Choosing a Topic and Writing a Literature Review - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

Choosing a Topic and Writing a Literature Review

Description:

'The Teaching of Children with Down Syndrome in Boston's Educational Institutions' 'Special Education in Boston Schools' More Appropriate/Manageable Topics ' ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:249
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: bos7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Choosing a Topic and Writing a Literature Review


1
Choosing a Topic and Writing a Literature Review
  • Brendan A. Rapple, Ph.D.
  • rappleb_at_bc.edu

2
The Literature Review
  • Purpose of a Lit. Review to
  • Get familiar with background/history of problem.
  • Identify possible ways to study the problem.
  • Assess strengths and weaknesses of previous
    studies.
  • Develop conceptual framework rationale for
    present study.
  • Acquaint you with new sources of data.
  • Help avoid needless replication of previous
    research.
  • Help you to define your topic. Etc. Etc

3
Phase 1 Specifying the Research Question
  • If research question is specified too broadly or
    defined too vaguely or abstractly, one may be
    overwhelmed with information.
  • If research question specified too narrowly or
    defined too concisely or concretely, one may miss
    out on peripheral and more general info.
  • If topic is very current, there may be few
    scholarly books and articles.
  • Certainly choose a good topic, one that
    interests you. But make sure that its doable,
    manageable.

4
Topic
  • Breadth of Topic.
  • Too broad a topic may be unmanageable, for
    example
  • "The Education of Girls"
  • or "The History of Universities"
  • or "Computers in Schools."
  • On the other hand, too narrow and/or trivial a
    topic, e.g., "My Favorite Teacher", is
    uninteresting and extremely difficult to
    research.

5
Defining a Research Topic
  • Unlimited Topic (TOO BROAD)
  • Life and Times of Sigmund Freud
  • The School Principal in the Modern School
    System
  • The History of Down Syndrome
  • Special Education as a Field of Study
  • Slightly Limited Topic (STILL TOO BROAD)
  • An Examination of Different Emphases in the
    Psychological Views of Sigmund Freud and Carl
    Jung
  • Improving the Effectiveness of the School
    Principal
  • The Teaching of Children with Down Syndrome in
    Bostons Educational Institutions
  • Special Education in Boston Schools

6
More Appropriate/Manageable Topics
  • "An Analysis of the Relationship of Freud and
    Jung in the International Psychoanalytic
    Association, 1910-1914
  • "Texas school principals knowledge and
    perceptions of bullying A descriptive study of
    bullying in seventh and eighth graders in
    Houston, Texas
  • Temperament and behavior problems in young
    children with Down syndrome at 12, 30, and 45
    months
  • The link between funding a mandated program
    (special education) vs. a non-mandated program
    (regular education) in two Massachusetts' public
    school districts during the 1980s

7
Possible Problems in Choosing a Topic
  • A topic that is not manageable in terms of
  • time
  • resources
  • energy
  • travel
  • researcher's knowledge and experience (e.g. do
    you speak Chinese?)
  • Choosing a topic that will not keep your
    interest, enthusiasm.

8
Definition of Terms
  • Title of Thesis/Dissertation
  • Christianists, Islamists, Theocons
    Harbingers of Apocalyptic Violence
  • Clearly there are some problem words here.
  • We must know how the RESEARCHER defines the term.

9
Limitations of Study
  • Important to specify precisely what you intend to
    do.
  • Important to know what you do NOT intend to do.
  • Limitations may be of
  • time
  • personnel
  • gender
  • age
  • geographic location
  • nationality
  • (and potentially numerous others)

10
Phase 2 Locating and Accessing Information
  • Some Difficulties -- Leading to Anxiety
  • not understanding information
  • overwhelmed by amount of info.
  • not knowing if certain info. exists
  • not knowing where to find info.
  • knowing where to find info. but not having key to
    access.

11
Phase 3Evaluating the Information
  • When reading each article, book, chapter etc one
    might ask such questions as
  • What fundamental beliefs are expressed in each
    item? Does the author have an ideological
    stance?
  • What is being described? Is it comprehensive or
    narrow?
  • What is being predicted? Does it predict
    outcomes satisfactorily?
  • How applicable, transferable, or generalizable is
    the information?

12
Contextual and Perceptual Implications
  • Who posed the research question?
  • Who funded the research study?
  • What were the political, economic, and social
    conditions of the time and place of the research
    study?

