Title: Lessons of Fukushima Powerpoint Majia Nadesan
1Lessons From Fukushima
2Abstract
- Lessons From Fukushima Governments and the Media
Will Deceive the Public and Withhold Vital
Information, Leaving Citizens to Create Informal
Information Sharing NetworksThis paper will
demonstrate that the Japanese and U.S.
Governments withheld vital information from their
citizens about the direction and risks of
Fukushima radiation plumes and the degree and
consequences of radioactive fallout. Second, the
paper will demonstrate that the mainstream news
media, including The Wall Street Journal and The
New York Times, were complicit in hiding
information about fallout levels, dispersion, and
plant conditions. The U.S. media are commonly
recognized as more independent from government
than Japanese media. This disaster demonstrates
that the U.S. mainstream news media censor
information, even when public safety is at issue.
Finally, this paper examines the spontaneous
creation of information sharing sites and the
subsequent development of a robust network of
citizen-supported information sites in Japan and
the United States.
3Timeline
- The nuclear disaster began on March 11 after
Fukushima reactors lost water. - March 12 Fukushima reactor number 1 reactor
exploded at 1530 after venting failed to release
pressure. - Chief Cabinet Secretary Yukio Edano confirms
that the concrete building surrounding the steel
reactor container has collapsed as a result of
the blast, but the steel containment chamber
itself had not been damaged (BBC Timeline
http//www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-1272
2719 ) - March 13 Assurances Risk is Low But Releases
Steam from Unit 3 - 0320 The World Health Organisation says the
risk to the public from the radiation leak at
Fukushima is "probably quite low (BBC Timeline) - March 14 An explosion occurred at the number 3
reactor. - March 15 An Explosion occurred at number 2
reactor after initial assurances. - Early March 15 containment structures of the
three reactorswhich house the all-important
reactor vesselsremain intact, Japanese official
stressed, preventing large-scale radiation
leaks. - Later in the day on March 15, an explosion
occurred in reactor number (Yuka Hayashi
Nuclear Risk Rising in Japan, The Wall Street
Journal (2011, March 15) A1, A12). - Details of Unit 4 are Hotly Contested, Unclear
4Fukushima Is a Major Disaster
- Fukushima cesium leaks 'equal 168 Hiroshima
bombs,' says report National Aug. 26, 2011
http//www.japantoday.com/category/national/view/f
ukushima-cesium-leaks-equal-168-hiroshima-bombs-sa
ys-report - HOW MUCH FUEL "The Daiichi complex had a total
of 1760 metric tons of fresh and used nuclear
fuel on site last year, according to a
presentation by its owners, the Tokyo Electric
Power Company (Tepco). The most damaged Daiichi
reactor, number 3, contains about 90 tons of
fuel, and the storage pool above reactor 4, which
the Nuclear Regulatory Commissions (NRCs)
Gregory Jaczko reported yesterday had lost its
cooling water, contains 135 tons of spent fuel.
The amount of fuel lost in the core melt at Three
Mile Island in 1979 was about 30 tons the
Chernobyl reactors had about 180 tons when the
accident occurred in 1986." http//news.sciencema
g.org/scienceinsider/2011/03/how-much-fuel-is-at-r
isk-at-fukushima.html?rss1
5Background
- I was driven to create this presentation by the
scale of the Fukushima disaster, and the
invisibility of an adequate response. - I drew upon my expertise as a scholar of
communication to study government and media
reports of the disaster since it began in March
of 2011 - I study biopolitics, the study of the
intersections across (1) economic models (2)
health (3) and dominant frameworks for
interpreting and mitigating disease. In my
research Ive studied autism, as interpreted
across scientific paradigms- including biological
psychiatry and genetics Ive also studied how
economic models shape attitudes toward the health
of the population, in relation to the workplace ,
childrearing, and environmental risks. The
biopolitics of Fukushima are a primary concern of
my current research. - To understand the significance of government and
media accounts Ive researched radiation
dispersion, radiation fallout and disease, and
laboratory research on radiation, cell biology,
and DNA. I received considerable assistance from
diverse people, including those who post at
Enenews, Fairewinds,, Fukushima Diary, Ex-SKF,
Enformable, If You Love This Planet, NukePimp,
etc. I also benefited from extended communication
with people who have knowledge and expertise in
radiation testing and other relevant issues,
including Ret. Capt. Clyde Stagner, Robert
Soltysik, Craig Daniels and my academic
colleagues at ASU
6Background
- Many people know nothing about Fukushima. Yet, it
has been spewing radiation for almost a year now
and fires have raged at the plant. - Japan is extensively contaminated. Fallout is
everywhere in the northern hemisphere. Health
effects are certain. However, doctors are not
trained in detecting sub-acute exposure to
radiation poisoning. Symptoms will be diverse,
and not clearly linked to radiation by doctors
trained in conventional models of medicine that
focus primarily on genes and lifestyle. - My data analysis of crisis communications and
press releases reveals that governments have
hidden the scope and severity of the crisis
including its ongoing nature and the extent of
fallout. - So, people may very well lose decades of their
life and never know the cause, even while they
see deteriorating health all around them. I
believe public health authorities need to take
action to project health implications and adopt
prevention and remediation strategies. - I believe public health authorities need to take
action to project health implications and adopt
prevention and remediation strategies, especially
in Japan but in the US and Canada as well. - This presentation seeks to use a variety of data
to demonstrate that governments and media have
failed to disclose information vital to human
health and welfare.
7Lessons From Fukushima
- Lesson 1 Democratic governments may elect to
withhold vital information in the event of severe
disasters - The presentation demonstrates that the Japanese
and U.S. Governments withheld vital information
from their citizens about the direction and risks
of Fukushima fallout. - Lesson 2 The Western media may censor vital
information - The presentation demonstrates that the mainstream
news media, including The Wall Street Journal and
The New York Times, were complicit in hiding
information about fallout levels, dispersion, and
plant conditions. - Lesson 3 Spontaneous citizens networks can
emerge in response to government censorship and
these networks have multiple functions, benefits,
and drawbacks - The presentation illustrates and examines the
spontaneous creation of information sharing sites
and the subsequent development of a robust
network of citizen-supported information sites in
Japan and the United States.
