PowerPoint Presentation Putting the Robots to Work: An Automated Storage

1 / 37
About This Presentation
Title:

PowerPoint Presentation Putting the Robots to Work: An Automated Storage

Description:

Number of Views:110
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 38
Provided by: Libr67
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: PowerPoint Presentation Putting the Robots to Work: An Automated Storage


1
IUG Boston, 2004 (E7)
Automated Storage Retrieval System the Link
to III
Paula Hammett Sandra Heft
2
Sonoma State University Library
  • Jean Charles Schulz Information
    Center,Rohnert Park, CA
  • (45 mi N of San Francisco)
  • 1 of 23 campuses of California State University
    System
  • Public liberal arts and sciences
  • 6996 FTES
  • Collection size 650,000

3
When you run out of room
You can
  • Stop buying materials or weed heavily.
  • Install open compact shelving.
  • Use off site storage.
  • dead storage - items unavailable
  • retrievable remote storage
  • Build a much larger building with more shelving
    and lots of room for growth.
  • Construction of our new building was approved at
    state level only if we employed space-saving
    mechanisms.
  • Or, you can build an

4
Automated Storage Retrieval System
  • A random-access, on-site robotic storage
    retrieval system
  • linked to the Innovative online catalog
  • We call it an ARS (automated retrieval system)
    to
  • De-emphasize the storage.
  • Emphasize the retrieval.
  • (Students call it Snoopy)

5
Advantages
  • requires 1/7th footprint of open stacks.
  • easy to track use patterns.
  • efficient for staff use.
  • encourages active current collection in open
    stacks.
  • allows retention of lesser-used material.
  • lower construction costs.
  • its expandable--more aisles can be added by
    taking out small parking lot behind building.
  • can foster cooperative collection development
    with other institutions.
  • allows for last copy storage of printed journals
    for consortia.
  • used often in industry now expanding into
    libraries.

6
Potential disadvantages
  • Vulnerable to power outages.
  • Need backup plan.
  • Rare mechanical breakdown or maintenance
    downtime.
  • Good training allows onsite staff to
    troubleshoot, repair, maintain system
  • Occasional misplaced item.
  • Transaction reports usually help find it.
  • Regular bin inventories during off times are done
    to consolidate bins and verify accuracy.

7
What does it look like?
  • 3-story room.
  • 45 x 110.
  • 4950 sq.ft. footprint.
  • Public viewing windows.
  • gt750,000-item capacity.
  • Other libraries have up to 2 million items.
  • 2-hour firewalls.

8
  • 6000 metal bins (2x4 footprint).
  • 5 different heights 6, 10, 12, 15, 18.
  • Each bin can hold 750 lbs.
  • Bins may be divided into sectors.

9
  • 3 aisles, each with own crane.
  • 32 bays wide and 31 tiers high.
  • 2 workstations per aisle with barcode scanners
    printers.
  • Additional terminal at Circulation Desk.
  • Add new aisles to expand system.

10
What goes into the ARS?
  • Bound periodicals.
  • Most monographs that havent circulated in 5
    years.
  • Annual reviews, Advances in , etc., which are
    more than 5 years old.
  • Other low-use items.
  • Shared resources with other California State
    University campuses.

11
The Interface to III
  • Innovative wrote custom programming for us to
    create this interface. Now available as a
    product.
  • Contact III for pricing information.
  • Each installation may require some special
    programming.
  • III worked directly with our ARS vendorHK
    Systems, Inc., of Park City, Utah.
  • Other vendors are available (search web for
    automated storage and retrieval for more vendor
    names)
  • All installations are unique, so make sure ARS
    vendor and III are working with the same
    specifications.

12
How it works for library users
  • User looks up item in Snoopy catalog.
  • Finds volume needed.
  • Clicks button to request.

13
If all goes well
  • User types in name, barcode, etc., clicks Submit
    button.
  • Receives Request Accepted message.
  • Picks up item at Circulation Desk.
  • Elapsed time usually 10 -15 minutes.

14
If not,
  • User receives error message.
  • Each message provides generic, but next-step
    advice to user.
  • We customized our error messages and included
    code numbers to provide more specific info to
    staff.

