Earnings - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

Earnings

Description:

All data is from the 1986 PGA tour. Estimates of the Returns to Skill ... Shmanske surveyed PGA golfers on how much they practiced each skill each week ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:76
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: rsa2
Category:
Tags: earnings | pga

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Earnings


1
Earnings Skills of Pro Golfers
  • Stephen Shmanske, "Earnings and Skills of Pro
    Golfers," Atlantic Economic Journal, September
    1992.

2
Introduction
  • Shmanske estimated an earnings equation for pro
    golfers.
  • An earnings equations typically looks like
  • Earnings a b1Skills b2Experience b3Other
    Factors
  • These equations are widely used to explore the
    economic impact of skills, discrimination,
    education, and other factors on earnings of
    individual workers.
  • Shmanske is interested in the relative impact of
    golfing skills on the earnings of a pro golfer.
    A question we will consider is whether his
    estimates of the relative impact of driving
    putting are close to what we obtain from our
    scoring equation.

3
Introduction The Equi-marginal Principle
  • We will also examine an important principle
    implied by economic optimization the
    equi-marginal principle.
  • Example suppose that there are two inputs, A
    B, with marginal products MPA and MPB. If these
    inputs cost PA and PB per unit, optimal input use
    implies that
  • MPA/PA MPB/PB
  • In this case, we are concerned with the
    allocation of practice time to different skills.
    Assuming the cost of practicing is the same
    across skills, the equi-marginal principle
    implies that the marginal product of practice is
    the same for each skill, i.e. for skills AB
  • MPA MPB
  • If this were not the case, one would increase
    output by reallocating practicing time to where
    MP was higher. Do this until they equalize.

4
Skill Variables
  • SKILLS VARIABLE MEASUREMENT
  • DRIVING
  • DISTANCE DRIVDIST YARDS OFF TEE
  • ACCURACY DRIVACC FAIRWAYS HIT
  • APPROACH SHOTS IRONS GREENS IN REG
  • BUNKER SHOTS SANDSAVE PARS FROM SAND
  • PUTTING PUTTPER PUTTS/HOLE (IN REG)
  • SHORT GAME SHORTGAME PUTTS/HOLE (X REG)
  •  
  • EXPERIENCE EXPER YEARS ON PGA TOUR
  •  

5
Earnings Equations
  • 2 MEASURES OF EARNINGS
  • WINNINGS EARNED ON TOUR IN 1986
  • WINPER EARNED PER TOURNAMENT ENTERED
  •  
  • EQUATION 1
  • WINNINGS a b1DRIVDIST b2DRIVACC b3IRONS
  • b4SANDSAVE b5PUTTPER b6SHORTGAME
    b7EXPERIENCE
  •  
  • EQUATION 2
  • WINPER a' b'1DRIVDIST b'2DRIVACC b'3IRONS
  • b'4SANDSAVE b'5PUTTPER b'6SHORTGAME
    b'7EXPERIENCE
  • All data is from the 1986 PGA tour.

6
Estimates of the Returns to Skill
  • Dept Variable Annual Earnings /Tournament
  • Constant 3,192,571 (2.02) 164,683 (2.54)
  • DRIVDIST 6,775 (2.76) 341.1 (3.39)
  • DRIVACC 2063 (0.51) 170.0 (1.02)
  • IRONS 16,037 (2.15) 495.2 (1.62)
  • SANDSAVE 64.99 (0.29) -4.23 (-0.47)
  • PUTTPER -2,929,565 (-4.76) -136,040 (-5.31)
  • SHORTGAME -453,858 (-1.14) -35,549 (-2.19)
  • EXPERNCE 1539 (0.59) 202.5 (1.91)
  • adj R2 .439 .516

7
Relative Returns to Skills
  • Most important skills as measured by precision
    (t-stats) of estd coefficients
  • Driving Distance (2.76, 3.39)
  • Irons (2.15, 1.62)
  • (hitting greens in regulation)
  • Putting (-4.76), -5.31)
  • Use WINPER regression to evaluate relative
    returns to driving vs. putting

8
Relative Returns to Skills (2)
  • Let D DRIVDIST
  • Let P PUTTPER
  • From Table
  • b'1 ?W/?D 341.1
  • b'5 ?W/?P -136,040
  • On an Earnings Isoquant
  • ?WINPER 0 (?W/?D)?D (?W/?P)?P
  • ?D/?P - b'5/b'1

W1
D
W2
?D
?P
P
9
Relative Returns to Skills (3)
  • What is Slope of Earnings Isoquant?
  • How much must D increase if P increases to keep
    ?W0?
  • ?D/?P - b'5/b'1 136,040/341.1 398.82
  • You must drive the ball 400 yards further to make
    up for 1 putt/hole!
  • Divide b'5 by 72 to make it one putt per
    tournament
  • -b'5/b'1 1889/341.1 5.54 yards
  • You can buy one missed putt per tournament if you
    drive the ball 5.5 yards further on every hole.
  • This is less than our estimate (7.9 yards) from
    the scoring isoquant. Part of this difference
    may be because pros are driving the ball 350
    yards now, but putting skill has not changed.

10
Practice Time and the Equi-marginal Principle
  • Shmanske surveyed PGA golfers on how much they
    practiced each skill each week
  • Estimated equation linking skills to practice
    time
  • Variables
  • St -- current stock of skill
  • St-1 -- stock of skill from prior period
  • PRACS -- Hours of practice per week
  • Equation St a St-1 b PRACS

11
Marginal Product of Practice
  • Marginal Products
  • Coefficient Estimates t-stats adj R2
  • bD 1.789 2.40 .670
  • bP -.006 -4.23 .616
  • 1 extra hour of practice increases D by 2 yards,
    reduces P by -.006
  • (.4 putts per tournament or 2.5 hours per putt
    per tournament)
  • patience patience patience!!!

12
Marginal Revenue Product of Practice
  • Use value of skills from annual winnings
    regression adjust to weekly measure (divide by
    52).
  • How much does one marginal hour of practice per
    week increase weekly earnings?
  • MRPD (?WINNINGS/?D)/52 bD
  • (6775/52)1.789 233
  • MRPP (?WINNINGS/?P)/52 bP
  • (-2,979,565/52)(-.006) 344

13
Practice the Equi-marginal Principle
  • Putting practice is 50 more valuable than
    driving
  • MRPP 344
  • MRPD 233
  • Is something wrong with these estimates?
  • they violate the equi-marginal principle.
  • Earnings would increase by 111 if one spent 1
    hour less driving (-233) but 1 more hour putting
    (344)
  • Why aren't golfers doing this?
  • a) these estimates are bogus
  • b) they're stupid
  • c) there may be different costs to driving and
    putting
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com