8Overview of Lesson 1 Government Censorship
- The Japanese and U.S. Governments withheld vital
information from their citizens about the
direction and risks of Fukushima radiation
fallout. Thus, citizens were not adequately
protected, evacuated to contaminated areas, and
were not provided with Potassium Iodide tablets
to combat uptake of Iodine-131. - Japanese Speedi data censored
- Japanese officials resisted releasing important
data about dispersion because of fear of
panicking residents - Japanese officials did not authorize potassium
iodide pills because of their unwillingness to
acknowledge scale of disaster - Japanese officials failed to expand evacuation
zone adequately because of censorship of
dispersion severity - Japanese officials tried to shut down radiation
monitoring equipment to reduce public fears about
contamination - Japanese government officials set dangerously
high standards for exposure and implemented
faulty monitoring strategies - Japanese government withheld a report of the
worst case scenario and minutes of the Fukushima
disaster response task force - The Canadian and US Governments also failed to
relay critical information about fallout and
asserted no health effects despite evidence to
the contrary - Each claim is supported with evidence
9Lesson 1 Speedi Censored
- Japan used a system called SpeediSystem for
Prediction of Environmental Emergency Dose
informationto model March radiation releases and
blamed the delay in reporting results to the
public in mid-April to their efforts to narrow
the margin of error in their calculations,
although nuclear regulators in other countries
were privy to Speedis results early on. - In July, the Atomic Energy Society of Japan
publicly criticized the Japanese government and
TEPCO for delays in reporting Speedi data to the
public T - the society notes that there is the possibility
that the damage to people's health from radiation
exposure has increased because the government,
Tepco and related institutions did not properly
disclose information on the status of the nuclear
accidents and the environmental contamination by
radioactive substances.. - Radiation hot spot in Namie, Fukushima Prefecture
were not disclosed. - Speedi data were given to the US military before
the data were provided to Japanese citizens - Hiroko Tabuchi, Keith Bradsher, and Andrew
Pollack Japanese Officials on Defensive as
Nuclear Alert Level Rises, The New York Times
(2011, April 13) http//www.nytimes.com/2011/04/1
3/world/asia/13japan.html. - Tabuchi, Bradsher, and Pollack Japanese
Officials on Defensive, http//www.nytimes.com/20
11/04/13/world/asia/13japan.html - Nuclear Accident Disclosure, Japan Times (2011,
July 8) http//search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/ed
20110708a1.html.
10Japanese Officials Resisted Releasing Data on
Radiation Dispersion
- Japan Economic Newswire (April 29, 2011).
Weather chief draws flak over plea not to
release radiation forecasts. Excerpted - The chief of the Meteorological Society of Japan
has drawn flak from within the academic society
over a request for member specialists to refrain
from releasing forecasts on the spread of
radioactive substances from the troubled
Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant. - Niino later said in commenting on the intention
he had in issuing the statement, "If (society
members') forecasts were announced, it would have
carried the risk that ordinary people may panic. - In this new statement, he said the principle of
keeping information sources unified "should be
applied when a country is going through a
critical situation" and "should not be applied
now that the release of radioactive substances
has been prolonged. - The controversy over Niino's statements came to
light when a series of delays in the release by
the government of information related to the
spread of radioactive substances have come under
intense public scrutiny. end excerpt
11Japanese Officials Failed to Dispense Potassium
Iodide Pills
- Fukushima area municipal entities had supplies of
potassium iodide pills but the Japanese disaster
manuals stipulated that local officials wait for
orders from the national government to
distribute. - Tokyo waited 5 days after Mar 11 before ordering
distribution - WSJ writes The failure to disburse the
preventive pills follows other examples of how
the Japanese government failed to implement
available measures aimed at protecting local
residents from the harms of radiation - Hayashi, Y. (2011, September 29). Japan
Officials Failed to Hand Out Radiation Pills in
Quakes Aftermath The Wall Street Journal.
12Lesson 1 Governments Censor Risk Leading to
Inadequate Evacuation
- On March 11, the Japanese government ordered
persons within a 1.9 mile radius of the Fukushima
I plant to evacuate and recommended that those
within 6.2 miles stay within their homes. - On March 12, the evacuation was extended to 20
kilometers. - On March 13, after the first explosion, the World
health Organization reported that the risk from
the reactors was probably quite low. - On March 17, the U.S. declared that U.S. citizens
and troops should stay at least 50 miles from the
Fukushima reactors. - March 25 the Japanese government declared a
voluntary evacuation for people within 30
kilometers of the plant while the official
evacuation zone remained 20 kilometers, or
approximately 20 miles. - On April 4, The Wall Street Journal reported that
Japanese authorities had finally acknowledged
that the evacuation zone needed to be expanded
beyond the 20 kilometer zone. - April 8 Evacuation zone still at 20 kilometers
intends to limit exposure to 50 millisieverts - "Timeline Japan Power Plant Crisis," BBC News
(2011, March 13) http//www.bbc.co.uk/news/scienc
e-environment-12722719. - Norihiko Shirouzu and Rebecca Smith U.S. Sounds
Alarm On Radiation, The Wall Street Journal
(2011, March 17) A1. - Andrew Morse and Mitsuru Obe Setback for Japan
at Rogue Reactors, The Wall Street Journal
(2011, March 26-27) A1. - Yoree Koh, Daisuke Wakabayashi, and Miho Inada
Worries Mount Over Residents Still Near Plant,
The Wall Street Journal (2011, April 4) A11. - Sekiguchi Obe (2011, April 8). Japan Weighs
Wider Evacuation Zone. A6. -
13Lesson 1 Mar 31 Japanese Government Sought to
Shut Down Radiation Monitoring
- During first month of the crisis the Japanese
government sought to shut down radiation
monitoring to prevent citizens from panicking - The Prometheus Trap / Order to Suspend Radiation
Monitoring Feb 6, 2012 Asahi - On March 31, 2011, Michio Aoyama, a 58-year-old
researcher at the Meteorological Research
Institute of the Japan Meteorological Agency, was
attending an International Atomic Energy Agency
(IAEA) conference in Monaco when he received an
e-mail from Japan. As he read the message, Aoyama
could not help but shake his head in
incomprehension and disbelief. - "We're discontinuing radiation monitoring? Now?
But we've been doing it for more than half a
century! - The sender of the e-mail was Takashi Inoue, 47,
a researcher at the institute's Office of
Planning in Tsukuba, Ibaraki Prefecture.