15
How it works Behind the scenes
  • When user clicks on button
  • III software talks to HK software, sending item
    barcode, call number, author, and title.
  • HK software responds to III, verifying volume is
    in ARS.
  • III software prompts user for name.
  • When user enters name and clicks Submit, pick
    request is sent by III software to HK software.
  • Both systems wait for human intervention.

16
How it works for Circulation Staff
  • Library staff requests pick from HK computer.
  • Robotic crane locates appropriate bin.
  • Bin pulled delivered to end of aisle.
  • Staff consults pick list on HK workstation
    screen to verify item barcode, title, etc.

17
  • Last 4 digits of barcode written on top or face
    of books.
  • Pick list identifies bin sector.
  • Student worker pulls item from bin inserts
    printed pull slip, which identifies requester on
    library hold shelf.
  • Straps item into ETV carrier.
  • ETV carrier delivers item to Circ Desk.

18
Tech Services responsibilities
  • TS currently responsible for III side, but this
    function will move to MilCirc from MilCat with
    new release.
  • When items are transferred to ARS, staff updates
    bib location(s) and changes item location to one
    of our ARS codes
  • ARS, ARSCI, ARSDO, ARSJO, ARSME, ARSMF, ARSRF,
    ARSRG, ARSSP, ARCTH, ARSTS.
  • This will change when function is moved to
    MilCirc.
  • These codes all display as Click to Request in
    Snoopy (except special collections) but may have
    different loan rules.
  • Separate item codes also allow us to keep
    statistics of types of materials in ARS.

19
  • TS staff also changes IMESSAGE field in item
    record to a SEND TO ARS.
  • This code prompts III circ module to display a
    SEND TO ARS message to circ staff when checking
    in materials our policy is to scan all
    materials before reshelving.
  • This ensures ARS materials are not mis-shelved in
    open stacks.
  • When items are transferred out of ARS, staff
    changes item location to reflect change and
    deletes IMESSAGE code.
  • In the new MilCirc, ARS will be a temporary
    location (e.g. reserve), so item location will
    automatically revert to original location when
    item is removed from ARS returned to open
    shelving.

20
Loading materials into the ARS
  • Materials added to the ARS need to be scanned at
    the HK workstation before being placed in
    bin.The process ensures that the HK software
    knows which bin contains each stored item.

21
If only a few items are being loaded,
  • Each item is scanned at HK workstation, twice.
  • Once to tell the HK software what the barcode
    number, author, title, and call number are, AND
  • Once more to tell the HK software that the item
    is being placed into a specific bin and sector
    within that bin.

22
Batch loading
  • To add a large number of materials to the ARS,
    such as an initial load or when open stacks are
    too full, it is easier to add the item
    information first.
  • Currently use character-based mode will use
    MilCirc soon.

23
The SSU Initial Load
  • Added 200,000 items for our initial load.
  • Used our largest review files (60K records).
  • Took approximately 12-14 hours for each review
    file (1 record per second).
  • Rapid updated each review file after it was
    loaded with an ARS loaded note in the item
    record so we did not keep loading the same
    records!

24
Problems weve run into
  • WebOPAC says item is in ARS but its not.
  • WebOPAC says item is in another location but it
    is in ARS.
  • Barcode linked to wrong bib record.
  • These are rare, human errors which we fix when we
    find.

25
User Technology Support Staff
  • Primarily responsible for HK (i.e. mechanical)
    side.
  • Lots of work on initial setup, partly due to
    equipment needing fine tuning calibration.
  • Annual maintenance contract very useful
  • in proactively identifying and addressing
    potential problems.
  • ensuring highest safety standards are met.
  • Some weekly routine maintenance.
  • Minor mechanical problems twice a month.
  • Frequency between problems getting longer.

26
What users think Students
  • Students seem to love it because they dont have
    to go to the shelves look for materials--its
    delivered!
  • Materials remaining on shelves tend to be more
    current or high-use items.
  • Most students dont mind losing stacks
    browsability in exchange for delivery.
  • Users may request several items and pick them up
    all at once.

27
What users think Faculty
  • Initially, some not thrilled with the idea .
  • Now, most appreciate speed of transactions
    convenience of paging items from their offices.
  • Fewer isolated concerns about losing the ability
    to browse shelves for monographs.
  • Many have not yet discovered browsing
    capabilities on III.
  • Appreciate ARS rather than off-site storage or
    heavy weeding.

