Workers Compensation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 33
About This Presentation
Title:

Workers Compensation

Description:

Alexis de Toqueville, Democracy in America (1835 1840) 3. Workers' Compensation ... The general rule is that he who engages in the employment of another for the ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:4029
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: lawrence93
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Workers Compensation


1
Workers Compensation
2
Workers Compensation
  • . . . The industrial aristocracy of our day,
    when it has impoverished and brutalized the man
    it uses, abandons them in time of crisis to
    public charity to feed them.
  • Alexis de Toqueville, Democracy in America (1835
    1840)

3
Workers Compensation
  • Farwell v. Boston and Worcester R.R. Corp., 4
    Metc. (Mass.) 49 (1849)
  • The general rule is that he who engages in the
    employment of another for the performance of
    specified duties and services, for compensation,
    takes upon himself the natural and ordinary risks
    and perils incident to the performance of such
    services, and in legal presumption, the
    compensation is adjusted accordingly.
  • C.J. Lemual Shaw

4
Workers Compensation
  • Farwell v. B.W R.R. (contd)
  • . . . the loss was sustained by means of an
    ordinary casualty, caused by the negligence of
    another servant of the company. . . it must be
    deemed the result of pure accident, like those to
    which all men, in all employments, and at all
    times, are more or less exposed and like similar
    losses from accidental causes, it must rest where
    it first fell . . .

5
Workers Compensation
  • Crystal Eastman, Study of Work Accidents in
    Allegheny County, Pennsylvania (1907).

6
Workers Compensation
  • The Unholy Trilogy of workplace activities
  • Assumption of Risk
  • Contributory Negligence
  • Fellow Servant Rule

7
Workers Compensation
  • Legislative Enactments
  • Employers Liability Acts
  • Worker had to prove fault
  • Contributory negligence mitigated damages
  • A/R and F/S would not apply if employer violated
    safety statute

8
Workers Compensation
  • Isaac Rubinow, Study of Claims Under Employers
    Liability Statutes (1913)
  • 32.5 resulted in no compensation
  • 23.7 paid claims of less than 100
  • 24 paid claims of less than 500
  • 9.3 paid claims over 1,000

9
Workers Compensation
  • Massachusetts Workers Compensation Statute
    passed in 1904
  • By 1920 eight states did not have such statutes
  • Indiana adopted workers compensation in 1929
  • Mississippi adopted workers compensation in 1949.

10
Workers Compensation
  • Controlled by statute

11
Workers Compensation
  • Controlled by statute
  • particular language varies is important

12
Workers Compensation
  • Controlled by statute
  • particular language varies is important
  • System is no-fault liability

13
Workers Compensation
  • Controlled by statute
  • particular language varies is important
  • System is no-fault liability
  • But no-fault does not mean no defense

14
Workers Compensation - Elements
  • Coverage
  • Workers and employers covered specific to statute

15
Coverage Indiana Statute e.g.
  • IC 22-3-2-2
  • (a) Every employer and every employee except as
    stated in IC 22-3-2 through IC 22-3-6, shall
    comply with the provisions of IC 22-3-2 through
    22-3-6 respectively to pay and accept
    compensation for personal injury or death by
    accident arising out of and in the course of the
    employment and shall be bound thereby.

16
Coverage Indiana Statute e.g.
  • IC 22-3-2-2
  • (a) Every employer and every employee except as
    stated in IC 22-3-2 through IC 22-3-6, shall
    comply with the provisions of IC 22-3-2 through
    22-3-6 respectively to pay and accept
    compensation for personal injury or death by
    accident arising out of and in the course of the
    employment and shall be bound thereby.

17
Exceptions Indiana Statute e.g.
  • (b) IC 22-3-2 through IC 22-3-6 does not apply to
    railroad employees engaged in train service as
    follows
  • (1) engineers
  • (2) firemen
  • (3) conductors
  • (4) brakemen
  • (5) flagmen
  • (6) baggagemen or
  • (7) foremen in charge of yard engines and
    helpers assigned thereto.

18
Exceptions Indiana Statute e.g.
  • (c) Municipal firefighters and police who are
    members of a pension fund.

19
Exceptions Indiana Statute e.g.
  • (c) Municipal firefighters and police who are
    members of a pension fund.
  • 22-3-2-9 (a)
  • IC 22-3-2 through 22-3-6 shall not apply to
    casual laborers as defined in 22-3-6-1) nor to
    domestic servants, nor to the employers of such
    persons.

20
Exceptions Indiana Statute e.g.
  • (c) Municipal firefighters and police who are
    members of a pension fund.
  • 22-3-2-9 (a)
  • IC 22-3-2 through 22-3-6 shall not apply to
    casual laborers as defined in 22-3-6-1) nor to
    domestic servants, nor to the employers of such
    persons.
  • irregular, unpredictable, sporadic, brief

21
Workers Compensation - Elements
  • Coverage
  • Workers and employers covered specific to statute
  • Compensable injury?

22
Workers Compensation - Elements
  • Coverage
  • Workers and employers covered specific to statute
  • Compensable injury?
  • Injury by accident
  • Arising out of employment
  • In the course of employment

23
Compensable Injury
  • Injury by accident
  • a sudden, unexpected, untoward event

24
Compensable Injury
  • Injury by accident
  • a sudden, unexpected, untoward event
  • intended to exclude disabilities resulting from
    usual wear and tear of the usual duties of the
    job and that developed gradually

25
Compensable Injury
  • Injury by accident
  • a sudden, unexpected, untoward event
  • intended to exclude disabilities resulting from
    usual wear and tear of the usual duties of the
    job and that developed gradually
  • former, rather rigid, exclusion has given way to
    broadened interpretation of accident,
    occupational disease acts, industrial disability
    acts, insurance, etc.

26
Compensable injury
  • Arising out of employment
  • i.e., can the injured claimant establish a causal
    connection between the workplace and the injury?

27
Compensable injury
  • Arising out of employment
  • i.e., can the injured claimant establish a causal
    connection between the workplace and the injury?
  • Satisfied if injury was produced by a risk posed
    by the employment

28
Compensable injury
  • Arising out of employment
  • i.e., can the injured claimant establish a causal
    connection between the workplace and the injury?
  • Satisfied if injury was produced by a risk posed
    by the employment
  • Split where employee faces street risks
  • restrictive risk must be different from street
    risk
  • expansive risk can include street risks

29
Compensable injury
  • In the course of employment
  • time, place and activity restrictions
  • within period of work
  • on the premises or where worker is supposed to be
  • while the worker was doing something connected to
    the job
  • requirements are generally restrictive

30
Workers Compensation - Elements
  • Covered?
  • Specific to statute
  • Compensable?
  • Accident?
  • Arising out of employment
  • Causal connection
  • In the course of employment
  • Time, place, activity restrictions

31
Defenses
  • Challenge claimants establishment of elements
  • fault (or lack of it) is irrelevant in most
    situations
  • Workers violation of criminal statute, willful
    violation of safety regulation, intoxication, or
    intentionally self-inflicted injury e.g., IC
    22-3-2-8
  • Details of coverage (e.g., duration)

32
Other Important Points
  • If worker is eligible for benefits, resort to
    torts compensation system is completely barred
  • some exceptions where employer violates safety
    regulations
  • Actions against third parties who share
    responsibility with employer are available, but
    non-culpable employer can be reimbursed from
    recovery

33
Workers Compensation
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com