According to Inoue, he received a phone call from
the meteorological agency's Planning Division in
Tokyo at 6 p.m. on March 31. The caller told
Inoue, "Effective tomorrow, there will be no more
budget for radiation monitoring. Please do as you
see fit at your end. - http//ajw.asahi.com/article/0311disaster/fukushim
a/AJ201202060076
14Japanese Government Understated Radiation Threats
and Set High Standards for Exposure
- Toshiso Kosako resigned from the Japanese
Governments panel of nuclear experts on April 30
in response to the governments ceiling on
unacceptable standards of radiation levels in
schoolyards. - Dr Kosako claimed that the Japanese government
understated radiation risks and was slow to test
for risks posed by contaminated seawater and
seafood - Hayashi, Y. (2011, July 2-3). Ex-Advisor Says
Tokyo Understated Radiation Threats. The Wall
Street Journal, p. A7.
15Lesson 1 Japanese Government Censored Disaster
Report
- Cabinet Kept Alarming Nuke Report Secret Japan
Times January 22 - Japanese Government buried a worst-case account
of the Fukushima disaster by treating it as a
personal document of Japans Atomic Energy
Agency. - The report projected that in the worst case
scenario the plant would intermittently release
radiation for about a year. - The report was buried in part because the
Japanese government recognized it could not
successfully evacuate citizens the necessary 170
kilometers out. http//www.japantimes.co.jp/text/n
n20120122a1.html - An interim report produced by the Japanese
Government found that the government delayed
relaying vital information to the public about
the seriousness of the meltdowns and the
radiation releases - Kageyama, Yuri (2011, December 260. Japan probe
finds nuclear disaster response failed. The
Associated Press. Available http//www.google.com
/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jJMKHqE_ffiXqRQKfiRIA
rgaojBw?docId38cf0057befd494a98dac1dccbcf47c7
and Japans Executive Summary of the Interim
Report found here http//www.bloomberg.com/news/20
11-12-26/fukushima-probe-highlights-nuclear-regula
tor-in-list-of-nuclear-failures.html
16Lesson 1 Japans Industry Minister Kept NO
MINUTES of Fukushima Taskforce
- TOKYO (Kyodo) Japanese industry minister Yukio
Edano on Tuesday apologized for the government's
failure to take minutes of meetings of a
taskforce dealing with the Fukushima nuclear
crisis and said that he has instructed the
Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency to compile
them soon based on notes taken by meeting
attendees. - Edano said at a press conference that although
the meetings were held in emergency situations
soon after the accident at the Fukushima Daiichi
power plant, the government should have created
minutes as soon as possible considering the
public interest in the matter and the significant
social impact that the handling of the accident
has. - "As then-Chief Cabinet Secretary and the current
Economy, Trade and Industry Minister, I
apologize," he said. - Various crisis management decisions were made at
the taskforce's meetings, such as setting of the
evacuation zone and policies for conducting
decontamination work after the leakage of
radioactive materials from the crippled power
plant. - http//mdn.mainichi.jp/mdnnews/news/20120124p2g00m
0dm144000c.html
17Lesson 1 Government Manipulation of Exposure
Data Persists in Japan
- AKIKO OKAZAKI Fukushima group calls QRS radiation
tests bogus (2012, Jan 2012). http//ajw.asahi.com
/article/0311disaster/fukushima/AJ201201270050 - A Fukushima day-care group sent letters earlier
this month warning its members of what it sees as
fraudulent tests to measure internal radiation
exposure among kindergarteners and preschoolers.
Many scientists have also questioned the
effectiveness and legitimacy of the QRS. - "The QRS is an offspring of a device developed by
a U.S. physician about a century ago, but it is
not recognized as medical equipment either in the
United States or Japan," said Macoto Kikuchi, a
physics professor at Osaka University, who
co-authored a book titled "Okashina Kagaku"
(Suspicious science). "It is perceived as 'bogus'
by scientists. The extent of internal exposure
should be indicated in units of becquerels.
Assessment of health should be impossible without
figures (in becquerels). - Speech by Professor Tasuhiko Kodama Head of the
Radioisotope Center at the Univ. of Tokyo July 27
giving testimony to the Committee on Welfare and
Labor in Japans Lower House in the Diet
Criticized the governments failure to provide
sensitive meters to test internal exposure and
notes that internal radiation exposure measured
in millisieverts is utterly meaningless
18Lesson 1 Conclusions for Japan
- Japanese government and Tepco authorities
trivialized the risk and withheld vital
information about the risks, leading people to
take inadequate safety preparations and causing
people to fail to evacuate to safe areas. - This inappropriate minimization of risk persists
in the monitoring of citizens internal radiation
exposure and in the testing of food and water.
19Overview of Lesson 1 US and Canada
- US Canadian Officials Censored and Trivialized
Radiation Fallout, Preventing Citizens from
Taking Simple Measures that Might Have Reduced
Exposure Risks - Canadian gov. failed to disclose Iodine-131 in
precipitation - Canadian gov. failed to test for contamination
(or release results) - US officials minimized risks despite models
predicting health effects from exposure to
Fukushima Iodine-131 in Alaska and detection of
Iodine-131 throughout nation - These incidents reveal a failure to warn and
protect the public in a context of new knowledge
about the harmful health effects of exposure to
relatively low-levels of ionizing radiation
20Canadian Officials Failed To Disclose Fallout
Exceeding Safety Levels
- What are officials hiding about Fukushima? By
Alex Roslin Oct 20 2011 http//www.straight.com/ar
ticle-491941/vancouver/what-are-officials-hiding-a
bout-fukushima - data shows rainwater in Calgary last March had
an average of 8.18 becquerels per liter of
radioactive iodine, easily exceeding the Canadian
guideline of six becquerels per liter for
drinking water. - Its above the recommended level for drinking
water, Eric Pellerin, chief of Health Canadas
radiation-surveillance division, admitted in a
phone interview from Ottawa. At any time you
sample it, it should not exceed the guideline. - Canadian government officials didnt disclose
the high radiation readings to the public.
Instead, they repeatedly insisted that fallout
drifting to Canada was negligible and posed no
health concerns.
21Lesson 1 Governments Reduce Perceptions of Risk
By Failing to Test
- Roslin cont Health Canadas data on rainwater
is also puzzling for another reason. It sharply
contrasts with the data collected by SFU
associate professor of chemistry Krzysztof
Starosta. He found iodine-131 levels in rainwater
in Burnaby spiked to 13 becquerels per litre in
the days after Fukushima. Thats many times
higher than the levels detected in Vancouver by
Health Canada. - Food is another big question mark. The Canadian
Food Inspection Agency briefly tested Japanese
food imports from the area around Fukushima, but
it dropped those measures in June. Canada now
relies on Japanese authorities to screen
contaminated food.
