IR2501 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

IR2501

Description:

How gender biased is the discipline of IR? How can we convince the mainstream of the significance of gender/feminism? Carol Cohn ... ( Adam Jones, Charli Carpenter) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:88
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: soc139
Category:
Tags: adam | ir2501 | jones

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: IR2501


1
IR2501
  • Gender and International Relations 2

2
3 different approaches to studying gender in IR
  • Cynthia Enloe
  • Where are the women?
  • What work are masculinity and femininity doing?
  • J. Ann Tickner
  • How gender biased is the discipline of IR?
  • How can we convince the mainstream of the
    significance of gender/feminism?
  • Carol Cohn
  • How does gender work in language?
  • What cant we say/think/conceptualise and does
    gender have anything to do with this?

3
Cynthia EnloeFor an explanation/theory to be
useful, a great deal of human dignity has to be
left on the cutting room floor
  • When we ask where are the women? in relation to
    International Politics Enloe says that we often
    see men for the first time as we scarcely
    notice (or care) that governments looks like
    mens clubs (see G8 summit photos next 2 slides)
    - often get blinded by what we see right in
    front of us
  • Seeing men for the first time makes us question
    why women seem so unimportant in the realm of
    international politics
  • Especially when women are so essential in keeping
    the wheels of the in international system moving
  • It takes an awful lot of power to make some
    things seem trivial or unimportant (never believe
    anyone who tells you things are just natural or
    obvious see next Enloe quote on next slide)

4
G8 Summit Gleneagles 2005
  • No individual or social group finds itself on
    the margins of any web of relationships a
    football league, an industry, an empire, a
    military alliance, a state without some other
    individual or group having accumulated enough
    power to create the center somewhere else
    (Enloe, Curious Feminist, p.19).

5
G8 Summit Russia 2006
6
What women do in IP? (not just in obvious
foreign policy or heads of govt roles)
  • Diplomatic wives/loyal politicians wives
    hundreds of years of unpaid labour of diplomatic
    wives smoothing and oiling the wheels of
    diplomacy (see chapter 5 in Bananas, Beaches and
    Bases) clearly some changes in the 21st century
    but still a politician/world leader needs a
    wife and preferably a traditional one like
    Laura Bush more on her in a moment
  • Militarization the gendered idea/ideal of the
    protector/protected has been crucial to keeping
    the ideology of militarization going defending
    the country one of the reason having women in
    combat roles is so strongly resisted

7
Military women
  • Women have always serviced military bases it
    is regularly official military policy to have a
    supply of prostitutes Japanese/Korean comfort
    women in the second world war. Hundreds of
    thousands of women and girls abducted and forced
    into prostitution to service Japanese soldiers.
  • In the early 1990s this was finally acknowledged
    by the Japanese government but it has still to
    formally apologise or offer compensation (and is
    backtracking on admitting it)
  • So women are consistently involved in many ways
    in the workings of international politics but
    in ways that are largely ignored/dismissed/trivial
    ised
  • But lets look at conventional understandings of
    what counts in or as international politics

8
How women are affected differently in IP
  • Security (whose?)
  • Billions spent on the arms race and nuclear
    technologies (see latest attempt at a star wars
    idea Missile shield plan in Poland)
  • http//www.spacewar.com/reports/United_States_Pola
    nd_Hold_Missile_Shield_Talks_999.html- does
    any of that really make anyone feel safe? In
    regard to women - women are more likely to be
    attacked by a man they know (not a nuclear
    missile)
  • Most common cause of death internationally? -
    Poverty (disease)
  • Human Rights (whose?)
  • 60 million females world-wide have died or not
    been allowed to be born because of a world-wide
    preference for boy children (malnutrition,
    infanticide, aborting female fetuses)
  • The world of international relations is much
    more complex and multi-layered than we imagine
    without thinking about women and gender- we fail
    to see this adequately think or the current war
    on terror

9
Women/Gender and the War on Terror
  • Major use of the rhetoric of womens rights in
    Afghanistan to justify the invasion both by
    George W. Bush but also through his wife the
    first lady
  • Laura Bush fight the cause for Afghani women
    (Zillah Eisenstein Against Empire p. 157)
  • Racialized and sexualised abuse in Abu Ghraib
    using sex/gender to add humiliation to the
    physical abuse.
  • Also the publication of the photos of Lynddie
    England a woman being involved in this abuse.
  • Bushs own masculinized western film rhetoric
    in response to the attacks on the World Trace
    Center in 2001 see Fahrenheit 9/11
    Using/selling gender
  • http//www.youtube.com/watch?v_y8I37BMOQc

10
Women gender IP. 3 points
  • Women are integrally involved in oiling the
    wheels and practices of international politics -
    but often in unseen/invisible ways. What gets
    categorised as trivial?
  • Women are affected differently by conventionally
    understood international political practices
    but if we put women at the centre we would get a
    very different picture of what is important to
    look at in IP.
  • Gender is constantly invoked and used in the
    practices and theories of international politics
    but what are the consequences of using these
    ideas about masculinity and femininity? Tickner
    on Morgenthau ..

