The Influence of the Research Training Environment: Preliminary Data - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

The Influence of the Research Training Environment: Preliminary Data

Description:

Thelma E. Acquah-Harrison (Dr. Lisa Scott) ... ASHA/CAPCSD 2002; Madison, Guy, & Koch, 2004; Ringel, 2004; Scott & Wilcox, 2002) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:114
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: Admini161
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Influence of the Research Training Environment: Preliminary Data


1
The Influence of the Research Training
Environment Preliminary Data
  • Lisa A. Scott Elishann Geiger
  • Thelma E. Acquaah-Harrison Hillary Hayes
  • Jillian E. Birch Lauren S. Herring
  • Kelli M.Campbell Rosalyn C. Leech
  • Brittany M. Geiger
  • Florida State University
  • 2007 American Speech-Language-Convention

2
Presenters Thelma Acquaah-Harrison Jillian
Birch
  • Thelma E. Acquah-Harrison (Dr. Lisa Scott)
  • Vowel Formant Transitions in Children Adults
    Who Stutter
  • Jillian Birch (Dr. Leonard LaPointe)
  • The Effects of Cognitive-Linguistic
  • Load On Individuals With Multiple
  • Sclerosis

3
Purpose of the Presentation
  • Various resources highlight the need for
    engaging/mentoring students early in their
    academic careers
  • We are conducting a study examining the influence
    of undergraduate research experiences on
    students perceptions of research

4
Rationale for Facilitating Undergraduate Research
Experiences
  • Shortage of students interested in pursuing PhDs
    in Communication Disorders is well-documented
    (ASHA, 2003 ASHA/CAPCSD 2002 Madison, Guy,
    Koch, 2004 Ringel, 2004 Scott Wilcox, 2002)
  • 2002 ASHA/CAPCSD Joint Survey findings
  • 2003 ASHA Academic Needs Assessment
  • Recruiting qualified students into doctoral
    programs has been designated as an ASHA Focused
    Initiative

5
ASHA/CAPCSD Survey
  • 3 practices may impede the students decision to
    enter a research career
  • Heavily concentrating on clinical career
    preparation in both undergraduate and graduate
    curricula
  • Talking about research vs. taking concrete
    actions to encourage students who express an
    interest in research
  • Delaying focus on predoctoral education until
    students are in their masters program

6
Undergraduates Research
  • Best evidence from other disciplines suggests
    that
  • More research exposure is needed at the
    undergraduate and graduate levels,
  • Experiences need to be varied in format, and
  • Serious recruitment into research careers needs
    to begin at the undergraduate level waiting
    until graduate school may be too late
  • (Chamberlain, 1988 DiBartolo Shutts, 2000
    Falvey, 1991 Fenton, James, Insel, 2004
    Hanser Madsen, 1972 Reynolds, Gatz, 2003
    Vittengl, Bosley, Brescia, Eckardt, Neidig,
    Shelver, 2004)

7
Presenters Brittany Geiger Elishann Geiger
  • Brittany Geiger (Dr. Carla Wood Jackson)
  • Children With Specific Language Impairment
    The Social Side Effects
  • Elishann Geiger (Dr. Lisa Scott)
  • The Influence of Time Pressure On Fluency
    Language In Adults

8
The Research Training Environment
  • Gelsos (1979, 1993, 1997) Research Training
    Environment (RTE) Theory
  • Based on the scholar-practitioner model
  • Research is necessary to advance the discipline
  • Evidence-based practice is essential
  • Gelsos hypothesis
  • Lack of practitioner productivity interest is
    related to inadequacies in the RTE

9
Importance of the RTE
  • Empirical relationships have been found between
    RTEs and students
  • Interest in research
  • Research self-efficacy
  • Research outcome expectations
  • Scholarly productivity
  • (Bishop Bieschke, 1998 Gelso, Mallinckrodt,
    Judge, 1996 Kahn 2001 Kahn Miller, 2000 Kahn
    Scott, 1997 Krebs, Smither, Hurley, 1991
    Mallinckrodt Gelso, 2002 Phillips Russell,
    1994)
  • The relationships between RTE and these other
    variables are independent of student personality

