Title: National Perspective Review Of Brownfields Proposals
1National PerspectiveReview Of Brownfields
Proposals
The United States Environmental Protection Agency
2Overview
- Grant Programs Background
- Purpose And Intent
- Impact Of History
- General Suggestions For A Better Proposal
- Going Beyond The Criteria
3Background
- Overall Vision and Plan for Project, from
Assessment thru Cleanup and Redevelopment - Give Us Reasons To Believe Overall Project/Vision
Will Be Completed - Schedule, Cost Estimates All Project Phases
- Funds
- Thought Out
4Background
- Evidence Of Local Commitment
- Budget, In-Kind, Man-hours
- Leveraging
- Local Partners, Ground Swell
- Community Groups, Environmental Groups, Chamber
of Commerce, Economic Development
District/Department, School Boards, Transit
Authority, Banks, Local Business, Churches
5Background
- Assessment Grant
- Local Program Seed Money
- Technical Work, Use Contractor (Assessment,
Cleanup Planning, Cleanup) - Work Applicant Can Do - Limit Contractor Use
(Outreach, Reporting) - If Possible, Make Activities In-Kind
6Background
- Strong Relationship with State
- Cleanups Are Overseen And Approved by State
- Private Projects Should Have Public Benefits
7Background
- EPA Has Seen Local Programs Struggle
- Lack of Political Support
- Assessment, Access
- RLF, Loans Do Not Occur
- Criteria Worth Extra Effort
- Community Need and Involvement
- Budget
- Reduction of Threats to Human Health/Environment
- Greenspace
- Experience Counts
- History of Success on Related Projects or
Partnering
8Key Terms
- Collaboration, Coordination, Voluntary
- Partners Local, State, Federal, Private,
Non-Profit - Stakeholders, Community
- Outreach, Meaningful Public Participation
- Commitment
- Vision
- Incentives
- Transform, Change Catalyst, Revitalize
- Innovative
9Potential Red Flags
- Superfund Sites
- Marketing, except RLF
- Contingencies
- Fund Raising
- Lobbying
- Enforcement Action/Order
- Administrative, Indirect
10General Suggestions
- Read Guidelines!
- All Criteria Matter, If Not Applicable - Say So
- Respond to All Parts of Each Criterion
- Get Clarification Of Any Not Fully Understood
- Reviewer Knows Only What You Tell Them
- Be Specific But Not Overly Detailed
- Be Specific And Thorough But Brief
- Provide Project Specifics
- If Not Possible Provide Area Wide Specifics
11General Suggestions
- Adhere To Format (page limit, font size, budget)
- Proposal With Pages Less Than Limit OK!
- Copy Ready
- Budget Versus All Project Activities Discussed in
Proposal Who Is Paying? - If Not Planning To Charge Activity To Grant, Show
As In-Kind Or Leverage In Budget Narrative or
Table - Examples Community Involvement, Cleanup Planning
12General Suggestions
- Know And Explain Community
- Strengths
- Unique Programs Or Characteristics
- Vision 2025, Main Street/Downtown Program,
Railroad City, Heritage Rivers - Weaknesses (help justify funds)
- Recognized By Outside Sources
- University or Environmental Groups studies,
Sierra Club
13General Suggestions
- Know What Activities Are Allowable Grant
Expenses, When in Doubt - Ask - Non-Allowable Costs Red-Flags
- Administrative Cost Ban
- Examples Indirect, Admin-type Activities,
Supervision, Management - Various Planned Grant Activities
- Examples Redevelopment Costs, Unjustified
Demolition for Cleanup/RLF, Land Acquisition
14General Suggestions
- Applying For Both Assessment and Cleanup Grants -
For Same Project, At Same Time - Viewed
Unfavorably - Quality of Proposal and Project Both Matter
15General Suggestions
- Be Clear About
- Total Amount Of Federal Funds Requested
- Type Of Proposal, Assessment Only
- Community Wide
- Site Specific
- Type Of Funds Requested
- Hazardous
- Petroleum
16General SuggestionsPut Yourself in Reviewers
Shoes
- Do Not Make Reviewer Hunt For Answers
- Organize Proposal by Criteria, Use Number System
- Describe All Unique or Local Terms Used
- Reviewer Does Not Know Your Area
- Briefly Explain All Local and State Programs
- Avoid Reiterating entire Criteria in Response
- Dont Reiterate General Brownfields Concepts,
Except As They Relate To Your Vision
17General SuggestionsPut Yourself in Reviewers
Shoes, cont.