22US Officials Minimize Risk
- We Do Not Expect Harmful Levels of Radiation To
Reach U.S.http//www.youtube.com/watch?vlpAqiGSp
29c - Broad, W. (2011, March 13). "Military Crew Said
to Be Exposed to Radiation, but Officials Call
Risk in US Slight" New York Times
http//www.nytimes.com/2011/03/14/world/asia/14plu
me.html?_r1 - On Sunday, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission said
it expected no harmful levels of radioactivity
to move on the winds to Hawaii, Alaska or the
West Coast from the reactors in Japan, given the
thousands of miles between the two countries.
23Safe? Cascades and Hot Particles
- Research conducted by Arnie Gunderson and Marco
Kaltofen - In the early days of the disaster, 10 hot
particles a day inhaled in Seattle, 100X more in
Japan. - Hot spots of hot particles in Seattle and local
contamination throughout Cascades of 100
becquerels (disintegrations per second) in about
2 pounds of dirt - Marco Kaltofen found 100 becquerels from
Cesium-134 and 137 in a square meter in the
Portland Oregon area. This research was conducted
before November 6 - The radiation is going to cause cancer on a
statistical basis - Findings discussed in Update from Gundersen on
Robert Knight's Five O'Clock Shadow - WBAI, New
York http//fairewinds.com/content/update-gunderse
n-robert-knights-five-oclock-shadow-wbai-new-york - The data Gunderson discusses in this recent
interview were presented in a November 6
Interview - with Marco Kaltofen - titled
"Airborne Radiation Spread" http//enenews.com/uni
versity-researcher-weve-seen-radioactive-rain-outs
-in-areas-of-oregon-and-washington-areas-with-a-lo
t-more-radiation-video 0r http//www.youtube.com/
watch?vRJe7rCHXgYs - Paper by Marco Kaltofen (2011, Oct. 31)
Radiation Exposure to the Population in Japan
after the Earthquake. American Public Health
Association. http//apha.confex.com/apha/139am/web
program/Paper254015.html
24Iodine-131 in Kansas and Pacific Northwest
- Govt Report Kansas detected Iodine-131 in grass
at over 2,000 pCi/kg Attributed to Fukushima
Report of Radiological Environmental Monitoring
of the Environs Surrounding Wolf Creek Generating
Station, Kansas Department of Health and
Environment, July 2010-June 2011 Sample
WCFV-1-A-005-2.5Location SharpeType
PasturageDate April 5, 2011 - Sample contained 2072.0 72 pCi/kg 131I and
503.0 29 137Cs. This was not a result of WCGS
operation, but is attributed to the Fukushima
nuclear incident in Japan. - Radiation Levels in Northwest Rain Were Up to
131 Times Drinking Water Standards Following
Fukushima, Japan Nuclear Reactor Explosion.
Heart of American Northwest. Press Release July
7 Radiation Levels in Rain in WA and OR were
high enough to be of concern despite news reports
and officials stating that levels were below any
level of public health concern
25EPA Data and Individual Sampling Show Elevated
Levels of Radiation
- Analysis of EPA data by Independent Consultant
Robert Soltysik (http//freepdfhosting.com/e9ba187
7d6.pdf) - He also analyzed the December EPA radiation data
from Corvallis, Oregon for 2008 and 2011. - Beta was 2.1 times higher (112). Gamma range 3
(200-400 keV) was up 4.4, gamma range 5 (600-800
keV) was up 8.2, and gamma range 6 (800-1000
keV) was up 4.8. - Ret. Capt. Clyde Stagner conducted similar
analysis for Phoenix using EPA Envirofacts
database for 2011 and 2010 and found 2011 up
18.3 Gross Beta as compared to 2010
Time Period US beta radiation level N plt
March 15-31 5.09x background 1093 .001
April 1-30 2.01x background 1877 .001
May 1-23 1.15x background 1173 .011
26Fukushima Uranium Transport Facilitated by Use of
Seawater
- Uranyl peroxide enhanced nuclear fuel corrosion
in seawater - Christopher R. Armstronga,1, May Nymanb, Tatiana
Shvarevaa, Ginger E. Sigmonc, Peter C. Burnsc,d,
and Alexandra Navrotskya,2 - aPeter A. Rock Thermochemistry Laboratory and
Nanomaterials in the Environment, Agriculture and
Technology Organized Research Unit, University of
California Davis, Davis, CA 95616 - bSandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM
87185 - cDepartment of Civil Engineering and Geological
Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame,
IN 46556 and - dDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry,
University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556 - Contributed by Alexandra Navrotsky, November 30,
2011 (sent for review October 31, 2011) - Abstract
- The Fukushima-Daiichi nuclear accident brought
together compromised irradiated fuel and large
amounts of seawater in a high radiation field.
Based on newly acquired thermochemical data for a
series of uranyl peroxide compounds containing
charge-balancing alkali cations, here we show
that nanoscale cage clusters containing as many
as 60 uranyl ions, bonded through peroxide and
hydroxide bridges, are likely to form in solution
or as precipitates under such conditions. These
species will enhance the corrosion of the damaged
fuel and, being thermodynamically stable and
kinetically persistent in the absence of
peroxide, they can potentially transport uranium
over long distances.
27Significance of Fallout
- Mangano, J. Sherman, J. (2012). An Unexpected
Mortality Increase in the United States Following
Arrival of the Radioactive Plume from Fukushima
Is There a Correlation? International Journal of
Health Services, 42(1) 47-62. - Excess mortality statistics called by independent
researcher Robert Soltysik http//freepdfhosting.c
om/ccafb5715d.pdf http//i40.tinypic.com/2q39p8p.j
pg
28Significance?
- For every 10 mSv of low-dose ionizing radiation,
there was a 3 increase in the risk of age- and
sex-adjusted cancer over a mean follow-up period
of five years (hazard ratio 1.003 per
milliSievert, 95 confidence interval
1.0021.004). Cancer risk related to low-dose
ionizing radiation from cardiac imaging in
patients after acute myocardial infarction. By M
J. Eisenberg, Jonathan A., P. R. Lawler, M.
Abrahamowicz , Hugues R., L. Pilote
http//www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC305094
7/?toolpubmed - New Research on childhood leukemia and nuclear
plants suggests significant health effects from
low levels of ionizing radiation International
Journal of Cancer study by C. Sermage-Faure, D.
Laurier, S. Goujon-Bellec, M. Chartier, A.
