Title: Genetic Testing for Melanoma Risk Stratification
1Genetic Testing for Melanoma Risk Stratification
- Sancy Leachman, MD, PhD
- Assistant ProfessorHuntsman Cancer Institute and
the Department of DermatologyUniversity of Utah
Health Sciences Center - Pacific Dermatologic AssociationAugust 9, 2008
2Hereditary Melanoma Nevus Phenotype Lots and
Atypical
3Hereditary MelanomaNevus Phenotype Many, Mainly
Small
4Hereditary MelanomaNevus Phenotype Few, Few/No
Atypical
Phenotype ? Genotype
5Other Phenotypic MarkersConstitutional Risk
6Wild-Type and Homozygous R Variant MC1R
7Heterozygous for MC1R Variants
Phenotype ? Genotype
8Risk EstimationFamily History is Greatest Risk
Factor
Relative Risk
- Member of melanoma family 35 70
- Previous primary melanoma 8.5
- Multiple nevi/atypical nevi 2 12
- Red hair 2.4 4
- Family history of melanoma 2 3
- History of blistering sunburn 2 3
- Freckling 2-3
- Blue eyes 1.6
- Skin type I 1.4
Kefford RF, et al. J Clin Oncol.
1999173245-3251.
9p16 Mutation CarriersMelanoma and Pancreatic
Adenocarcinoma
- p16 Tumor Suppressor controlling the cell cycle
- Higher lifetime risk of melanoma
- United Kingdom 58
- United States 76
- Australia 91
- Increased risk of pancreatic cancer
- (11-17 in some families)
- Red hair increases risk
Bishop DT et al. J Natl Cancer Inst.
200294894-903. Rulyak SJ et al. Cancer.
200398(4)798-804 and Paker JF et al. Arch
Dermatol. 20031391019-1025.
10Few Melanomas Are Hereditary
11Case Presentation
- A dermatologist from Kentucky contacted our
genetic counseling group to discuss how to
perform genetic testing on a patient - 64 y/o nurse practitioner with dysplastic nevus
syndrome, a personal history of melanoma, no
children - No known family history of melanoma or pancreatic
cancer - Patient wishes to have p16 genetic testing
performed on a self-pay basis - Patient is interested in participating in
available research protocols for melanoma
12Should Clinical Genetic Testing be Offered to
This Patient?
- Yes
- No
- Maybe
13Issues for Consideration
- Statistically, the patient has only between a
0.2-2.0 risk of carrying a p16 mutation (Aitken
et al, and Begg et al) - The patient does NOT have features suggestive of
elevated risk for carriage of a p16 mutation
(Hansen et al. Lancet Oncology. 2004) - Multiple primary melanomas
- Two or more other family members with melanoma
- Family member with pancreatic cancer
- Because she has already had melanoma, there is
little chance that a positive or negative test
result will alter prevention, early detection,
management, or follow-up recommendations - She expressed the desire for testing and
willingness to pay - Knowledge of status may provide psychological
benefit to her because of her curiosity and
professional background - If p16-positive (unlikely), other family members
could be tested and pancreatic cancer screening
(if available) could be offered - Research protocols are available to p16
mutation-tested individuals
14Candidates for p16 TestingRule of Threes
3 cancer events in a family (any combination
of melanoma and pancreatic cancer) 68
3 melanomas in a family (any degree of
relationship) 12-41
3 melanomas in an individual 5-23
Only 1 criteria needs to be met. Consideration
should be given to age of diagnosis, UV exposure,
skin type, and ethnicity, as there may be
exceptions to the Rule of Threes.
15Should Clinical Genetic Testing be Offered to
This Patient?
- Yes
- No
- Maybe
Answer Based on typical criteria used to
evaluate a patient for genetic testing, the
answer is NO. However, as with all areas of
medicine, there is art involved.
16Case Presentation
- 32 y/o woman with numerous clinically atypical
nevi - No personal history of melanoma
- Confirmed family history of invasive melanomain
2 of 6 siblings, and 2 paternal uncles. - Her father died from metastatic pancreatic
carcinoma - She has 3 children (ages 10, 8, and 6 years)
- Two children have clinically atypical nevi
- She is NOT interested in participating in an
available research protocol for familial melanoma - She wishes to have p16 genetic testing performed
17Should Clinical Genetic Testing be Offered to
This Patient?
18Answer NoInterpreting a Negative Result Not
Possible
True negative
Inconclusive
Adapted from ASCO.
19Should an Affected Member of the Family be
Tested?
- Yes
- No
- Maybe
20Issues for Consideration
- Statistically, the patients family has a greater
than 50 risk of carrying a p16 mutation - Carriers in her family are also likely to be
predisposed to pancreatic cancer - She expressed the desire for testing
- If she is not interested in clinical research,
there will be little change in management - Knowledge of status may provide psychological
benefit, especially if negative - Knowledge of status may permit lifestyle change
and rigorous adherence to prevention and early
detection strategies in her children if positive - Summary Benefit of knowledge, little to no risk
- A family member would be tested in our
institution if desired
21p16 Test Reporting Study
- 45 members of p16 families received test results
- 19 non-carriers, 26 carriers
- 23 female, 22 male
- 43/45 reported benefits or positive aspects to
testing - 40/45 reported no downside or negative aspects
22Receipt of Positive p16 Results Increases
Screening
Overscreeners
P lt .0003
n.s.
P lt .023
1 SSE/Month (On Target)
Underscreeners
Aspinwall et al. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers
Prev. 200817(6)1510-1519.
23How Should it be Done?
- Identify high-risk patients
- Get Help First Time Around!!
- Refer to a research protocol
- Consult a clinical genetic testing center
- Find a local center www.nsgc.org
- www.cancer.gov/ (National Cancer Institute)
- Huntsman Cancer Institute wendy.kohlmann_at_hci.utah
.edu
24Where is Testing Performed?
- Clinical U.S. genetic laboratories offering p16
genetic testing (some will assist with obtaining
insurance approvals) - Find details at www.genetests.org
- Current CLIA certified laboratories
- GeneDX (USA)
- Myriad Genetic Laboratories (USA)
- Yale University School of Medicine (USA)
25How Much Does it Cost?
- Approximately 750 for first test
- Site-specific testing about 385
- 70 who go through pre-authorization receive 90
coverage on average
26Conclusions for Genetic Testing
- It is difficult to perform clinical genetic
testing in the average outpatient setting - Patient selection for candidacy is crucial
- Informed consent and pre- and post-test
counseling is important - Enrollment of patients in a research protocol for
hereditary melanoma is preferable whenever
possible, though patients may wish to choose
protocols that report results - Special situations may arise in which clinical
genetic testing is appropriate for a given
individual, but should never replace the standard
criteria for testing