Yellow dots are nodes in the network - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Yellow dots are nodes in the network

Description:

Yellow dots are nodes in the network. http://noosphere.princeton.edu ... The figures on this page almost speak for themselves. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:64
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 79
Provided by: noosphere
Category:
Tags: dots | london | network | nodes | pages | yellow

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Yellow dots are nodes in the network


1
Gathering Global Awareness Are we seeing a
Consciousness Field?
Yellow dots are nodes in the network
http//noosphere.princeton.eduRoger Nelson
rdnelson_at_princeton.edu
2
The EGG Project(aka the Global Consciousness
Project)
  • International collaboration
  • 75 Scientists, Artists, Friends,
  • Network of host sites world wide
  • The tools REG technology, Field application
  • Make an EEG for the earth, an ElectroGaiaGram
  • Identify engaging moments of global events
  • The question Can we capture a
  • Glimmering of Global Consciousness?

3
When you put a thing in order, and give it a
name, and you are all in accord, it becomes.
- - From the Navajo, Masked Gods, Waters, 1950

4
The technology is only now availableElectronics,
Computers, Networking
  • REG/RNG devices run continuously
  • Synchronized computers and software
  • Internet transfer of data to central server
  • Automatic archiving, public access
  • Formal analyses and explorations
  • Background, methods, poetic history

5
A Random Event Generator (REG or RNG)
Mindsong REG
Orion RNG
6
How it works Heres 1000 Trials Each trial is
the sum of 200 bitsLike flipping 200 coins and
counting heads
7
The binomial distribution of 1000 200-bit
trials, compared with Theoretical normal
distribution
100 is expected
8
What happens in such data over time?Plot
cumulative deviation from expectation
Should be a Random Walk (a Drunkards Walk)
A General Case
GCP Standard Analysis
9
Laboratory Experiments, PEARIntention to change
the REG behavior High and Low both depart from
expectation
HI
BL
LO
10
Field REG Experiments No Intentions We simply
collect data in the situationWe find departures
from expectation
Queens Chamber
Grand Gallery
Kings Chamber
11
Departures from expectation correlate with
Coherent or Resonant group consciousnessDeeply
engaging ideas and emotions
12
The next step A prototype collaborationColleague
s in Europe and the US Collected 12 independent
data streams
13
How About a Global Network?Might we see Effects
of Engaging Events?Natural disastersTerrible
accidentsThe beginning of warThe Popes
pilgrimageGrand celebrations Political
excitementAstrological hot spotsWorld-wide
meditations
14
A network of eggs around the world A
computer, special software, an REG/RNG
15
Internet transfer of data to Princeton Here we
see the combined dataFor a whole day, from 48
eggs
16
We can see better whats happening by Plotting
the cumulative deviations (c2 - df) Correlation
Tilts Variance Spreads
17
Combine all eggs and plot cumulative deviation
May show a trend if there is a common Influence
or correlation among the eggs
(c2 - df)
18
When we make a composite across eggs, the
cumulative deviation may show a trend
19
Maybe a trend in the cumulative Deviation is
Meaningful?
20
So far, sporting events seem Not to produce big
deviations
21
The Popes 6-day pilgrimage to the middle eastAn
occasion of hope for resolution of differences
22
Political events, even big ones, are not
necessarily of interest to the EGG
Clinton Impeachment Acquittal
23
Well try anything once. Significant
correlations with astrologically determined hot
times
24
Tearing the Social Fabric Terrorists Attack
Civilians and Diplomats Nato Bombs Kosovo to
End Ethnic CleansingTaliban Destroy Ancient
Buddhist TreasureSeptember 11 Enters History of
the Earth
25
Major disasters that engage us powerfullyOften
correlate with big deviations
26
Context explorations Six hours of dataAround
the beginning of bombing in KosovoCumulative
deviation of Zs2 or c2
27
The Buddhas of Bamiyan
After
Before March 12 2001
28
The destruction of a world treasureApproximate
time, noon in Afghanistan
noon
29
The World Trade Center Fall, 2001
Carol M. Highsmith
Al Dove
30
The World Trade Center September 11 2001
Tamara Beckwith
31
The destruction of the World Trade TowersSept 11
2001 A 50-hour trend followed the attacks
32
Sept 11 prediction Inter-egg Variance will
fluctuate Red is real data, Green is Pseudorandom
33
Autocorrelation on Sept 11Structure where there
should be none
Calculations Peter Bancel
34
What is there to say?
35
Repairing, Restoring The Social
FabricHealingMeditationsPrayer
VigilsCeremoniesHolidays
36
Chicago, Moment of Silence September 14 2001
37
Three Minutes of Silence September 14 2001
38
Focused Siddhi Meditations September 23 to 27,
2001
Peak Day, Maximum Numbers
39
Synchronized Johrei Ceremonies Around the World,
April 1 2001
40
Four Million People Pilgrimage For Ritual and
Prayer
41
A Substantial Agreement on Getting Our Ecological
Act Together
42
Natural Disasters And Accidents Earthquakes,
Floods Planes, Trains, Ships
43
The Great Earthquake in Turkey August 17 1999
Standard Analysis
US vs Europe, Bierman
Variance Analysis, Bierman
44
Volcano in Nairobi January 17 2002
45
Typhoon in Orissa, India October 29 1999
46
The Concorde Crash July 25 2000
47
The Kursk Submarine Disaster August 12 2000
48
Train Crash in India August 2 2001
All Eggs, 4 hrs
Nearby Eggs, 1.5 hrs
49
The Lighter Side Celebrations What better
example than New Years?
50