Guyot-Goubin, J. Rudant, D. Hemon and J. Clavel,
Childhood leukemia around French nuclear power
plants the Geocap study, 2002 2007,
http//onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijc.274
25/pdf. - Prof. Yuri Bandazhevsky found that children
contaminated with cesium-137 producing 50
disintegrations per second (becquerels) per
kilogram of body weight suffered irreversible
heart damage . (Starrr, S. 2012 Health Threat
From Cesium 1-137. Japan Times Feb 16. Available
http//www.japantimes.co.jp/text/rc20120216a1.html
- Genomic Damage in Children Accidently Exposed to
Ionizing Radiation A Review of the Literature.
Fucic, A. et al. (2008). Mutation Research, 658,
111-123. Overall, the evidence from the
studiesreveals consistently increased chromosome
aberration and micronuclei frequency in exposed
than in referent children - New Understandings of radiation Bystander effect
and DNA Instability - New model emphasizes how low-dose radiation can
cause indirect damage to cells through the
bystander effect and through genomic instability.
The effects of low-dose ionizing radiation are
variable and can reduce DNA repair mechanisms,
operate lethally on cells or some instances
activate them depending upon type of radiation,
chemical environment, etc. - Dietrich Averbeck, a, Towards a New Paradigm for
Evaluating the Effects of Exposure to Ionizing
Radiation Mutation Research/Fundamental and
Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis Volume 687,
Issues 1-2, 1 May 2010 pages 7-12
29NRC NO HARMFUL LEVELS
- excerpt On Sunday, the International Atomic
Energy Agency offered a spot of good news. The
prevailing winds at Daiichi are blowing to the
northeast, out to sea, and should continue to do
so for the next three days. - If the wind carries the emissions to sea, that
will certainly minimize the human and
environmental impacts in Japan, said Timothy
Mousseau of the University of South Carolina, who
has spent the past decade studying the ecological
consequences of the 1986 Chernobyl disaster. - Such emissions would not endanger the United
States, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
announced Sunday in a statement. Given the
thousands of miles between the countries, the
United States is not expected to experience any
harmful levels of radioactivity. In other words,
the danger could simply dissipate over the
Pacific. - Ultimate impact of damage to Japan nuclear
reactors still unknown. Brian Vastag, Published
March 13, 2011http//www.washingtonpost.com/nation
al/ultimate-impact-of-damage-to-japan-nuclear-reac
tors-still-unknown/2011/03/13/ABbwoBU_story.html
30NRC Failed to Disclose Its Scenarios for Fallout
in Alaska
- Washington Post While assuring Americans
publicly that there was no danger, the NRC did
not disclose one worst-case scenario, which did
not rule out the possibility of radiation
exceeding safe levels for thyroid doses in
Alaska, the e-mails show. Because things were
uncertain, we considered it but the data that was
available .?.?. did not support that very
pessimistic scenario so no, it was not discussed
publicly at that point, NRC spokesman Scott
Burnell said. In the end, Alaska was not
affected. (Mufson, S. 2012, Feb 7. Messages
show conflict within NRC after Japans
earthquakes and tsunami WashingtonPost
http//www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/mes
sages-show-conflict-within-nrc-after-japan-earthqu
ake-and-tsunami/2012/01/09/gIQA2ll6uQ_print.html - Japan not alone in failing to protect population
The WSJs criticism of Japan may apply to NRC
The failure to disburse the preventive pills
follows other examples of how the Japanese
government failed to implement available measures
aimed at protecting local residents from the
harms of radiation Hayashi, Y. (2011, September
29). Japan Officials Failed to Hand Out
Radiation Pills in Quakes Aftermath
31Deliberate Government Censorship?
- No health effects are expected among the
Japanese people as a result of the events at
Fukushima, read a statement issued by the
Nuclear Energy Institute, the nuclear industry
trade group, at a June Washington Press
conference (Karl Grossman Fukushima and the
Nuclear Establishment, Counterpunch 2011, June
16 http//counterpunch.org/grossman06162011.html)
. - According to The Guardian, two days after the
earthquake British government authorities
contacted nuclear companies including
Westinghouse, Areva, EDF Energy, and the Nuclear
Industry Association to coordinate a public
relations campaign aimed at assuring the public
nuclear is safe in order to avoid resistance to a
new generation of nuclear plants planned for the
UK. In April, the UK office for nuclear
development met with nuclear companies in London
to "to discuss a joint communications and
engagement strategy aimed at ensuring we maintain
confidence among the British public on the safety
of nuclear power stations and nuclear new-build
policy in light of recent events at the Fukushima
nuclear power plant." - Rob Edwards Revealed British Government's Plan
To Play Down Fukushima, The Guardian (2011, June
30) http//www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/ju
n/30/british-government-plan-play-down-fukushima.
32ConclusionLessons from Government Censorship
- Public cannot currently rely on government to
accurately describe risks posed by an ongoing
disaster nor can they rely on government to
evaluate ongoing risks to health posed by
disasters - Government regulatory agencies are likely to
minimize risks in order to prevent panic and
public outrage
33Lessons from Government Censorship
- Japan betrayed citizens over radiation danger
ABC Ballarat Australian Broadcasting
Corporation ABC Australia. Mark Willacy January
19, 2012 - Japan has been accused of betraying its own
people by giving the American military
information about the spread of radiation from
Fukushima more than a week before it told the
Japanese public. - The mayor of a Japanese community abandoned
because of its proximity to the Fukushima nuclear
plant has told AM the governments actions are
akin to murder. - An official from Japans science ministry, which
was in charge of mapping the spread of radiation,
has acknowledged to AM that perhaps the public
should have been told about the dangers at the
same time the US military was informed. ... - Just three days after the tsunami crushed the
Fukushima nuclear plant, Japans science ministry
handed over computer predictions about the
radiation dispersal to the US military. ...
Namie Mayor Tamotsu Baba - Because we had no information, we were
unwittingly evacuating to an area where the
radiation level was high. So Im very worried
about the peoples health - I feel pain in my heart but also rage over the
poor actions of the government - Its not nice language, but I still think it was
an act of murder - What were they thinking when it came to peoples
dignity and lives? I doubt that they even thought
about our existence - Itaru Watanabe from the science ministry says the
government - According to the government panel investigating
the disaster, the information about the potential
spread of radiation could have been given to the
public - The science ministry should have told the
nuclear disaster task force to pass on the data
to the people But we didnt think of that
34Overview Lesson 2
- Government censorship and denial can succeed
because the mainstream media largely fail to
investigate government and Tepco reports. - Censorship/Data Manipulation evident in media
reporting - Pattern Exists Between Alarming Initial Reports
and Subsequent Efforts by Officials to Minimize
Perceptions of Danger, Which Are Reported
Uncritically by Mainstream Media - Media, including western media, may directly
withhold vital information deliberately and as a
result of their unwillingness to question or
investigate official pronouncements - Mainstream media may frame issues in ways that
inaccurately and/or misleadingly represent the
significance and/or severity of the information.
