InterMinisterial Conference on Landlocked and Transit Developing Countries - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

InterMinisterial Conference on Landlocked and Transit Developing Countries

Description:

Inter-Ministerial Conference on Landlocked and Transit Developing Countries ... The Abidjan-Ouagadougou Railway Concession Sitarail ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:90
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: wb1867
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: InterMinisterial Conference on Landlocked and Transit Developing Countries


1
Inter-Ministerial Conference on Landlocked and
Transit Developing Countries
  • (Almaty, 28-29 August, 2003)

2
The World Bank/PPIAF Report for The High Level
Investment Forum
  • Private Investment in Infrastructure How Can It
    Facilitate Landlocked Developing Countries
    (LLDCs) Access to World Markets ?

PART ONESurvey of Strategies for Enabling
Cross-Border Investment in Infrastructure for
Landlocked Countries
PART TWOSurvey of Private Investors and
Operators (from interviews in April 2003 with
some 30 participants representing 17 different
European and North American Firms)
ANNEX I19 Boxes (illustrating specific private
participation investments and specific types of
international support for such efforts)
ANNEX II7 Tables (comparing private and public
investment flows to transit transport
infrastructure in each of 31 LLDCs and about 40
transit neighbor countries, as well as basic data
on these countries)
3
The Abidjan-Ouagadougou Railway Concession
Sitarail
The Chad-Cameroon Petroleum Development and
Pipleline Project
4
Overcoming Barriers to Private Investments in
Transit-Related Infrastructure for
LLDCsCross-Border Investments
  • Traditionally transport projects have been
    accomplished as separate activities by govts on
    each side of a border. But in seeking big
    productivity increases expected from
    privatization, major gains may come about if
    resulting private entity is able to control the
    full length of a corridor, regardless of
    intervening borders.
  • The ability to develop true multi-country
    cross-border privatization projects requires
    cooperation of the countries involved in unusual
    ways. To pull together a single project
    involving assets separately owned by governments
    of two (or more) countries on which to elicit
    single bids by a number of consortia of private
    parties, and which also might receive support
    from multilateral entities, is a complex effort.
    A legal regimen that covers the new created
    private entity needs to be clearly understood by
    all parties concerned in case of disputes.

5
The Bolivia-Brazil Natural Gas Pipeline Project
6
Some Highlights from The Survey of Private
Investors and Operators
  • Bidding Process(I) too expensive, and costs
    should be reduced or partly subsidized (ii)
    should be shortened (iii) potential investors
    need to be able to argue their objections to
    proposed bidding requirements before they are
    finalized (iv) lack of precision in concession
    terms, while also criticizing lack of flexibility
    of rigidly fixed investment requirements in face
    of changing economic conditions.
  • Infrastructure investment for the long term
    needs to be better financed, with the
    participation of the IFIs.

7
More Highlights
  • Ways need to be found to reduce the very high
    risk exposure of private investors from time of
    announcing winning bid to completion of
    financial contracting requirementsby sharing
    those risks with government, or insurers, or IFC
    or other IFIs.
  • Several investors want to see World Bank and
    other multilateral agencies take a stronger role
    in follow-up of compliance with concession
    requirements, and, where governments fail to
    comply, investors would like to see World Banks
    weight brought to bear to make correction of such
    failures part of overall conditionality
    requirements governing further lending by the WB
    and others.
  • Flexibility and desire to attract more bidders
    argue for a negotiated sale of a concession,
    whereas transparency argues strongly for
    competitive bidding to given terms with price as
    main criterion.

8
A Private Participation Action Program for
Landlocked Transit Cooperation
  • Assessing The Potential for Privatization
  • An Immediate stocktaking of the existing or
    planned public or public-private transit
    transport assets
  • A rough assessment of the potential benefits to
    be gained from private participation in best
    immediate targets
  • Focus on corridors and main cargo owners
  • Telecoms, IT overcome geography
  • Dry Ports offer economies of scale in logistic
    services, if users are willing to pay
  • Air freight facilities

9
Conclusions
  • Large productivity gains are possible from
    private provision of some transport services
    (notably rail).
  • Need to be win-win for transit country
  • But transactions can be very demanding of scarce
    govt management skills.

10
Conclusions (contd)
  • Think ahead regarding competitive bidding versus
    negotiation. 2-stage process?
  • 5. World Bank is willing to advise govts on
    concession transactions and may finance prior
    upgrading of infrastructure and labor
    restructuring.

11
Main Subjects Covered in The Survey of Private
Investors and Operators (with some sample quotes)
  • Privatization Projects in Landlocked Countries as
    A Nucleus for Cross-Border Projects
  • IFC and World Bank Support
  • Private Investment Based on An Original Materials
    Model
  • Railroad Efficiency and ProductivityRealistic
    Expectations
  • Problems in Railroad Tendering
  • Alternative Offers vs. Transparency and The World
    Bank
  • Negotiation vs. Competition in Concession
    Arrangements
  • Railroad Concessioning and Possible Further Areas
    for Its Use
  • Enforcing Compliance with The Terms of
    Concessions, and The Role of The World Bank
  • Public-Private Partnerships and The International
    Finance Corporation (IFC)
  • The Costs of Bidding
  • How Can We Shorten The Time and Lower The Cost of
    Bidding ?
  • Open Access
  • Overbuilding and Unnecessary Aid
  • The Role of The World Bank
  • RiskThe Views of An Investment Banker on Risk
  • Rates of ReturnThe Views of An Investment Banker
    on Rates of Return
  • Corruption
  • Management, Control and Expertise

12
Examples of True Cross-Border Projects Affecting
Landlocked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • There have in fact been a fair number of true
    cross-border projects affecting LLDCs
  • The N4 Mozambique-South Africa toll road project.
  • The recently awarded bid for a Senegal-Mali
    railroad concession.
  • The concessioned railroad system in Malawi which
    is now joining the Mozambique railroad line to
    the port of Nacala.
  • Sitarail from Côte dIvoire to Burkina Faso.
  • In South Asia, there is the new rail-based dry
    port in Nepal (an extension of Indian Railways).
  • In Latin America, two cross-border projects link
    Chile and BoliviaThe Arica to La Paz
    concession(currently inoperative because of
    floods) and the Antofagasto and Bolivia, which
    has been a private railway for many years.
  • Further examples include private investor
    pipelines, usually in cooperation with
    governments, such as those serving oil production
    in Central Asian Republics, the oil pipeline
    project serving Chad, and in South America a
    major gas pipeline project from Bolivia to
    Brazil.
  • Several cross-border power transmission and
    pipeline projects have been supported by World
    Bank partial risk guarantees, and a new one in
    LaosThe Nam Theun private sector power project
    scheduled for 2004involves construction of a
    1,070 MW hydropower facility to primarily export
    power to Thailand, at an estimated cost of
    US1,280 Million, and to include a partial risk
    guarantee for USD 80 Million.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com