28
What users thinkCirculation Staff
  • Circ staff appreciate the ARS because
  • Books are easy to retrieve are put back in
    random order - no shelf reading for ARS items.
  • They can track an item for patrons with great
    clarity, using the HK audits reports.
  • MilCirc will also offer tracking.
  • Faster for a patron to get an item from the ARS
    than it is for them to retrieve it from the shelf
    .
  • The system, after working out initial kinks, is
    extremely dependable.
  • 200-250 picks per week.

29
What users think Reference/Instruction Staff
  • Have identified areas for more user instruction
  • Train users to do-it-yourself on ARS requests.
    (Experimented to find best wording on request
    button.)
  • Emphasize importance of using catalog.
  • Teach call number browsing through Innovative.
  • Customized ARS error messages explain to the user
    why item is not available.

30
What users think ILL LINK (i.e. InnReach)
Staff
  • ILL LINK staff request items as they verify
    call numbers/circulation status on paging slips.
  • ILL LINK staff time dramatically conserved
    since the materials are delivered to Circ Desk.
  • Eliminates time-consuming step of going to
    shelves to pull ILL requests.
  • Mis-shelved items are minimized in ARS.

31
What users think Tech Services Circulation
  • Working with Innovative on a number of
    enhancements to the interface
  • A better log.
  • More user-friendly batch load process with
    MilCirc.
  • Adding or deleting items via MilCirc.
  • Allow requesting ARS items from Search/Hold in
    MilCirc.
  • Requires good teamwork and open communication in
    order to to put the pieces in place and have it
    run smoothly.

32
Features we wish we had
  • Inconvenient to count internal use.
  • Need to automatically increment the internal use
    counter in the item record when the item is
    picked from the ARS
  • Cannot use the staff modules to request
    materials.
  • e.g., to pull items from the ARS withdraw them
    or transfer to non-ARS location, must use the ARS
    REQUEST button on the WebOPAC.(This will change
    with new MilCirc release.)
  • Cannot tell by looking at an item record if it
    has been loaded into the ARS database.
  • In the batch add mode, the ARS software will
    accept the same barcode number over and over
    again.

33
What does it cost?
  • Staffing (higher for start-up)
  • ARS Supervisor 19,000 (LA III_at_ 50)
  • III coordinator, etc 3,500 (tech serv _at_
    5)
  • Mechanical 6,000(building
    engineer _at_10)
  • HK software 9,500(1 x UTS staff _at_
    25)
  • Student assistants 8,000(1 x librarys open
    hours) Total staffing 46,000
  • Construction Costs
    2,057,000
  • Including design training
  • Annual Operating Costs
  • Maint. contract 12,000
  • Spare parts 5,000
  • Staffing 46,000
  • Total Annual Costs 63,000 ( 8 -
    21 cents per item / year)

34
Are there cost savings?
  • Staffing/OE
  • Minimal additional staffing.
  • No off-site storage costs.
  • No courier to off-site storage.
  • Faster reshelving.
  • No shelf-reading.
  • Rental income for storing for other libraries.
  • Construction
  • No off-site land needed.
  • Compressed space for storage less square
    footage.
  • Possible accommodation on existing site.
  • Easy expansion.

35
Who else has one?
  • CSU, Northridge, (1991)
  • Eastern Michigan University, (1998)
  • University of Nevada, Las Vegas, (2001) III
    libraries
  • Santa Clara University (Summer 2004)
  • Valparaiso University (Summer 2004)
  • San Francisco State University(in planning
    stages)
  • Etc

36
Where do I get one?
  • HK Systems
  • Salt Lake City, UTwww.hksystems.com
  • Innovative Interfaces
  • Emeryville, CAwww.iii.com
  • Other ASRS vendors are available, e.g. SwissLog.

37
For more infohttp//libweb.sonoma.edu/about/ars/
iug2004.ppt
Paula Hammett Collection Development Web
Coordinator hammett_at_sonoma.edu 707-664-3912 Sandy
Heft Technical Services Coordinator sandy.heft_at_so
noma.edu 707-664-2528 Jean Charles Schulz
Information Center Sonoma State
University Rohnert Park, CA 94928
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com