35Summary of Media Misrepresentations
- During the early days of the disaster the
Japanese press reported - That no explosions had occurred
- That no more explosions would occur within hours
of more explosions - That no meltdowns had occurred
- That no radiation had been released
- that the effects of radiation released was too
small to affect health - That contamination was limited to peoples
clothes - That no danger was posed by radioactive iodine in
tap water - That contaminated food was safe to eat
- US news media even less critical in reporting
than Japanese press, particularly given an
inability to formalize in print - that meltdowns had occurred
- that melt-throughs were reported
- that cold shutdown is a fantasy
- Japanese, American and other nations media all
systematically under-represented the scale of
radiation releases, their ongoing dynamics, and
their probable health effects - In particular, emphasis on no immediate effects
and no acute effects functioned to mislead
publics about severity of releases
36A Note on Method Analyzing Mainstream Press
Reporting in Japan, Canada, US
- We learn the most from the Japanese press when
they interview experts not employed by Tepco or
the national Japanese government. - Typically, an informative Japanese press release
is followed by contradictory statements from
Japanese government and Tepco officials - Observers must discern developments from leaked
comments by officials, Japanese bloggers
investigations (Ex-SKF and Fukushima Diary),
from FOIA requests, (Enformable) and from
crowd-sourced interpretations of the Tepco and
JNN reported plant data and webcams. - Observers interpretations of webcam are limited
by a variety of factors, including increasingly
poor visibility and outright censorship.
37Propaganda Techniques
- Or-well January 15, 2012 at 1146 am Log in to
Reply - RE-BUNK restating a position that is not
well-supported factually, or restating it with
details changed. Serves to promote confusion,
intended to support a weak or unsupportable
position. - E.G. Reactors are in cold-shutdown partial
meltdown - POST-BUNKING pro-active and after-the-fact.
Restates a position, or promotes false/misleading
info or adds false/misleading info in response to
new or discovered conditions. May serve to
reposition or even change a previously stated
position or intention. - No immediate health effects
- PRE-BUNKING falsely positioning future intended
acts or consequences, falsely framing terms of
future discussion, serves to obfuscate and/or
limit discovery through complete dialogue. - no Chernobyl
- http//enenews.com/study-authors-now-20000-excess-
u-s-deaths-after-fukushima-not-14000-follow-up-art
icle-looking-at-age-groups-cities-in-works
38 Japanese Authorities on Japanese Television
(Pre-Bunking ) No Meltdown, No Danger
- During the midst of these disasters, Japanese
authorities insisted that there was little to no
danger. On March 12, University of Tokyo
Professor Naoto Sekimura appeared repeatedly on
Japanese television to reassure local residents
that all was under control. - David McNeill of CNN reports Sekimuras
comments Only a small part of the fuel may
have melted and leaked outside, he said.
Residents near the power station should stay
calm, because most of the fuel remains inside
the reactor, which has stopped operating and is
being cooled. In April, a former nuclear
regulator who had served as a consultant to TEPCO
in April claimed publicly that there was no
danger of a total meltdown. - David McNeill Who's Telling the Truth On the
Fukushima Meltdown? CNNGo.Com (2011, June 15)
CNNGo.com http//www.cnngo.com/tokyo/life/tell-me-
about-it/david-mcneill-whos-telling-truth-fukushim
a-448215ixzz1PMTJwTk1. -
- Ex-Regulator Resigns from Tepco, Reuters video
(2011, April 19) http//www.reuters.com/article/v
ideo/idUSTRE73I10E20110419?videoId204721879.
39Lesson 2 Denying ExplosionsComparison of
Initial Reports With Subsequent Statements
(Post-Bunking)
- Report from Ex-SKF here Saturday, March 12, 2011
- Ex-SKF Explosion at Fukushima Nuclear Plant,
Evacuation Expanded to 20 Kilometers, Government
Doesnt Tell the whole Truth - 430 pm, disaster prevention radio is flowing
again. "There have been reports (that the
explosion), it was a mistake." - http//ex-skf.blogspot.com/2011/03/explosion-at-fu
kushima-i-nuclear-plant.html. His links for
sources - http//www.yomiuri.co.jp/national/news/20110313-OY
T1T00047.htm?frommain3 - http//translate.google.com/translate?slautotle
njsnprev_thlenieUTF-8layout2eotf1uht
tp3A2F2Fwww.yomiuri.co.jp2Fnational2Fnews2F2
0110313-OYT1T00047.htm3Ffrom3Dmain3
40Japanese Press Uncritically Repeat Government
Assertions No Radiation Leaks
- The Japan Times March 12, 2011, Saturday Kan
pledges full rescue responseKanako Takahara,
Staff writer Prime Minister Naoto Kan said the
government is doing its utmost to ensure the
public's safety and minimize the damage,
including dispatching the Self-Defense Forces for
rescue operations, following the massive
earthquake and tsunami that hit the Tohoku region
Friday. - "I ask the people to act with calm and continue
to listen carefully for information via
television and radio," Kan said in a televised
address.He said some nuclear power plants
stopped operations but the government detected no
radiation leaks.