10
Two Dimensions of Effective RTEs (Gelso 1979,
1993, 1997)
  • Interpersonal
  • Encourage students to become involved in research
    in minimally threatening ways early in their
    training
  • Reinforce students for their research efforts
  • Emphasize the social elements of conducting
    research
  • Include faculty who serve as role models of
    appropriate scientific behavior
  • Instructional
  • Encourage students to generate ideas from own
    interests
  • Teach varied approaches to conducting research
  • Stress how science relates to clinical practice
  • Let students know that all studies have flaws
  • Teach statistics and design in relevant ways

11
Positive RTEs Are Not Enough
  • Also needed are efforts to
  • Provide earlier research instruction and
    experiences
  • Ideally, at the undergraduate level
  • Pair mentoring with positive RTEs
  • When considering gender, relationship styles,
    number of mentors involved, etc. most critical
    factors seem to be
  • Involvement of multiple mentors
  • Mentors must model desired behaviors themselves
  • (Cain, Schulkin, Parisi, Power, Holzman,
    Williams, 2001 Cunic, McLaughlin, Phipps,
    Evans, 2004 Chamberlain, 1988 DiBartolo
    Shutts, 2000 de Janasz Sullivan, 2004 Gibson,
    2004 Hazzard, 1999 Hoyt, 1999 Johnson, 2001
    Wells Grabert, 2004 Williams, Levine,
    Malhotra, Holtzheimer, 2004)

12
Presenters Kelli Campbell Lauren Herring
  • Kelli Campbell (Dr. Kenn Apel)
  • Semantic Fast Mapping In Kindergarteners
    After Minimal Exposure To Nonwords
  • Lauren Herring (Dr. Julie Stierwalt)
  • The Effects Of Distraction On
  • Performance Under Varied Cognitive
  • Load

13
Our Research Purpose
  • Do graduate students who completed an
    undergraduate thesis differ from those who did
    not in
  • Demographics (e.g., GPA, GRE scores)
  • Perceptions of the undergraduate research
    training environment?
  • Attitudes towards research?
  • Plans for continued involvement in research?
  • Our hypothesis is that students who are actively
    engaged in research experiences as undergraduates
    will have more positive attitudes and increased
    expectations for continuing to participate in
    research in graduate studies

14
Method Participants
  • Two groups of graduate students are being
    recruited
  • 25 graduate students who have completed an
    undergraduate thesis (TG)
  • 25 graduate students who have not (NTG)
  • Inclusion/exclusion criteria
  • Both SLP and AuD emphasis areas are being
    recruited
  • Must be between enrolled in a Masters/AuD
    program (not PhD)

15
MethodInstrumentation The Undergraduate
Research Experience Survey
  • 3 sections, 73 items total
  • Demographics
  • Attitudes Towards Research (adapted)
  • Research Training Environment Scale-Revised
    (adapted)
  • 30-45 minutes completion time
  • Administered via SurveyMonkey

16
Presenters Hillary Hayes Rosalyn Leech
  • Hillary Hayes (Dr. Richard Morris)
  • The Number Of Presentations Needed For
    Intrarater Reliability Of Choral And Speech
    Stimuli
  • Rosalyn Leech (Dr. Carla Wood Jackson)
  • English Vocabulary Acquisition In Bilingual
    Preschoolers A Comparison Of Shared Storybook
    Readings Extension Activities

17
Section I Demographics
  • Age, gender
  • GPA (current graduate final undergrad)
  • Combined GRE score
  • Emphasis area (SLP AuD)
  • Undergraduate program information
  • Were students encouraged to participate in
    research?
  • Was there an undergraduate thesis option? If so,
    did you write one?

18
  • Graduate enrollment
  • Same program as undergrad?
  • semesters of enrollment
  • Required to participate in a research experience?
  • Plan to write a graduate thesis?
  • Plan to pursue a PhD?