11
J. Ann Tickner
  • Rather than discussing strategies for bringing
    more women into the international relations
    discipline I shall seek answers to my questions
    by bringing to light what I believe to be the
    masculinist underpinnings of the field (1992
    xi).
  • Her 2 main questions
  • How gender biased or masculinist - is the
    discipline of IR?
  • How can we convince the mainstream of the
    significance of scholarship on gender and
    feminism?
  • She engages the discipline of IR in a big way
    (not like Enloe)
  • Started (in 1991 Grant Newland) by looking at
    Hans Morgenthaus 6 principles of political
    realism to show how BIASED they were based on
    typically male lives casting out or trashing
    anything associated with femininity/women
  • http//www.ciaonet.org/book/tickner/tickner13.html

12
Hans Morgenthau 6 principles
  • Morgenthaus 6 principles of political realism
    (see Lecture 3)
  • Politics governed by objective laws
  • Interest defined in terms of power - stresses
    the rational, objective and unemotional aspects
    of this
  • Nature of power can change but (self) interest
    remains consistent
  • Universal moral principles do not govern state
    behaviour
  • No universally agreed set of moral principles -
    power is about control of man over man (state
    over state )
  • Politics and political man must be
    removed/abstracted from other aspects of human
    nature this is an autonomous zone, In other
    words politics is a separate sphere of human
    activity

13
Tickners feminist reformulation
  • Objectivity is culturally defined AND it is
    associated with masculinity - so objectivity is
    ALWAYS partial
  • National interest is multi-dimensional so not
    one set of interests can (or should) define it
  • Power as domination and control privileges
    masculinity
  • All political action has moral significance
    cannot/should not separate them
  • Perhaps look for common moral elements ?
  • Feminists deny the autonomy of the political
    realm building boundaries around a narrowly
    defined political realm defines political in a
    way that excluded the concerns and contributions
    of women.
  • THE PERSONAL IS POLITICAL
  • So Tickner critiques the foundations of the
    discipline and attempts to get the discipline
    to understand

14
Carol Cohn Sex and Death in the Rational
World of Defense Intellectuals Wars, Wimps and
Women Talking Gender and Thinking War
  • Her questions
  • How does gender work in language?
  • What cant we say and does gender have anything
    to do with that?
  • She has spent a lot of time working with military
    officials in the US.
  • Primarily she is interested in how gender works
    at the level of language/discourse directs
    attention away from gendered individuals to
    gendered discourses (stories)
  • Her definition of gender discourse not only
    about words or language but about a system of
    meanings, of ways of thinking, images and words
    that shape how we experience understand gender
    as a central organizing discourse of culture,
    politics and society. (Page 228)
  • Gender can work as a PRE-EMPTIVE DETERRENT to
    thought
  • Read from page 230 from Wars, Wimps and Women
  • This well illustrates the HIERARCHY involved in
    and around gender

15
Criticisms of feminist/gender work in IR
  • Mainstream (whats it got to do with real IR?
    and isnt it just about women issues only?)
    OR Not scientific enough (Robert Keohane)
  • Womens movements/activists (feminism has got too
    academic/theoretical Halliday thinks this a
    bit too 1998 Millennium article)
  • Poststructuralists (they have a problem with
    identity politics which feminism is seen as a
    part of)
  • Though perhaps still on the margins? But is there
    a difference between IR as an academic discipline
    and the real world?
  • Fred Halliday in 1998 saw some change in the
    disciplinary study of IR the discipline but not
    so much in real world
  • Jill Steans in 2003 still sees feminism and
    gender on the margins of the discipline
  • Currently new wave of critique the
    neo-feminists who want to study gender without
    feminism - the neo-feminists - too much about
    feminism do gender without feminism? (Adam
    Jones, Charli Carpenter).
  • BUT - currently still a lot being written on
    feminism/gender and IR, and a lot more on
    masculinity and popular culture (e.g. films G.I.
    Jane, Forrest Gump, Fahrenheit 9/11, Independence
    Day, The Day After Tomorrow, Team America, Dr
    Strangelove Or how I stopped worrying and began
    to love the bomb

16
World Trade Center trailer
  • http//www.youtube.com/watch?v_y8I37BMOQc
  • What use is made of masculinity and femininity in
    this film?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com