41Sample Analysis Press Releases Aimed at
Minimizing Perceptions of Risk Emphasize No
Health Effects
- Jiji Press March 12 News Addresses Radiation
Releases - Jiji Press Ticker Service March 12, 2011 Saturday
1113 PM JST (Update) Blast Hits Japan N-Reactor
Building Container Unhurt - Because of the pressure release, radioactive
substance may have leaked. At 329 p.m. on the
fringe of the plant's grounds, the company
detected radiation of 1,015 microsieverts per
hour, almost equivalent to the maximum allowable
annual radiation exposure of 1,000 microsieverts
for a civilian. The radiation level was reduced
later. - Jiji Press March 13 Information Management
Aimed At Reducing Perceptions of Risk - March 13, 2011 Sunday 127 PM JST (Update) Safety
of Japanese Nuclear Reactor Secured after Blast
There appear to be little risk for now that a
massive amount of radioactive substances will
leak from the reactor, officials at the Nuclear
and Industrial Safety Agency said. Chief Cabinet
Secretary Yukio Edano said at a news conference
that the amount of radioactive substances
released due to the work is so small that human
health is not affected. (http//www.lexisnexis.com
.ezproxy1.lib.asu.edu/hottopics/lnacademic/?verbs
rcsi169235stermsPUBLICATION(KyodoNewsInterna
tionalTokyo))
42Media Report Official Statements Uncritically
Despite Absurdity Radiation Exposure Limited to
Clothes
- Japanese Residents May Have Been Exposed to
RadiationTokyo, March 13 Jiji Press Ticker
Service 1019 AM http//www.lexisnexis.com.ezproxy
1.lib.asu.edu/hottopics/lnacademic/?verbsrcsi16
9235stermsPUBLICATION(KyodoNewsInternationalT
okyo) - Nine residents may have been exposed to
radiation while being evacuated from an area near
a quake-damaged nuclear plant in northern Japan,
a government official said Sunday morning. The
residents were evacuated by bus from the town of
Futaba in Fukushima Prefecture, where the No. 1
Fukushima nuclear plant is located, Chief Cabinet
Secretary Yukio Edano said at a news conference. - Edano said the exposure was apparently limited to
their clothes, there will be no serious health
damage, Edano said
43March 14 No Danger After Initial Explosions
- Jiji Press Ticker Service March 14, 2011 Monday
1140 PM JST (Update) Partial Meltdown May Have
Occurred at Another Fukushima Reactor
http//www.lexisnexis.com.ezproxy1.lib.asu.edu/hot
topics/lnacademic/?verbsrcsi169235stermsPUBLI
CATION(KyodoNewsInternationalTokyo) - Tepco said Monday evening that the No. 2 reactor
of its quake-hit Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power
plant may have experienced a partial meltdown.
The fuel rods of the reactor, each of which is 4
meters long, became fully exposed to air because
of a substantial drop in the amount of cooling
water in the reactor, according to the firm's
report to the prefectural government of
Fukushima, northeastern Japan. For about two
hours after that, the reactor appeared to have
kept operating without any cooling water, and
this might have caused the fuel rods to melt - Tepco also said that the No. 1 and No. 2
reactors at its Fukushima No. 2 nuclear plant
were no longer in dangerous states as the
temperatures inside the reactors fell below 100
degrees Celsius. - Unit 2 Explodes March 15
44No Danger in From Radioactive Iodine in Tap Water
- This analysis of news framing was conducted by
blogger Ex-SKF March 19 comparing Kyodo News
Japanese and Kyodo News English
http//ex-skf.blogspot.com/2011/03/japan-earthquak
e-kyodo-news-english-vs.html - One of the major headlines in Kyodo News English
site (front page)Radioactive iodine beyond
limit detected in tap water in Fukushima - One of the major headlines in Kyodo News Japanese
site (front page) (translation)Radioactive
iodine and cesium detected in tap water in
Ibaragi, below limit, no health risk - Ex-SKF comments Is this some kind of a joke?
English language news for doom and gloom foreign
media consumption, and Japanese language news for
extend and pretend Japanese media consumption?
45Japanese Nuclear Regulators Still
Mis-Representing Scale of Disaster in April
- In April, a former nuclear regulator who had
served as a consultant to TEPCO in April claimed
publicly that there was no danger of a total
meltdown. - Ex-Regulator Resigns from Tepco, Reuters video
(2011, April 19) http//www.reuters.com/article/v
ideo/idUSTRE73I10E20110419?videoId204721879.
46Rating of Accident Failed to Reflect Severity of
Multiple Explosions and Massive Releases
- Fukushima N-Plant Accidents Rated Level 5, Worst
in Japan Anonymous. Jiji Press English News
Service Tokyo 19 Mar 2011. - Tokyo, March 18 (Jiji Press)--Japan on Friday
gave a provisional rating of Level 5 to accidents
at the No. 1, 2 and 3 reactors of Tokyo Electric
Power Co.'s quake-damaged Fukushima No. 1 nuclear
power plant, the worst for any nuclear accident
that has happened in the nation. - The No. 1, 2 and 3 reactors at the Fukushima
plant are seen to have experienced partial
meltdowns, the first such phenomenon in Japan, as
their cooling system were damaged by tsunami
waves unleashed by the 9.0-magnitude earthquake
that hit the Tohoku northeastern Japan region
including Fukushima Prefecture. - At the No. 1, 2 and 4 reactors of Tokyo Electric
Power's Fukushima No. 2 nuclear plant, the
pumping systems temporarily stopped working. The
nuclear safety agency thus gave a rating of Level
3 to the incidents. END
47US Media Pre-bunkingInitial Assurances
Findings
- Its simply impossible to imagine anything like
Chernobyl happening in these reactors, despite
all the problems theyre having.
