Chapter 5 Stop and Frisk and Stationhouse Detentions - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Chapter 5 Stop and Frisk and Stationhouse Detentions

Description:

A governmental intrusion into a person's reasonable expectation of privacy ... The greater the degree of police control over a person, the closer it is to an arrest ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:642
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: ericjf
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Chapter 5 Stop and Frisk and Stationhouse Detentions


1
  • Chapter 5 Stop and Frisk and Stationhouse
    Detentions

2
What is a Search?
  • A governmental intrusion into a persons
    reasonable expectation of privacy
  • This is the test that the courts use to determine
    if a search occurred and whether the 4th
    amendment applies

3
Kyllo v. United States 2001
  • Used evidence obtained by use of thermal imaging
    device to obtain warrant to search for marijuana
  • Court ruled that when the govt. explores the
    detail of a private home that would have
    previously been unknowable without physical
    intrusion, then it is a search, and it is
    presumptively unreasonable without a warrant

4
What is a seizure?
  • When a person has been restrained of freedom is a
    manner where a reasonable person would not have
    felt free to leave

5
Brendlin v. California (2007)
  • When police make a traffic stop, a passenger in
    the car, like the driver, is seized for Fourth
    Amendment purposes and so may challenge the
    stops constitutionality.

6
Stop and Frisk
  • Can a police officer stop a person, question the
    person, and frisk the person without p/c?
  • Stop and Frisk is a form of search and seizure
    but less intrusive than an arrest and full blown
    search

7
Stop and Frisk
  • Terry v. Ohio (1968) facts of case
  • Declared stop and frisk based on reasonable
    suspicion constitutional
  • Stop and Frisk are two separate acts requiring
    different elements for legality

8
Stop
  • A stop is justified only if the police officer
    has reasonable suspicion that criminal activity
    is about to take place or has just taken place
  • Need articulable facts to justify
  • The stop is an investigatory process that is
    designed to prevent criminal activity
  • An officer cannot arbitrarily stop people and
    make them stop

9
What is Reasonable Suspicion?
  • Lower degree of certainty than p/c around 30
    certainty
  • Must be anchored in specific objective facts and
    logical conclusions based on the officers
    experience
  • General considerations as the high crime nature
    of the area are no substitute for specific facts
    about suspect

10
What is reasonable suspicion?
  • Can be based on facts and circumstances within
    officers own knowledge, information from someone
    else, and even an anonymous tip if corroborated

11
What is reasonable suspicion?
  • Florida v. J.L. (2000)
  • The Court held that an anonymous tip that a
    person is carrying a gun does not, without more,
    justify a police officers stop of that person

12
What is reasonable suspicion?
  • Illinois v. Wardlow (1999) flight from officer
    creates reasonable suspicion to justify a stop
  • Stop can escalate into p/c to arrest

13
What is reasonable suspicion?
  • Bond v. US (2000)
  • Involved a border patrol agent boarding a bus to
    check the immigration status of its passengers
  • Court ruled that agents physical manipulation
    of a persons carry-on bag without reasonable
    suspicion violated 4th Amendment

14
Are Drug Courier Profiles Valid?
  • May a person who fits a drug courier profile be
    stopped by the police?
  • Yes, if based on totality of the circumstances
    rather than on drug courier profile alone

15
Scope and Duration of a Stop
  • How long can a stop last?
  • No exact time limit set - Cannot be any longer
    than necessary under the circumstances to achieve
    its purpose

16
Scope and Duration of a Stop
  • Suspect does not have to answer questions except
    what is mandated by law
  • Investigative method must be least intrusive to
    verify or dispel officers suspicion
  • The greater the degree of police control over a
    person, the closer it is to an arrest
  • Rule of thumb keep the person where you found
    them

17
Frisk
  • A frisk does not always follow a stop they are
    two distinct acts
  • A frisk should follow only if there is nothing in
    the initial stages of the encounter that would
    dispel the fear of safety of the officer or
    others

18
Frisk
  • Purpose of frisk protection of officer and
    others

19
Extent of Frisk
  • A frisk is limited to a pat-down of outer
    clothing and only an object that feels like a
    weapon may be properly seized
  • If it does not feel like a weapon cant be seized

20
Extent of Frisk
  • Exception if immediately apparent that the
    object is contraband then can be seized because
    have p/c
  • Minnesota v. Dickerson (1993)
  • Stop and frisk can lead to arrest if p/c is
    established

21
Stop and Frisk Applies to Motor Vehicles
  • Police may conduct a brief search of a vehicle
    after a stop, if officer has reasonable suspicion
    that the motorist is dangerous and there might be
    a weapon in vehicle
  • This applies even if the person is no longer in
    the vehicle

22
Stop and Frisk Applies to Motor Vehicles
  • What is the scope of the frisk in a motor
    vehicle?
  • Anywhere in the passenger compartment of the
    vehicle where a weapon can be found or hidden
    any place a person can gain quick access to a
    weapon
  • Not locked containers or the trunk

23
Stationhouse Detention
  • Bringing a person to the police station for
    interrogation or fingerprinting requires probable
    cause unless the person consents
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com