19
Section II Attitudes Towards Research
  • Modification of Papanastasious (2005) Attitudes
    Towards Research (ATR) Scale
  • In its original form, the ATR scale is comprised
    of 34 items and uses a 1 to 7 strength-of-agreemen
    t response index.
  • For the current investigation, however, the scale
    was reduced to 30 questions
  • Better reflect the experiences to which UGs most
    likely have been exposed (e.g., eliminating
    questions about statistics courses).
  • Also, strength-of-agreement was modified to 1 to
    5, to be consistent with Section III response
    format

20
Section IIAttitudes Towards Research Sample Items
  • Research is interesting.
  • I feel confident in concerning my ability to
    interpret research data.
  • Research is useful for my career.
  • Research is connected to my field of study.
  • Research is useful to every professional.
  • Research-oriented thinking plays an important
    role in my daily life.
  • Research should be taught to all students.

21
Section III Research Training Environment
Scale-Revised
  • Modification of Gelsos (1997) Research-Training
    Environment Scale-Revised
  • Original form has 54 items organized into 9
    different subscales that assess
    quality/effectiveness of the RTE
  • Responses are 1-5 Strength-of-Agreement
  • For the URES, we eliminated that were specific to
    counseling psychology or statistics coursework
  • Resulted in 38 items used in Section III

22
Section IIIResearch Training EnvironmentSample
Items
  • The faculty did what it could to make research
    opportunities as rewarding as possible.
  • There was informal sharing of research ideas and
    feelings about research in my program.
  • Faculty members often invited undergraduate
    students to be responsible collaborators in the
    faculty members own research projects.
  • I was encouraged to get involved in some aspects
    of research early in my undergraduate training.

23
References
  • ASHA (2003). Academic needs assessment 2003
    Executive summary. Retrieved March 2, 2005 from
    http//www.asha.org/members/phd-faculty-research/r
    eports/needs-03.htm
  • ASHA/CAPCSD (2002). Crisis in the discipline A
    plan for reshaping our future. Report of the
    Joint Ad Hoc Committee on the Shortage of PhD
    Students and Faculty in Communication Sciences
    and Disorders. Retrieved April 4, 2005 from
    http//www.capcsd.org/reports/JointAdHocCmteFinalR
    eport.pdf
  • Bishop, R. M., Bieschke, K. J. (1998). Applying
    social cognitive theory to interest in research
    among counseling psychology doctoral studnets A
    path analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology.
    45, 182-188.
  • Cain, J. M., Schulkin. J., Parisi, V. Power, M.
    L., Holzman, G. B., Williams, S. (2001).
    Effects of perceptions and mentorship on pursuing
    a career in academic medicine in obstetrics and
    gynecology. Academic Medicine, 76, 628-634.
  • Chamberlain, K. (1988). Devising relevant and
    topical undergraduate laboratory projects The
    core article approach. Teaching of Psychology,
    15, 207-208.
  • Cunic, T. L., McLaughlin, M., Phipps, K.,
    Evans, B. (2000). Graduate research training
    Single mentor versus informal mentor models.
    Behavior Therapist, 23, 108-109.
  • de Janasz, S. C., Sullivan, S. E. (2004).
    Multiple mentoring in academe Developing the
    professorial network. Journal of Vocational
    Behavior, 64, 263-283.
  • DiBartolo, P. M., Shutts, K. (2000). Issues in
    training undergraduates in research. Behavior
    Therapist, 23, 85-90.
  • Falvey, J. E. (1991). Rethinking research Form
    and function in a clinical curriculum. Journal of
    Mental Health Counseling, 13, 221-235.
  • Fenton, W., James, R., Insel, T. (2004).
    Psychiatry residency training, the
    physician-scientist, and the future of
    psychiatry. Academic Psychiatry, 28, 263-266.
  • Gelso, C. J. (1979). Research in counseling
    Methodological and professional issues.
    Counseling Psychologist, 8, 7-35.
  • Gelso, C. J. (1993). On the making of a
    scientist-practitioner A theory of research
    training in professional psychology. Professional
    Psychology Research and Practice, 24, 468-476.
  • Gelso, C. J. (1997). The making of a scientist in
    applied psychology An aptitude by treatment
    conception. Counseling Psychologist, 25, 307-320.
  • Gelso, C. J., Mallinckrodt, B., Judge, A. B.
    (1996). Research training environment, attitudes
    toward research, and research self-efficacy The
    Revised Research Training Environment Scale.
    Counseling Psychologist, 24, 304-322.
  • Gibson, S. K. (2004). Being mentored The
    experience of women faculty. Journal of Career
    Development, 30, 173-188.
  • Hanser, S. B., Madsen, C. K. (1972). Comparison
    of graduate and undergraduate research in music
    therapy. Journal of Music Therapy, 9, 88-93.
  • Hazzard, W. R. (1999). Mentoring across the
    professional lifespan in academic geriatrics.
    Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 47,
    1466-1470.