- Know Your Reviewer (Scientists, Engineers,
Environmentalists) - Cleanup Plan Description
- Get Technical Professional Help
- Specifics
- All Environmental Impacts, Direct and Indirect
- Discuss Other Area Environmental Projects
- Specifics Preferred
- Details Generally Preferred, Dont Overdo
- Provide Numbers, If Possible
- Use Simple Legible Charts/Tables
- Examples Demographics, Contaminant Levels, Grant
History
18General SuggestionsPut Yourself in Reviewers
Shoes, cont.
- Overall Proposal Check
- Unnecessary Redundancy?
- Unusual Activities? Explained? Justified?
- Media Services For Site Project
- Offsite Planning
- Understandable? Readable?
- Ask Third Party to Read Proposal
19General Suggestions Proposal Attachments
- Summarize and Refer to All Attachments
- Mandatory Attachments
- State Letter(s)
- Petroleum determination by State
- RLF Legal Opinion
- Excluded or Property-Specific Site Information
- Attach Community Notice Documentation
- Attach Site Access Agreement, Assessment Site
Specific Only - Think Minimal Attachments, Value Added?
20General SuggestionsProposal Attachments,
continued
- Maps (81/2 x 11, copy ready)
- Include Index
- Support Letters Are Encouraged
- From Sub-Jurisdictions, If Proposal Covers
Multiple Jurisdictions - From Local Community Based Groups
- From Partners Discussed In Proposal
- Letters Should Include Discussion Of Partners
Specific Contributions, If Any
21Specific Criteria Suggestions Above and Beyond,
Extra Points
- Community Need
- Compare Demographics To State/National
- Primary Race, Unemployment, Poverty, Income
- Other Crime, Disabled, Food Stamps, Renters,
High School Graduate, Unmarried Mothers, Infant
Mortality - Think Sensitive Populations (Children, Elderly)
- Any Special Designation of Need
- Empowerment Zone, Enterprise Community, Renewal
Community, Treasury Hot Zone, Health Human
Services Underserved Medical Community, Weed
Seed - www.epa.gov/compliance/environmentaljustice
22Specific Criteria Suggestions Above and Beyond,
Extra Points
- Budget
- Realistic Environmental Costs
- Ph I, 2,000-5,000
- Ph II, highly variable, 20,000
- Ph III/Cleanup Plan, highly variable, 10,000
- Explain all Personnel Costs
- What Will Staff Do On Project?
- Do Environmental Work With Federal Funds
- Be Clear About Your Intent - What Will Be Charged
To Grant? In-Kind? Donated?
23Specific Criteria Suggestions Above and Beyond,
Extra Points
- Community Involvement
- Early and Often, Never Too Soon To Build
Relationship - Plan to Provide Translators
- Conduct Design Charette, if appropriate
- Hold Public Meetings
- Use Internet
- Go Overboard, Have an Aggressive Plan
- Community Based Group List, Residents, Grass
Roots, Business, Neighborhood Groups - Are They Actual Partners? How Are They Involved?
- Use Citizen Advisory Committee
- Form Before Proposal Submission or Plan to Form
24Specific Criteria Suggestions Above and Beyond,
Extra Points
- Leveraging
- Explain How Funds Will Be Used In Project
- Research Identify Potential Funding Sources
- Private, Foundations
- Federal
- EDA for Redevelopment HUD for BEDI, CDBG COE
- State
- Bonds, Park Funds
- Local
- Tax, Community Development Block Grant
25Specific Criteria Suggestions Above and Beyond,
Extra Points
- Ability to Manage Grants
- Refer to Grant Requirements
- Progress Reports
- Financial Reports
- Minority/Women Owned Business Reports
- Quality Assurance
- Quality Management Plan Before Award
- Quality Assurance Project Plans Before Sampling
26Specific Criteria Suggestions Above and Beyond,
Extra Points
- Site Selection Assessment
- Site Specific, Attach Access Consent
- Access For Private Sites
- Refer to Written Agreement
- Attach Example of Written Agreement
- Past Experience Getting Access
27Contacts
- Brownfields National Homepage
- www.epa.gov/brownfields
- EPA Region 4 http//www.epa.gov/region4/waste/bf
/index.htm