13
Phase 4 Recording the Information
  • We all have different ways of recording info.,
    making notes etc.
  • But particularly useful is the Web-based
    bibliographic citation management tool RefWorks
  • RefWorks
  • http//www.bc.edu/libraries/services/ref-instruc/s
    -productivity/refworks

14
RefWorks
  • Web based tool for automatically formatting your
    paper.
  • Allows you to store, organize and keep track of
    citations.
  • References can then be inserted into papers.
  • Footnotes and bibliography can be generated in a
    variety of formats such as APA, MLA.
  • RefWorks Tutorial
  • step by step instruction
  • Details on setting up your account and using
    RefWorks remotely
  • Importing records from specific databases

15
Phase 5 Organizing the Information
  • When writing a Lit. Review the researcher must
  • categorize
  • compare
  • make connections among various forms and sources
    of information

16
Perhaps She Groups Findings According to Whether
They Provide
  • strong support . . .
  • medium support . . .
  • low support to her own hypothesis/theory

17
Perhaps She Groups the Material Chronologically
  • e.g. a Lit. Review on the topic The Free School
    Movement, 1967--1972 A Study of Countercultural
    Ideology might be divided chronologically as
    follows
  • Material published in the
  • 1960s
  • 1970s
  • 1980s
  • 1990s
  • 2000-2006
  • But this is quite an arbitrary approach it may
    not be particularly informative.
  • If one does use a chronological method, a
    trends approach with the date periods might be
    more useful.

18
Perhaps She Groups the Material Thematically
  • Organizing about topics or issues rather than
    passage of time often the best method.
  • Again, a lit. review of the topic The Free
    School Movement, 1967--1972 A Study of
    Countercultural Ideology might consider such
    themes as
  • Views of parents, teachers, students, and
    political activists.
  • Aims of the schools.
  • Types of school, curricula, textbooks,
    pedagogies.
  • Ideological basis of the free school movement.
  • New Left the civil rights movement student
    protests the antiwar movement other societal,
    cultural and intellectual contexts.
  • Divisions within the movement.
  • Critics of the movement.
  • Collapse of the movement.
  • Views on the movements legacy.

19
Another Example of a Thematic Organization
  • A lit. review on aspects of standardized testing
    might be organized according to the following
    themes or issues
  • Background
  • History of Standardized Tests
  • Different Types of Standardized Tests
  • Rationale of Standardized Tests
  • Role of High Stakes Tests
  • Standardized Tests and the Law
  • Standardized Tests in Practice
  • Testing at Elementary School
  • Testing at Secondary School
  • Statistics

20
  • Critics and Proponents of Standardized Tests
  • Testing of Students with Disabilities
  • Testing of Minority Students
  • Testing of Students from Different Social
    Backgrounds
  • Gender Differences in Testing
  • Case for Bias
  • Case against Bias
  • Teachers Perspectives
  • School Administrators Perspectives
  • Students Perspectives
  • Alternative Assessment Methodologies

21
Perhaps She Groups the Material Methodologically
  • Less attention focused on the content of the
    material.
  • Rather more attention is paid to the "methods"
    used by the researcher.

22
How Does One Treat each Article, Book?
  • One might include comments on
  • methods of analysis employed
  • quality of the findings or conclusions
  • major strengths and weaknesses
  • any other pivotal information

23
Many Similar Studies?
  • Describe most important one and simply say that
    the results were confirmed in the other studies
    listed.
  • Still, to include only germane studies, you must
    examine many.

24
Essential
  • To aim at an INTEGRATED treatment that explains
    why the studies and theories cited are important
    to your work.
  • To avoid a series of abstracts, one per
    paragraph.
  • To keep reader constantly aware that the
    literature reviewed is related to the research
    problem.

25
At End of Review, Reader Should Be Able To
Conclude
  • "Yes, of course, this is the exact study that
    needs to be done at this time to move knowledge
    in this field a little further along."

26
Lit. Review -- Tips
  • Begin with most recent studies and work
    backwards.
  • Dont try to read EVERYTHING in its entirety.
  • If the report/article has an abstract, read it
    first.
  • Before taking notes, skim the document to get to
    the most relevant part.
  • Most important part of a scholarly book is the
    index.
  • Write out complete bibliographic citation for
    each work. Add library call no.

27
  • Indicate carefully any direct quotations and your
    paraphrases.
  • Generally, paraphrase is better than lengthy
    quotation.
  • Avoid "grandfather" citations. Return to
    original source.
  • Don't cite references that you haven't read.
  • Use headings and subheadings for clarity.

28
  • Evaluate carefully everything you read. Just
    because a famous scholar argued something, that
    doesn't mean that you have to accept it
    uncritically.
  • Lit. Review can be time consuming -- usually too
    much rather than too little to survey (especially
    in science and in technology).
  • Not a list of everything ever written on subject
    it is not an annotated bibliography.
  • Important to know when to stop the research
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com