24
References
  • Hoyt, S. K. (1999). Mentoring with class
    Connections between social class and
    developmental relationships in the academy. In A.
    J. Murrell F. J. Crosby (Eds.), Mentoring
    dilemmas Developmental relationships within
    multicultural organizations. Applied Social
    Research (pp. 189-210). Mahwah, NJ Lawrence
    Erlbaum Associates.
  • Johnson, B. A. (2001). Mentoring in academia An
    exploration of mentoring relationships between
    graduate students and faculty members.
    Dissertation Abstracts International Section B
    The Sciences Engineering, 62 (6-B), 2990.
  • Kahn, J. H. (2001). Predicting the scholarly
    activity of counseling psychology students A
    refinement and extension. Journal of Counseling
    Psychology, 48, 344-354.
  • Kahn, J. H., Miller, S. A. (2000). Measuring
    global perceptions of the research training
    environment using a short form of the RTES-R.
    Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and
    Development, 33, 103-119.
  • Kahn, J. H., Scott, N. A. (1997). Predictors of
    research productivity and science-related career
    goals among counseling psychology graduate
    students. Counseling Psychologist, 25, 38-67.
  • Krebs, P. J., Smither, J. W., Hurley, R. B.
    (1991). Relationship of vocational personality
    and research training environment to the research
    productivity of counseling psychologists.
    Professional Psychology Research and Practice,
    22, 362-367.
  • Madison, C. L., Guy, B., Koch, M. (2004).
    Pursuit of the speech-language pathology
    doctorate Who, why, why not. Contemporary Issues
    in Communication Sciences Disorders, 31,
    191-199.
  • Mallinckrodt, B. Gelso, C. J. (2002). Impact of
    research training environment and Holland
    personality type A 15-year follow-up of research
    productivity. Journal of Counseling Psychology,
    49, 60-70.
  • Phillips, J. C., Russell, R. K. (1994).
    Research self-efficacy, the research training
    evnironment, and research productivity among
    graduate students in counseling psychology.
    Counseling Psychologist, 22, 628-641.
  • Reynolds, C. F.,III, Gatz, M. (2003). Research
    training in mental health and aging The harvest
    is plentiful the laborers, few. American Journal
    of Geriatric Psychiatry, 11, 267-270.
  • Vittengl, J. R., Bosley, C. Y., Brescia, S. A.,
    Eckardt, E. A., Neidig, J. M., Shelver, K. S.
    et al. (2004). Why are some undergraduates more
    (and others less) interested in psychological
    research? Teaching of Psychology, 31, 91-97.
  • Wells, C. V., Grabert, C. (2004).
    Service-learning and mentoring Effective
    pedagogical strategies. College Student Journal,
    38, 573-578.
  • Williams, L. L., Levine, J. B., Malhotra, S.,
    Holtzheimer, P. (2004). The good-enough mentoring
    relationship. Academic Psychiatry, 28, 111-115.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com