http//www.npr.org/2011/03/14/134543680/sizing-up-
japan-s-nuclear-emergency-no-chernobyl - Stephen Kurczy Staff writer. The Christian
Science Monitor March 17, 2011 byline Fear of
Japan's nuclear crisis far exceeds actual risks,
say scientists Pop culture has long helped fuel
an irrational fear of radiation, and dire
warnings about Japan's embattled Fukushima
Daiichi nuclear power plant are likely overblown,
scientists say. - There is no question of a Chernobyl situation or
of anything like the same threat to human health
and safety An accident like Chernobyl cannot
happen againthis is a reactor of a different
generation. Even in the worst-case scenario of a
total coolant failure, the radiation released
will be hundreds of times less than from
Chernobyl. http//www.thedailybeast.com/articles/
2011/03/13/why-japans-nuclear-meltdown-is-no-chern
obyl.html
Summary Report of RSMC Beijing on Fukushima
Nuclear Accident Emergency Response WORLD
METEOROLOGICAL ORGANIZATION CBS/CG-NERA/Doc. 5.4
(27.10.2011) Nuclear leaks occurred in
Fukushima and lasted for five days. The total
release amount was equal to that of Chernobyl
nuclear explosion p. 4
48Lesson 2 WSJ Unable to Write Full Melt-Down
- Article Power, Stephen Smith, Rebecca (2011,
July 18). Nuclear plant safety proposals put on
fast track. The Wall Street Journal, p. A3. - The print version of this article (referenced
above) described the Fukushima mega-disaster as
a partial meltdown - Article Nuclear Plant Loses Electricity in
Temblor. The Wall Street Journal August 24 - Electricity is needed to keep the reactor cores
covered with coolant and to keep safe
temperatures in spent fuel pools. Problems in
both those areas led to the near-meltdown of
reactors at the Fukushima Daiichi plant in Japan,
following a 9.0 earthquake and tsunami on March
11. http//online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405311
1903461304576526642400085456.html
49December WSJ Finally Announces Meltdown
- Wall Street Journal finally reports Reactor Core
Melted Fully, Japan SaysFuel Breeched Vessel
Floor, Operator Says, in its Gravest Status
Report M. Obe T. Fowler (2011, Dec 1), p. A8 - one reactors molten core likely burned through
its primary containment chamber and then ate as
far as three-quarters of the way through the
concrete in a secondary vessel - The New York Times had reported this level of
meltdown May 25 Japan Sees Signs of 2 More
Meltdowns by H. Tabuchi p. 10 - The plants operator also said that it was
possible that the pressure vessels in the three
stricken reactors, which house the uranium fuel
rods, had been breeched as well. But most of the
fuel remained inside the vessels, the company
said far from a more severe nuclear meltdown in
which molten fuel penetrates the ground, a
calamity known as the China Syndrome
50Meltdown was Really a Melt-Through, Reported in
June by the Yomiuri
- 'Melt-through' at Fukushima? / Govt report to
IAEA suggests situation worse than
meltdownhttp//www.yomiuri.co.jp/dy/national/T110
607005367.htm"Nuclear fuel in three reactors at
the Fukushima No. 1 nuclear plant has possibly
melted through pressure vessels and accumulated
at the bottom of outer containment vessels,
according to a government report obtained Tuesday
by The Yomiuri Shimbun."A "melt-through"--when
melted nuclear fuel leaks from the bottom of
damaged reactor pressure vessels into containment
vessels--is far worse than a core meltdown and is
the worst possibility in a nuclear accident. - Justin McCurry Fukushima Nuclear Plant May Have
Suffered Melt-Through, Japan Admits, The
Guardian (2011, Jun3 8) http//www.guardian.co.uk
/world/2011/jun/08/fukushima-nuclear-plant-melt-th
rough?CMPtwt_gu - Julian Ryall Nuclear Fuel Has Melted Through
Base of Fukushima Plant, The Telegraph (2011,
June 9) http//www.telegraph.co.uk/news/8565020/
Nuclear-fuel-has-melted-through-base-of-Fukushima-
plant.html - TEPCO Melted fuel ate into containment vessel
http//www3.nhk.or.jp/daily/english/20111130_39.ht
ml
51No Major U.S. Newspaper Reported the Melt-Through
in June-Nov
- Searched ABI and Lexus-Nexus using Fukushima and
melt-through, Fukushima and meltthrough and
Fukushima and China syndrome - Japanese Press Melt-through at Fukushima? Govt
report to IAEA suggests situation worse than
meltdown. The Daily Yomiuri(Tokyo), June 8, 2011
Wednesday, Pg. 1 - 1 US PAPER PICKED UP THIS REPORT INDIRECTLY. NO
MENTION OF A MELT-THROUGH BE FOUND IN US MAJOR
NEWSPAPERS AFTER THIS ONE REPORT UNTIL DEC
52The 1 indirect report of the melt-through was
buried and on page A10.
- Chico Harlan (2011, June 8) Japan to create
independent nuclear agency. The Washington Post,
A10. - As the disaster unfolded, Japanese authorities
relied on computer models and uncertain data
while trying to assess the full scope of the
damage to the reactor cores. Even now, it will
probably be years before guesses about units 1, 2
and 3 turn into facts. But the government's
admission Tuesday of a possible melt-through
reaffirmed assumptions held by outside
scientists. - "It's much like the Japanese government conceding
that gravity is a possibility," David Lochbaum,
an independent nuclear power expert, wrote in an
e-mail. "Studies for decades have consistently
concluded that a reactor core without cooling and
makeup will overheat, melt, slump to the bottom
of the reactor vessel, and burn through the
vessel wall and drop on to the drywell floor."
53Australian Media Can Type It Melt-Through
- The Age (Melbourne, Australia) June 10, 2011
Friday First EditionMeltdown to the core
JAPANSECTION NEWS In Brief Overseas Pg.
15LENGTH 121 wordsTOKYO. Molten nuclear fuel
in three reactors at the Fukushima No. 1 power
plant is likely to have burnt through pressure
vessels, not just the cores. It is the first time
Japanese authorities have admitted the
possibility that the fuel suffered "melt-through"
- more serious than a core meltdown. The report,
which is to be submitted to the International
Atomic Energy Agency, said fuel rods in reactors
Nos. 1, 2 and 3 had probably not only melted, but
also breached their inner containment vessels and
accumulated in the outer steel containment
vessels. The plant's operator, Tokyo Electric
Power (Tepco), says it believes the molten fuel
is being cooled by water that has built up in the
bottom of the three reactor buildings. -
54Lesson 2 Media Censorship Japanese Gov. and
Media Report Cold Shutdown Despite Increasing
Evidence of Iodine-131 and Spiking Cesium in Dec
2011.
- In this 4 minute clip, Prime Minister Noda of
Japan explains that the claim of "cold shutdown"
of the reactors was based on the average
temperature of the overall reactor pressure
vehicles (not bottom). - PM Noda refused to address journalists' questions
concerning the status of the fuel rods given
Tepco's previous admission that melt-throughs had
occurred. http//www.youtube.com/watch?vMxUQKJwk
IeYfeatureplayer_embedded - Fukushima Diary posted finding of Iodine-131 in
dehydration sludge, sampled between 12/1 12/6
in Japan. Original link here http//www.gesui.metr
o.tokyo.jp/oshi/infn0579.htm - Also here http//www.pref.gunma.jp/cate_list/ct000
05089.html - Evidence of Increasing detections of Iodine-131,
which has an 8 day half life, indicate ongoing
fission. - Dr. Chris Busby also asserts ongoing fission in
this Dec 27 Russia Today interview
http//www.youtube.com/watch?v1F0uFAWV7uc
55Cold Shutdown?
- The Mainichi Daily News News Navigator What is
a 'cold shutdown' at the Fukushima nuclear plant?
December 17 http//mdn.mainichi.jp/perspectives/ne
ws/20111217p2a00m0na015000c.html - Excerpted "Question What does it mean when a
nuclear reactor has achieved a "cold shutdown?" - Answer It means the reactors have been
stabilized and shut down. Under normal
circumstances this means control rods have been
inserted into the gaps between the fuel rods in
the reactor, and the temperature of the water in
the reactor pressure con