And again for last year. The pattern is
replicated for the third time.
Global Attention Sharing New Years Eve All
over the world, people celebrate the change to a
New Year. Since 1998, we have recorded data from
a network of physical random event generators
(called eggs). Here we look at what happens at
midnight around the world. The scientific
prediction is that there will be a pattern of
increased correlation among the eggs. We test for
trends away from the expected random walk. We
have learned to expect reductions in the
variation across the eggs. The figures on this
page almost speak for themselves. They are
pictures of our engagement with each other.
We predicted the same pattern for the following
year.
Then, for the infamous Y2K transition, we looked
at a measure of the variability among the eggs
and predicted it would decrease as we all focused
on midnight.
Variance Drop, Midnight, 1999-2000
In the first year, 1998-1999, we looked for a
change in the average deviation, and compared
Maxi- and Mini-celebration time zones.
More at http//noosphere.princeton.edu
51
An obvious prediction New Years celebrations
Concatenation across all (24) time
zonesCumulative excess deviation of means
Model Prediction
Weak Replication
52
Taking the Electrogaiagram metaphor to
heartMaxi-celebrating time zones, Signal
averaging
Figure by Richard Broughton
53
Evoked Response in the ElectrogaiagramSignal
averaging Mini-Celebrating time zones
Figure by Richard Broughton
54
Y2K New Year 1999-2000 Coherent engagement?
Radin makes an independent prediction Reduction
of Variance across eggs
Odds, GMT
55
New Years 2000-2001 Variance Reduction Signal
Average over 37 time zones Normalized, Squared,
Smoothed
56
New Years 2001-2002 Variance Reduction Signal
Average over 37 time zones Normalized as
Z-scores, Smoothed
5-Min Smoothing Window
57
New Years 2002-2003 Variance ReductionShows
ambiguous response, But Meanshift is significant
again
58
Questions outnumber answersGreat numbers
contributeDeep engagement is powerfulbutDoes
distance from the focus matter?How about
relevance to local people?Is human consciousness
necessary? Are experimenter effects the
source? What kinds of events are strongest?Is
the effect repeatable and reliable?
59
Columbia Explodes Seven astronauts lost But the
eggs apparently do not respond
60
Why do we sometimes see no effect?
Perhaps we do, But not in the form we expect
61
The Columbia ExplosionViewing through a
different instrument
Note, however, about 1/3 of permutations Have
such an extreme deviation sometime in 24 hours
62
Categories What seems to touch The Global
Consciousness?
Calculations, Dean Radin
63
Does the distance of the eggsFrom the event make
a difference?
Calculations, Dean Radin
64
Does the distance of the eggsFrom the event make
a difference?
65
Current Result Formal Database132 global
events over 4.5 yearsOdds about 100,000 to 1
66
What do we have in hand?Where do we want to go
with it?
  • Four years of data
  • 55 eggs around the world
  • More than 130 formal studies
  • About 65 positive outcome
  • About 18 individually significant
  • Many analyses remain to be done

67
Bigger Picture What is our aspiration?
  • Sharpen and focus our questions
  • Aim for theoretical understanding
  • Capture insight about creative mind
  • Consider evidence that we are one
  • Contribute to better future for culture

68
We think the world apart. What would it be like
to think the world together? -- Parker
Palmer, educator
http//noosphere.princeton.edu
69
Homepage
http//noosphere.princeton.edu
Berger Web Design
Magic Buttons
Status Day Sum Results Extract
Primary Links Menu at Bottom
70
Barry Fenn 1950 2000 A memorial assessmentof
GCP data Perhaps the eggs Respond to their
hosts
71
A respectful, exploratory look at the death of
egg host Barry FennAll 28 eggs
72
Same time period, Barrys egg only.After he
passes, a 20 hour falling trend
73
Symmetry in the data, maybe even meaning Barrys
egg and that of his friend, Sze Tan
74
A total solar eclipse was of Special interest to
people in the path
75
For most of the formal predictionsWe specify a
Standard Analysis
  • Normalized signed deviation of mean, zi
    (mi-m)/s
  • Composite across eggs Stouffer Zs
    (Szi)/N1/2
  • Composite Z is squared for c2 distributed
    statistic
  • Large cumulative sum of Zs2 1 or c2 df
  • Reflects inter-egg correlation, or
  • Consistent large deviations, or both

76
Global Emotion Transfixed by
Tragedy On September 11 2001, early in the
morning, a network of physical random event
generators (called eggs) took on a striking
trend. By 845 the non-random behavior was
unmistakable. It peaked at about 1030 with odds
against chance of a thousand to one. See the
red trace below. Other measures also deviated
from expectation on that day, creating an
unmistakable pattern where there should be none.
The eggs became linked across distance and time
in some subtle way that we do not yet know how to
explain. This is not a physical or
electromagnetic effect. Its not due to
extraordinary mobile phone use, or saturation
TV. It appears to be related to our profound
engagement.
On 9/11 the data showed extraordinary moments
On 9/11 the data contained unique sequential
structure
On 9/11 deviations began that persisted for 2 days
The jagged red line shows three days of a measure
(squared cumulative deviation of variance) that
represents the composite randomness of 37
eggs. On September 11, the data show clear
structure where there should be none.
More at http//noosphere.princeton.edu
am
am
...
. Normal range of variation
am
77
Squared Cumulative Variance, Sept 10 - 12The
departure begins nearly 4 hours before the first
attack
78
Bottom Line ComparisonFormal outcome sequence
versus Random draws from distribution
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com