
Rand
  • help strangers in an emergency and only in
    emergency
  • poverty, ignorance, illness and other problems
    of that kind are not metaphysical emergencies

4
Rand
  • what is the cause of todays egalitarian trend?
    For over two hundred years, Europes
    predominantly altruist-collectivist intellectuals
    had claimed to be the voice of the people the
    champions of the downtrodden masses and of
    unlimited majority rule

5
  • majority will and majority welfare were their
    moral base and political goal which justified
    anything

6
  • with varying consistency this belief was shared
    by most of Europes social thinkers, from Marx to
    Bentham to John Stuart Mill (whose On Liberty is
    the most deadly and destructive piece of
    collectivism ever adopted by suicidal defenders
    of liberty (Philosophy who needs it, p.114)

7
Robert Nozick, Anarchy, State and Utopia (1974)
  • Näkymättömän käden avulla syntynyt yhteiskunta
    on oikeutettu

8
  • 1. Minimivaltio voi syntyä luonnontilassa,
    näkymättömän käden ohjaamana
  • 2. Resurssien redistribuutio ei oikeutettua
  • 3. Proseduraalinen oikeudenmukaisuus

9
  • Kriitikot kysyneet miksi näkymättömän käden
    prosesseilla olisi enemmän arvoa kuin
    tahallisilla interventioilla?
  • Miksi legitiimi valtio ei voisi syntyä
    lockelaisen sopimuksen avulla?

10
  • Yksilöillä on oikeuksia ja on asioita joita
    heille ei saa tehdä koska muutoin heidän
    oikeuksiaan loukattaisiin
  • Protective agencies

11
  • INH1 State S is legitimate because it arose from
    a prepolitical state of nature in morally
    permissible ways
  • IHS2 State S is leg because it could have arisen
    from a prepolitical state of nature in etc

12
  • SC1 State S is leg because it was brought into
    existence by the free agreement of individuals in
    a prepolitical state of nature etc
  • SC2 State S is leg because it could have been
    brought into existence
  • by the free etc

13
David Miller toimiiko invisible hand argumentti?
  • Joskus vain selittää miten jokin tapahtui (ei
    seuraa välttämättä että lopputulos olisi hyvä
    asia esim. extreme residential segregation)
  • Nozick tarvitsee justifikatorisen argumentin
    miksi lopputulos olisi hyvä asia?

14
Nozickin entitlement teoria
  • Millä perusteella jokin voi omistaa jotain?
    Miksi jokin kuuluu jollekulle?
  • 1. a principle of transfer
  • 2. a principle of just initial acquisition
    (Villi Länsi)
  • 3. a principle of rectification

15
Ainoat sallitut omaisuudensiirtomuodot
  • person who acquires a holding in accordance with
    the principle of justice in acquisition is
    entitled to that holding
  • A person who acquires a holding in accordance
    with the principle of justice in transfer, from
    someone else entitled to the holding, is entitled
    to the holding.
  • No one is entitled to a holding except by
    repeated applications of 1 and 2.

16
Intuitiivinen argumentti
  • Ihmiset haluavat itse päättää miten rahansa
    käyttävät (Wilt Chamberlain esimerkki)
  • toisaalta intuitiomme kertoo, että heikompia on
    autettava (vrt. Rand) se ei voi kuitenkaan olla
    velvollisuutemme

17
Self-ownership argumentti
  • Itseen kohdistuvat oikeudet tärkeimmät,
    muodostavat self-ownership
  • omistaja omistettava
  • Siksi omaisuuden loukkaus aina loukkaa myös
    omistajaa.
  • Mutta millaisia asioita voi sitten omistaa?

18
Libertaristit eivät lämpene Millin kommentille
teoksessa On Socialism
  • No longer enslaved or made dependent by force of
    law, the great majority are so by force of
    poverty they are still chained to a place, to an
    occupation, and to conformity with the will of an
    employer, and debarred by the accident of birth
    both from the enjoyments, and from the mental and
    moral advantages, which others inherit
    independently of desert.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com